• About
  • Blog (Ext.)
  • Books
  • Contact
  • Education Resources
  • News Links

PERRIN LOVETT

~ Deo Vindice

PERRIN LOVETT

Tag Archives: The People

Democracy in America: A Charming Children’s Story

17 Sunday May 2015

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, Other Columns

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

Alexis de Tocqueville, America, blacks, Bush, choice, Democracy in America, Democrats, election, Frank the Frog, freedom, future, history, Mexicans, Obama, politicians, rats, Republicans, roaches, ruin, security, The People, white

Last week I mentioned that an election was coming.  I also presented my own favorite candidate – Frank the Frog.  Frank will not win and the election is in vain.  Vote if you care.  I don’t.

The Illustrious Barry Hussein El Islam Muhammad Obama the Magnificent has finished the job begun by his predecessors – the country is in ruins.  For his replacement the Democrats have dug to the very bottom of the bag of wrinkled has-beens, to one Hillary Clinton, the wife of “good times Bill, the slickster.”

The Republicans have other, similar ideas.  They would foist upon the people yet a third member of the Bush clan.  Obviously, the people are okay with two families maintaining a grip on national power for two or three or five decades.  Their business.  Is there some national obsession with rats and roaches of which I am not completely aware?

In Iowa the Republicans “think they must soften their image and expand their appeal in particular to women and Latino voters.”  I assume women and Latinos enjoy constant war, perpetual debt and crushing loads of government buffoonery.  Again, their business.

However, down in South Carolina, the GOP still caters to the Budweiser and NASCAR crowd.  There, apparently, women and Latinos are still at odds.  A woman, who had once been a Democrat, shouted, “People are coming in this country across the borders like rats and roaches in the woodpile! … The audience applauded.  She complained that states were registering people to vote and failing to ‘check them out.’ ‘We’ve got to get control,'” she bellowed while munching on a Twinkie.

“You would think that after all this time conservative conference planners would have learned the one most important lesson about conservative conferences: Never let the audience speak. Ever.”  They don’t learn.  No-one learns.  Ten thousand years of history demonstrate unequivocally than government does not work.  Democrats love it. Republicans still love it.  The people hoot and holler like chimps in a cage.

Capture

(Large gathering of fat, illiterate white people.  Google.)

The universal message provided by the freedom-loving Republican candidates may be summarized as follows: more war!; Mexicans bad!; Muslims bad!; Democrats bad!; give taxes to banksters!; huff; puff.

472763392

(Bubba believes in the flag.  Google/Getty.)

Such fairy tales are humorous but foolish when taken seriously.  If the Democrats false egalitarianism had been real thirty years ago things might be better today.  If flag-worshipping Republicans actually had sought freedom, things might be better.  In reality, their lies and deceit have done us in.

Following his in-depth observations of early nineteenth-century America, Frenchman Alexis de Tocqueville, wrote Democracy in America, 1835.  The book is a masterful account of the political and demographic expanse of early America.

De Tocqueville wrote of the three races in the new world at that time: whites, blacks, and indians.  He proposed that whites and blacks would have to get along together in a future in which they formed the vast majority of the populace.  The fate of the native people seemed doubtful to Tocqueville.  Sensing there would be unnecessary, faction-based strife among the people for years to come, he refrained from any ultimate prediction in favor of a “time will tell” conclusion.

Time has told.  Following the two major parties, the people have chosen a sort of mass suicide followed by uncertain government managed life support.  Currently, while the bloated carcass of the American public drools on the gurney, the plug is being pulled.

This all leads me to a charming little tale, told in the far distant future.

In the cold winter of 3187, in the nation of Utopia, two young children dined with their old grandfather.  Following their meal the children enjoyed a brief holographic conversation with their parents.  Mom and Dad were enjoying a well deserved vacation on Mars.

As the evening deepened outside grandpa built a cozy fire on the hearth.

“Come and tell me about your school day,” he eagerly beckoned.  Little Timmy and Suzy recounted with wonder the day’s history lesson.  “Teacher read to us from an old book by Alex Me Folkville!,” volunteered Timmy.  “It was all about the ancient Americans,” exclaimed Suzy.

Timmy inquired of the smiling old man, “Have you ever heard of the Americans?”

“Yes, they were once a great people,” said Grandpa with a sigh.

“What happened to them,” asked Suzy, snuggling under Grandpa’s flannel-clad arm.

6573676575_4e93045b4c

(A future history unfolds.  Google.)

“Well, if you really want to know, I can tell you of the Americans and their strange fate.”  Grandpa began:

A long, long time ago in a land far away, a group of wise men built up a great nation. The people were virtuous and hard-working.  Sure, they had their troubles, but they always tried to resolve them.

In such fashion they became wealthy, powerful, and happy.  They, it were, who invented many of the things we enjoy today – airplanes, spaceships, and cheeseburgers.

Just when they reached the zenith of their prosperity a funny thing happened…

“What’s a ‘zenith’,” asked Timmy as he enjoyed the wood fire.

“‘Zenith’ means ‘height’ or ‘best’,” answered Grandpa.  He continued:

The Americans were a diverse and happy people. De Tocqueville, your Me Folkville, noted their main divisions – white, black and indian or Mexican.  But, for reasons no-one really understands, they all fell under the dominion of two parties of deranged fools.  When I was a lad our teachers referred to the two groups as the rats and the roaches.  I think their real names were the Democrats and the Republicans.

Inexplicably, the free people of America, the most self-reliant and strongest of all people on earth, ceded all control of their lives to the most vile, idiotic, debased and degenerate lowlifes imaginable.

Every few years or so the people would hold a big popularity contest.  There was no need.  Everything was fine as it was.  But the rats … the Democrats and Republicans convinced the people there was good reason to place them in power.  The people filled their time with television, sports, food, and other trivialities.  Politically, they adopted an ‘us’ verses ‘them’ mentality.

Slowly, the politicians took control.  They perverted everything good about America. They made war on all other peoples just for the fun of it.  They spent money to the point the money had no value.  They encouraged the people to hate each other and themselves.  The times were vicious and confusing.

At last, in the middle of the 21st century, things fell apart.  All those great Americans had become a host of overweight, lazy, angry couch potatoes.  They traded their freedom for false security.  They were all on welfare. The world hated them.  They were poor.  They had no purpose.

The politicians and their huckster friends took the last of the money and fled abroad. The people were left in abject squalor.  Bereft of their jobs, their entertainment and their dignity they resorted to primitive tribalism.

The indians/Mexicans were centered in the southwest.  One day it was discovered that there was not a drop of water left there.  The Mexicans, those who survived, all returned to Mexico.

The southeast of the country was inhabited almost entirely by blacks.  In their collective psychosis, they decided to revert to an earlier way of life.  They decided to become slaves on various cotton plantations under the rule of white masters.  Lacking real whites, they appointed several of their own number to serve in this role.  They fared poorly and became extinct.

The whites fared no better.  Living mostly in the mountainous west, after a night of hard-drinking, they became enamoured of the idea of re-enacting the cowboy and indian wars of old.  As all real indians were then fled to Mexico, they held a giant game of shirts and skins amongst themselves. Thus, they uniformly perished.

The great American northeast, cradle of the original nation, was inhabited by one man – a Canadian named Jacque Strapp.  It was never known what became of him.

So the great land became uninhabited.  The old forests overtook the cities and after a whil, few traces of civilization remained.  And now, it is all history.  It happened so long ago…

“Would you like to live like the Americans?” Grandpa asked the children.  “Would you vote for fool politicians to ruin and destroy your lives?”

“No!” yelled both of the little ones in unison.

“Well then, good! Let us enjoy the fire,” said grandpa.

So ends the tale yet untold.  Will it become a reality?  Do we, the living, have the ability to change our fates and future history?

Will you continue to vote for your own destruction?

I hope not.  Take a queue from Timmy and Suzy.  Dispense with the rats and roaches of democracy.

Nothing to Worry About

03 Sunday May 2015

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ Comments Off on Nothing to Worry About

Tags

Baltimore, crime, FDR, Freddie Gray, freedom, government, Jesus, law, Mencken, murder, police, politicians, rednecks, riots, The People

Several years ago I wrote a book I never published – I have not published it yet.  The central theme of the text was that worry is a waste of time and that, rather than fretting constantly, one should use one’s time to the best and highest endeavors possible.  I think this will lead to a happier life on earth.

Meanwhile, I write here about many subjects I find alarming and which may cause some to fret and worry.  My purpose is only to educate and not to burden any with fear. Fear is a funny thing.  It’s natural purpose is to use the brain to wake the body in answer to physical danger.

Today fear is usually utilized as a weapon to keep the public in check – see H.L. Mencken on the aim of practical politics.  A famous American socialist once (in half truth) declared, “The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.”

Regarding life in the new Amerika, many insist “if you ain’t doing nothing wrong, you ain’t got nothing to worry about.”  They especially say this concerning interaction with the police – and especially when it is someone else doing the interacting.  This view is usually espoused by a “God-fearing conservative” to the host of a radio program.  I have derided this nonsensical assertion time and time again.

The unfolding debacle in Baltimore, Maryland again illustrates the sobering point that the innocent do have something to worry about (or fear).

Twenty-five year old Freddie Gray was chased down and hog-tied by Baltimore police officers for the high crime of making eye contact with the officers.  Gray was then thrown into the steel back of a paddy wagon.  In violation of police procedures Gray was not seat-belted or otherwise secured.   His complaints that he couldn’t breath and his plea for a medical inhaler were ignored.  Gray was assaulted and kidnapped.

The cops drove around for a while with Gray bouncing around in the back.  Several times they stopped and consulted with other officers.  Gray begged for help and was ignored.  Each time Gray was re-positioned in unsecured fashion in his rolling torture chamber.  By the time the van reached the police station Gray had suffered a broken neck.  He died as a result.

At lunch one day last week I listened for a few seconds to one of those right-wing radio shows.  The caller or guest  was explaining that Gray probably had a pre-existing injury and that injury was the real cause of this demise.  The torture during his kidnapping merely added the final straw.  Cursing, I turned off the radio.  I should have called in and explained the centuries-old law on this point.  There is an ancient legal maxim (in torts and in criminal law) that you take your victim as you find them.  In civil matters this is known as the “eggshell plaintiff” phenomenon.

A criminal wrongdoer is not relieved of culpability because he happened to choose a weak victim.  The fact that a person is predisposed to injury is no excuse for harming the person.  A person of conscience knows he shouldn’t harm anyone – weakened or not. This point is lost on the tobacco chewing NASCAR set.  Mercifully, it is not foreign to the Maryland State Attorney.

On May 1st, that Attorney, Marilyn J Mosby, charged the criminal officers involved in Gray’s death with various criminal charges, including murder.  The free people of Baltimore rightly celebrated in the streets.  All to often the police are granted blanket immunity for actions which would land any ordinary citizen in jail.

Mrs. Mosby also concluded that Gray’s arrest and transport was illegal: the police had no reason to believe he committed any crime.  He committed no crime.  Looking at the police is not a crime.  Walking or running away from the police is not a crime (as the police are known to murder people, it might be a good idea).  Carrying a pocket knife as Gray did is not a crime.  Assault, kidnapping and murder are crimes.

050115-cc-baltimore-cops-mugshots-5

(Brian Rice, criminal police agent.  Google/ABCnews.)

In ancient times the police were held to a higher standard than ordinary people due to their positions of power.  The common law of old England held that not only was an officer criminally and civilly liable for his mal-actions but, also, any citizen witnessing police misconduct were obliged to take whatever action was necessary to protect the innocent.  As such, on rare occasions criminal officers were subject to summary execution in order to preserve the freedoms of the people.

Today, our rodent politicians and the limp-wristed weaklings of society bemoan any action, no matter how justified, which interferes with police activity (right or wrong).  The new mantra is “submit and obey” for the people rather than have the police “serve and protect.”  These low-minded, soulless beings also share responsibility for deaths such as Gray’s.

In a strange but happy reversal of fate the officers who murdered Gray are facing up to 63 years in prison.  This will not help Gray at all but it will set a new precedent that (as should be) the police are not above the law.

Those six criminals in blue and their useless enablers have also stirred up other crimes against society.  Following Gray’s murder the oppressed of Baltimore took to the streets to vent their pent-up frustration.  This provided cover for gangs of looters and thugs to move in like vultures and riot across the city – causing damage untold.  This is a familiar pattern.  This pattern demonstrates how upside-down America has become.

In a perfect world the police would leave people like Freddie Gray alone and spend their hours weeding out the ruinous members of the populace given to riot and loot when the opportunity presents itself.  The rest of the people would express heartfelt appreciation. We have a long way to go reach this perfect place.

Until then, we must continue our vigilance against the forces of evil.  We must live aware of these forces not in fear of them.  In the words of Jesus, “And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.”  Matthew 10: 28 (KJV).

Overhauling the Digital Millennium Copyright Act: Fix a Car, Go to Jail

26 Sunday Apr 2015

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

Adam Smith, Benito Mussolini, cars, computers, crime, democracy, Digital Millennium Copyright Act, Ed Markey, freedom, government, H.L. Mencken, law, terror, The People

Some, mostly of the ivory-tower dwelling variety, still suffer the delusion that America is a “democracy,” a free land governed by the will of the people.  I am ever happy for the elation of this crowd; ignorance is bliss.  In truth we live amidst a somewhat darker time and landscape.  The government is a ridiculous mixture of ochlocracy (mob rule) and oligarchy. The ruling elite keeps the mob happy with spectacles, martial, material and illusory, and the mob dutifully empowers the elite – Cozy if schizophrenic.

Our economy (what remains of it, anyway) is more akin to something from the dreams of Mussolini than those of Adam Smith.  Regardless, beer is cheap and the television is loaded with “entertainment.”  Everyone wins, right?

Our institutions of political and economic leadership form a home, of sorts, for the criminally insane. Lacking any useful skills, without their positions of power, these people would be otherwise confined to normal mental institutions – whiling away the hours weaving baskets and so forth.  As is, they subsist by playing Menckenish tricks on the people. They perpetually create one problem after another.  Each problem is designed to have a ready solution which, in turn, leads to yet another problem.  Keep your eyes on the Kardashians, please.

Back in February of this year I penned a short series on the potential dangers posed by the modern computerization of automobiles.  See: Tracking and Hacking; Drivin’ N Spyin’.  U.S. Senator Ed Markey released a report spotlighting the complete failure of auto makers to protect the public from malicious hacking of their computers on wheels, formerly known as cars.  At last, the industry has answered the call!

All companies, from Ford to Honda to Caterpillar, have announced the need for a change in the law.  Specifically, they want to amend the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) of 1998, Pub. L. No. 105-304, 112 Stat. 2860 (Oct. 28, 1998) to protect their proprietary software from your incessant meddling.  Yes, you, the shade-tree mechanics of America, are the real problem here.

In a way, this is only fair.  New cars, all of them, are totally controlled by sophisticated computer programs.  Those programs were developed by the car makers at considerable cost.  When you endeavor to work on “your” own car you will inevitably run into programming issues.  Most shy away from this spectacle of technology.  However, some intrepidly dive in and use their own skill to navigate the oil stained field of ones and zeroes which make the new cars work.  In doing so they may, intentionally or unwittingly, alter the original programming.  This equates to software piracy, you see.

Never mind that you paid for the car, computers and all.  It’s not really your property – not all of it.  Back in the 90’s the lobbyist for the industries of America wrote and paid for the DMCA.  It’s their law, designed to protect their money, and they can change it as needed.  You get back to that baseball game – nothing to see here.

“Your” representatives will be bribe … er … convinced to alter the law.  In the future only dealership mechanics and licensed big chain techs will be authorized to work on cars.  This will save you the trouble of reading code and allow the manufacturers to reap additional profits.  Go under the hood yourself and you will likely lose the car and land yourself in prison.  As it should be.

32376_1

(“Protect the CPU at all cost!”  Google.)

The terrorist with a laptop, of whom Markey and I warned you, will no more obey the new DMCA than he will the old laws against kidnapping, murder, and extortion.  No mind; eventually this too will be cured.  A new dawn of self-driving, un-hackable, super “safe” but un-Godly expensive cars is just over the horizon.

This dawning will surely usher in new problems.  Rest assured our wise and benevolent betters will have solutions for these too.  In the meanwhile get ready for the coming Avengers movie!

 

 

Slavery in America, Part III of III.

04 Wednesday Feb 2015

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ 4 Comments

Tags

ATF, Congress, Courts, debt, elections, Federal Reserve, freedom, Liberty, Ruby Ridge, slavery, society, The People, Thomas Jefferson, Waco

This concluding article has been delayed a while – it’s finally done!  And, I hereby dedicate it to Antywan, who gave me the inspiration to finish it.  Thanks for the encouragement, buddy.

This is the third and final segment in my series on modern American slavery.  So far, I’ve detailed human trafficking and the big corporate/government plantation.  Find the first two installments here: Part One; Part Two.

In Part Two I mentioned the astounding prosecution levels for victim-less crimes (non-crimes, mind you).  Here’s a recent example from the news, a story within a story, which illustrates another problem with the modern criminal “justice” system.  I’ve read, and experienced in court, that around 90% of criminal cases end with plea bargains, where the accused admits guilt and forgoes a trial.  Maybe it’s more like 97%.  Anyway, of the remaining cases, which are tried, another 90 – 97% end with convictions.  Many might say this is efficient justice.  I say it indicates a “fixed” system.

A recent sting operation in the Southern District of Georgia by the Federal Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms (and Explosives) (“ATF”) resulted in about 200 indictments in Federal Court.  Sandy Hodson, Federal Prosecutor, ATF Agent Under Investigation, Augusta (GA) Chronicle, Feb. 2, 2015.  “At least one of the defendants in the Savannah operation, Eduardo Cruz-Camacho, stood trial.”  Chronicle, Ibid.  One out of 200 is .5%.  Of course, the defendant was convicted by a Jury, November 2013.  U.S. v. Cruz-Camacho, NO. 4:13-CR-129-2, (So. Dist. U.S., 2014).  Total justice…

Oh, did you catch the headline of the Chronicle story?  Due to their illegal actions, the U.S. Assistant Attorney on the case and an ATF agent are under investigation.  The agent, with the Attorney’s blessing, falsified a visa application for an informant, withheld information to the Defendant, and lied about it.  U.S. Attorney Ed Tarver estimates the fiasco may taint at least four of those 200 cases.  The Court has ordered an accounting of each and every case touched by the ATF agent.

I know Ed Tarver.  He is as honest a government employee as one can find and he pre-emptively came forward with this information.  I know of the subject AUSA and agent but not well enough to judge their character nor actions.  However, I can easily pass judgment on the ATF as an organization.

This is the same ATF that ran Operation Gunrunner (aka Fast and Furious).  In this dubious program thousands of military grade weapons were delivered by the ATF to the Mexican drug cartels.  At first the ATF used straw purchasers to funnel the weapons.  When sales slowed due to a drop in demand the ATF actually started giving the guns (and grenades) away.  One of the guns was later used to murder U.S. Border Patrol agent Brian Terry.  See: Issa, Grassley Report on Fast & Furious Finds Widespread Justice Department Management Failures, House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, 2012.

This is the same ATF which played a deadly role in the murders at Waco and Ruby Ridge.  As no-one (in the government) has ever been held accountable for these criminal conspiracies, I suggest Mr. Cruz-Camacho and associates are out of luck.

The Georgia sting operation worked by entrapping hundreds of individuals in the exact same kinds of crimes the ATF routinely commits with impunity.  These operations occur year after year all over the country.  One difference is that I do not think anyone was hurt by Cruz-Camachos actions.  The other difference is the acceptance of the courts, of Congress, and the public of the ATF’s programs.  It’s a double standard writ large and written in blood.

That public acceptance is the worst part of this sordid story.  Most don’t merely accept this kind of government railroading; they demand it.  Thomas Jefferson said something to the effect that the people are the best defenders of their own liberty and the gravest threat to their liberty.

In other words, the people are their own worst enemies.  We turn ourselves into slaves when no-one else can.  Most do so without any thought.  It’s not just with the government, but with all facets of society.

We continually tolerate domination by a failed two-party political system.  We ensnare ourselves in mortgages, student loans, car loans, credit cards and any other debts we can acquire – usually to purchase worthless trinkets or dreams we don’t need.  We work decades in jobs and careers we hate.  We willingly participate in a banking/financial system operated by a cartel.  We devote hours every day watching idiocy on television.  We idolize devil-worshipping celebrities who prey on our children.  We ship those children off to government concentration camps to learn how to repeat our mistakes.  On and on and on…

On Sunday I watched the Super Bowl along with 100 million of you.  Per my prediction, New England picked up their fourth trophy.  Along with a great game came dozens of the worst commercials I have ever seen.  “I died in an accident.”  “Sorry, it’s a boy.” “Drink our beer – horses save a puppy from a wolf.”  Pitiful.  The marketing geniuses on Madison Avenue think we’re slaves – the lowest and dumbest to ever walk the earth.  Are they right?  Do you choose your beverage based on the plight of a puppy?

I did not watch Katy Perry’s half-time show.  Last year I read about her performance at the Grammy Awards wherein she literally conducted a witchcraft ceremony before a national audience.  See: KATY PERRY: ILLUMINATI PRIESTESS CONDUCTS WITCHCRAFT CEREMONY IN FRONT OF THE ENTIRE WORLD.  Should we let our children (or ourselves) listen to this type of music?  These people are serious in their desire to enslave us to materialism and dark forces.  Do we let them?

The answer should be “no.”  There is no way to immediately turn back the tide of big government.  The Federal Reserve and its criminal predator member institutions cannot be undone this year.  Fear of life and ease of entertainment will always follow us.  But, we can begin to slowly free ourselves.  Stop voting for the same cabal of nit-wits every election.  Rethink your commitment to debt.  Stop trusting the voices of the government and their media.  Turn off the tube.

broken-chain

(Google.)

You can make a difference.  You can free yourselves.  You have tremendous power.  Break those chains.

 

Right of Rebellion

25 Sunday Jan 2015

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

America, anarchy, arms, Constitution, Declaration of Independence, freedom, Hew Hampshire, King George, law, Natural Law, Plato, revolution, Saint Augustine, Saint Thomas Aquinas, Second Amendment, The People, tyranny

I have an affection for New Hampshire.  The air is clean.  The people are friendly.  They have mountains and beaches relatively close together.  There’s no income tax.  It’s close to Boston.  It’s far enough away from Boston.  The Granite State is just a beautiful place and bears a beautiful motto – Live Free or Die.

The State Constitution is also unique among written political charters.  While generally resembling other such State documents as well as that of the United States this New England version has a stark difference.  It’s something I am not aware of, in writing, anywhere else in the world.  It contains a “Right of Revolution,” which I, here, call a Right of Rebellion (semantics).

“Government being instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security, of the whole community, and not for the private interest or emolument of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, whenever the ends of government are perverted, and public liberty manifestly endangered, and all other means of redress are ineffectual, the people may, and of right ought to reform the old, or establish a new government. The doctrine of nonresistance against arbitrary power, and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind.”  N. H. Const., Sect. I, Art 10 (entirety, as amended, 2007).

old_man

(The Old Man of the Mountain [NH natural wonder], Google Images)

Re-read the above and let the meaning sink in.  The free people not only have a natural right but a duty to reform a corrupted government.  When all other usual and peaceful methods of redress fail, the people are authorized to resist evil.  Otherwise the people become subjects – slaves.  That’s what “slavish” means: “of or characteristic of a slave; especially : basely or abjectly servile…”  Webster’s English Dictionary, http://www.merriam-webster.com.

Further, such acquiescence is “absurd,” being illogical and futile.  This is the literary embodiment of that spirit which lead early Americans to cast off the yoke of King George III.

“When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.”  U.S. Declaration of Independence, Para. 1, July 4, 1776.

The Declaration proceeds with a long list of oppressive grievances committed by the King. A recount of usual redress follows: “We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.”

Then, the Declaration: “That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved…”

Mind you, this is the spirit of the former America.  Today such sentiment is almost sacrosanct.  Look into the heart of nearly any purported American and one finds either a zealous appreciation for total government or, at the least, a complete resolve to do nothing conducive to the ends of liberty.  Worse than the loss of freedom in Columbia is the veneration of the forces which have brought forth the doom of tyranny.  There exists in America today a cult of statism.

The New Hampshire Constitution provides an outline for the heretics who would still be free.  The entire document is worth reviewing – please click here and read.

Article one artfully defines the sole legitimate reason for government: “All men are born equally free and independent; therefore, all government of right originates from the people, is founded in consent, and instituted for the general good.”

Article two evokes the Natural Law: “All men have certain natural, essential, and inherent rights – among which are, the enjoying and defending life and liberty; acquiring, possessing, and protecting, property; and, in a word, of seeking and obtaining happiness. ”  Made-man law is or is supposed to be an expression of the natural law. David Miller, et al., eds, The Blackwell Encyclopedia of political Thought (Oxford 1987).

Plato asserted that freedom from and doubt of human law is the “indispensable” beginning of the search for natural law.  Strauss, Natural Right and History, pg. 84, U. Chicago Press, 1953.

St. Thomas Aquinas and Saint Augustine posit that any law “which is not just seems to be no law at all.  Hence a law has as much force as it has justice.”  St. Thomas, Treatise on Law, R.J. Henle, S.J., editor, pg. 287, U. Notre Dame Press, 1993.  St. Thomas goes on to say that a civil or earthly law with conflicts with natural law is a perversion rather than a law.  Again, once an entire government loses its claim to justice the people have a duty to reform or disband said non-government.

Article two-a, mimics the Second Amendment and puts teeth behind the other declarations: “All persons have the right to keep and bear arms in defense of themselves, their families, their property and the state.”  New Hampshire, with some of the least restrictive gun laws in the nation, has an on-again, off-again habit of allowing carry even inside the State Capital building.  N.H. lawmakers allow concealed weapons in House chambers, Boston Globe, Jan. 7, 2015.  Note that NH consistently ranks as one of the safest, crime free states in the Union.  101 Reasons to Move to New Hampshire, Free State Project.

Those aiming to reform government or create anew must be able and willing to forcefully defend their cause.

The question arises as to when, exactly, does new for such cause becomes necessary and proper.  People acting out individually whenever they are personally slighted does not seem just cause.  Such action would inevitably lead to anarchy in the lowest sense of the word.

Article three notes, to this end: “When men enter into a state of society, they surrender up some of their natural rights to that society, in order to ensure the protection of others; and, without such an equivalent, the surrender is void.”  However, Article four affirms that “Among the natural rights, some are, in their very nature unalienable, because no equivalent can be given or received for them.”

So, while individuals may not personally rebel without great need, they must retain the means to do so should collective need present itself.

How do or how will we know when this time comes?  I do not pretend to be an expert nor arbiter of this process.  For now I offer only mental food for thought.  I do, however, reserve the right to expand on this theme in the future.

PS: the forgoing is not a paid endorsement of New Hampshire.

Doctor Who On Taxes

04 Sunday Aug 2013

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, Other Columns

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

1977, anarchy, BBC, Doctor Who, false god, freedom, government, revolution, taxes, The People

Recently, for reasons which will remain classified, my mind wandered back to my childhood and late night viewings of Doctor Who on the BBC (via PBS).  Through the magic of the internet one thing lead to another and I stumbled upon the following gem of cheap sci-fi anarchy.  Enjoy.

In 1977 (Nov 26, 1977 to be exact) there was a Doctor Who episode called “The Sun Makers.”  Tom Baker played the Doctor back then.  Polls I found on-line say he is by far the most popular Doctor of all time as well as the longest tenured.  He’s certainly the version I recall.  I found a few video segments of the Sun Makers as well as the entire episode transcript.  I vaguely remember the show – mostly as semi-decent entertainment.  Now, having read the transcript, I am blown away by the trenchant social commentary

You can read the transcript here: http://www.chakoteya.net/doctorwho/15-4.htm.

The Doctor and his companion, Leela (more on her in a moment), arrive on Pluto in the distant future.  It seems that sometime between now and then the Earth becomes worn out and uninhabitable.  In humanity’s darkest hour an alien race of inter-galactic Shylocks come along and move humans to a rehabilitated Mars – for a price.  A high price.  Soon Mars is worn out and the show moves to Pluto which, thanks to the malevolent aliens, has artificial suns (hence the name).

When the Doctor arrives humans work in mines and live is large, futuristic cities where they are literally taxed to death by “The Company,” an outfit run by a greedy little alien named “The Collector” (of taxes…).  The Collector employs “The Gatherer” as a sidekick henchman.

Everything is taxed on future Pluto: incomes, medicine, other taxes, even death.  It almost sounds as bad as the USSA.  In fact, the people’s interactions with The Gatherer seem just like current relations with the IRS.  At the beginning of the show some poor sap is pleading with The Gatherer about a tax debt.  The Gatherer insists the man work double shifts and do without sleep until the debt is paid.  Poor sap: “It will kill me!”  Gatherer: “You complain too much.”

On future Pluto “The Company” is synonymous with “government.”  The Company serves as employer, lender, and civil authority for all.  Pluto is a giant “company town” from which there is no escape.  The Plutonians have come to literally worship the Company like a god.  The dialogue is thoroughly peppered with constant statements of adoration towards the great alien “benefactor” – “praise the company,” God save the company,” and so on.  It reminds me of the way modern Amerikans veritably worship the federal government as a god.

The Doctor arrives just in time to stop the afore-mentioned sap from committing suicide by jumping off a high roof.  The distressed man explains the terrible situation to the Doctor.

Dr Who Tardis

(You’re taxing my Tardis?! What the….  BBC.)

The Doctor explains the man’s plight to Leela: “He can’t make ends meet. Probably too many economists in the government.”  By the way, Leela was a beautiful and intelligent “savage” the Doctor picked up on one of his adventures.  She came along between Sarah Jane Smith and the two Ramonas.  She was like a Xena prototype.

bbc-fourth-doctor-tom-baker-doctor-who-HD-Wallpapers

(Go on.  You were extolling the “benefits” of government…  BBC.)

Leela immediately catches on the semi-divine perception of The Company: “These taxes, they are like sacrifices to tribal gods?”  The Doctor responds, accurately: “Well, roughly speaking, but paying tax is more painful.”

Leela then issues one of the most succinct and wonderful solutions ever stated with regards to the universal problem of taxation: “Then the people should rise up and slaughter their oppressors!” 

leela

(Yeeeeeah.  Before there was Xena, there was Leela.  BBC.)

At the time of the Doctor’s arrival a rebellion is already forming in the Plutonian underworld.  With a little help from the old sonic screwdriver the movement is a smash success.  The good people of Pluto take Leela’s advice literally.  Immediately below is a picture of The Gatherer seconds before he is thrown off the roof of a skyscraper by several of his former victims.  Look at the face on than arrogant tax-o-mite.

taxman who

(The taxman falleth … off the roof…  BBC.)

On future Pluto, just like current Earth, the only certainties in life are death and taxes.  Watch the following clip of The Gatherer’s last ride as one begets the other: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5cC__bBM1A.  I’m still laughing.  This is reminiscent of our fore-fathers tarring and feathering the taxman and running him out on a rail.  At least, modern Amerikans would do well to so reminisce.

In the next video, the Doctor confronts the “blood-sucking leech” in charge (The Collector): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9emqnRpYoU.  Upon learning his little empire has crumbled, The Collector reverts back to his natural state – a little piece of green slime.  He promptly and simply imprisoned in a box.  This strategy would likely work well with members of Congress.

Saved by the cunning of the Doctor and by their own courage, the people of Pluto set out to re-colonize Earth, which has apparently healed itself in the intervening years.  One has to hope they choose, this time, to forgo the trappings of government in favor of a little freedom.  Perhaps we can someday do the same.  Thanks, Doctor Who!

Swabbing The Fourth Amendment

04 Tuesday Jun 2013

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns

≈ 4 Comments

Tags

Alito, Amerika, Antonin Scalia, Breyer, Constitution, crime, DNA, evidence, Fifith Amendment, Founders, Fourth Amendment, Ginsburg, government, Hagan, innocence, justice, Kennedy, King George, law, Liberty, Maryland, police state, Roberts, searches, slippery slope, Sotomayor, Supreme Court, The People, Thomas, Virginia Declaration of Rights

Yesterday, June 3, 2013, the Supreme Court neatly planted new, green sod over the grave of the late Fourth Amendment.  In Maryland v. King, 569 U.S. ___, Slip Op. No. 12-207 (June 3, 2013), the Court held, 5 – 4, obtaining DNA samples from criminal suspects via oral swabbing in permissible under the Fourth Amendment.  The high priests of the Temple of “Justice” divined the procedure analogous to fingerprinting and photographing.

The growth of government power knows no bounds; the ruling itself was not a surprise.  The nature of the close vote was, itself, of slight interest.  The opinion was penned by Justice Anthony “Swing Man” Kennedy.  Joining him were the arch-“conservative” trio of Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Alito, and Justice Thomas.  “Liberal” milk toast Justice Breyer joined in for grins and giggles.

Standing firm for the Constitution and Liberty were the Court’s three Divas, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan.  The ladies backed the dissent of Antonin Scalia, the originalists’ originalist and the only Justice usually worth reading or quoting.  Scalia read his dissent aloud in Court.  I’ll examine that dissent in a second.

antonin_scalia-photograph1

(Putting the “justice” in Justice.  Google.)

First, in all fairness, let me paraphrase the majority opinion for you: The government can (as always) do whatever the hell it wants.  Good enough?  Good.

Scalia began: “The Fourth Amendment forbids searching a person for evidence of a crime when there is no basis for believing the person is guilty of the crime or is in possession of incriminating evidence.”  Maryland v. King, supra, at Slip. Op. Scalia Dissent 1.  Citing the Virgina Declaration of Rights, § 10 (1776), Scalia recalled the Founder’s distrust and hatred for “general warrants” whereby persons were searched by the King’s agents without regard to evidence or suspicion.  These warrants were, rightly, considered “grievous and oppressive…”  Id, at Scalia 2.

Like most of the Bill or Rights, the Fourth Amendment has been under continual assault from an ever-growing list of “exceptions.”  Scalia notes these, including suspicionless searches in public prisons…er…schools, but notes that they all (purportedly) derive from some extra-law enforcement need of society.  He goes on to detail how the DNA swabs are intended only for general law enforcement purposes – for the gathering of evidence of criminal wrongdoing.  Id, at 3 -4.

As usual Scalia blasts the majority with its own lame arguments: “The Court hastens to clarify that it does not mean to approve invasive surgery on arrestees or warrantless searches of their homes.  [Internal Cite].  That the Court feels the need to disclaim these consequences is as damning a criticism of its suspicionless-search regime as any I can muster.” Id, at 4.  “Sensing (correctly) that it needs more, the Court elaborates at length the ways that the search here served the special purpose of ‘identifying’ King.  But that seems to me quite wrong – unless what one means by ‘identifying’ someone is ‘searching for evidence that he has committed crimes unrelated to the crime of his arrest.'”  Id, at 5.

The process of “identifying” Mr. King by his DNA took many, many months.  During that time King moved through many stages of the court process on his original charges.  Maryland knew, without a doubt, who they were dealing with.  The DNA was unnecessary for identification; rather, it was critical for a fishing expedition aimed at discovering other potential crimes also committed by King.  This is an affront to both the Fourth and the Fifth Amendments.  By the way, for viewing purposes, the Fifth is buried conveniently next to the Fourth at Constitutional Memorial Gardens.

“King was not identified by his association with the sample; rather, the sample was identified by its association with King. The Court effectively destroys its own ‘identification’ theory when it acknowledges that the object of this search was ‘to see what [was] already known about [King].'”  Id, at 9.  Both the Governor and the Attorney General of Maryland are on record praising DNA collection, not as a suspect identification, but as one designed to fight unsolved crimes.

Scalia knocked the assertion that DNA swabbing is no different, Fourth Amendment wise, than fingerprinting: “The Court asserts that the taking of fingerprints was constitutional for generations prior to the introduction’ of the FBI’s rapid computer-matching system.  This bold assertion is bereft of citation to authority because there is none for it.  The great expansion in fingerprinting came before the modern era of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence, and so we were never asked to decide the legitimacy of the practice.”  Id, at 15.   

I love the following quote: “Solving unsolved crimes is a noble objective, but it occupies a lower place in the American pantheon of noble objectives than the protection of our people from suspicionless law-enforcement searches. The Fourth Amendment must prevail.”  Id, at 17.  Sadly, it did not prevail.

The following is also memorable and, in Scalia’s estimate, “most regrettable”: “All parties concede that it would have been entirely permissible, as far as the Fourth Amendment is concerned, for Maryland to take a sample of King’s DNA as a consequence of his conviction for second-degree assault. So the ironic result of the Court’s error is this: The only arrestees to whom the outcome here will ever make a difference are those who have been acquitted (so that their DNA could not have been taken upon conviction).  In other words, this Act manages to burden uniquely the sole group for whom the Fourth Amendment’s protections ought to be most jealously guarded: people who are innocent of the State’s accusations.”  Id, at 18. 

Classic Scalia: “I doubt that the proud men who wrote the charter of our liberties would have been so eager to open their mouths for royal inspection.  I therefore dissent…”  Id, at 18.

DNA%20swab%20for%20web

(Say Ahhhhhh…for the children and such.  Google.)

This ruling pushes us all a bit further down the slippery slope of the modern Amerikan police state.  Scalia noted as much: “Searching every lawfully stopped car, for example, might turn up information about unsolved crimes the driver had committed…”  Id, at 5.  The King case concerned (nominally) serious cases, felonies.  However, the next time you’re stopped for speeding or blowing through a stop sign, don’t be surprised if the officer demands you open your mouth for a good old swabbing.  “If one believes that DNA will ‘identify’ someone arrested for assault, he must believe that it will ‘identify’ someone arrested for a traffic offense.”  Id, at 17.  It’s all for the children or something, you know…

London Calling

23 Thursday May 2013

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ Comments Off on London Calling

Tags

Enoch Powell, freedom, government, London, murder, Red Barchetta, rifles, Rush, savages, The People, trust, War

I want all of you to be free, safe and comfortable.  I want you to be free and safe more than comfortable.  Therefor, I suggest you all read the following story and review the disturbing pictures and videos therein: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2329089/Woolwich-attack-Two-men-hack-soldier-wearing-Help-Heroes-T-shirt-death-machetes-suspected-terror-attack.html.  The fact of the story is more disturbing (to me) than any of the gory details.

In his insane post-homicidal rant one “Michael” Adebolajo says something to the effect of “don’t trust your government.”  I agree with that, particularly for those of us in the UK and the US.  I also agree with the shooting of this animal and his accomplice and nothing else in the whole affair.

article-2329089-19F1FAAA000005DC-790_634x476

(Not quite a river of blood, yet.  The Daily Mail, UK.)

For those of you just awakening from a decades-long coma, the UK (the US and much of the West) is engaged in a series of idiotic wars of aggression against various, mostly muslim peoples around the globe.  These wars benefit the Big Club, no-one else.  They also stir up what is known as “blowback,” a phenomenon partly responsible for the deadly attack on a soldier in London in broad daylight by a couple of “native” Britains (see the story above).

Just as civilized man does not belong in the lands of barbarians, the barbarians have no place or role in our lands.  Tornados cannot be prevented.  Acts like this one in London can.  Did you notice all of the mindless sheep standing around as if nothing was out of the ordinary.  Give it a little more time, and nothing will be.  For those in Connecticut and London, this is as good as any reason I can imagine why people need to carry umbrell…er…rifles in public.

article-2329089-19F14C94000005DC-596_634x382

(As usual, one small, unarmed WOMAN is the only person capable of confronting the attackers.  Note the herd in the background.  Daily Mail.)

I suppose Powell should have said “the meat cleaver hand…”  How much more, folks?  The only answer is to insist our “leaders” leave foreign peoples alone and insist (with lethal force, if necessary) that those peoples leave us alone.

Okay, back to the Arias sentencing and whatever sports/entertainment nonsense you’re following…

More Rock N Roll – Rush, live in Frankfurt – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0xZBRsLNiM.

Survey Says…Another “Common Sense” Gun Survey.

02 Thursday May 2013

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns

≈ Comments Off on Survey Says…Another “Common Sense” Gun Survey.

Tags

crime, freedom, government, guns, Natural Rights, Second Amendment, The People

Today I received another email survey on the Second Amendment courtesy of CCRKBA.  See the survey here: https://secure.freedomdonations.com/ag/ccrkba/survey_stand/?a=7737-n-ag.

Once again, I cannot simply answer these questions with a “yes” or “no.”  Thus, I have written out my responses below for you to consider.  My answers follow in red.  Feel free to take the survey yourself.

1. Is the protection of your Second Amendment Rights the most important issue for you?

YES     NO

Yes and no.  The Second Amendment is representative of one of our fundamental natural rights; they must all be protected equally as a threat to any one is a threat to all.

2. Would you support background checks at gun shows and on the Internet that exempt family members and those with firearm permits that also contains protection and criminal penalties against forming a national gun registry?

YES     NO

No, I do not support background checks ay more than I do registries.

3. Do you think ANY military style firearm such as an AR-15 should be banned from law abiding citizens?

YES     NO

Only if those citizens work for the government.  Oh, we’re talking about law abiding people – no, then.  All military firearms should be available to the people and not the military, which should not exist.

4. Do you think ANY rifle used for hunting should be banned from law abiding citizens?

YES     NO

See number 3, above.

5. Do you think ANY handgun should be banned from law abiding citizens?

YES     NO

See number 3, above.

6. Do you think ANY shotgun should be banned from law abiding citizens?

YES     NO

See number 3, above.

7. Do you think there should be more severe penalties for breaking current gun laws such as illegal gun purchases or guns used in crimes?

YES     NO

Almost all current gun laws are illegal.  Let’s just prosecute the real crimes.

8. Should veterans diagnosed with PTSD be allowed to own a firearm?

YES     NO

Absolutely!  These people are horribly abused by the government and needs a reliable means to defend themselves.

9. Would you support a UN Arms Trade Treaty in our United States?

YES     NO

I do not acknowledge the legitimacy of the UN or any other extra-national “government.”

10. Would there be any benefit to keeping records of firearms owned by law abiding citizens?

YES     NO

Only for the government and the ruling elite.  And, it’s not “would.”  It’s “is” as they already tract our guns.  This is adire threat to everyone else.

11. Should there be a national Conceal Weapons Permit so you do not have to worry about breaking a law when carrying firearms across the country?

YES     NO

Yes!  Fortunately, we’ve had one since 1791.  It’s called the Second Amendment.

      Yes, I want to support the CCRKBA with a much-needed contribution of:

$10 $20 $40 $80
$100                Your most generous gift: $. * Please enter numbers only, no decimal points or commas.

I do not wish to donate at this time.

I am broke and cannot donate at this time.  In fact, I am currently soliciting donations myself.  How about it, kind, rich friends???

Guarding Liberty?

20 Saturday Apr 2013

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

America, CIA, Constitution, FBI, God, government, Liberty, Miranda, New York Times, Patrick Henry, rednecks, republic, Sixth Amendment, terror, The People, Tsarnaev

225 years ago, Patrick Henry remarked in a speech: “Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined.”

We are hurdling toward our inevitable ruin.  The New York Times reports today that the Obama Administration is delaying both reading Dzhokhar A. Tsarnaev his Miranda warnings and granting him an attorney, despite being questioned by the FBI.  I suspect most Americans could care less or, more likely, are happy about the situation.  Today at the gym and beyond I was treated to comments like, “They shoulda killed that thar tarrisss when they found heeem!” 

I understand passions run high in this case but, folks, we still live in a Constitutional Republic (if in name only).  I have sworn an oath to God Almighty to support and defend the Constitution and the rights of the People, even those (especially those) accused of committing crimes.

In 1966 the Supreme Court ruled that criminal suspects must be read a short summary of their rights – you know these from TV cop shows – before being questioned.  The right to an attorney is set forth in the Sixth Amendment.  “Public safety” exceptions to the speed at which these rights are exercised have unwisely dripped out of the courts over the years.  In theory, the government can question Tsarnaev immediately concerning imminent threats.  However, once they began asking broader questions, the law should apply.  Concerning terrorism cases, the Justice [SIC] Department has advised the FBI to go as broad as possible from the start.  The courts have, by and large, stood by silently.  If his prosecution goes forward as a criminal case, without application of the law, any conviction or plea could be reversed.

Of course, he may be deemed an enemy combatant and hauled off to Gitmo or some CIA torture facility abroad.  Remember, our Dear Leader has declare himself capable of simply killing Americans at will, with or without evidence.  Perhaps that will be Tsarnaev’s fate.

Whatever happens, it is clear the jewel of our Liberty has been approached.  I suspect the government and its motives here.  The only force I can exert is here, via my writings.  This may enrage the “America.  F**k yeah!” rednecks.  I do not care.  Will you join me or give in to ruin?

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Perrin Lovett

From Green Altar Books, an imprint of Shotwell Publishing

From Green Altar Books, an imprint of Shotwell Publishing

Perrin Lovett at:

Perrin on Geopolitical Affairs:

Archives

  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • June 2012

Prepper Post News Podcast by Freedom Prepper (sadly concluded, but still archived!)

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • PERRIN LOVETT
    • Join 42 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • PERRIN LOVETT
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.