Category Archives: Other Columns

Columns concerning any and everything. Enjoy!

COLUMN: How About Murder?

31 Wednesday Aug 2022

Posted by in Other Columns

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

How About Murder?

Opposing Student Debt Forgiveness Subborns Evil:

A Christian Perspective

 

*Perhaps unwisely, I am publishing this as-is and unedited. It’s a little rough and not as artfully brushed together as I’d like. Still, it’s rather irrefutable – from any good and honest perspective. I may touch it up some, or not; I have one of the darndest head colds ever and don’t feel at all like going any further. Enjoy. 

 

As far as I can tell, there are two primary reasons why one would oppose eliminating American student loan debts, in particular, and (perhaps) all fake, credit-based, usurious loans, in general: 1) one is either ignorant (and/or stupid), or 2) one is possessed of wickedness, of a spirit of evil. I understand there may be categorical overlap. There are multiple reasons to favor loan forgiveness. Chief among them are the facts that these loans: 1) are greatly assisting the general destruction of society; 2) consist of legal, economic, and monetary fraud stacked upon fraud, and; 3) contravene the tenets of Christianity, directly opposing the will of Jesus Christ and His Father.

Herein, I will concentrate on the Christian perspective. Lately, Christians are making their voices heard on this matter. Dark state puppet and fake president Biden, allegedly a Catholic, has stirred interest and controversy by touting a plan to shift some debtors’ burdens ($10,000 – 20,000 per debtor) via another spending spree bill. The plan, as presented, is fraught with problems, though it is a stumbling, half-step in the right direction. Many reactions to the plan, even from other alleged Christians, are at best selfish, short-sighted, and solipsistic. 

Even Ron Paul has objected. I suppose that he understands the true underlying evil and would – I know he would – right all the wrongs. Others don’t get such benefit of the doubt. Thanks to a friend’s email about something else, I inadvertently came across a Tweet(!) by a Matt Walsh: 

Yes, you were scammed when you took out your student loans. You got suckered. You bought a worthless thing for way too much money. That’s true. But making someone else pay for your mistakes is a greater injustice. It sucks that you have the debt but it is your debt. Not mine.

-Tweet(!) of Matt Walsh, August 23, 2022.

Not knowing who Matt Walsh is, I did some quick research. The man purports to be Catholic, like former vice president Biden and myself, and also describes himself as a “theocratic fascist.” He also appears to be in league with Benjamin Aaron Shapiro, so I suppose there might be a question as to the theos in the theocracy. But his statement sums up much of the current hyperbole: he acknowledges that a scam suckered the victims, whom he then blames, shuns, and disowns. 

Other comments I have seen, from the left, the right, and the inebriated libertarian center, go further and to worse effect. Most of them fall along the lines of argumentum ad personalem (I paid my loans! I’m better than you!) or argumentum ad hominem (You ain’t paid yer loan! You ain’t good as me! And your major sucked, you commie…); both miss the reality that there is a world outside of the self. It is not all “me, me, meeee!”

Before moving to Biblical precepts, I thought it advantageous to briefly examine the thoughts of two men well-grounded in reality and logical reasoning. Neither of them were Christians, both living and dying before the Holy Birth of Christ. Yet their thoughts which I give in example are in-line with the teachings of the Catholic Church – consider it further proof of Truth by universal acceptance and understanding. 

In or around 44 BC, Old Tully related an alleged conversation between the mighty Cato and a presumably ambitious young Patrician. I’ve elsewhere read that the younger man was attempting to goad Cato into ratifying the man’s pre-selected occupation. The conversation is presented as an example of competing expediencies or comparative outward advantages. It did not go exactly as the young man had hoped:

To this class of comparisons belongs that famous saying of old Cato’s: when he was asked what was the most profitable feature of an estate, he replied: “Raising cattle successfully.” What next to that? “Raising cattle with fair success.” And next? “Raising cattle with but slight success.” And fourth? “Raising crops.” And when his questioner said, “How about money-lending?” Cato replied: “How about murder?”

-M.T. Cicero, De Officiis, II, § 89 (W. Miller) (Loeb, 1913).

Keep that response in mind: why did Cato equate money-lending with murder? 

We’re going to get to the answers. But first, a brief look at the magnitude of the problem currently faced by American college students and graduates who indebted themselves in pursuit of academic credentials.

Ye Old National Debt Clock, as of Wednesday, August 31, 2022, says the total US student loan debt is somewhere around $1.768 trillion (it’s higher, now that you’re reading this). That’s a lot of debt, and a considerable portion of the total outstanding personal debt in the US. It averages to about $40,000 per debtor, which mathematically produces a total college debtor class of about 44 million people. (As an aside, the Debt Clock explains in stark terms, and immediately below the student loan numbers, how and why all the credit money is utterly fake – statistically, there is zero real money in the economy. Again, that is an aside.).

The Census Bureau recently told me, as far as I one can trust them, that about 85 million US residents and citizens hold some level of college education (roughly 25% of the total US population). Either 44 million or 85 million is a little high, in my estimation; I would presume that fewer than 10% of the population has any real need of or derives any real benefit from higher education. This assumes that any of them are receiving an education – which most of them are not. Mr. Walsh is correct as to the scam and the suckering. Of course, that falls under the decline of society and outside the parameters of this essay.

Also outside the Christian scope of discussion – but still worth noting – are the inflationary effects of too many people attending college. That inflation, along with many other factors (women in the workforce, immigrants in the workforce, massive credit financialization in the general economy, etc.), has completely erased the definition and the concept of money, regarding education or anything else. If the wages of 1950 had kept pace with the cost of a new house, then today the average single-job annual salary would be around $300,000 nationwide. Minimum wage would pay something like $75,000 per year. As-is, NBC “News,” in another of those cherished “you gotta go to college!” hit pieces, says “good jobs,” only obtainable with a sacred degree, have starting salaries of … $35,000. It’s not that something doesn’t add up; nothing adds up. 

Like houses and other large-ticket items, education has soared far above and beyond the corresponding costs of labor. (In other words, kids, you are losing). And, sadly, there’s something uniquely or exceptionally American about the disparity. The late, great Tom Moore wrote School For Genius (2006) about Switzerland’s Federal Institute of Technology, or ETH. Lately, ETH charges around 730 CHF per semester in tuition, which roughly equals $1,500 per year. MIT offers a similar education (or, it once did), for an annual tuition of $57,000. Back in 1950, when the average American man earned $6,000 per year, MIT, like Harvard and other “elite” schools, charged something like $500 per year. 

It’s like this for each and every other US school. For many or most students, the only way to cope is through loans, which repeat and exacerbate the problem. Scam. Suckers.

What would Jesus say about all of this? He said forgive it.

“And forgive us our debts, as we have forgiven those who are in debt to us.” Matthew 6:12.

For the quantum edits folks, the Codex Sinaiticus quoted, in Greek, “debts” not trespasses. That, for what it’s worth, was in or about 350 AD.

Some Christians and churches have transmuted that part of the Lord’s Prayer into “sins” rather than “debts.” That is somewhat understandable, though incomplete. Elsewhere in the Gospels, it’s: “…and forgive us our sins, for we ourselves forgive each one who is in debt to us. …” Luke 11:3-4. Sin and debt go together, and both are forgiven upon righteous and humble request.

Jesus drove home the importance of forgiveness of debt, along with the punishment for refusing to forgive debt, in the Parable of the Wicked Servant: 

Then the master sent for the man and said to him, “You wicked servant, I cancelled all that debt of yours when you appealed to me. Were you not bound, then, to have pity on your fellow-servant just as I had pity on you?” And in his anger the master handed him over to the torturers till he should pay all his debt.

-Matthew 18:32-34.

One is reminded that, as Jesus came to fulfil rather than replace The Law, so His New Testament generally mirrors the Old. Forgiveness of debts stems from the Levitical Law and the Code of Legal Holiness. 

Leviticus, Chapter 25, concerns the Sabbatical Year and the Jubilee Year. Sabbatical years, which concern far more than debts, come every seventh year. Seven cycles of seven years, or forty-nine years, leads to the fifttieth year of Jubilee. The Sabbatical and the Jubilee may be thought of as minor and major resets. In years seven, fourteen, twenty-one, twenty-eight, thirty-five, forty-two, and forty-eight, as to debts, there is a “relaxation” or “remission.” 

At the end of every seven years, you must grant remission. The nature of the remission is as follows: any creditor holding a personal pledge obtained from his fellow must release him from it; he must not exploit his fellow or his brother once the latter has appealed to Yahweh for remission. A foreigner you may exploit, but you must remit whatever claim you have on your brother. There must, then, be no poor among you. For Yahweh will grant you his blessing in the country which Yahweh your God is giving you to possess as your heritage, only if you pay careful attention to the voice of Yahweh your God, by keeping and practising all these commandments which I am enjoining on you today.

-Deuteronomy 15:1-5.

Note that the Lord, here, prescribed the debt-creditor remissions of His People of the day, the Israelites. The point of inclusivity is that among the Hebrews there was to be economic equality of a degree, and that the blessings of God only extended to the degree His Laws were honored.

The Jubilee Year dealt with, in addition to elimination of domestic debts, a complete ancestral and cultural reversion. See, Leviticus 25:8—. Much of this law was exclusive to the Israelites and held, even as to them, some exceptions which might not be applicable to modern peoples, Christian, Karaite, or others (land within or without certain walled cities, for example). 

Leviticus also contains a strict prohibition against usury (one of several in the Pentateuch and the Old Testament) as to fellow Israelites. “Do not charge [your brother or countryman] interest on a loan, but fear your God, and let your brother live with you.” Leviticus 25:36. For those who fail to fear and honor their God, Chapter 26 explains the rather exacting Punishments of Disobedience. These are the same punishments the Hebrews (and “Jews”) eventually succumbed to upon their rejection of Christ.

Christ came to fulfill, and in a way, simplify the laws which very few had been able to faithfully follow through the many long years. It is interesting that the forgiveness of debts survived to become a central tenet of the Lord’s Prayer. It is also interesting, though not exactly necessary to point out, that at all times, Jesus, His Father, Moses, Aaron, and everyone else, were concerned with debts based on real money, whether silver shekels, Roman silver, gold, etc. Usury was prohibited, even in terms of actual money with legitimate value in and of itself, as a sin. 

St. Thomas Aquinas examines the nature of the sin of usury, in Question 78 of the Summa Theologiae. After listing, and before defeating, seven objections to the concept of usury as a sin, Aquinas explains:

On the contrary, It is written (Exodus 22:25): “If thou lend money to any of thy people that is poor, that dwelleth with thee, thou shalt not be hard upon them as an extortioner, nor oppress them with usuries.”

I answer that, To take usury for money lent is unjust in itself, because this is to sell what does not exist, and this evidently leads to inequality which is contrary to justice. In order to make this evident, we must observe that there are certain things the use of which consists in their consumption: thus we consume wine when we use it for drink and we consume wheat when we use it for food. Wherefore in such like things the use of the thing must not be reckoned apart from the thing itself, and whoever is granted the use of the thing, is granted the thing itself and for this reason, to lend things of this kin is to transfer the ownership. Accordingly if a man wanted to sell wine separately from the use of the wine, he would be selling the same thing twice, or he would be selling what does not exist, wherefore he would evidently commit a sin of injustice. On like manner he commits an injustice who lends wine or wheat, and asks for double payment, viz. one, the return of the thing in equal measure, the other, the price of the use, which is called usury.

On the other hand, there are things the use of which does not consist in their consumption: thus to use a house is to dwell in it, not to destroy it. Wherefore in such things both may be granted: for instance, one man may hand over to another the ownership of his house while reserving to himself the use of it for a time, or vice versa, he may grant the use of the house, while retaining the ownership. For this reason a man may lawfully make a charge for the use of his house, and, besides this, revendicate the house from the person to whom he has granted its use, as happens in renting and letting a house.

Now money, according to the Philosopher (Ethic. v, 5; Polit. i, 3) was invented chiefly for the purpose of exchange: and consequently the proper and principal use of money is its consumption or alienation whereby it is sunk in exchange. Hence it is by its very nature unlawful to take payment for the use of money lent, which payment is known as usury: and just as a man is bound to restore other ill-gotten goods, so is he bound to restore the money which he has taken in usury.

– Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, § 78, Sin of Usury (“THE Philosopher” is Aristotle).

Again, in Aquinas’s thirteenth century, money, debt, and usury, was calculated as to legitimate money, rather than ones and zeros summoned effortlessly from a computer. How much worse is our present situation, when all the money, not just the elusive interest, does not exist? Also, usury means interest, period, and not “excessive” interest as modern usurers tell.

The fake “money” for a modern loan, like a student loan, is created by the loan itself. It does not exist in reality. Under no circumstances does the interest for a loan otherwise exist. Repayment, with interest, works like this: a loan (real or fake) is made; the debtor must work to obtain money (real or fake) to repay it, and; the debtor must work extra hard to conjure the interest money (real or fake), in essence robbing Peter to pay Paul. This process of robbery and overwork, for something that does not exist and which cost the lender nothing to loan, requires the debtor to literally give up a portion of his life in repayment. 

Without the benefit of Hebrew law, Jesus Christ, the Catholic Church, or any other part of Christianity, Old Cato was onto something. It’s something that nominal Catholics like Mr. Walsh and poor Biden (and others) would do well to consider.

The fifth commandment [6th to some (8th(!) to a very few)] forbids doing anything with the intention of indirectly bringing about a person’s death. The moral law prohibits exposing someone to mortal danger without grave reason, as well as refusing assistance to a person in danger.

The acceptance by human society of murderous famines, without efforts to remedy them, is a scandalous injustice and a grave offense. Those whose usurious and avaricious dealings lead to the hunger and death of their brethren in the human family indirectly commit homicide, which is imputable to them. …

–Catechism of the Catholic Church, Para. 2269 (2nd Ed., 1994).

Usury is not theft. It is not robbery. It is a form of full or partial murder. 

PS: for a great summary, for those who don’t read, of the economic and societal evils of the debts, listen to Vox’s Darkstream No. 919.

COLUMN: More on Moore

24 Wednesday Aug 2022

Posted by in Other Columns

≈ Comments Off on COLUMN: More on Moore

Tags

,

More on Moore

 

Greetings, friends. This one, given the circumstances, will be a little shorter than usual.

Saturday, August 27th, marks a full year since Thomas G. Moore left us holding the bag of post-modern doom and gloom. One can’t blame him for getting while the getting was good, though I’m still a little upset about it. So much has happened during the past twelve months that would have benefited from his observations. But while he was here, he certainly did his part.

His Amazon author’s page says much: “Thomas Moore writes historical fiction, recognizing that certain events from the past impart dramatic power to his fictional scenarios set in the present. He seeks to entertain as well as illuminate, to engage the heart as well as the mind.” That last bit says it all and is bolstered by a great Faulkner quote: “The best fiction is far more true than any journalism.”

So it is. Tom recognized the fact. He liked to say that good fiction allowed for a better imparting of genuine ideas, better than the best dialectical diatribe because it engaged the reader’s heart and emotion instead of simply the mind. It grants a degree of participation.

Sometimes a novel will plant a little seed that doesn’t sprout for some time. Tom and I had a few mutually favorite books. One of them, which I need not name at this time, brought an idea to my mind recently, something that I witnessed and was able to confirm, even though the connection came years after the fact. It had to do with a certain cinq ans period. I could not convince most readers of the truism therein even as many or most of them have lived through the exact experience. C’est la vie.

At any rate, there is plenty of illumination and heart in Tom’s published works.

I’ve declared that A Fatal Mercy (2019) is one of the best Civil War fictional stories ever written. Had it been published in 1959, it would have probably sold ten million copies. It’s one of the best books your not reading – the shame is yours.

The Hunt for Confederate Gold (2014) ain’t bad either. Tom declared it a little amateurish, but I liked it nonetheless. I think rather than being a dilettante work, it merely pushes hard, timely concepts at a faster pace than perhaps the author intended. However, it does so within an excellent storyline.

To my shame, I have not yet read No Villains No Heroes (2012). Tom spoke highly and exuberantly about it, so it must be with the effort!

He also wrote the non-fiction School for Genius (2006, N. Am.) about the ETH in Zurich, a book that answers one question of what Einstein and von Braun had in common. For the gifted young American student, here’s an independent tidbit to illuminate some things and enrage, er, engage the heart: one can get a comparable education at MIT for only … 35 TIMES the annual tuition cost. USA! Usa. U ass eh?

And, there was more. So much Moore.

Requiescant in pace, Frater.

COLUMN: A Gross Failure To Read The Room

17 Wednesday Aug 2022

Posted by in Other Columns

≈ Comments Off on COLUMN: A Gross Failure To Read The Room

Tags

, , , ,

A Gross Failure To Read The Room

 

Out of an abundance of wishful optimism, I made a little mistake a few years ago. At the end of one of my first TPC columns on the great Hoax, I tried to reason that with so much lockdown time on their hands, the younger people might do what younger people used to do. I wrote: “We might even have a new baby boom. Hey! You two millennials! Go work on that one, right now!” See, I was still under the false belief that birds and bees and lockdowns make for… My bad.

I now understand that boys and girls may, in fact, be girls and boys, that vasectomies are cool, that abortion is healthcare, and that nobody has any interest in children. We now have even more bad news about the decline of the American population; this is an update on my hideously malformed population column from about a year ago.

Way back in 1914, the rather odd E.A. Ross wrote in Chapter Ten, Social Effects of Immigration, of The Old World In The New: The Significance of Past and Present Immigration to the American People:

Not until the twenty-first century will the philosophic historian be able to declare with scientific certitude that the cause of the mysterious decline that came upon the American people early in the twentieth century was the deterioration of popular intelligence by the admission of great numbers of backward immigrants.

Please keep in mind Ross was writing about immigrants from Portugal, Italy, and Poland. As true and accurate as his work in 1914 was, he probably could not have imagined the decline in post-1965 America. Well, it is the twenty-first century, I stand in as the philosophic historian, and I hereby declare with scientific certitude that the decline in popular intelligence and the decline in general society derives (in half part) from the admission of ridiculous numbers of backward immigrants throughout the twentieth century and beyond. Immigrants from the European countries Ross bemoaned still scored very close to the Northwestern Euro average IQ of 100. Today’s new arrivals score at or below the general world average of 82.

The other half part is the decline in the native American population, particularly among those of higher intelligence. In Ross’s time, intelligent young American couples married and had four, six, or more children. Today, they trade “genders,” pile on the debt, dope themselves out of their minds, slave away for minimum wage, and die early surrounded by face masks, booze bottles, and fur babies.

These two evil twin factors have seen the country’s average IQ drop by at least ten points over the past seventy years, with a current annual average depreciation of around .4 points.

The great news here and now is that the Great Replacement is not a theory, conspiracy, or otherwise. In addition to being, since 1965, the official legal policy of the US, it is a scientific certainty. It is mathematical.

Over the past year, since equating “non-Hispanic White” with “American” in that 2021 column, I have gotten into the lazy habit of checking Census information updates through a third-party source. (By Ross’s Anglo standards, the Heritage Posterity American population probably stands at only 20-30% of the total. As everything loses meaning, I’ll keep standing by the catch-all, stand-in “American” definition as I have previously explained). The other day, I consulted the direct government sources and was able to round out the rough decline for 2021. Thanks to the Hoax and other matters, some directly hoax-related and others not, the total population of the US practically stalled last year – adding only about 400,000 new folks (mostly via lower-IQ migrant invasion). Non-Hispanic Whites, as one might guess, continued to take one hell of a beating. The number I was waiting on was 2,545,602 White deaths – a first-ever record high. Cheery, eh?

First, an update on the update about the 2020 loss. They keep micro-tinkering with the numbers. Right now, the best estimate for 2020 is that we lost 640,640 White Americans. In 2021, we lost another 661,048. Since the drop started in 2016, we are down 2,064,791 White people. It’s like the loss of the entire metro population of Cleveland or Kansas City. *POOF* Gone. With the increasing effects of the Hoax and the apparent collapse in opposite-sex attraction and family building, look for 2022 to continue the trend.

Trends… Since 2000, the total US population has grown by about 50 million people, from 281 million to 331 million. Yet, the White American population has decreased, as both a percentage and as a whole numerical figure. It has fallen to around 195.1 million, essentially where it stood circa 1999. It’s almost as if some kind of replacement is in progress. Odd, huh? I do see that my calculator is wearing a little tin foil hat.

As a total percentage, Whites were approximately 70% of the population the last time our total numbers were this low. That was down from about 83% when I was born and about 90% in 1950. So, where are we now? There really is no exact telling. My most recent ciphering, based on the latest birth and death statistics, has us at or around 58.78%. But the Census proudly says it’s more like 57.8%. Averaging – through the conspiracy theory of “division” – could it be 58.29%? Or, winnowing down to those of strictly European ancestry – an inexact process – is it more like 54.5%? Here, we lose scientific precision, though the forest is clear through the falling trees.

Another way to gauge the present and near-future collapse is by extending the officially-reported decadal descents: 1970 (83.5%); 1980 (79.6%); 1990 (75.6%); 2000 (69.1%); 2010 (63.7%); 2020 (57.8%). The general trend is mildly accelerating; by chucking the high and low increase rates, we can average out a ten-year decline rate against the whole population of 5.1%. The losses are just over half a percent per year. From the official 2020 57.8%, to base minority status at 49.9%, we need … lemme conspire with my theory a second … 15.5 more years (2035~). From the best guess of 54.5% in 2022, it’s another nine years (2031).

Either of those two dates will come sooner than the ballyhooed 2040, 2050, or whatever. I’m sticking with my simple prediction, from last year, that replacement inversion happens in 2029. Why? Again, the 50-year trend is slowly, generally accelerating. Again, in general, young people are not producing more young people like they used to. And, since 2020-21, huge numbers of people have been willingly, stupidly injecting themselves with a poison that is now proven to cause gestational obstacles, total infertility, and overall depopulation. Maybe there was a conspiracy, after all. Some sort of great reset or something.

And we were warned. Ross was writing long before the luciferian rat Klaus Schwab was hatched and before the base destroyer Emanuel Celler ever slithered into politics. Others rang the bells. Few heeded them. Ross got in a modicum of difficulty over his tacit embrace of eugenics. A century later, the American people and the United States Empire succumbed to the arguably worse plight of dysgenics.

Now, now, if there’s a real problem in all of this, I’m sure it’s nothing that another cure-all election can’t fix. Go ahead and vote to your heart’s content this fall. In 2024 too. If they let you. A future room to read.

UPDATE: The jobs slide away too.

COLUMN: Cracking Safes, Cracking History

10 Wednesday Aug 2022

Posted by in Legal/Political Columns, Other Columns

≈ Comments Off on COLUMN: Cracking Safes, Cracking History

Tags

, , ,

Cracking Safes, Cracking History

 

The FBI’s website boldly proclaims: “We protect the American people and uphold the U.S. Constitution.” To that noble end, among many other things, the FBI:

Constantly spied(ies) on the American people;

Constantly subverted(s) the U.S. Constitution;

Covered up hundreds of cases of ritualistic satanic child abuse, to include connections to the US government and assorted international entities;

Prosecuted zero cases from Epstein Island (Mas’ Epstein and his hag aside)(your author is aware of the previous work of the judge who signed the Mar-a-Lago search warrant);

Stood aside while the DOD and the CIA unleashed Operation Northwoods;

Stood aside and/or colluded in a coup against the democratically-elected government of the United States;

Rounded up hundreds of mostly-peaceful political dissidents who dared protest the coup;

Did essentially nothing in the wake of the de facto civil war fomented during the summer of 2020 in the wake of one felon’s drug overdose death;

Did absolutely nothing concerning the largest biological and psychological warfare attack and genocide in human history; and,

Raided the private home and safe of a former US President for actual reasons yet unknown.

The reasons obviously have to do with political motivation and revenge. When or if they are ever articulated, the articulation will be a lie not designed to protect the American people nor their faded Constitution. 

To better understand both the pitiful shape of the US today and the endless hatred of Donald J. Trump, a brief look at modern presidential history is in order. This is a theory of that history which may require the reader to dispense with certain preconceived notions.

Kennedy

I’ve written before, as have others, that JFK was the last American President who attempted to govern as if he really thought he was in charge of the Executive branch. He obstinately thwarted the nascent Dark State on at least four major fronts. For his defiance, he was assassinated.

Johnson

LBJ was a pure good old boy politician and scumbag. However, he was not a direct agent of the Dark State. Instead, he was merely amenable to and usable for their interests. 

Nixon

Milhouse was an oddity as President. Love him, hate him, or forget him, he was not the Dark State’s man. yes, many of his actions served their dark purposes, but he still was not one of them – at this point it’s not really important. Rather than risk exposure by murdering two presidents within ten years, they found another way to rid themselves of this prickly academic.

Ford

Ford was the penultimate all-American public servant who genuinely loved the American people. He was naturally tasked with calming the nation in the wake of the upheaval of the early 1970s. He was not particularly note-worthy as an ambitious achiever – which is not a bad thing. And, most importantly, he was not a creature of the swamp.

Carter

See what I just wrote about Ford. Jimmah was the last of “our” men to hold the highest office, at least without substantial interference from the growing power of the cabal. But by 1980, their power had grown to the point where they felt they could make changes in their favor. And they did. Here, I must note once again that James Earl Carter and Mrs. Rosalynn are the only President and First Lady couple I have ever met. Our brief encounter was a pleasure; these two veritable steel peaches radiated goodness of a kind we will likely not see or feel again. 

Reagan

Ronny Raygun was literally a Hollywood actor hired to play a part. He played it better in some regards than in others. A presumably deeply compromised and controllable man, he garnered a popularity that made the next phases of national descent less noticeable by or more acceptable to the masses.

Bush 41

Following Reagan’s very successful stage show, the Dark State did something novel, something one might think unthinkable. They put one of their very own in power. Prescott’s son was not on the cabal’s side; he was a full and powerful member. The experiment, while it worked well for the devil’s forces, proved a little too much, perhaps, as far as the still plausibly arousable public was concerned. Going forward the DS opted for a safer approach.

Clinton

The Arkansas hillbilly was the first of an extremely effective series of puppets. Two terms, smoke and mirrors, and the agenda advanced nicely.

Bush 43

The second puppet continued the ways and services of his immediate predecessor. Under his eight-year reign, things went into overdrive on multiple fronts. To keep these things moving, a special character was required.

Obama

Barry was the special character, literally hand-crafted from his youth to play his role as the third great marionette. By even his first term, many observers had begun to finally notice the general direction the nation was headed, but they, most of them, did not fully understand the scope or the gravity of the situation; your author did not, for what it’s worth.

*Tactical Note

From the end of Carter’s administration, all Democratic and Republican opposition candidates (nominees) fit into one or more categories: controlled opposition, controllable opposition, or carefully-selected or allowed weak horses incapable of affecting insurrection against the cabal. Perot, I think, fell into the latter category. Anderson I knew, literally knew as a man. He was definitely not part of the wicked program but was allowed to proceed because, as good a man as he was and/or with his flaws, he was not a threat. All other third-party or independent candidates were nonstarters of no concern to the DS.

Trump

Approaching the 2016 election, the demographic, cultural, and political landscape had changed to such a large degree that the DS was forced into a new strategy. They selected a hybrid candidate, a puppet so closely-aligned with them as to practically be a member of their cult. All was proceeding smoothly until one fateful summer day when a brash, megalomaniac real estate showman rode down an escalator, accompanied by his lovely wife and Neil Young’s Rockin’ in the Free World. 

As soon as Trump announced his entry into politics, I knew he would be elected. I did not imagine the psychotic overreaction of the DS or the war they would launch. They cranked it up immediately and they have not let off the hammer as of today. (I chose “psychotic” just now for a reason). 

Behind the scenes meddling and common rigging methods have been a feature of American politics for my entire lifetime. Subtle interdiction served the DS well since they disposed of Kennedy. However, Trump was a wrench in the works they had not counted on. Hence, they deployed their full system to prevent his election. Two things happened, I think: one, they didn’t count on the Don’s popularity, and two, their system wasn’t fully ready. So, never accepting Trump’s victory, they spent the next four years obstructing his entire presidency. From November 2020 through January 2021, Trump was unable to “cross the Rubicon” as he had no support at all from his own government, to include his military. None of it was really his. But his greatest accomplishment, in being cast down in 2020, was to expose the DS corruption to plain view.

Biden

In November 2020, the new election system worked as needed and perfectly. More importantly, the cabal embarked on a new strategy more suited to this extremely late political hour. They no longer need a president. Trump won the legal popular contest, but Biden won the machinated count and was illegally legally certified and installed. Trump rode into the tumultuous sunset. However, literally no one believes that Biden is a real executive officer. This includes Biden, to the extent he is capable in his condition of considering the matter.

Going forward, as far as we do, this is probably the way it is and will be. Both Republicans and Democrats are excited about the 2022 Midterms. And the 2024 election. I think none of it matters. Just as they no longer require a president, they also no longer need Congress. If a validly-elected administration can be nullified, and a fake administration accepted, then there is no recourse against the bureaucracy that controls everything. The DS now has the unfettered power to directly control the elections to fit their whims, or they can allow honest elections and simply ignore or abuse the results as they desire. 

It is truly a dark day for the United States and, especially, for the American people. But it was a long time coming. And it is here. It’s not about to happen, just down the road, or possible; it is now and in force. The silver lining is that all of this is a clear sign that things are spinning apart. The Atlantic calls it the “Great Unwinding.” Thank God our betters have given us a name for the phenomenon and spared us the ridicule of the conspiracy theory! Though we may guess with some certainty, none of us know exactly how this unwinding will play out. Like the dark tyranny, it too is already in motion. And there appears to be no stopping it. Let it play out.

My theory is that, once the great unpleasantness has run its course, a new nation, or more likely, new nations will emerge. In it, or in one of them, let us hope and pray that the American People have a happy home. Evil never rests, and it cannot be fully defeated until the Return. Thus, the Americans of the future must guard against the certain rise, sometime in the unknown future, of a new subversive cult of destruction. 

In the meanwhile, we must all wait patiently and trust in Providence. This applies equally to the good federal employees, FBI agents included, who read the foregoing with an anger not based on what was written, but on the known or suspected truth in it. To you honest men and women, I can only counsel restraint. There is little to nothing you can do, directly. Rather, refuse to loudly and openly serve and enforce the agendas of the Dark State. Do not make yourselves needless targets. Lay low, do your jobs by living up to that website statement, and prepare with the rest of us for tomorrow. You will be needed. 

As for the mad matter at hand, we will see what develops. The official excuse, when or if given, may cover J-6, classified files, Russia, or the Man in the Moon. Whatever it is, it is theater. And so, we wait and we watch.

BONUS! Everyone is really fired up now! For now. Suddenly, left, right, and center all see some sort of double standard in law and justice. Welcome to the 19th century, late birdies! Yes, I’m sure that the very next election will solve all your problems and fully restore the REPUBLIC under the (High and Most Holy) CONSTITUTION! *sing praise!* Well, no… I’ll go ahead and call it: Your beloved Constitutional Republic is dead. I suggest it died on or about April 15, 1861. You may say otherwise.

COLUMN: Bak 2 Shul: CRT Truths in Rhode Island

03 Wednesday Aug 2022

Posted by in Other Columns

≈ Comments Off on COLUMN: Bak 2 Shul: CRT Truths in Rhode Island

Tags

, , , , ,

Bak 2 Shul: CRT Truths in Rhode Island

 

Well, it’s that time of year again! This month, about fifty million US children will once again be herded into oppressive grooming-center concentration camps run by the tiny, fearful minions of satan. USA! USA! USA!

It’s another education column. This one was prompted by an informative article at Legal Insurrection, Romona Bessinger’s I’m A Teacher Who Blew The Whistle On CRT In Schools, Suffered Retaliation, But Now I’ve Prevailed. 

Mrs. Bessinger appears to be a member of the dwindling cadre of American teachers still dedicated to teaching. As one will learn from the linked article, Bessinger rang the alarm bell over the march of anti-civilizational doctrines into her Providence school(s) and she was punished for doing so. With the help of an attorney and some media coverage, she feels vindicated. Very soon she will report to Classical High School, Providence, happily back in the classroom to serve as an educator. Read the whole thing; it is inspirational and representative of the resistance to CRT mounted here and there around the country. However, I also read some odd admissions and road signs therein, which I will now address.

Bessinger related the situation in the trenches and asked a heartfelt question: “My students, almost all of whom were minority, started calling me ‘America’ because I was white — You are America, they would say, we are not. How could I keep silent seeing what the Critical Race curriculum was doing to the students and our society?”

The answer to the question, which she correctly and bravely provided, is that she could not keep silent. However, there are a few things that she and other Americans should understand about this situation, which is not at all confined to New England public schools. Even within the pack of vicious lies that is CRT, a little truth still lurks. Those minority students let it slip out. They are right that Bessinger is an American and that they are not. That is, in the traditional sense of the national definition; in the mythos of the postmodern, there simply is no tradition or sense.

The Preamble of the High and Most Holy *sing praise!* United States’ Constitution (1789 – 1861) plainly states who Americans are: 

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Interspersed throughout the rest of the text are statements about who is not American. It was an exclusionary document, written by and for White Europeans. While not exclusively of English origins, they all were bound into a culture that was distinctly English or British. These facts are further reinforced by the Naturalization Act of 1790, the common, expressed understanding of the day, and by the language of the Declaration of Independence (from England, not Japan, Spain, or Mali) of 1776. At the time the Constitution was drafted, (poorly) debated, and ratified, the States were, in aggregate, over eighty percent White. That percentage rose and fell, generally increasing, and peaked around ninety percent between 1940 and 1950. The rhetoric of Thomas Jefferson notwithstanding, it was also founded as a Christian nation, and it still is, marginally and nominally.

To be American, was to be White. To be non-White, was to be not-American. I am proud, circumstances aside, of those students for recognizing the difference. And I suggest that the declining nature of education and the rising racial/ethnic tensions, both including CRT as cause and effect, are products of that difference and the shifting of the majority and minority populations.

The demographic change has been profound. In 1940, Rhode Island was 98.3% White. It was still 96.1% White in 1970 and 81.9% White in 2000. Today, it stands around 62% European heritage. The City of Providence has seen an ever steeper decline: 96.5% White in 1950, 89.5% in 1970, 64.5% in 1990, and a staggeringly-low 33.8%(!) in 2020. This is the fruit of the Great Replacement, which is not a “conspiracy theory;” rather, it is the official policy of the US government and its owners, and it has been since 1965. Today, they brag about it, smugly calling it “diffusion.” Providence has been diffused.

Bessinger’s new academic home, Classical High, has seen a shift consistent with, in fact, worse than the City’s. The school was 71.9% White in 1990 (down considerably from previous years). 2000 was the final year White students were a slight majority – at 50.4%. Last year, Whites were a mere 24.2% of the enrolled population. Hispanics are the largest group, followed by Whites. Whites are followed closely by Blacks. There is a healthy contingent of Asians, almost a percentage decade. There are also a number of “mixed” students and those of other separate races. These non-Whites, like most newcomers to any host society, have little to no interest in the history, traditions, and values of their new host country, state, and city. Being proud of who they are, they desire to continue the ways of their own peoples. Why wouldn’t they? This phenomenon has been exacerbated by CRT, but it exists independently. When minorities are smaller, when they truly are minorities, there are fewer issues because of overt or subliminal pressures to fit in. However, once a certain numerical line is crossed, certainly once the newcomers outnumber the natives, people naturally revert to their own in-group preferences. Diffusion = confusion at best.

Classical lists, among several nebulous house beliefs, that “education in a culturally, socially, and economically diverse environment enriches learning, builds community and opens the minds and hearts of people.” They certainly have achieved the diversity part in terms of race, ethnicity, and origin. They also offer student victims the choice of joining the Gender and Sexuality Alliance and the Yoga Club. Thus, they appear to have diversity in other fields, at least as to the “P” in the devil’s rainbow and regarding mind-altering demoniacs. In her story, Bessinger explains some of the fake political and gender-based ideologies inherent in CRT, while still not admitting or acknowledging the totality of the new demographic reality. No one can explain how any of it enriches, builds, or opens anything other than the doors of Babelistic discord and wickedness.

This is what Viktor Orban meant recently, in his speech not well received by the usual suspects (read the whole thing), about mixed-ancestry countries: “These countries are no longer nations: they are nothing more than a conglomeration of peoples.” He was speaking of the faltering nations of Western Europe, all of which are still many years behind the hard pace of the US. They would all do well to look to Providence as an example of what could someday be their future.

Bessinger posted a sad photograph of herself wearing a face diaper, her attempt at “complying with the school mask mandate.” The demented demand allegiance on all fronts, and it is unwise to give it to them on any. Still, she will undoubtedly try to pound some common culture and intelligence into the new jumble of identities. In partibus furibundus. It is a noble undertaking; may that she have some measure of success! 

Classical High, regardless of its transformation, still boasts better reported academic performance than the national average. US News ranks it 91st out of thousands of high schools. The 2022 proficiency scores are far better than the post-modern customary: 82% in English, 75% in math, and a (not-so-great) 42% in science. Still, per the inflationary standard, the school’s graduation rate is 97% – which, if one was “educated” in US schools, is higher than the proficiency measures suggest appropriate. 

What will Bessinger teach this fall? I gather that she, at heart, is a very good English teacher who enjoys sharing the historical relevance behind the literature. I have no doubt she is a proud American, a dedicated teacher, and a literate woman. However, in her anticipatory description of the coming school year, I caught something else rather telling:

I’ll be back in the classroom this September sharing literature about the Holocaust, American authors with universal messages to share, historical references and literature that reflects the greatness of America in all her flaws and perfection.  I’ll teach universal themes that all children can relate to, my classroom will have characters and poetry free of harmful political activism and full of accuracy.  I hope to instill critical thinking, freedom of thought, rigorous activities that promote lively discussion unprompted by curriculum materials filled with propaganda.

Most of that statement is laudably optimistic. Thinking, freedom, and rigor long ago departed the schools, though I am confident Bessinger will fight on in defiance of convention. But it was her very first example that caught my attention. In an essay devoted to American culture and education, “literature about the Holocaust” seems a little misplaced unless Meyer Levin and Elie Wiesel are considered American. Your author wonders how far back in time those historical references will stretch. (He suspects it will go no further than the mid-twentieth century, and that it will not include current statistical data). Perhaps she means the holocaust of the American Indians. Or the holocaust of the Southern Confederates. Or the holocaust of the unborn children. Or the current holocaust of the Great Replacement. Perhaps, but probably not.

Tom Ironsides was onto something when he noted the over-abundance of devotion in the schools to a religious, political, and historical episode that in no way concerned Americans. He found it in virtually all subjects – except math. Its inclusion here, as an example of a real curriculum to counter propaganda, is really an admission that another form of indoctrination already crept into academia and general society long before the advent of CRT. In fact, one might plausibly flow from or because of the other. Interesting, some might call it. Disheartening too.

Bessinger winds up her tale with the revelation that she resisted throwing in the towel and leaving the “nonsense” where it rots. It is my opinion that she should have, though I, of course, defer to her great courage and determination. Hopefully, she will accomplish a little mitigation as things move along. And they are moving. As I keep writing, no child – American or otherwise – deserves to be trapped in the US’s one-size-fits-none system. The children of each different group, like the groups themselves, will benefit from a degree of separation and realignment with reality. They all need something better and more fitting to their unique identities and cultures.

With that in mind, I find Bessinger’s parting words understandable but misplaced: “Now, I can continue to teach children the truth about this great nation and perhaps contribute to the restoration of a politically neutral zone for all children K-12.”

Political neutrality has nothing to do with the matter, because, the peripheral notions of FOX News, Ronald Reagan, and the Littlest Chickenhawk aside, the problem isn’t political. Identity > culture > politics. The proof of that little formula is born out by statistics, observable reality, and even by the very rise of CRT. The majority-minority kids already know it. It would be grand if everyone else would learn too.

The losing battle for the Amerikan shuls (Latin, scholis) begins again.

COLUMN: “The Crazies” Have Nukes … And Lies

27 Wednesday Jul 2022

Posted by in Other Columns

≈ Comments Off on COLUMN: “The Crazies” Have Nukes … And Lies

Tags

, , , , ,

“The Crazies” Have Nukes … And Lies

 

This missive was going to cover a few more of the endless lies about Russia, NATO, the SMO, and WW3, but, again, it’s all lies. It always has been. And, I’ve covered them pretty well for the past five months. Instead, the bulk of this column is about other lies.

Let me get one little anecdote out of the way. I recall being told as a child many terrible things about Russia and life in the USSR. Miserable people lived somber lives of poverty, and so forth. I was told they didn’t even have the luxury of blue jeans. As a child, I never questioned any of it. However, just for fun and not long before the SMO started, I looked into what middle-class Russian life was like back around the time I was being lied to as a child. What did I find?

I found pictures of a typical factory-working family from Moscow, circa 1979. They – mom, dad, sons, daughters-in-law, and grandkids – were on vacation at their lakeside dacha. These poor, oppressed people were at their summer home, somberly enjoying the sunshine and craft beer. The kids were happily playing with modern toys. Everyone looked healthy and they were all wearing clothing and shoes, as bell-bottomly-tacky as anything in America during the same unfashionable period. But, hey, wait! Half of them were wearing blue jeans. In fairness to my memory, they might have allegedly been denied designer American jeans. Still, again, and again, and again … we just haven’t been told much in the way of truth. 

Several years ago, I found myself in a conversation about nuclear weapons and the terrible specter of their usage. A reliable and intelligent friend expressed his concern about what would happen if “the crazies” ever obtained A or H bombs. It is, I think, a reasonable concern.

What he meant by “the crazies” was Iran and North Korea. Of course, we now have the big OOPS factor in re Pyongyang. We also have the undeniable truth that while the House of Kim has developed nukes and the systems to deliver them, they haven’t delivered them and they show no signs of doing so. For what it’s worth – probably not much – I hear they also have some first-class beer gardens they are keeping all to themselves.

That leaves Iran. 

At the outset, and just in case any neocons or churchians read this, I have a link RIGHT HERE to some pictures that illustrate the horrible, unconscionable, and dismal oppression that simply is modern Iran. Shredding, chics in lipstick, a DJ, and that dude in a Batman shirt! Can you “even”?

I didn’t bother to look up any, but I easily recall some of the recent prevaricating headlines about Persia:

“Mad Mullahs Want Bomb”

“Iran Hates Our Freedom (Fries)”

“Tehran Threatens To ‘WiPe IsRaEL oFf ThE MaP!!!!!!’”

“Iran Weeks Away From A-Bomb”

“Iran Days Away From Nukes”

“Minutes To Iranian Warheads”

“Final Seconds!!!”

“You Were Probably Vaporized Before You Finished Reading This Lie!”

It’s all lies, all the time, in the WereWestern media. Still, sometimes a little remarkable truth manages to leak out. Last week at the Aspen Security Forum, amid many interesting revelations, threats, and hints (watch your back, little Ze!), Bill Burns, as honest a CIA director as any fake administration could ever appoint, said of Iran’s nuclear ambitions: “Our best intelligence judgment is that the Iranians have not resumed the weaponization effort that they had underway up until 2004 and then suspended, so that’s something, obviously we at CIA and across the US intelligence community keep a very, very sharp focus on”. 

First, whenever I think of Billy the Spook, I always hear Homer Simpson’s voice say, “Mr. Burns.” You? Bet you will now. And second, don’t they have the Drudge Report or RT at Langley? Gekaufte Journalisten and all that? What kind of police state doesn’t even buy into its own idiotic fake headlines?!

It turns out that despite all the hysteria, Iran does not, in fact, plan to build nuclear weapons. Burns has the right time frame. In 2005, then-President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad mentioned the Fatwa issued by Ayatollah Ali Khamenei forbidding the development, possession, or use of nuclear arms as a violation of (Shia) Islamic law. 

Yes, Cleetus, I realize the Iranians must have, at some level, their own propaganda and that certain subtleties may affect the Ayatollah’s ban. I just happen to trust Tehran’s (and anyone else’s) potential subterfuge more than Washington’s.

I did a little independent digging, and it appears there is an ancient Islamic injunction against what we might call total war or war by mass destruction. While it’s not perfect, this little summary is a good start. Abu Bakr’s orders sound somewhat like Christian just war principles. That’s probably one reason most Americans and modern Christians have never heard about them. It’s kind of like the extreme similarity between the Islamic take on the current whereabouts, seating arrangement, and future plans of Jesus and those found in the Nicene Creed. 

While I was drafting, and while I was pondering the dichotomy between the foregoing and the revelations of Gitten 56-57, another, semi-ponderings-aligned headline came along: “Israel may strike Iran over atomic program.” They even admit what Burns was saying, which is what Mossad and the IDF have been saying, though they still whoop to conquer. Because, you know… Good luck with that! If there is any sort of major military strike by the USSA or Israel against Iran, then we likely won’t get the truth about how it fails.

We haven’t been told the truth. About much of anything.

We got lies about Iranian nukes.

We got lies about terrorism.

We got lies about Operation Nine-Eleven-Woods.

We got lies about Saddam’s WMDs.

We got lies about Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc.

We got lies about the Hon. Gen. Qasem Soleimani.

We got lies about Soleimani’s war crime murder by the Empire.

We got lies about Iran’s just, proportionate, and total retaliation at Al Assad, at the consular office, and later, at the Mossad FOB.

We got lies regarding the CCB (“Chinese Communist Bat”). 

We got lies about a bioweapon poorly disguised as a vaccine.

We’re already getting lies about the queer nothing that is Monkeypox.

Lie, after lie, after lie about all things Russia.

And about anything else of any importance.

Back to the crazies. The crazies already have nuclear weapons. They’ve had them for some time. And the very craziest among them, the evilest, have already used those weapons. 

The final Strike Order for the bombing of Hiroshima (with Nagaski to follow) listed Protestant and Catholic service times for the 509th Composite Group. Mass was at 22:00, on Monday, August 6, 1945. On the morning of Thursday, August 9th, someone else’s Mass was interrupted. At 11:01 AM, local time, Immaculate Conception Cathedral in Nagasaki was the largest Christian Church in the Orient. At 11:02, the building was turned into a pile of blasted, scorched rubble, and the many parishioners present were turned into ash. 

The Yankee Empire dropped an atomic bomb on a Church. Please tell us more lies about Iran, North Korea, China, and Russia. 

COLUMN: A Comprehensive Peace Plan?

20 Wednesday Jul 2022

Posted by in Other Columns

≈ Comments Off on COLUMN: A Comprehensive Peace Plan?

Tags

, , ,

A Comprehensive Peace Plan?

 

Aleksandar Vucic looks like an affable fellow. My people in Belgrade tell me (warn me?) that while the man might not be a Schwabian globohomo agent of doom, he also might not be the great nationalist hero some outsiders think or imagine. Who, really, has ever heard of a politician out for himself, first and foremost?! Not me. Anyway, at the least he’s one of the few European leaders who is observably not against the free, sovereign nations. And he’s probably the first who correctly called our new world war what it is. 

Most of my television news-watching friends, including most of my retired military friends, are convinced Russia invaded Ukraine for no other reason than Vladimir Putin’s mad desire to recreate the USSR. Or the Russian Empire. Or because he hates freedom fries. Or something. I, honestly, don’t listen closely when most of these people talk. They’re convinced that Russia is losing or is just about to lose, despite the fact their very valid, very expert sources previously claimed Russia already lost. I asked them if they listened to or read any of Putin’s remarks, and they informed me Putin died of cancer six times. I recommended some books, only to be met with mostly-vacant, nearly-apprehensive stares. In their defense, most of these poor folks wore diapers on their faces and accepted DNA-altering poison in their veins because the same very valid, very expert experts on the TeeVee suggested as much. Experience has taught me to let such matters rest.

Back in the real world, Vucic echoed a rumor about Putin’s strategy regarding NATO and NATO’s war of aggression against Russia. It’s all a rumor at this point, as neither Putin, Medvedev, Lavrov, or the MOD have said anything concrete. But the notion is that once Russia has sufficiently secured, pacified, demilitarized, and de-Nazified the Donbass – and that will be accomplished very soon – Team Putin will extend a treaty or peace plan. I suspect it will be aimed at NATO, rather than at NATO’s little puppet in Kiev. It will concern far more than Ukraine. How much more is anyone’s guess. Mine is that it will be primarily geared towards the European nations currently acting as fiefdoms of Washington. Some speculate that the SMO was just an initial phase to liberate Europe (and eventually, the entire fallen West) from itself.

Ukraine will be included, of course. The DPR, the LPR, Crimea, the land-bridge, and a little more territory are Russian and they will remain Russian. That’s not negotiable. What happens to the rest of Ukraine might be, though the negotiations will have to end on Moscow-friendly terms. Further, the sanctions, the eastward push, and thirty years of hateful neocon dreams of forcibly Balkanizing Russia into miserable slavery and exploitation must end. 

For what it’s worth, I’d also love to see a little justice for years of other wars of aggression, war crimes, pandemic hoaxes, biowarfare, and associated psyops. I assume Russia will be happy just being left alone. I suspect they would settle for a genuine reset with the Combined West, along honest terms and lines. However, if I understand things correctly, they are really, really tired of the degenerate wickedness that the people in the US, France, Germany, et al, have stupidly allowed to conquer and pervade. 

Whatever the terms are, they will almost certainly be rejected. Then, as Vucic said, “all hell will break loose.” Rumor has it, again, that whatever offer Moscow makes will likely be the final offer. If or when it is rejected, then the party starts in a global conflict. 

The offer will probably be Europe’s one chance to break away from US hegemony and rejoin the sane world. There will probably be something offered to the US, but whatever controls Brandon simply won’t be able to accept it. Things will get interesting if a few Euros do break away, hastening the inevitable demise of the EU. For the most part, I think Europe will reject any deal. Then, they will pay. They already are, of course, along with the rest of the West, but the next steps will be different. Until now, Europe’s food, fuel, energy, and general economic problems have been self-inflicted, the products of their childish, failed sanctions and poor decisions. Russia, for her part, has done almost nothing in retaliation. Look for that to change, up to and including a total break. Russia has plenty of other buyers for its copious goods, and if the idiots in Brussels and London want to starve and freeze, they will.

There’s also the possibility of more military action. Ukraine can be completely subdued. It will be, if that becomes necessary. Other regional adjustments might be in order as well. I still don’t think NATO will go to full war, largely because it can’t. Time will tell.

Then, there’s the global part of the global conflict. Look for the opening of new fronts away from Europe.  China is the odds-on favorite to kick off stage two, which might or might not involve Taiwan. There’s also Iran. The Middle East is, as usual, a bubbling hotbed. Look for unexpected developments in unexpected places. There are all the new, potential members of BRICS(+), a club that will continue to grow. There’s the great bifurcation, the Gold-Petro-Ruble, and the growth of MIR-CIPS as an alternative to (or replacement of) SWIFT.

What does any of this mean for the average American? I’m not sure, though I expect the exciting Midterms will cure absolutely everything, as elections always do! Or, more realistically, I could see anything from $15 a gallon gas to substantial nuclear devastation. I find the former far more plausible than the latter, if that helps soothe any nerves. The sad fact is that none of the outcomes are up to the average American. It turns out that surrendering your nation to hostile foreigners, hysterical women, degenerates, and devil-worshippers was not, in fact, a good idea. In the end, survivors in the potential new rump states may have the chance to join the sovereign nations as this century progresses. Again, time will tell, and we will see. Getting there, things will assuredly be a little … rough. 

If or when the offer or plan is presented, read it. Read IT, not what is said about it. Whatever happens, trust that the liars will continue to lie, obfuscate, and project. Sadly, many people will continue to believe them. Someday, if a majority of people ever turn off the plug-in drug and realize what a complete load of manure they’ve been fed, all their lives and about everything, then things might change. Then, we might really have comprehensive peace. 

COLUMN: As A Narrative Crumbles

13 Wednesday Jul 2022

Posted by in Other Columns

≈ Comments Off on COLUMN: As A Narrative Crumbles

Tags

, , ,

As A Narrative Crumbles

 

I cobbled this opening portion in after I initially loaded and scheduled the post. It’s somewhat important. But, as I’ve been repeating myself for over two years now, I’m a tad “over” it.

It appears that the slow-thinking masses are beginning to come around to the fact that the C19 “pandemic” was, as I called it in the winter of 2020, a HOAX. All of it: the weak engineered bug, all the cover-ups and distractions, and especially the death jabs. A hoax, a war, and assorted war crimes. The people, faithless and stupid as ever, couldn’t get enough of it. Now, as more of them (the survivors) realize what’s been done to them and what they have done to themselves and their children, they will be both remorseful and angry. Yes, something must be done! To that end, a few points:

It’s still not over! Stop going along with it. I never took the jab, took a test, or even wore a mask because I saw through the lies from the get-go. Wherever you’re at, just stop!

When doing that “something,” it will be critical not to allow any leadership positions for those who idiotically went along with the narrative. They’re retarded, and mentally-compromised people just don’t get anything accomplished. If they (you?) wore a mask, took the damned jab, bejabbed your kids, and/or preached that others should do the same, then they (you?) are more than a little wicked and extraordinarily stupid. It’s high time, passed time that they (you?) shut up and let intelligent people who believe in and are protected by God try to fix the mess. I know it’s hard to have sympathy for these idiots, but we should try. We’ll help them in spite of them.

Things that will not work: more of the same, laws, ordinary criminal prosecutions, lawsuits, hot air, white papers, voting, Republicucks, Demoncrats, Libertardians, etc. This is a war, with war crimes, and wars are won by fighting them. And, by “war” and “fighting,” what I mean is war and fighting.

What will work: I propose a Special Military Operation, specifically regarding the C19 war, and in general, to de-globalize and de-satanize America and the West. Got the idea from a friend. Any of the termites that escape the big tent treatment can be rounded up, prosecuted, and then burned alive. It’s a developing idea, that I’ve already become tired of, and that I may explain further.

Otherwise:

In my defense, I’ve been a little busy with other things. I’ve essentially written or rewritten three novels in the past three weeks. I’m a little tired. In your defense?

Here’s a rerun of sorts: from two years ago, July 12, 2020: UKRAINE, RUSSIA, and THE REST. It’s also a chapter towards the end of GET OUT! And, despite the fun and games of this year, I still stand by the assessment. No, obviously I do not want good young people moving into an active war zone. But that part of the war(s) will end sooner or later (probably sooner). And, as I wrote in 2020:

These are two great and proud countries. They are not without issues. Think of it as trading one form of uncertainty for another, but in two places where the people and their lands will outlast the problems they face.

It’s still true. And it’s still in harsh contrast to the USSA, where neither the people or the land may survive. The point of my book was to get worthy American kids to safety so they don’t have to suffer through the horrendous civil war we have now entered. Whatever you think about how bad things are in Ukraine, you ain’t seen nothing yet. 

Note: I’ve adjusted my assessment of Poland down a little this year, as they’ve been acting extra retarded lately. That too, will sort itself out. Time may have just about run out, but I’m still proud I wrote what I did. I hope it helped someone. Anyway…

Some extra reading:

Michael Hudson is on a roll regarding the debts that are a huge part of the decline of the US and the greater West. Read his latest remarks:

Michael Hudson: The End of Western Civilization – Why It Lacks Resilience, and What Will Take Its Place

Michael Hudson: Keynote speech at the David Graeber anthropology conference in France

That’s more than enough for today and this week. I may have an announcement in re PPN and FP on Friday or maybe next week. More soon. Happy week!

COLUMN: Fiction for Factions

05 Tuesday Jul 2022

Posted by in fiction, Other Columns

≈ Comments Off on COLUMN: Fiction for Factions

Tags

, ,

Fiction for Factions

 

*A day early! And this almost ran yesterday. 

Well, hello. Happy Independence Week to one of the least independent populations in the world! I had thought to write something else about the unfolding collapse and the coming, necessary fun. Again. For about the fifty-seventh time. What can I say? Prepare for battle? And, by that I, of course, mean prepare to vote and so forth.

Who has time for all that? Not me, not this week. Instead, I have something much better! Breathing new life into THE SUBSTITUTE, I thought to give you a glimpse of an outtake from the original 2019 cobbling. It’s the side story of how Tom bought the Dodge Demon, originally planned as either a stand-alone or as the opening of chapter three. It failed to make the cut, but it still warrants a little interest. So, here she is! Enjoy.

***

“Southbound and Down”

Charlotte, North Carolina, June 13, 2018, mid-day…

‘You don’t want to trade that Rover? We’d love to make you an offer on it, my friend! Those things sell here. Based on looking at it, we could probably do Blue Book plus.’ Another overly-friendly man wearing a tie and a wide, cheap grin had appeared at the cubicle doorway. Tom began to answer (again), ‘oh, no. I need something to tow the—’

   ‘Not a problem, my man,’ Mr. Whoever cut in; ‘I had to come ask.’ He extended his hand, the smile a little more genuine now, saying, ‘my name is David Fierce. I’m the sales manager here at Hamrick CDJR. I had to drop by and say hello. Is Ms. Francinia treating you right?’ He almost seemed like a nice guy at that point.

   ‘She’s doing a heck of a job, Mr. Fierce,’ Tom said as he, for a second, shifted into his version of cheap salesman’s mode: ‘She was just telling me about the, everything is 50% off sale, today only. I’d have never known. Really nice of you guys.’

   Fierce was a veteran of the car business, knowing a joke (and a real non-nonsense buyer) when he heard or saw one. ‘Shhh! Mr. Hamrick will fire me if he finds out.’

   Tom and Francinia laughed it off as the manager continued, ‘I just wanted you to know how much we appreciate your business, sir. Mr. Ironsides, is it?’

   ‘It is.’

   ‘Thank you, again, sir. It’s not everyday we sell a Demon. That is some car, huh?!’

   ‘I’ll think she’ll do, until I can find something fast,’ Tom joked.

   ‘Hey! Dodge’s brochure literally says the thing is too damn fast!’ Fierce said. ‘Maybe you can trade it in on an F-18!’ He turned to go but looked back in, adding, ‘and, do let us know if you consider selling the Rover.’

   ‘Will do,’ answered Tom.

   Fierce stopped again. ‘Couldn’t help but notice your hat inside the windshield. Semper fi, brother!’

   ‘Oorah!’ Tom concluded Fierce was all-right and the real deal.

   He’d left New England that Monday on his trek south. This deal was something he’d actually worked out on the phone days earlier, on his other trip back from the Yukon. As he rolled down I-81, the extremely attractive Ms. Francinia Santarosa, his personal buying assistant and product specialist, had called several times to assure him about options, make sure he as coming, and to tell him that a Mr. Kreight had approved his wire transfer payment ability, but he still recommended Chrysler financing. Tom said he’d think about that last part.

   He also had to think about getting his new muscle car down to New Augusta. In Concord, he’d rented a U-Haul car carrier. Hamrick had a padded professional transport cover rushed in after he declined their offer to specially ship the car to his new home.

   When he arrived, an older salesman had rushed out to meet him, becoming slightly dejected when he asked for Francinia by name. He had gotten a slight rush when she first appeared, twenty-eightish, long dark hair, perfect Latin skin, and almost a better build than the Demon. Powerful and fun as Dodge’s supercar was, during the test drive he’d had trouble taking his focus off of her. Now, they sat together, making small talk, and waiting on Mr. Kreight, Tom’s finance manager, to finish whatever it was he was doing. 

   ‘Do you get a commission off of financing?’ Tom was direct. ‘I want you to make money off me.’

   ‘We do. Off of the back end. The finance office. Yes,’ she answered directly.

   ‘Then, I’ll think about it. He said I could pay off the loan as soon as the paperwork came in.’

   ‘Don’t worry about me, Tom,’ she said with a smile. ‘I do alright. Top sales four months in a row.’

   I can believe that! he thought. He imagined that her looks and charm (and considerable car knowledge) made a big difference. He was more direct: ‘Do you ever date customers?’

   ‘I’m open to the idea,’ she said as she batted her eyes.

   ‘Okay. Good. I’ve got a few days. Now, I don’t usually date older women, but I might make an exception for you. [The cheap line worked before…] What time do you get off today?’

   ‘I’m at double my weekly quota already. They’ll let me leave anytime I want. Let me go change and I’ll be yours at—’

   ‘You’re perfect, right now. Already too good for this old man,’ he said.

   ‘Ha! Okay. Four work? I could drop by your hotel.’

   ‘That’ll be perfect!’ Tom thought for a second. ‘Where’s a nice hotel around here?’

   ‘Come back here at four,’ she said. ‘I’ll lead you.’

   ‘I’ll be happy to follow…’

   Mr. Kreight interrupted the match-making. ‘Ookay, Mr. Ir, uh, Ironsides. I’ve got everything set up. Here’s your license back. Oh, and I made you a paper copy of what USAA emailed me. New card. If you’ll come with me. This shouldn’t take too long.’

   Kreight was actually efficient. First he rattled off the car information from a brochure or dealer sheet:

    • 2019 Challenger SRT Demon
    • Pitch Black (Tom had wanted Maximum Steel but this color was satisfactory)
    • Leather interior
    • No backseat
    • 840 HP! (running racing fuel)
    • 203 MPH top speed

   There was the matter of titling in South Carolina versus New Hampshire. Neither state, Tom learned, had a percentage sales tax on car purchases. Because he technically had an address in Derry, and as he technically did not own a home in New Augusta, just yet, they opted for the Granite State’s paperwork. As optioned and with Tom’s cover, the price came to $95,745. To this, Tom agreed. In the end, he paid cash. Not having any debts was great for him, but not so great for his credit score (that he never cared about) nor for Chrysler financing (which he really didn’t care about). To make it up to Kreight and Francinia, and to boost any future effort to offload a collector’s item, he bought a transferable protection and service plan. Kreight insisted on working in a discount on something, which rounded down the overall cost; as such, his bank transfer was for exactly $99,999, out the door. When he approved the wire, he thought: Hey! You’re first new car, ever. A hundred grand car! Holy moly!

   Francinia met him with his new car cover and an extra-large, tall Hamrick’s Racing polo shirt, compliments of the house. After she made sure he was comfortable in the new driver’s seat, and after Mr. Fierce thanked him several more times and pleaded for a good buyer’s survey, they had a surprise for him. Fierce, without knowing more details, understood that Tom was spending the night somewhere. Tom gratefully accepted the kind offer for help trailering the race car and being allowed to store the rig overnight in an enclosed, secure bay in the back of the shop. Fierce also reminded him about the Rover. Tom made him a deal of sorts: Hamrick Auto Group also sold Chevy’s. Fierce agreed to get in touch with that sales manager and to keep an eye out for the new 2019 Corvette, rumored to have 1,000 HP – and some structural issues that stalled availability. That was a trade Tom would consider.

   Back to the Rover, and the rest of the day, Francinia thought it was a nice old truck, faint cigar smoke smell and all. He’d followed her home at four. Ms. Santarosa did very well for herself, having just purchased a new house in a fashionable neighborhood off I-85, north of town. After several hours of fun there, they went out for dinner. He never did find a nice hotel that night.

   …

***

If one was really keeping score, then Francinia was at least Tom’s number three by chapter three. He, of course, has or had his ways. If you’ve not read the novel, then wait; the revised edition, so much better, is coming soon. I’ll tell you all about it when it happens. -P

COLUMN: How Big Are the Larger U-Hauls?

29 Wednesday Jun 2022

Posted by in Other Columns

≈ Comments Off on COLUMN: How Big Are the Larger U-Hauls?

Tags

, , , ,

How Big Are the Larger U-Hauls?

 

About a year ago, I penned a column about balkanization in the US and developing events that proved somewhat popular with, among others, a group of White Nationalists in Arkansas. They, it turns out, were unsurprisingly not popular with a certain group dedicated to honoring the memory of a convicted child rapist and murderer. Maybe that’s why the Nationalist site went the way of Chateau Heartiste? And no, I’m not so sure how they, either party, react to my continuing appreciation for a certain Gadot. No worries, all the way around.

However, this past week, balkanization was back in the news, part of an official plan of the neocons or whatever controls the dark state behind Brandon’s fake government. The big difference? Well, I’ve been writing about the breakup of the US. The luciferian loons are talking about Russia, specifically about carving the Federation into five or six manageable parts. Guess who would do the managing??? Yes, they’ve been talking about it, and they keep putting the talking points in writing. Sadly, the Babel-builders have hit a terminal roadblock in the form of Vlad, the SMO, hypersonic missilery, Mir-CIPS, and the rest. NATO’s losing war on Russia is the worst thing to happen to them since Xi rejected the Great Leap. Better luck next time, globos.

It may end up being centuries hence, but odds are, there will be a “next time.” These types always have plans. And plans behind the plans. And counter-plans. Schemes. Pastor Chuck Baldwin recently wrote a smart piece on another, most improbable-sounding scheme, of moving Israel to Ukraine. Read that if you’ve never heard about the concept. I have, and like the “moral and strategic imperative” of slicing up Russia, I think the SMO has squashed it. For now. Also, read Two Hundred Years Together, by Solzhenitsyn – if one can find a copy in one’s language – for background. Yes, Baldwin is correct that deluded American Scofield Churchians wouldn’t miss a beat in supporting Neo-Khazaria in place of Apartheid Palaestina. Yes, this plan involves the skin-in-the-game Zionist Nationalists, not the USian Diasporan leapers. Yes, I’ll bet MB is glad this one isn’t a CFF submission. Yes, as-is Israel is closer than many think to becoming a failed state, and as I keep saying, Bennett, Lapid, or someone had better figure something out pretty fast. No, the plan, to the degree it really existed, won’t work now. Not unless the western part of future Ukraine, Banderastan(?), would allow it. If Poland and Romania would allow that. And wouldn’t that dynamic be interesting?

The greater concept of this column is about the movement of peoples. Movement, under mostly-peaceful circumstances, is possible, if allowed. Maybe if encouraged. Nine million Israelis were not always in Palestine. Nor would they magically reappear in the 404. Were the Russian Federation broken up, some movement of people would be necessary between, say, “Komi” and “Sakha.” Under Stalin’s reorganization system of Republics and Oblasts, partly based on ethnic divisions, and which has perhaps worked better than might have otherwise been, people had to back up and move. It works that way, migration. Sometimes it takes a while. The demographic reordering of the US has seen 80-100 million Not-Americans relocated to America in the past 50+ years. Under a similar plan, the past 20 – 30 years, millions of Africans, Arabs, and Asians have moved into Europe. Sometimes it doesn’t take a while. In just a few months this year, the SMO has seen 7 – 10 million Ukrainians move around within and without Ukraine. Anything is possible.

I thought of these possibilities when I looked at two maps last week, one by the Daily Mail and one by the Wall Street Journal. Both showed the breakdown of US states in terms of child murder legality in the wake of Dobbs. One would have to notice patterns and groupings. I’m not sure about you, but I saw potential Rump States. There are many other considerations but some starting boundaries are there for those who want to see them.

That means, or it will mean, at some point, that many people will have to pack it up and relocate—

Oh, the Midterms! I forgot. Sorry. (Maybe, this time, try some women and foreigners?) Okay, so wait until next summer when the latest electoral failures start becoming obvious, and then—

Right! Hold onto hopes for 2024! “Q” is back, so maybe Trump isn’t far behind? Trust the plan?

Eventually, all but the most ardent reality deniers will have to admit that things are broken and cannot be fixed under the old legal framework. The old political boundaries, however, might still be useful. How, exactly, will this work out? I have no idea. I’m tempted to draw up a map of future nations, but literally no one would like it at this point. And I’d honestly be drawing blind. The great news is that the US is vast and there’s plenty of physical room for everyone. Divisions are already forming without any overtly-expressed intent. How about a sovereign land for each and every people? A grand idea. For the diehard ‘Muricans, I even foresee a continued “Constitutional Republic!” Aka, Columbia! Those maps revealed a distinct area consisting of the Mid-Atlantic and the Northeast with Illinois as an outlier. I’d look for New England, or part of it, to depart sooner or later, followed by further separation. But for a little while, Boomers, CivNats, Neocons, and others would have an exceptional place to be proud of diversity, usury, illiteracy, hoaxes, and the rest of it. 

Me? I really have no idea – that I’ll share. It’s not about me. It’s about us, all of us. And I’d like to see all of us compartmentalized happily and without resort to a massive and utterly destructive civil war. That too is an option. In fact, as I see them, there are three options. One, an amicable divorce and friendly coexistence in the aftermath (I am a romantic). Two, a war the likes of which is rarely seen, something to make WWII look a little tame. And three, more same old, same old and a lackluster reversion to some kind of hunter-gatherer existence, something to ultimately make the worst parts of the current third-world look advanced. 

I’m for Number One, because we’re Number One! Remember that if a chant breaks out next week on or about the Fourth! Ex multis, multis.