Birth of a Nation: Catalonia Prepares for Independence

Tags

, , , , , ,

Catalans prepares for freedom.

Spain prepares for war.

Catalonia will declare independence from Spain in a matter of days, the leader of the autonomous region has told the BBC.

In his first interview since a disputed vote on Sunday, Carles Puigdemont said his government would “act at the end of this week or the beginning of next”.

Meanwhile, Spain’s King Felipe VI said the vote’s organisers had put themselves “outside the law”.

He said the situation in Spain was “extremely serious”, calling for unity.

Tensions between Spain and the north-eastern Catalonia region continue to mount, days after the vote was marred by violence involving national police.

The Spanish High Court said it had begun an investigation into key Catalan figures on Wednesday on suspicion of sedition – inciting rebellion against the state – including the head of Catalonia’s regional police.

The troops mobilize:

Defense Tuesday ordered the sending of the Army to Catalonia with material and to provide logistical support to the Civil Guard and the National Police. [Translated].

Channeling his inner T-Rex or Abe Lincoln, King Felipe says Catalans “have broken the democratic principles of the rule of law.”

So, according to the monarchist, globalist statists, engaging in democracy is now considered braking democracy. And we pay these people…

It’s also refreshing to see that a government that won’t send a single soldier to halt an invasion from Africa will happily send the army to stop tax protesters.

nimbus-image-1507135847032

Democratically suppressing democracy. BBC.

I stand ready to welcome and acknowledge the Catalan Republic.

By the way, this is the beginning of a trend – probably coming to a country near you. Results may vary.

First Law in Canada: Known Wolf (from The Last Refuge)

Tags

, ,

Maybe it’s time at last for a national discussion on immigration and “refugees.” Time for common sense controls – maybe even outright bans. The average citizen just doesn’t need terrorists like this. Only the police and military can handle them. You can’t even hunt with one…

Read the following from Sundance:

Oh my. This is awkward. The Somali terrorist who carried out the attack in Edmonton Canada, injuring five people, was originally in the U.S. and evaded deportation by seeking refugee status in Canada. EDMONTON, Alberta (Reuters) – The Somali immigrant charged with attempted murder in connection with a weekend vehicle and knife attack in Edmonton, […]

via “Known Wolf” – Canadian Somali Terrorist Was U.S. Deportee Who Fled to Canada… — The Last Refuge

SJW Seeks “One Logical or Practical Reason” for Guns

Tags

, , , , , , , ,

Not that he would understand either logic or practicality.

Following the mass shooting in Las Vegas the Amerikan Sovinformburo has swung into high gear. Ban the guns! (Ban the private guns – government guns, as everyone knows, have never killed anyone. Trust us.)

An example: the local fish wrapper in Tampa ran a panic editorial piece yesterday: Las Vegas massacre cries out for response.

Paddock reportedly had 19 rifles with him at the hotel. Experts said the rapid gunfire sounded as though it came from automatic weapons, which are heavily regulated, or from semi-automatic weapons altered to keep firing with one squeeze of the trigger. Law-abiding citizens have no need to carry such firepower, and magazines that hold 30 rounds or more only make it easier to take more innocent lives.

The death tolls in these mass shootings are escalating at a rapid pace in recent years, and they are occurring in places that are part of the natural fabric of life. A movie theater. An elementary school. A university campus. A nightclub. Now an outdoor country concert attended by more than 20,000 people. There are again remarkable stories of heroic efforts by first responders and by citizens helping the injured and guiding the terrified to safety. But this time, there is no talk of how more guns could have saved lives.

The issues Congress should address are well-known: Ban assault-style rifles and limit the size of magazines. Expand background checks on guns purchased in so-called private sales, such as gun shows and over the Internet. Make it more difficult for people with mental health issues to buy guns. Flag anyone attempting to purchase a gun who is or has been under investigation for terrorism by any federal agency.

Hear that? You have no need for assault weapons. A propaganda organ newspaper says so. No need. And contrary to the experience of more than a few of you using larger magazines to fight off multiple attackers, those mags are only good for taking innocent lives. (Makes one wonder why even the government needs them, then.)

They may (or may not) finally have the angry white male shooter of their dreams. And, they may be correct that guns on the ground would not have made any positive difference – at least not the variety normally toted CCW. One size fits all, based on this (and only this) case.

No mention of the TN church shooting stopped by a good guy with a gun. Certainly no mention of who and what the shooter there was. No mention period. Like it never even happened. The other 1-2 million firearm defenses each year don’t happen either.

And they kind of slipped, I think, by throwing in the other recent high-profile shootings: those committed by ISIS soldiers, immigrants, and MK-Ultra descendant patients. No mind. Never let the truth get in the way of good communism.

And, for Gawd’s sake, never mention the 488 shooting murders in Chicago during the first nine months of this year alone – nor the 1,000’s of attendant non-lethal but illegal shootings. No Chicago. No Baltimore. No Atlanta. No LA. No Miami. Nor any of the other rapidly deteriorating third world ghettos. Those lives must not matter. Those gun laws certainly did not work. The possibility that something other than the inanimate guns themselves might cause the evil must never be consider or even mentioned.

We know three things about SJW types:

1) They always lie;

2) They always double down; and

3) They always project.

Here’s the prelude to a living example: “Brutus813” (likely not a real name) wrote the following comment on the Tampa editorial:

Ok with all due respect here. To the people who don’t think banning Semi-automatic weapons and large capacity magazines is a good idea please give me one logical or practical reason for anyone other than police or military to have them. You can’t use them for hunting so that’s a no. I am not against people owning handguns for self protection and grew up in a hunting community so even though I don’t hunt I am fine with the true hunters owning their hunting rifles. Just one good reason for semi-automatic(which can be converted to automatic) and large capacity mags please.

nimbus-image-1507062220824

Tampa Bay Times.

They lie: “Brutus” effectively says what they all say: “you don’t need guns.” A lie demonstrated by 1,000,000+ logical reasons. I’ll give him his one in a moment.

They double down: Nationwide they’ve reached the Nth degree of downs. In his one paragraph alone Brutus gives us: “other than police or military” and “can’t use them” – a lie and a doubling down within consecutive sentences. Impressive.

They project: These people are unstable. Deep down inside they know that they should never be trusted with guns – not personally nor through their beloved government agents. They’re the type of people who ultimately beget gulags, concentration camps, and killing fields. To sooth themselves psychologically, they project their dangerous deviance onto everyone else.

One logical or practical reason for anyone other than police or military to have them? Because the police and military have them. You’re welcome. With all due respect here.

There is that remote, yet possible chance that a government goes rogue. It happens every now and then. The police and military have been known throughout recent history to load unarmed citizens onto box cars and murder them. Little things like that. If it got bad enough even our government might someday: regulate everything under the sun; tax people’s’ incomes; steal property; send American kids off to war for profits; bomb foreign kids for profit; ban the possession of “short” lobsters – whatever the hell those are; destroy the healthcare industry; turn Congressionally mandated monetary policy over to a private corporation; facilitate the wholesale invasion of the USA, or; even stage false flags events just to ban guns or justify more war profiteering. It’s crazy, I know. But it could happen; they could become tyrannical. Knowing that I’d rather keep the martial odds at least nominally equal.

Mind you there is no interest in logic or practical application or respect with the anti-freedom crowd. No notion of history. No regard for liberty, responsibility, or real safety. And they have no consistency either.

The Times talks about people on terror watch lists. Yet these same kinds are prone to sue to halt bans, however minor, on the importation of terrorists. When any non-white, male, dream terrorist commits a crime, they immediately tell us that the event is in no way representative of the larger community (usually Muslim). They may be right. Why then, do they immediately assign blame for any narrative-conforming attack to all gun owners and freedom lovers? Bigot much?

A few of these folks are decent people – people who actually want to solve real problems. That’s good as we have more than a few of those issues around us. The rest of them literally have mental deficiencies which go beyond mere functional mid-wittery. Cut into their heads or run a CT scan and one finds their brains are actually deformed physically. They may deserve sympathy and even help. They do not deserve to dictate terms.

That’s logical and practical.

Watch Your Guns and Your Politicians

Tags

, , , , ,

One might, just might, want the other.

Another seemingly narrative conforming mass shooting. Along with some other hallmarks of a false flag or crime of convenience, it’s interesting that the usual suspects immediately rolled out the gun control calls. Hillary and Tom Brokaw resumed the mantra at once, as if pre-planned.

There was another, perhaps less noticeable, but perhaps much more dangerous voice – Donald Trump’s. It was a little hard to hear over the noise.

According to the Washington Times, Trump praised the police response to the attack, saying on Tuesday the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police did an “incredible job.” He added, “How quickly the police department was able to get in was really very much of a miracle. They’ve done an amazing job.”

But after praising the police, Trump made clear a discussion on gun laws is coming:

During an October 2 press briefing, White House press secretary Sarah Sanders expressed the same sentiment. While dismissing calls to discuss gun control during the briefing, Sanders suggested there will be a time to look at gun policies. The Washington Post quoted her describing Monday as a “day of mourning.” She said, “There will certainly be a time for that policy discussion to take place, but that’s not the place that we’re in at this moment.”

Axios reports that Breitbart News’ executive chairman Steve Bannon observed that Trump’s voting base would react worse to gun control than to an amnesty bill. Bannon said that Trump’s support for gun control would “be the end of everything.”

A discussion. What on Earth would he mean by that? It may not be what you think or care to think.

I really like Trump and I want his (stated) mission to succeed – Make America Great Again, America First. However, a few issues aside, there seems to be a disconnect between what Candidate Trump said and what President Trump does:

Lock her up? We don’t need that.

Build a wall? DACA amnesty.

Repeal Obamacare? When???

Tax Reform? When???

Humble foreign policy? War, war, and more war.

Debt reduction and budgets? Not this term.

The Fed under the microscope? Telescope maybe.

103643514-GettyImages-494045244.530x298

CNBC.

Then there is that gun control question. Where does Trump really stand? And what is he willing to stand for?

I hinted around about this 18 months ago:

Trump says he’s pro-Second Amendment but he hasn’t said it loud enough or demonstrated anything beyond saying to convince me. Reagan was pro-2A and he handed us the GCA modifications of 1986.

A reporter once asked Trump if he owned a gun. He answered that he had a concealed carry permit. He never said if he owned a gun to go along with the permit. He said it was none of the reporter’s business whether he did. That is true but I found it a little wishy-washy. I was reminded of a GOP presidential debate a few years ago. There and then an audience member asked the field if any of them owned a firearm which required a tax stamp. The answer was uniformly “no” and it seemed to go over all their heads.

Do we want a wishy-washy politician with a developing track record of flip-floppery having this “discussion?”

We’re about to find out. I may be completely wrong, but…

Guard the guns anyway.

On the Adjunctification of Higher Education

Tags

, , , , , , , , ,

I have a nominal esoteric interest in formal education. I write, from time to time, about the schools, what they were, what they’ve become, and their modern failings.

To the point: increasingly, the “education” is worthless and is overly expensive. That’s a problem for students and for larger society.

The “liberal” takeover angle gets a decent amount of attention and rightly so. For instance, more and more schools abandon “AD” and “BC,” because PC. 10,001 other examples to go with that one.

But it’s not, as a whole, a purely left-right issue.

I follow a small number of my fellow WordPressers. I get daily updates. I read this one with thoughtful attention. Please do likewise. It’s by “The Homeless Adjunct” and, as might be expected, sheds light on the trials of the non-tenured, part-time faculty of America’s colleges and universities (75% of all instructors now). It’s bad.

This piece is a follow-up to an earlier post (2012). I think it was that one that made me follow Homeless. Read it too. Also consider her (slightly liberal – but mostly correct) take on the overall problem:

Within one generation, in five easy steps, not only have the scholars and intellectuals of the country been silenced and nearly wiped out, but the entire institution has been hijacked, and recreated as a machine through which future generations will ALL be impoverished, indebted and silenced. Now, low wage migrant professors teach repetitive courses they did not design to students who travel through on a kind of conveyor belt, only to be spit out, indebted and desperate into a jobless economy. The only people immediately benefitting inside this system are the administrative class – whores to the corporatized colonizers, earning money in this system in order to oversee this travesty. But the most important thing to keep in mind is this: The real winners, the only people truly benefitting from the big-picture meltdown of the American university are those people who, in the 1960s, saw those vibrant college campuses as a threat to their established power. They are the same people now working feverishly to dismantle other social structures, everything from Medicare and Social Security to the Post Office.

Looking at this wreckage of American academia, we have to acknowledge: They have won.

BUT these are victors who will never declare victory — because the carefully-maintained capitalist illusion of the “university education” still benefits them. Never, ever, admit that the university is dead. No, no. Quite the opposite. Instead, continue to insist that the university is the ONLY way to gain a successful, middle class life. Say that the university is mandatory for happiness in adulthood. All the while, maintain this low-wage precariate class of edu-migrants, continually mis-educate and indebt in the students to ensure their docility, pimp the institution out to corporate interests. It’s a win-win for those right wingers – they’ve crippled those in the country who would push back against them, and have so carefully and cleverly hijacked the educational institutions that they can now be turned into part of the neoliberal/neocon machinery, further benefitting the right-wing agenda.

So now what?

This ruination has taken about a generation. Will we be able to undo this damage? Can we force refunding of our public educational system? Can we professionalize faculty, drive out the administrative glut and corporate hijackers? Can we provide free or low-cost tuition and high-quality education to our students in a way that does NOT focus only on job training, but on high-level personal and intellectual development? I believe we can. But only if we understand this as a big picture issue, and refuse to allow those in government, or those corporate-owned media mouthpieces to divide and conquer us further. This ruinous rampage is part of the much larger attack on progressive values, on the institutions of social good. The battle isn’t only to reclaim the professoriate, to wipe out student debt, to raise educational outcomes — although each of those goals deserve to be fought for. But we will win a Pyrrhic victory at best unless we understand the nature of the larger war, and fight back in a much, much bigger way to reclaim the country’s values for the betterment of our citizens.

There’s more to it than that, but the five-point plan pretty well sums up the problem. This is something to truly consider if you’re off to college or have a youngin headed that way. Grades and test scores are up while IQs are down. Just too many degrees floating about. Faculty paid at 1970’s levels in 2017. A pathetic return on investment in many cases. Outside of a few (and shrinking) fields, an absence of actual learning. The death of critical thinking. Football coaches who view your daughter as a prostitute for the team and recruits. Get the picture?

For the adjunct faculty, Homeless and others, I may have a partial answer to the professional issues. Maybe, not sure. Just as there is a real thing called the IQ Communication Gap, that dictates an incredible difficulty related to and communicating with those 2 SD north or south of one’s own intelligence level, so there is also a real IQ cap on elite faculty – at places like Harvard, Yale, Oxford, etc.

The average student at Harvard (let’s call them representative of the elite students of the world) clocks in at 128 (W. or S.B.). That’s superior but not genius. The average faculty from these institutions rates around 133. And the curve is extremely narrow, clustering almost exclusively around that number.

Those too far below can’t make it for obvious reasons. Those above, however, suffer a similar yet more difficult to define exclusion. Around 135 there is a steep drop off. At 140 there is a collapse. One SD above the average, in the real genius range, the chances of obtaining elite teaching or research work effectively falls to zero.

This may be a product of the genius/near genius tendency for nonconformity. Or, it might have to do with the fact that we think and operate entirely differently that the rest of humanity. Whatever the cause, the effect is real.

I have a sneaking suspicion, one that might make a good thesis or research project for some psych. grad student. Anyway, I suspect that the average adjunct professional has a higher IQ than the average tenure track professional within a given institution. It’s even possible, as a whole, that average adjunct IQ exceeds that of the regular elite professors, as a whole. That could be a stretch – but not one too far. And that’s the faculty. I have no doubt I am 100% correct when comparing adjuncts to superfluous administrators.

Whatever the cause, the effects are real and felt. Please do read those above articles if you have half a modicum of interest in the subject.

Like Homeless I have some hope that the system may be salvageable. However, a better strategy is probably to abandon the schools and start new, better, and more modern alternatives. People are doing that with great success.

And, like the story of Cato’s cattle, it’s the great success that’s admirable.

RIP, Tom Petty??

Tags

, ,

*An UPDATE. Maybe Petty still lives! Lord, let’s hope so. First he was unresponsive and on life support. Then he was taken off. Then the pop media declared him dead. Now – seems he’s bad (very bad) but still clinging to life somehow. The Latest in the very strange case. Come on Tom!*

Don’t come around here no more…

If you grew up in the 70’s or 80’s (or both) and knew rock, then you knew Tom Petty. Gone at 66. Heart attack.

The good, genuine pop culture, along with the rest of it, seems to be dying off. Or, maybe I’m starting to get old.

Tom-Petty-Net-Worth-2017-2018

Then again, can you imagine Petty, Elvis, James Brown,and Johnny Cash jamming tonight? They might.

The Culture War Goes Full Auto

Tags

, , , ,

I do not believe the ISIS claim about Las Vegas. It’s possible but I think it’s another kind of terrorism. And it’s part of the bigger, crazier picture.

Over at FP I expounded about the tragedy a little more:

There’s something wrong with society, with civilization itself. You know that. There’s no hiding it. This is but the latest, dramatic example.

ISIS has claimed responsibility for the massacre. That was my first guess. Now, even with the claim, I’m not so sure – I doubt it. If a crime is committed and the suspect is killed before he can say anything, why not claim responsibility. It’s self-serving but not necessarily believable.

Make no mistake: this was an act of terrorism. The motives will (may) be uncovered as time goes by. Per my First Law of Terrorism it is a given that this suspect was known in advance to some authority somewhere. Someone knew something. They always do. Always.

“America is reeling from the worst mass shooting in its history after 58 people were killed and 515 wounded at a country music festival in Las Vegas on Sunday night.

The shooting broke out on the final night of the three-day Route 91 Harvest festival, a sold-out event attended by 22,000 and featuring top acts such as Eric Church, Sam Hunt and Jason Aldean.

Police say the shooter was 64-year-old Stephen Craig Paddock, a resident of nearby Mesquite,
Nevada, unloaded thousands of rounds on the festival taking place at Las Vegas Village from a room across the street in the Mandalay Bay Hotel at 10:08pm.

Clark County Sheriff Joseph Lombardo said that his officers breached Paddock’s room on the 32nd floor and found Paddock dead inside, among an ‘arsenal’ of 10 firearms. Lombardo said that Paddock shot himself dead.”

-Daily Mail (UK)

The only good news here is that the worthless sack of excrement is dead. That’s it. The rest is pointless tragedy. You don’t need my details. Just watch the news or read anything anywhere.

There are videos from the concert which capture the horror and the sounds from the attack. I’ve been around guns of all kinds for a long time. That was a full-auto battlefield rifle. Either it was mechanically automatic (light machine gun) or it was fitted with a high quality bump stock. I strongly suspect the former. I would guess an AK or some other .30 caliber weapon.

The killer rained what must have been thousands of bullets on the crowd. The shots came in constant burst of 30? 50? 60? Maybe more? rounds. Sustained fire. He either had high-capacity mags or perhaps even a belt.

The shooter was on the 32nd floor of a hotel some distance from the concert. I don’t know but I estimate the distance was maybe 1,000 feet, give or take a few. A long distance attack from an elevated position. This was obviously premeditated for maximum carnage.

Just as with the Orlando gay club attack last year, last night the concert-goers were distracted from the shooting by the music. The shooter knew that. One can actually see the distraction play out on video. The SOB fired off a long burst of bullets and the band played on. The victims didn’t realize what was happening until people started dropping.

And there were plenty of targets. From the distance I estimate and in the dark it would be almost impossible to target any specific person. That wasn’t necessary as there were over 20,000 people packed closely together. It was merely aiming in the general direction and firing with a steady hand. More details will emerge.

So what is the prepper’s takeaway here? Several as it turns out.

First, today, if you live anywhere near Las Vegas – please go and give blood. The hospitals need it badly! The number to call for victim or assistance is 866-535-5654.

Second, I’d like to address the firearms angle, briefly. Some lower, dumber politicians are already politicizing this tragedy. If they want to use criminal acts as the basis for gun control, this is their great chance. They’re already trying. We must resist this. Period. The weapon(s) really do not matter. I’ll get to the real problem in a second.

Next, I’d like to praise the police and first responders. They responded to what was a real war zone in about 10 minutes. That’s very fast. And they rapidly pressed the shooter into offing himself. Good. Still, this response, as great as it was, was reactionary.

Terrible things like this are going to happen and lately they seem to be happening all over and all the time. It’s up to us (not the police) to do what we can to protect ourselves.

Back to the guns, most of you, here, practice CCW – almost universally with handguns. I hate to say that with an attack like this, those weapons would have been utterly useless. The odds of effectively engaging a shooter with a rifle and in a protected, elevated position so far away are effectively zero. (You should still keep carrying, however, just not to stop things like this).

Your .38, 9mm, .45, or .40 simply lacks the power and range to reach such distant heights. The only weapons which would have made a counter difference here would be a heavy rifle or a rocket launcher – neither practical.

What do we do to protect ourselves?

First, keep up the general preps. Keep up the training, the education, and the prayers. Beyond that, the only way to avoid being caught in a situation like this, is to simply not be there. The only way to avoid problems like this is to avoid large public crowds. That’s hard, I know. That takes some of the fun out of daily life. Still, it’s the only safe option in a world gone utterly mad. Please consider abstinence as a survival strategy.

The world gone mad it the real problem. This shooting, as terrible as it was (is), is but a small part of the larger disintegration of our societies. The crime, the terror, the war, the invasions, the politics, the hatred, the kneelers, the Nazis, the commies, the economics, the decline of civility – it’s all connected. Everything decent in the world is under assault.

I do not …

I just got confirmation the distance from the shooter’s vantage to the field was 1,100 feet… I’ve also read or heard 800 – 1,700 feet. I’ll stick to 1,000…

I do not have answers for this omnibus problem. All I can offer is that we must maintain faith and persevere the best we can. That’s really all we can do.

For my part, I vow to keep bringing you information of the topic and possible, plausible ways out. The rest is up to you. And whatever you do, so long as you’re doing something, will have to suffice.

God bless and keep you all.

nimbus-image-1506962929604

Getty/Daily Mail.

This crap can really stop anytime now.

I Support the People of Catalonia

Tags

, , , , , ,

In their independence, if they wish, or otherwise. The craven and useless U.S. government does not – nor do their pets in the media. That’s why you, in the US or outside of Western Europe, have heard so so little about today’s referendum.

For what it’s worth, the US doesn’t support independence in Kurdistan either – or anywhere else really.

“The United States does not recognize the Kurdistan Regional Government’s unilateral referendum held on Monday. The vote and the results lack legitimacy and we continue to support a united, federal, democratic and prosperous Iraq,” said the man who tried to destroy the Boy Scouts of America.

Out of respect for democracy, we cannot recognize the democratic actions of a people. Nice.

The controllers want control. They don’t care about unity, freedom, or prosperity. They certainly don’t care about peace. This woman wasn’t a victim of the terror attacks in either Canada nor France:

DLEo553V4AAMw78

Drudge.

No. She was a victim of imperial aggression meted out by the shock troops of Madrid. Her crime was trying to vote her conscience.

Not a lot of unity or prosperity in that picture, eh?

Despite the worst efforts of the Satanic globalists some people still want self-determination; some wish to be free.

Viuen Lliures o moren, Catalunya!

Another Statue Coming Down?

Tags

, , , , , , ,

Not too long ago, when the trend to remove, shroud, or destroy all things Confederate started in earnest, I warned the BLMers and the SJWs about unintended consequences. And I wasn’t talking about the natural progression from heroes of the CSA to heroes of the early USA and then to any and all white or Christian men – that was a given; it happened practically concurrently.

What I meant and said was that it shouldn’t take too long before the SJW types start eating their own. And it has happened much faster than I anticipated.

BALTIMORE — The Maryland Stadium Authority has increased security around the Ray Lewis statue outside M&T Bank Stadium after the former All-Pro linebacker joined Ravens players in kneeling during the national anthem, which spurred an on-line petition to remove the 3-year-old landmark.

The petition on change.org has received more than 50,000 signatures as of Thursday morning.

Of course the statue is a divisive symbol of hate. As such, it must be removed. 50,000 of the people have spoken. This is what democracy looks like. Tear it down.

download

Hate has no place in Neo-Amerika. USA Today.

Antiquated relics like Lewis’s statue (and those of Robert E. Lee, Thomas Jefferson, Christopher Columbus, Walt Disney, etc.) represent the past. They should not be displayed in public, subsidized by taxpayers. Their proper places are in museums or on private property. They have to go.

Unintended consequences.

 

Reality Winner on Not Talking to the Police

Tags

, , , , , , , ,

Just don’t do it. Don’t ever answer their questions or give them statements. Just don’t talk. Reality Winner, alleged NSA leaker, could tell you about it.

In the interview [with the FBI], Winner at first denied several times that she leaked any secret documents. She said she had been trying to get an assignment working with U.S. forces in Afghanistan.

First she acknowledged printing a report that “looked like a piece of history.” She told the agents “I thought it would be cool if I had it on my desk for a couple of days.” But she insisted she dropped the report in a bin used for papers that were to be destroyed.

“I mean, I’m trying to deploy,” Winner said. “I’m not trying to be a whistleblower. That’s crazy.”

She changed her story after an agent asked bluntly how she got the document out of the office.

“Folded in half in my pantyhose,” Winner replied.

Winner at one point asked the agents, “This sounds really bad. Am I going to jail tonight?”

One of the agents replied, “I don’t know the answer to that yet.”

An interview (i.e. talking). One story. Another story. On and on. Yes, dear, it sounds bad – because it sounds. Because you’re talking. Period. Half the time they have no evidence other that what you volunteer. Give them anything and, as they WARN YOU, it “can and WILL be used against you in court.” Yes, you’re in jail, now. Judge Epps will probably keep you there after today’s hearing.

Actually, I’m not so sure Winner could put all this together even at this time. She has a history of talking. A lot. Little of it makes sense:

“Yeah, I screwed up royally.”

Saying anything is a bad idea. That one was really bad.

 

“Look, I only say I hate America like 3 times a day. I’m no radical. It’s mostly just about Americans obsession with air conditioning.”

Like, OMG, radicals at least attempt a little coherency.

“I mean yeah I do [America’s] literally the worst thing to happen on the planet. We invented capitalism the downfall of the environment.”

Give an SJW a little rope… Yeah, maybe that’s not fair, here. How about SJI = Social Justice Idiot?

 

“I’ve filed formal complaints about [the NSA] having Fox News on, you know? Uh, just at least, for God’s sake, put Al Jazeera on, or a slideshow with people’s pets.”

She needs to be re-educated for bringing God into this. People’s pets???

I’m starting to see a mental deficiency defense if nothing else. Something lacking in the amygdala or something…

For the rest of you: just don’t talk.

nimbus-image-1506709658993

In causally related news, the other day was the 230 anniversary of the U.S. Constitution. I missed it along with all the “fun”. Shame they didn’t miss it back in 1787. Proof some lies live forever a long time.