• About
  • Blog (Ext.)
  • Books
  • Contact
  • Education Resources
  • News Links

PERRIN LOVETT

~ Deo Vindice

PERRIN LOVETT

Tag Archives: voting

Draw! ‘Lifelike’ Robot Terrorizes Pub Yobs…

19 Thursday Apr 2018

Posted by perrinlovett in News and Notes

≈ Comments Off on Draw! ‘Lifelike’ Robot Terrorizes Pub Yobs…

Tags

England, Perrin hates robots, robots, violence, voting, Westworld

It’s just a “malfunction” and IT is just smashing the pint glasses … for now:

A ‘malfunctioning’ robot named Fred has terrified drinkers in a London pub by smashing a pint glass while talking about a ‘robot invasion’.

The hyper-realistic automaton, modeled to be an exact replica of London-based actor Tedroy Newell, sat down for a refreshing lager at The Prince Alfred pub in Maida Vale, in the west of the capital.

Unsuspecting customers were unprepared for what came next, with the humanoid berating locals before crushing the drinking vessel in his hands.

The robot, described as ‘indistinguishable from humans’, was created as part of a stunt to promote TV Series Westworld.

Ah, yes. Westworld. Yul Brynner’s little “malfunction.” Nice. Artificial life imitates art. No word if “Fred” has a swashbuckling friend.

Westworld (1973) Blu-ray Screenshot

Draw. Westworld.

But fear not! Besides the warnings of this “highly respected web log,” other resistance forms, of a kind most effective:

What resistance may look like: In the Industrial Age, [Carl] Frey said, people rioted against automation. This time will be different, he said. “Now people have political rights and can vote against automation,” he said.

Exactly. Voting has worked ever so well these past, what, 6,000 years??? The robot monsters, including the rigged Diebold ballots, will certainly honor your wishes. Just ask “Fred” when he calms down.

This may not end well.

On The Money

15 Saturday Oct 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns

≈ Comments Off on On The Money

Tags

America, banksters, corruption, criminals, democracy, Federal Reserve, Jesus Christ, President, voting

Banker criminals (banksters) own and run the United States. They have almost complete control of the government. Any illusion of democracy and independent control by or for the people is just that, illusory.

Thanks to Vox Day and The New Republic for pointing this out: perhaps the biggest and most alarming bombshell in the Wikileaks Hillary file isn’t even about Hillary. It’s about how the banksters, Citibank in this case, control Washington from New York. Citi literally handed down a set of lists for nominees for cabinet officer and other high-level administrative positions.

The lists went to Podesta. Remember, this weekend I leave out all negative comments about Pres. Obama himself, he of the Cuban cigars, God bless him. This isn’t about him anyway, it’s about the owners of the nation and their rule over all things political. And those lists turned into the real cabinet – dead on the money:

The cabinet list ended up being almost entirely on the money. It correctly identified Eric Holder for the Justice Department, Janet Napolitano for Homeland Security, Robert Gates for Defense, Rahm Emanuel for chief of staff, Peter Orszag for the Office of Management and Budget, Arne Duncan for Education, Eric Shinseki for Veterans Affairs, Kathleen Sebelius for Health and Human Services, Melody Barnes for the Domestic Policy Council, and more. For the Treasury, three possibilities were on the list: Robert Rubin, Larry Summers, and Timothy Geithner.

This was October 6. The election was November 4. And yet Froman, an executive at Citigroup, which would ultimately become the recipient of the largest bailout from the federal government during the financial crisis, had mapped out virtually the entire Obama cabinet, a month before votes were counted. And according to the Froman/Podesta emails, lists were floating around even before that.

Congress and the President are extremely powerful. But the admin agencies run the government, day-to-day. Their regulations, their interpretations thereof and enforcement (or not) are what constitutes real federal law and power. And the banksters had these pre-picked before the 2008 election. These financial criminals appointed “your” government before you even voted. I say again, your vote means nothing. Literally. And something tells me they had another list in case the President had been a Republican.

Your walking into a voting booth isn’t how it works. This is:

nimbus-image-1476574804197

Email from banking criminal Mike Froman to political criminal John Podesta, Oct. 6, 2008.

You’ll note the lists are arranged in a manner to appease ardent Democratic diversity-mongers: women, blacks, Hispanics, Muslims, Jews, etc. Rest assured each and every name on the list was vetted to comply with the demands of the financial elite.

The banks were well compensated for this service, for putting together “your” government. Citi received nearly $500 Billion from Uncle Sam during the financial crisis bailouts – the most of any bank. And the Fed printed up and loaned fake money – effectively for free – to Citi and other banks (and not just American banks) to the tune of $15-20 Trillion.

In other words, they robbed you of your vote and your government. They robbed you of your currency and they robbed your children’s futures. That money may be fake but someday they will expect someone to pay it back – ain’t gonna be the banksters.

Please believe these people have a similar plan for this fall. I imagine the lists are already under consideration. There’s growing financial unrest again so it follows the printing presses are being revved up too.

How? Why? It’s because, as George Carlin put it, because they own this place; they own you. They’re going to get it all.

http://www.wga.hu/art/v/valentin/driving.jpg

http://www.wga.hu/art/v/valentin/driving.jpg

Valentin de Boulogne.

These are same thieves, the same clique of money changing Satanists that Jesus drove out of the Temple with a whip. “My house shall be called the house of prayer; but ye have made it a den of thieves.” Jesus, Matt. 21:13 (JKV). When was the last time your Priest or preacher mentioned that? When’s the last time they put it in a modern context. As Christ drove them from the Temple of the Lord, so we should drive them from America into the sea.

Mapping The Real Vote

26 Monday Sep 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

America, Constitution, election, government, GQBM, Mencken, The People, voting

I tinkered with the Electoral map over at Real Clear Politics to reflect a Trump-slide.

Trump, full landslide:

nimbus-image-1474884450704

Trump, worst to middle case landslide:

nimbus-image-1474886115866

Either way, it’s not even going to be close. In both of these maps: blue areas represent states where people will be disappointed in November; red represents areas where people will be disappointed 2017 – 202(?).

Here’s a Hillary map:

club_map

She takes everything but the “Solid South” Quadling Country. The Impassible Desert is a toss-up.

Again, except for Oz, these are Electoral College maps. Your vote means nothing. The system under the old Constitution, as amended, considers you untrustworthy. Considering that you boiled it down to Hillary and Donald there may be credence to that theory. At any rate the Black Mass is practically decided now, the outcome (either way) certainly is.

Enjoy the “debate” tonight but remember your Mencken: “Under democracy one party always devotes its chief energies to trying to prove that the other party is unfit to rule—and both commonly succeed, and are right.”

In Government We Trust: The Shadow Lengthens

31 Wednesday Aug 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ Comments Off on In Government We Trust: The Shadow Lengthens

Tags

America, Constitution, corruption, election, evil, false flag, government, Homeland Security, immigration, IRS, law, taxes, The People, voting

Just yesterday morning I followed up on the bumbling attempts by Washington to explain electoral system security breaches. I pondered whether the FBI actually found said breaches as part of an investigation or if they had created them as part of some false flag scheme for control. Today, we may have part of an answer.

I woke up (late) to this headline at Drudge:

nimbus-image-1472645099779

Hussein Obama elaborates on his golf handicap at NASA; Jeh Johnson looks on.

Drudge likes a little shock value. It should read: DHS to take charge of election security. That’s what they’re planning to do.

Even before the FBI identified new cyber attacks on two separate state election boards, the Department of Homeland Security began considering declaring the election a “critical infrastructure,” giving it the same control over security it has over Wall Street and and the electric power grid.

The latest admissions of attacks could speed up that effort possibly including the upcoming presidential election, according to officials.

“We should carefully consider whether our election system, our election process, is critical infrastructure like the financial sector, like the power grid,” Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson said.

…

Johnson also said that the big issue at hand is that there isn’t a central election system since the states run elections. “There’s no one federal election system. There are some 9,000 jurisdictions involved in the election process,” Johnson said.

Or, there were 9,000. Decentralization of power is a long-standing paper theme in America. I say “paper” because though we cut ties to centralized authority (King George III) in 1776, we reinstituted them in 1787 with the federal Constitution. Still, with something like elections, it’s probably preferable to have 9,000 separate authorities rather than just one. That makes corruption 9,000 times harder. Or, it did.

A related topic was raised in a U.S. News article today:

“There’s nothing in the Constitution which requires a popular election for the electors serving in the Electoral College,” says John Nagle, a law professor at the University of Notre Dame, meaning the body that officially elects presidents could convene without the general public voting.

“It’s up to each state legislature to decide how they want to choose the state’s electors,” Nagle says. “It may be a situation in which the fact that we have an Electoral College, rather than direct voting for presidential candidates, may prove to be helpful.”

Both major parties do have rules for presidential ticket replacements, however, and Congress has the power to change the election date under Article II of the Constitution, which allows federal lawmakers to set dates for the selection of presidential electors and when those electors will vote.

But Congress would be up against a de facto December deadline, as the Constitution’s 20th Amendment requires that congressional terms expire Jan. 3 and presidential terms on Jan. 20. Though it’s conceivable to split legislative and presidential elections, they generally happen at the same time. And if the entire general election were to be moved after Jan. 3, Congress effectively would have voted themselves out of office.

While I would be happy as a clam if Congress voted itself out of office I suspect many others would not. “There’s nothing in the Constitution which requires a popular election…” – that doesn’t jive with all that “democracy” and “you’re vote counts” business so popular today. But, it’s true.

Your vote, your participation in the election is not needed. It is only an illusion. At best it provides the real state electoral system with suggestions. If someone wanted to tamper with your suggestion box, it would be better for them (worse for you) to do so from a singular point (as opposed to 9,000 little points all over the place). Thus, my suspicion of DHS’s power grab.

Oddly, DHS isn’t necessary either nor is it found in the Constitution. With the brief and partial interruption in the scheme from 1861-1865, the federal system operated without DHS from 1787 until 2002 (2003 really). It was a gift of the wooden, horse-like, Greek variety from our dear friend Jorge the Dimmer. (Miss him yet?) It was instituted after another false flag event. (Thanks for that recent admission, Rudy!)

I’m really close to 700 posts on this site and at least about 600 of them deal with the evil nature of government. You simply cannot underestimate the state’s capacity to do harm. Yesterday I mockingly rattled off but a few of the known recent depredations from D.C. Here’s a new one:

Those hard-working, just like us, only trying to better their lives while hiding “in the shadows” illegal aliens have stolen 1,000,000 of our social security numbers. What’s more, the IRS has known about this for about FIVE YEARS and has done nothing! They haven’t even notified the victims. A can of worms this is.

Social Security isn’t in the Constitution either, apart from just being another tax. The IRS is happy to collect taxes from any source it can. If illegals pay in, great. They care nothing about you and your identity theft claims.

As for the illegals, some say there is no such thing as an “illegal person”. This is where I part ways with the open borders libertarians. Is there now no such thing as an illegal identity thief?

We are not the world, nor are we children.

Even if the IRS cared (they don’t), they would have a very hard time sorting all this out. Likely they have no idea how to solve this problem. Their position is partly defensible mathematically: in just a few short score of years both the illegals and the identity victims, every last one, will be dead – thus, no problem in the long run to worry about.

Back to DHS, they have a short but growing history of doing a whole lot of nothing. Nothing except for taking control – of anything they can. That helps boost their budget numbers. A few of you may recall how DHS took control of the West Virginia situation in the novel Republic and the ensuing hilarity.

By the way, and on a concluding note, pursuant to the deficiencies discovered in Republic those you in WV might want to go ahead and stock up on AAA and SAMs.

Scheming the Impossible: FBI Finds(??) Voting Security Breaches

30 Tuesday Aug 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

America, election, FBI, government, Russia, The People, voting

This is interesting, especially for anyone still interested in conventional politics. Really especially interesting for someone planning to participate in the Great Quadrennial Black Mass this November. It even has my attention though for academic and juridical reasons.

The FBI says it has detected security breaches in computerized voting systems in Arizona and Illinois.

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The Federal Bureau of Investigation has found breaches in Illinois and Arizona’s voter registration databases and is urging states to increase computer security ahead of the Nov. 8 presidential election, according to a U.S. official familiar with the probe.

The official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said on Monday that investigators were also seeking evidence of whether other states may have been targeted.

The FBI warning in an Aug. 18 flash alert from the agency’s Cyber Division did not identify the intruders or the two states targeted.

Reuters obtained a copy of the document after Yahoo News first reported the story Monday.

Accessing information in a voter database, much of which is publicly accessible, does not necessarily suggest an effort to manipulate the votes themselves. When registering, voters typically provide their names, home addresses, driver’s license or identification numbers, and party affiliations.

But U.S. intelligence officials have become increasingly worried that hackers sponsored by Russia or other countries may attempt to disrupt the presidential election.

…

Of course, blame Russia. Always Russia. It is entirely possible the hacks came from or through Russia but that does not mean Vladimir Putin or anyone else in the government had anything to do with them. Putin has enough to do trying to maintain the last vestiges of traditional life in his country against the onslaught of neo-Jacobin globalists. I sincerely doubt he cares which way the final elections of the former United States go.

To blame Russia seems self-serving for the corrupt power-mongers of Washington. Many in their ranks still see an opportunity to drag the Bear down with the rest of civilization. Others, sensing Slavic resistance to domination, want an outright war with Russia. Those are crazy enough to risk electoral security in an attempt to frame Putin. Your vote is a small price to pay.

And, remember, your vote really, truly means nothing. It is at beast a steering suggestion for the real electoral process. In an alternative universe every single voter will write in Gary Johnson only to see one of the major party shills elected.

This issue isn’t new. The FBI notes that there are existing cases of tampering with various state systems. Homeland Security sees it as a problem. However, the golfer in chief has flippantly brushed it all off as he does most problems.

brerfoxbear

Who you gonna trust here? Walt Disney.

That a government agency is ringing the bell here seems itself troubling to me. The government is already: a leading cause of terrorism in the world;  the largest drug dealer in the world; one of the largest illegal weapons suppliers in the Western Hemisphere, and; one of the largest traffickers of internet pornography in the U.S. Why, then,wouldn’t they also be the largest threat to their own crooked elections?

And that’s all there is to it. Br’er Fox is concerned about Br’er Wolf’s possible meddling in the scheme which, either way, will result in the election of Br’er Bear. None of these parties are trustworthy.

Yet and still, the people are a dizzy, preparing their sacrifices for Black Tuesday. I wish them well. When and if something does go wrong, they can always blame the Russians.

Those of you 100 or 1,000 years hence, please take note of this corruption. Please do not repeat the mistakes of the past. Assuming you are reading this, at least we didn’t go through with a war with Russia. Hope remains?

Voter Fraud and Other Urgent Matters

03 Wednesday Aug 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

America, crime, fraud, government, law, terrorism, The People, voting

What would Holden Caulfield say about modern America? “Phony” until he was hoarse, of course. True. Even our frauds are phony. Or, perhaps, our phonies, frauds.

fraud-alert

Activistpost.com.

The Vote

Donald Trump and his supporters have recently raised the specter of a rigged election, of voter fraud coast to coast. Jimmy Carter and others have been concerned about this issue for years. The White House, also busy laundering money for Iran, mockingly wrote off the concerns while the Department of Homeland Security seems a little more interested. Congruence, that. Homeland is taking a look at the risk of hackers swinging the general election; their cyber-alarm is in tandem with a belief that Russia was behind the DNC email affair. By the way: it wasn’t the Russians.

Newsflash: voting in American is a fraud in and of itself. One political party masquerading as two offering up the same crap every cycle. The party has a legal monopoly on election law in many (most) places so as to keep out honest competition. Voters must play by the party’s narrow rules while the party can and does bend its own rules in order to perpetuate the monopoly. None of the candidates are fit for the jobs they seek nor do they care at all about the people (or the law). And, nothing ever changes regardless of who gets elected. Fraud.

Terrorism

The government and the party do everything they can to create terrorism, resentment and hatred worldwide. Some of their lab monster creations actually come to life. ISIS is no longer an imaginary hobgoblin. Still, the CIA and the other alphabet agencies can’t even keep track of what their babies are doing and where they are. The National Counterterrorism Center just released a map of ISIS hotspots.

The map is part of a classified briefing document received by the White House dated “August 2016” and prepared by the National Counterterrorism Center. It shows a stunning three-fold increase in the number of places around the globe where ISIS is operating.

U.S. State Department documents indicated that in 2014, when the U.S. military began its campaign to destroy the extremists, there were only seven nations in which the fledgling state was operating.

160802-whitehouse-monthly_report-isil-mbe-610p_d117e8af1191fbf20c3b4a724ab8a3fc.nbcnews-ux-600-480

       “Phony” Map: U.S. government.

Only in seven countries before we started to destroy them. Now they’re fully operational in 18 countries! In D.C. “destroy” must mean proliferate. But wait! Doesn’t that map look a little lite? What about the attacks in Orlando, Tennessee, Oklahoma, Texas, and California, among others? No ISIS is the U.S.? Why is Europe blank? ISIS just fire-bombed a bus in Paris. (I vowed not to talk terror unless it was really big – this is a report on terror reporting, or the lack thereof). Fraud!

Terror-Prone Police

A metro D.C. police officer was just arraigned on charges he joined or supported ISIS. Not only did this not make the NCC map, it raises startling questions about those who are supposed to enforce the law, not break it. USA Today reports there is an increasing concern about jihadis on the police force.

Many already think the police act enough like terrorists as is. Many of them have a point. What does this outright conjunction of law enforcement with the caliphate mean for the last shreds of justice in the U.S.?

How will “law and order” yokels handle this development. The yokels always want to “nuke them taarists” while at the same time holding a police officer up in a saintly light. What about when the two are the same? Mass confusion? I call it another fraud.

These are just three out of about 10,000 frauds actively running around the nation right now. To be on the safe side one might want to treat anything coming out of Washington as a fraud. What a bunch of phonies.

It’s Like the Movies: Vote for Rat!

27 Monday Jun 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes, Other Columns

≈ Comments Off on It’s Like the Movies: Vote for Rat!

Tags

Germany, Pearls Before Swine, terrorism, voting

Stephan Pastis nails it today:

Pearls Before Swine, June 27, 2016.

In your ridiculous fantasy, you hope what comes next doesn’t suck. That is the essence of politics. Might as well vote for Rat.

******

Viernheim Shooting Update – I’m letting this one go – STILL NO WORD! But, I found a slight description of the shooter in a German news interview. The official story is that the shooter was a “native” German, a disturbed man probably not a terrorist. Given the huge number of “refugees” and other non-Germans in Germany it’s very likely the shooter may have been a “German” of non-German descent. A witness/hostage said the attacker spoke “broken German”:

The Waffen-man holed up, takes hostages. Almir Halilovic (16) was one of them: “The perpetrator surprised us on the toilet, spoke broken German. He hissed to us: ” Sets you go if you value your lives! ” We were about 17 hostages “.

  • Account of Almir Halilovic, former hostage, BILD, June 27, 2016. (Translated by computer. By the way, “Waffen-man” means “armed” man or “man with weapons”).

Maybe the shooter’s German was broken by his excitement. Or maybe it was the best he could muster given his foreign disposition. If he was a second of third or whatever generation immigrant “national”, he probably came from … wait and think … fill in the blank non-Western, probably Muslim country. Is that what they’re trying to hide? The local press should re-interview the hostages and ask them if the nut looked like a native German or if his broken German had any particular accent of if he mentioned Allah. I’m sure the police will come on out with all this information anytime now.

Dying to Vote?

18 Wednesday May 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

America, anarchy, banksters, Constitution, crime, democracy, election, evil, Facebook, freedom, government, H.L. Mencken, math, murder, politicians, The People, voting, War

This morning I drove between two government welfare operations (a “school” and some sort of dance hall/basketball court). Dozens of merry-looking people lined the street (many of them heavily heavy) waving and holding signs proclaiming the need to vote for one criminal busybody or another. The otherwise pleasant neighborhood was clogged with hideous campaign signs. I waved at a few of the sign holders and laughed to myself.

Ah! Another election. Another chance for the slaves to make suggestions about their overseers. Another chance to remember Mencken: “Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard.” Later at the supermarket I observed some of the overweight and/or disabled and/or EBT-empowered citizenry sporting cute little “I voted!” stickers. I am so happy for them. I’m glad they are proud they think they made a difference. I know they didn’t but it is good for folks to have something to believe in.

I believe in freedom. I have it. I have it because I take it. I do not need to waste time playing political games with people who despise me and who are not fit to shine shoes let alone hold important offices. I know the concept is so simple that it cuts against the grain of what most have been taught. I get it. They vote to feel comfortable. I say let them. I’m happy for that one in a million that finally notices that after election after election after election, after all the lies and broken promises – that nothing changes. It’s a rigged game and the house always wins. I’d love to see people stop playing. If everyone stopped the politicians and their false god would shrivel up and try to slink away by night.

Some people get militant about elections and “their” state. It is usually the militants. They are generally given to a particular faction. They even get militant about militancy – often in conjunction with their partisanship. Facebook provides a lot of examples. Take this one:

nimbus-image-1463613669280

One sees the darndest things on Facebook.

This post is an attempted admonishment of people like me, insinuating that by not supporting the criminal regime we insult the memory of dead soldiers (valiant every one of them).

Let’s start with the picture. I said it was about partisanship. “Republicans who stay home elect Democrats.” I suppose this is not targeted specifically at me, the anarchist. Shame on the non-voting Republicans! Shame! But, what happens if they decide to vote and vote Democrat? What it the Democrats do the opposite? What if everyone stays home and nobody votes? Who cares, really? I’ve noticed over the long years that both parties tend to push the same thing – their god of omnipresent government. It never works out for anyone except the politicians, some bureaucrats, the banksters and other corporate criminal hacks. Again, why participate in such a stupid scheme?

For non-voting Republicans the shame goes deeper than just seeing the other team in office. “Keep this in mind when you turn your back on the millions who died to give and keep your right to vote as you choose to stay home and not vote.” Modern Republicans tend to be jingoistic and pro-military – to the point of making the armed forces a demi-god under almighty government. Support the troops!

As with the subject picture, this caption is complete and total bullshit. Millions did not die to give you the right to vote. But, if they did, then they also would have given you the right to not vote. Rights do not have to be used. The freedom thing again – to do or not to do as one chooses.

In fact, “millions” dying is a stretch to begin with. The author of the caption obviously means the millions of American soldiers who died. At the outside maximum only 1.354 Million men have died in all of America’s wars. Out of that number only 664,440 actually died in combat.

nimbus-image-1463615600264

Who knew we were in the middle of Operation Inherent Resolve? Resolve what? To vote? Wikipedia.

Wikipedia lists about 80 American wars or conflicts. That’s about one war every three years since we told off King George. We’re a warlike people it seems. Most of those wars had absolutely nothing to do with voting. At best I would say three were somewhat election related and those are very complicated cases. The Revolution set us free from England. That war was over before the current Constitutional (ha!) form of government was created. The statutory right to vote, indeed the existence of the government for and under which to vote was not around when those 25,000 soldiers (maximum estimate) died. Can they really be counted for Facebook shaming purposes?

The English struck back in 1812. Presumably they did not want to deprive Americans of the right to vote; they just wanted to change the voting system. Do we include the 15,000 (maximum estimate again) who died fending them off?

Then there is the strange case of the Civil War. It wasn’t a civil war by definition – more a war to stop a second revolution. It wasn’t a declared war either. The “wisdom” goes that Lincoln couldn’t get a declaration of war against the Confederacy because that would have required a facial acknowledgment of the CSA as a distinct nation. Semantics and legalities aside, Lincoln killed a whole hell of lot of people. The War of Northern Aggression was America’s deadliest conflict to date. 214,938 men were known to have perished in combat and an estimated 750,000 died all toll.

Of course, those numbers have to be divided into two sides. 364,511 died fighting for Lincoln; 299,524 died for Davis and Co. (By government math those numbers add up to 750,000). If by modern geography I identify myself with the Confederate dead, then wouldn’t it stand to reason that the 364,511 Union troops died trying to take away my (my ancestors) right to vote? Oh yeah, all those marauding Union troops came to my family’s home under orders from a Republican. Details…

Going with the above supposition, I’ll count the 299,524 CSA dead along with the maximum estimates of those killed in the other two wars for a grand total of 339,524 dying for the right to vote. If you subtract the Union dead from that number (they did die trying to take away the right, right?), then the total number of dead soldiers deceased for the electorate is 24,987 – terrible, but not in the millions. If the Yankees run a similar scenario, they come up with another number nowhere near one million, let alone millions plural.

The other wars? No voting consequences. WWII, Korea, Vietnam, and the Cold War were arguably results of WWI and the awful aftermath. America entered WWI at the behest of bankers and other criminals who stood to make a lot of money. Ask Smedley Butler about that. The Germans did not ever want to take away your “I voted!” stickers. Neither did Ho Chi Minh. Saddam was no threat to the ballot. A huge number of our wars were fought against American Indians for the sole purpose of genocide (wave the flag about that). I cannot believe Wikipedia actually included the 34 killed on board the U.S.S. Liberty but, even so, those men died while minding their business in international waters while monitoring someone else’s war. No votes affected.

As sure as people will keep voting, America will keep on fighting more wars. I challenge the assertion that all those who died and those that surely will die deserve our respect (fighting for the vote or not). Columbia County, Georgia is a hotbed of pro-military, flag-waving, GOP voters. It is also the home of U.S. Army Sergeant Chris Muse. I have no idea if Sgt. Muse is willing to lay down his life in the very real possibility the Apache decide to attack an Evans polling place. I do know the police seem to think him capable of kidnapping and raping a 14-year-old girl. Should said girl’s parents thank Muse for his “service”? Should they go out and vote about it? Were I the girl’s father I would rather hang the criminal upside down and disembowel him with a rusty hacksaw. Then again, I am not a Republican.

This pitiful episode and others were about power, money and killing – not voting, freedom or slavery. Google.

No Republican nor Democrat nor any other fairy-tale believer am I. I am repulsed by the idea of giving my sanction to the government – the government known for wantonly killing at home and abroad for no other reasons than to exterminate Injuns and enrich slimy merchants. If you vote, you do so to honor murder and mayhem, not to honor the right of voting itself.

Keep yours ugly signs, your stickers, your child molesters, and your death merchants to yourself if keep them you must. Or, in the better alternative, join me in happy, unobtrusive freedom.

After the Lord Mayor’s Show

07 Saturday May 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ Comments Off on After the Lord Mayor’s Show

Tags

America, banksters, Europe, government, Great Britain, human rights, law, London, rights, Sidiq Khan, The People, The West, UKIP, voting

The voters of London have elected a new mayor. Sadiq Khan is the first Muslim mayor of the Imperial Capital City, indeed the first elected mayor of any major Western Capital. The Drudge Report is aghast as is some of the right-ish media. I am not.

nimbus-image-1462625071308.png

Drudge. May 7, 2016.

I have been a harsh critic of the mass migration/invasion of Europe and the West by incompatible third-worlders, particularly by radical Islamists. I am not as pessimistic (realistic, maybe) as Taki; I think the problems are far-gone but not gone too far just yet. It was with this perspective that I analyzed the London election. Things are not always what they seem on the surface. As far as it goes, I rather like Mr. Khan.

First, consider the demographics behind the election. London is a massive city with nearly 10 million residents centered in a metropolitan region of nearly 15 million. Status-wise it is a combination of New York City and Washington, D.C. Until the rise of those cities in the previous century London was the financial and political center of the world (it still vies heavily for the title). London, unlike its American relatives, is an ancient city; Londinium was settled by the Romans in 43 AD. It was fully resettled by Island natives two centuries before William swept across the Channel (with a certain Lovett in train, by the way).

London was the capital of an Empire which controlled vast swaths of the Americas, Africa, and the East, near and far. Over the past five decades from its former colonies have come a multitude of non-Westerners. The City is now about half non-white, non-native British; more than 40% of the population is foreign born. This recent sea-change explains, partially, how a Muslim named Kahn could get elected.

Now, let us look at the man who was elected. Khan’s parents are Indian, by way of Pakistan (both former British colonies). The family arrived in London in the late 1960s. Sadiq was born in 1970, the fifth of eight children.

Khan, like many immigrants prior to the welfare/terrorism/”refugee” hoards, was a hard worker from an early age. He ran a paper route and worked construction before going to law school. After school he worked as a solicitor (trial attorney). His specialty was human rights.

Some of his cases handled as a solicitor have an American-sounding slant. In Bubbins vs. The United Kingdom, [2005] All ER (D) 290, European Court of Human Rights, (Mar., 2005), Khan successfully represented the family of an unarmed Britain gunned down by police snipers (sound familiar, America?).

Sadiq Khan.jpg

Khan, not particularly dangerous looking. Wiki.

Politically, Khan has held various elected and appointed positions including powerful shadow offices. Under the British model, the out-of-power party always maintains a shadow government, inactive but ready to assume operation unless or until called in via a political change, which can occur rapidly under the parliamentary system.

Khan is a British Liberal’s liberal but not necessarily a Muslim’s Muslim. His stance in favor of gay “marriage” earned him a death sentence and led an Imam to declare him no Muslim at all. It appears his politics will suit the current flavor of London well. If he maintains his defense of human rights, he may be a breath of fresh air.

Now for a brief glimpse at the competition. In Britain, as in America and other places, many cheer on “their” party and candidates with psychotic fervor. Labor and Tory are nearly synonymous with Democrat and Republican. The “conservatives” usually demonstrate one can’t spell “conservative” without “con”.

Against Khan the Tories ran one Zacharias Goldsmith (nee Goldschmidt). Like many Tories, Goldschmidt says the right things for the wrong reasons. London is a major finance center. Zac opposes tax increases, not because they amount to theft, but because he desperately wants to protect banksters. He has good reason as his extraordinarily wealthy family is in league with the Rothschilds. The Gold-Ss (whatever money-changing term in whatever language) also immigrated to Britain – having  crept in during the mid Seventeenth Century.

Whatever his conservative positions are, behind them one will expect to find that Zac holds them out of expedience and only to promote his family’s interests. He is of a class Cato once equated with murderers. He, unlike Khan, has never done manual labor and likely doesn’t give a damn about human rights. I may be wrong but I doubt it.

I have not in too deeply investigated the election beyond the news stories. If I lived in London and if I bothered to vote, I would have likely supported Peter Whittle or some other UKIP candidate – I relish throwing away a good vote. Between the two major parties the people seem to have picked the better man, certainly the lesser of two evils.

Now for the clean up if you happen to know what my title means.

The Keys of Our Prison

04 Wednesday May 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ Comments Off on The Keys of Our Prison

Tags

America, Brady Motion, Constitution, Courts, criminal justice, evil, Fifth Amendment, fraud, freedom, government, law, Sixth Amendment, State, The People, tyranny, voting, Will Grigg

Here follows a brief political discussion I had once with old Jethro.

Jethro: “If you ain’t got nothing to hide, you ain’t got nothing to worry about.”

Me: “So the government is constantly worried?”

Jethro: “Huh?”

Jethro: “We need to get back to tha Constitution.”

Me: “Why?”

Jehtro: “Cause the liberals done got the government out of control.”

Me: “You want to go back to the thing that created the very out of control government you’re complaining about?”

Jethro: “Huh?”

Jethro: “We gotta have a government.”

Me: “No. We don’t. Maybe you gotta have one.”

Jethro: “Huh?”

They never found Jethro’s body…

Jethro was spared further lamentation about the Constitution and the liberals and all. I sometimes miss him. At least he cared in a strange way about the state of things. Most folks don’t have the slightest idea what is going on around them. If, by strange chance, they happen to learn something, they immediately self-lobotomize with dope, booze, or the demon television.

Will Grigg knows what’s happening and he tries to affect changes by chronicling the endless fraud and evil of the state. He’s one of the best bloggers and investigative reporters of the day. His column de jure, Take the Fifth — And Face Life Imprisonment Without a Trial, highlights the death of the Fifth Amendment. He also briefly reviews the death of the Brady Motion. Death of the Sixth Amendment, that is. And the death of the impartial and honest judiciary. And of law enforcement. The law itself. Actually, the story is an expose of the complete loss of everything within and without the Constitution not related to unlimited government power.

Last August 27, after Rawls refused to comply with Rueter’s facially unconstitutional order, the judge found him in civil contempt and ordered him to be taken into custody by federal marshals and imprisoned until he repudiates his right against self-incrimination. A motion filed by his defense attorney received a judicial reply citing a smirking, sucks-to-be-him statement from a 1994 Supreme Court ruling that someone facing the prospect of life imprisonment, without trial, for civil contempt “carries the keys of his prison in his own pocket.”

Rawls, in other words, can unlock his own prison only if he hands over his encryption key to the State – which will inevitably find some reason to send him back to prison.

Those rights, as set forth in the old parchment, are in practice and reality only privileges the government can take away on a whim. The Constitution, the liberals, and all. ISIS. Budweiser. ‘Merica.

This kind of thing happens day in, day out and has happened for years out of mind. It will go on for at least a little while longer. It’s not hidden away. The depredations of the state are always on display at all times for all to see. And still! Still the people support “their” candidates for this and that office with the glee normally associated with a favorite sports team or a rock star.

Yep. Notbeinggoverned.com.

News flash! The Donald will not fix these problems. Hillary will not fix them. Crazy Uncle Bernie won’t do it either. Support the system if you want to. Just remember that doing so means you use your key to lock yourself in their prison.

Sic semper evello mortem tyrannis! Or television … your choice.

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Perrin Lovett

From Green Altar Books, an imprint of Shotwell Publishing

From Green Altar Books, an imprint of Shotwell Publishing

Perrin Lovett at:

Perrin on Geopolitical Affairs:

Archives

  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • June 2012

Prepper Post News Podcast by Freedom Prepper (sadly concluded, but still archived!)

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • PERRIN LOVETT
    • Join 41 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • PERRIN LOVETT
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.