• About
  • Blog (Ext.)
  • Books
  • Contact
  • Education Resources
  • News Links

PERRIN LOVETT

~ Deo Vindice

PERRIN LOVETT

Tag Archives: government

Though The Heavens Fall; Wednesday Night

01 Wednesday May 2013

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

ALex Jones, Austin Rhodes, banksters, Boston Justice, crime, freedom, government, police, Rocky, Rome

First, site news – the RC/Banksters v. Rocky/The People case has generated substantial activity here.  This is shaping up to be another biggest week ever.  Tuesday was another all-time high!  Keep it up, friends.  April was also the site’s busiest month.  I am flattered and thank you all.

My name apparently came up on the Austin Rhodes Show yesterday, I think.  I did not hear but was regaled by a few friends.  I may call in tomorrow, time permitting.  Rocky and I will likely be guests next week.  Stay tuned – here and to 580 AM.  Alllllllso: Rocky is famous!  The story has been picked up by Alex Jones!!!!! Citizen Arrested at Suspicionless Checkpoint for Not Obeying Petty Commands.  I’m calling Alex tomorrow!  Fire it up!

Fiat justitia ruat caelum!  That’s Latin for: “Let justice be done though the heavens fall!”  It’s an ancient legal maxim oft attributed to Lucius Calpurnius Piso Caesoninus, he of the late, dying Roman Republic.  Modern legal scholars seldom quote it, if they are even aware.  Most prefer “justice” at a lower cost.  We will have justice in Augusta, Georgia.  I doubt the heavens ever will fall, but the local government can.  So be it.

In addition to the Federal Justice [SIC (- sorry, guys, habit…)] Department’s investigation, I’m in talks with a prominent Constitutional  attorney and a powerful civil rights organization about how to proceed civilly against the local and international (bank) criminals.  I look forward to building a strong team to attack this problem.  I also need your help – any help.  We must have a mult-pronged approach: criminally, civilly, and public relations.

This problem is spread all across the USSA,  However, people are fighting back.  There’s a massive uproar in Dallas and in Arkansas a federal class action suit has already been filed.  I’ll be talking to the Plaintiffs’ attorneys soon.  If you, a friend, or relative have been arrested lately, you might be a member – contact me, if so.

I see two gigantic forces behind this issue.  Really, it’s just one – the devil.  He’s using two groups for his purposes.  First, there’s the government with its insatiable lust to control everything on the planet.  Second, this is yet another scheme by the Big Club, international, banking elite to suck up all wealth in advance of the looming financial collapse/dark age.  Like Aragorn (in Jackson’s telling), I bid you, stand, men of the West!  We must do justice to the evil.

Before I get to the generic news I want to briefly talk about a few lingering stories from around our fading Republic.

In California, New Hampshire, and all other States, the police are seizing innocent people’s children from their homes for nothing.  Sound like America?  Sounds more like The Hunger Games to me.

Mentally ill and disabled men and women across the country are being treated like garbage by the police and the courts.  I know.  I had such a case last fall.  Soon, I will publish an account with Paul Craig Roberts’s outfit and, of course, here.  America?

In Boston, thousands of citizens “sheltered in place” like sheep in the pen, while an army of stormtroopers stomped all over the Constitution in and out of the pen … homes.  Boston strong?  More like, Kapo weak.

Imperial_stormtroopers_-_Dragon_Con_2008_-_Parade_123

(Protecting the children or something.  Google.)

The news:

Three more arrests in the Boston bombing/false flag operation.  I watched six seconds of CNN (Fox?) today and heard the reporter remark: “Unbelievable!”  I agree, I belive none of it.  Again, enough with the kitchen pot and the fireworks!  With all those cameras running 24/7, where are the images or video of the provocateurs PLANTING or DETONATING the bombs!  They found DNA?  Where?  Whose?  Did Urban Moving Systems do the marathon setup?  Any evidence out there????

Satan is recalling Uncle Ben to Hell.  Until his resignation takes effect, the money will fly at full speed.  Sit on those jail debit cards, please.  The crooks need the fees.

In their zeal to hold children and families at gun-point the Boston police skipped the street where the surviving “suspect” was yachting.  Feel safer?  Boston stronger?

It’s May Day!  Happy May Day!!!  Much more to come!

Guarding Liberty?

20 Saturday Apr 2013

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

America, CIA, Constitution, FBI, God, government, Liberty, Miranda, New York Times, Patrick Henry, rednecks, republic, Sixth Amendment, terror, The People, Tsarnaev

225 years ago, Patrick Henry remarked in a speech: “Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined.”

We are hurdling toward our inevitable ruin.  The New York Times reports today that the Obama Administration is delaying both reading Dzhokhar A. Tsarnaev his Miranda warnings and granting him an attorney, despite being questioned by the FBI.  I suspect most Americans could care less or, more likely, are happy about the situation.  Today at the gym and beyond I was treated to comments like, “They shoulda killed that thar tarrisss when they found heeem!” 

I understand passions run high in this case but, folks, we still live in a Constitutional Republic (if in name only).  I have sworn an oath to God Almighty to support and defend the Constitution and the rights of the People, even those (especially those) accused of committing crimes.

In 1966 the Supreme Court ruled that criminal suspects must be read a short summary of their rights – you know these from TV cop shows – before being questioned.  The right to an attorney is set forth in the Sixth Amendment.  “Public safety” exceptions to the speed at which these rights are exercised have unwisely dripped out of the courts over the years.  In theory, the government can question Tsarnaev immediately concerning imminent threats.  However, once they began asking broader questions, the law should apply.  Concerning terrorism cases, the Justice [SIC] Department has advised the FBI to go as broad as possible from the start.  The courts have, by and large, stood by silently.  If his prosecution goes forward as a criminal case, without application of the law, any conviction or plea could be reversed.

Of course, he may be deemed an enemy combatant and hauled off to Gitmo or some CIA torture facility abroad.  Remember, our Dear Leader has declare himself capable of simply killing Americans at will, with or without evidence.  Perhaps that will be Tsarnaev’s fate.

Whatever happens, it is clear the jewel of our Liberty has been approached.  I suspect the government and its motives here.  The only force I can exert is here, via my writings.  This may enrage the “America.  F**k yeah!” rednecks.  I do not care.  Will you join me or give in to ruin?

Waco: A Harbinger, 20 Years Later

19 Friday Apr 2013

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns

≈ 6 Comments

Tags

1993, AR-15, army, ATF, Bill Clinton, children, church, citizens, Congress, Constitution, CS gas, David Koresh, due process, FBI, felony, FLIR, Fort Hood, freedom, George Roden, government, grenades, guns, JAG, Janet Reno, John Danforth, law, lies, media, methamphetamines, military, murder, Posse Comitatus, Seventh Day Adventists, sheriff, snipers, tanks, Texas, thugs, UPS, Waco, War, warrant

Today marks the 20th anniversary of the fiery end of the federal government’s siege on the Branch Davidian Seventh Day Adventist Church in Waco, Texas.  April 19, 1993 was the end of a month and a half ordeal probably unlawfully initiated against a peaceful, if weird, group of Christians by the tyrannical Imperial federal government.  In addition to being a serious injustice in and of itself, it also stands as a critical warning to all of us free citizens currently enduring the 21st Century.

ruby21

(Separation of Church and State?  Google Images.)

I recall the media’s treatment of the story during the winter and spring of 1993.  Essentially, they reported the feds’ words verbatim and, in keeping with modern journalistic tact, did so with no critical analysis whatsoever.  The Clinton administration and their lamestream puppets said that David Koresh was a deranged and dangerous man who had brainwashed a large group of followers Jim Jones style and who had engaged in several serious criminal offenses.  All of this was based on lies.  Seventhy-six innocent civilians and four stormtroopers lost their lives because of these lies.  Numerous others, on both sides, were scarred, physically and mentally, as a result of the battle.

Twenty years later, there has never been an honest official review of the crimes committed by the government between February 28th and April 19th that fateful year.  Laws have been rendered obsolete, innocents have been imprisoned, criminals have been promoted and lionized, and the truth might have just as well burned in the terrible conflagration.

The Branch Davidians separated from the mainline Seventh Day Adventist Church in 1955.  Essentially, they believed they were living in the “end times” and ordered their lives accordingly.  There developed a power struggle within the group between David Koresh and George Roden.  During the 1980’s there was a violent confrontation between the factions which resulted in several prosecutions; there were no convictions and the matter faded away.  Following his conviction for a 1989 axe murder, Roden was imprisoned in a mental facility.  Koresh took command of the church.

Koresh believed himself the final prophet of the church and the man who would guide the group through the end of days, the rapture, or whatever.  His methods were odd to say the least.  His followers moved into his compound in Waco where Koresh lead a polygamist prophetly existence.  I have never understood why people ever allow themselves to come under the sway of such men.  At any rate, Koresh and his followers were largely isolated from the rest of the world, engaged in their final preparations. 

koresh_David_320x240

(David Koresh, born Vernon Wayne Howell.  Google.)

Those preparations, in part, lead to the government’s investigation and subsequent charges.  The charges were as follows: manufacture and possession of illegal weapons (machine guns), the manufacture of methamphetamines, and child abuse and statutory rape of young girls.  I seem to recall tax evasion charges as well but cannot locate definitive documentation.  The IRS can always bring tax charges or administrative actions against anyone due to the impossible nature of the tax code.

There was no evidence to support the meth charges.  Roden had allegedly run a meth lab at the church during the 80s.  However, the operation had ceased years before Koresh took over the group.  Not approving a drugs, Koresh dutifully turned over to local authorities the remains of lab.  That was the extent of the evidence – none.  Some FBI and ATF agents acknowledged the lack of evidence on these counts. 

The allegations of child abuse, etc. came from Koresh’s critics, both before and after the 1993 ordeal.  Such crimes, even when real, are not federal matters.  They are within the jurisdiction of the state.  Nevertheless, the accusations were included against Koresh and Co. in order to make them look as bad as possible to the grand jury and judge.  The government never lets the truth interfere with a case. 

Reports indicate that Texas child-protective authorities had previously visited the church and talked extensively with Koresh.  No charges resulted.  Koresh was also on relatively friendly speaking terms with the local Sheriff, who later expressed concern over federal actions. 

As for the “machine guns,” the charges stemmed from a report by a UPS delivery driver of weapons components being shipped to the group in Waco.  The driver relayed his information to the Sheriff’s Office.  A deputy then informed the BATF (BATFE or ATF).  Another Koresh detractor and former member provided hearsay of the illegal conversion of AR-15 rifles into automatic M-16s.  The Davidians ran a legitimate weapons business, the Mag Bag, in order to raise funds for their operation.  None of their wares and weapons were illegally obtained.  However, the ATF (again not concerned with the truth) mislead a federal judge by speculating that the mere existence of the legal weapons might suggest a crime. 

The ATF also informed the judge that a neighbor had previously reported the sound of automatic gun fire emanating from the church.  They failed to leave out the fact that, as with the child abuse charges, this sound was also reported to the Sheriff, who had investigated the matter and concluded there was no criminal activity. 

You may recall that during the siege and its aftermath, the media parrotted reports of a certain number of machine guns at the church.  The number continued to decline oddly as time passed until it reached th true number – zero.

As part of their speculative fishing trip the ATF set up surveillance from a nearby house and sent an unconvincing infiltrator to join the group.  Koresh became aware of both but said nothing.  Once their lies were neatly typed out, the ATF obtained search and arrest warrants and prepared to descend on the church on February 28, 1993.

A reported was tipped off about the impending raid and asked for directions to the church from a postman, who happened to be Koresh’s brother-in-law.  Thus was Koresh tipped off.  He then dismissed the ATF’s informant from the group.  The informant reported that, when he departed the church, the members were praying.

Having come to belive their own lies, the ATF geared for battle against the church members.  They illegally assembled at Fort Hood, a nearby Army installation (remember the Posse Comitatus Act, anyone?).  They were well armed and well armoured though their other preparations were unbelievably incompetent.  Rather than arriving in marked vehicles so as to identify themselves as lawmen, the agents rode up in cattle trailers pulled by several pick-up trucks (private models belonging to various agents).  They also neglected to carry communications equipment.  The first reports of a gun fight at the church came from the church itself; the members called 911 to report they were being attacked by a gang of heavily armed thugs.

Those thugs, once they disembarked their trailers, immediately opened fire on the church – in order to kill and silence the canine residents.  Normally, approaching officers identify themselves as such and attempt to serve their warrants peacefully.

Thus, with no indication of the agent’s legal intentions (if any), the Davidians responded as Americans typically do to violent intruders.  They shot back.  A lethal gun battle raged from around 45 minutes.  The local Sheriff, who said he was not apprised of the raid and knew nothing of it until the Davidians called for help, was unable to communicate with the ATF (dead radios don’t receive calls).  The Sheriff’s Office eventually negotiated a cease-fire.  Five Davidains and four agents were dead.  At this point, Koresh’s and his followers’ fates were sealed.  The government does not tolerate the killing of their own, even in cases of self-defense.

21320458_BG1

(“No-Knock” warrant entry.  Fox 4 Dallas.)

Following the ceasefire, one of the most infamous sieges in American history commenced.  The government dispensed with all vestiges of common sense and gradually increased tensions at the church.  Eventually, all the communications and utilities of the Davidians were cut off.  This left the members without running water and electricity.  The government apparently had lost interest in those abused children.

The FBI took over the operation.  Some within the agency favored negotiating a peaceful end to the ordeal.  Others, who views won out in the end, favored aggressive military action.  Koresh allowed eleven of his followers to depart – they were immediately arrested and some were prosecuted.  At least they survived.  As April passed the government prepared to end the confrontation violently.  As part of their campaign, the FBI mobilized military assets including, helicopters, light armoured vehicles, main battle tanks, and tactical advice from the military.

You may recall from my column, Posse Comitatus, that using the force of the military in domestic law enforcement is a felony.  Remember, no-one has ever been prosecuted under the Act.  However, some within the government remained honest and faithful to the law.  Before rendering illegal assistance to the FBI, the Army attempted to procedurally clear the matter internally.  The case was given to a JAG Attorney for analysis, particularly as to the FBI’s request for assistance.  The JAG Officer promptly reported the scheme was a Posse Comitatus violation.  He was told to stick his opinion in his ear.

The FBI, now armed for battle in an actual war, began to harass the Davidians intensely.  In addition to cutting off their utilities and treating those afore-mentioned children to high-decibel AC/DC music around the clock, the government constantly circled the church with their tanks.  They flattened everything outside, including the Davidians automobiles.  They also intentionally ran over grave sites repeatedly (a crime).

waco_texas_tanks_compound_fire

(We don’t need no stinking Posse Comitatus!  Google.)

At last, on April 19th, the government made its move.  President Clinton still desired a peaceful, negotiated end but was convinced by his chief-Nazi, Attorney General Janet Reno, to use violent force.  Reno’s justification for the use of overwhelming force varied and changed as time passed and the number of machine guns declined. 

The FBI used their tanks to smash holes through the walls of the church.  Into these they pumped CS gas, which as a chemistry major like Reno (“consulted” by the military) should have known, is delivered via a highly flammable powder.  The FBI also launched numerous flash-bang grenades into the building.  As normally happens when extreme heat and sparks are applied to a flammable substance, a fire erupted.  Of course, the government blamed the fire on the Davidians – why stop the lies, at this point.  You will surely recall the fire, it is engrained in my memory forever.  See the picture above.

They government continued to ram the building with tanks.  They drove one into the building at a point where they knew the children were likely gathered.  I have seen video of a Davidian crushed and shredded beneath the tracks of one of the 70-ton vehicles. 

The fire killed the Davidians.  Some attempted to escape only to be shot to death by FBI (or military) snipers.  I watched a video of a subsequent Congressional investigation of the event.  The Congressmen watched a video of the assault unfold that was filmed used FLIR (forward-looking infrared).  An expert identified various flashes as muzzle blasts directed toward fleeing, unarmed Davidians.  A member, indignant that anyone would question or accuse the government of murder, demanded to know what the expert’s expertise with FLIR.  The expert’s assertion he had invented the technology was insufficient for the panel.

All ensuing investigations, including that of Former Senator and Special Counsel John Danforth, exonerated the government.  We call this a whitewashing.  Following a criminal trial, eight Davidains were convicted of firearms charges.  Four were acquitted outright and all were cleared of murder charges.  Following numerous appeals the Davidans received much lighter sentences and all were freed from custody by 2007.  No criminal investigation or prosecution of the federal agents was ever conducted.  In another whitewashing, the survivors and the families of the deceased lost a civil lawsuit in the case of Andrade v. Chojnacki, 338 F.3d 448 (5th Cir. 2003).

This story is one of massive and complete injustice.  It should also serve as a dire warning to all Americans of the government’s boundless power and ability to get away with any crime, no matter the circumstances.  Remember Waco whenever you see or hear accusations from the government.  Remember who really abused children.  Remember who lied to initiate and to justify their actions.  Remember and do all you ever can to combat injustice.  We owe that much, at least, to our deceased citizens and to the Natural order of the law.

Friday Madness

19 Friday Apr 2013

Posted by perrinlovett in News and Notes

≈ Comments Off on Friday Madness

Tags

abortion, bomb, Boston, Chechnya, choice, Gosnell, government, Islam, murder, terror, Waco

The Waco story is coming a little later; hang on.  The Boston terror story is on every media outlet at present.

On April 6, 2013 I wrote the following: “A forty-story skyscraper in Chechnya completely burned on all floors last week without collapsing neatly into its own footprint at free fall speed. The entire Chechnyan people have been declared terrorists.”  I am not a prophet, just really really good.

I doubt the stories are related.  However, I still smell something funny.  Read this historical record: Why Government Should Be The First Suspect In Any Terror Attack. 

Anyway, the man below is on the run, possibly held up and surrounded at present.

dt-294x300

(Dzhokhar A. Tsarnaev.)

It is possible Dzhokhar and his dead brother planted the bombs and acted alone.  Let justice be served.  It’s also possible, despite the government lover’s mad assertions, the two were fall guys for some larger plot.  Let justice be served.

Tamerlan Tsarnaev is dead.  I wonder if he will be buried at sea within 24 hours with no photographs… Just thinking.

I also wonder when Barney Fwank, Salon, Little Barry, and Co. will apologize to the right-wing extremists among us.  Don’t hold your breath.

Another story, not being covered by the lamestream media, is the murder prosecution of Dr. Kermit Gosnell in Philadelphia.  Gosnell is charged with seven counts for first degree murder for killing seven babies who survived his first attempts to murder …. abort them.  The babies were killed by having their necks snipped with scissors or by having their brains sucked out with a vacuum.  The seven (and many many more apparently) were born and alive (by liberal standards even) when they were killed.  Their bodies were ignobly placed in toilets, trash bags, and freezers.  The major media has all but censored the trial due to their allegiance with the satanic pro-murder crowd.  Is this what you people mean by “choice?”???  I hate to say it but I would enjoy beating Kermit to dead with my fists – slowly.

What a world we have here.

Boston Cover Up?

18 Thursday Apr 2013

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ 4 Comments

Tags

ALex Jones, Big Club, bomb, Boston, communication, government, Illuminati, infowars.com, terror

Alex Jones requested this video be disseminated to as many people as possible.  Ergo, I bring it to you.  I hate that he is right so often about such terrible things.  Watch the following relatively short video and pay attention to the pictures shown therein: Proof Boston Marathon Bombing is False Flag Cover-Up.  Then read the following: http://www.infowars.com/breaking-police-confirm-infowars-photos-of-boston-suspects/.

Are these men the bombers?  Is there a suspect?  No suspect?  Can’t find their scapegoat?

180413photo

180413photo1

180413photo2

180413photo4a

All photos are courtesy of Alex Jones and Infowars.com.  Thanks, Alex.  Keep up the heat!

My sources in MA tell me cellphone service was disrupted for hours following the bombings, allegedly due to proactive interruption by the service providers.  This means they shut down the system.  It did not crash under the strain of too many calls.  Why?  Why block communication at a time when people really need to get messages to each other?  Did the companies do this on their own? Or, did someone do it for them?

If this is the work of real, independent terrorists, wouldn’t all this foolish interference make their work so much easier? 

This is your government (and its Big Club masters) at work.  Remember this next election when the Dems and Rupes come a callin.

Wednesday Night News: Guns, Bombs, and Communism

17 Wednesday Apr 2013

Posted by perrinlovett in News and Notes

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

America, Augusta, bombing, Boston, common sense, communists, false flag, freedom, globalists, government, guns, laws, press, stupid, The People

Details about Monday’s horrific bombing in Boston and the resulting investigation continue to trickle out.  I’m still not jumping to conclusions or putting stock in the evolving stories, not yet.  When the government has an official line, then I will attack it.  I do not trust anything the government says.  You shouldn’t either.  Don’t trust the press (American press) either.

Some of the trashier domestic presstitutes at Salon actually ran a story called Let’s Hope The Boston Marathon Bomber Is A White American.  That would fit a certain agenda.  CBS Boston and the AP report a suspect has been identified via surveillance footage from Lord and Taylor.  Salon may get its wish: the “suspect” reportedly is a white male (although he wore a hoodie and a backwards ball cap).  Apparently he used a cell phone, which may trap him (unless he just used it as a face-hiding prop).  The FBI is searching records to see who made calls from the scene. This may give the suspect a name and address.

cleanup

(Army and CIA personnel hurriedly attempt to scour all evidence of military-grade high explosives and nano-thermites from the bomb scene as such materials would cast doubt upon a “home-grown” local yokel theory.  UK Daily Mail.)

Alas for Salon, CNN has reported the suspect may be a dark-skinned male.  This would upset some people but it would also fit another agenda. 

I don’t have an agenda but I do have theories.  One is that this sad affair was a false flag operation initiated by criminal elements within the government, the military-industrial complex, and the international banksters (sorry for that redundancy).  The suspect could be white, black, brown, yellow, green, or purple and the elite would have an excuse to usurp something somewhere.  The reasons why are too numerous to list, but might include: new wars, freedom quashing, gun grabbing, gold grabbing, diversion from the economic collapse, some satanic ritual.  Who really knows.

Another theory I have is that maybe the bomber(s) was a disgruntled or psychotic veteran of Washington’s wars who, with or without official assistance, decided to bring a little IED action home to the masses.  Despite all the “support the troops” hype our veterans are treated like third-class trash at home as they grapple with physical, mental, emotional, and financial hardships.  Suicide is a leading (if not number one) killer of such men and more than a few have acted out their ingrained violent tendencies against other Americans at home (i.e. the Texas(?) gun range killing [soldier on soldier]).  I’ve dealt with this firsthand in my legal practice.  I’ve also seen how that certain criminal element among the globalists (redundant again, sorry) loves to capitalize on this sort of thing.

Time will tell.  Look for no justice.

Look for no sanity either – apparently a pack of good old American looters descended on the scene of the bombing to make off with whatever they could – perhaps even as others lay bleeding and limbless nearby.  Pathetic…

Along the lines of grabbing guns and freedom from the People, President Sotoro is madder than a hornet over the Senate’s rejection (for now) of new firearm background checks.  Politico called this Barry’s biggest loss.  I guess his birth certificate loss doesn’t count.  The great community activist even called Second Amendment civil rights activists “liars” – this from the foreign exchange President.  Even more pathetic.

The Senate voted 54-46 against the illegal measure (for now).  I am happy to report that, due to that letter I sent last week, both of Georgia’s Senators voted against the bill and for the People.  Good on ya, men!  Letters work sometimes. 

By the way, Senator John McInsane of Arizona, the former darling of so many “conservatives” and other idiots, voted for the measure.  Go figure.  That boy picked up a local bug at the Hanoi Hilton.  It’s time for him to retire and rid us of his dastardly ways.

Another moron that needs to just go away is “The Jerk” Bloomberg in NYC.  His excellence snorted, “Today’s vote is a damning indictment of the stranglehold that special interests have on Washington.”  No, Jerk, it’s an amazing affirmance of the Constitution in Washington.  Go suck a 32 oz. slurpee.

Admonishing her terrified cohorts, a hysterical Dianne Feinstink shrieked, “Show some guts!”  I hope she’s not referring to her’s literally.  Holly Sonders’s midriff we can handle, Feinstink’s … puke…give me a second here…..

“Shotgun” Joe wiped tears from his eyes when he learned the news.  It seems he at first thought the Senate had voted down his crazy plan to answer the doorbell with indiscriminate shotgun blasts…

Meanwhile, in America, despite all the hype, the propaganda, and the psychotropic false flags, the People are waking up.  According to an early April Gallop poll, only 4% of those asked said gun control was even an issue.  And, they thought the question refered to government guns only. 

Are we finally seeing a little common sense in the USA???  Hell, just to feel good, I’ll say “YES!”  Let’s keep the guns, kill the bombers (all of them, even the rich and powerful), and drive the state-worshipping commies into the sea!

God Bless America!

PS:  Augusta.  Disgusta.  Necropolis.  I know the Masters is over for another year and you’re all ready to get back to crapulence as usual.  For God’s sake though – learn to drive those f*****g SUVs, dualys, and tuna boats a little better.  If you’re too old, too crippled, too stupid, or too intextuated, maybe you shouldn’t be behind the wheel at all.  At least clear a little room for the dude in the big green tank.  He wants to make it wherever he’s going in one piece.  Thank you…

 thumbs_stupid-accidents2

(Seriously…tired of this s**t.  Google.)

Another Case Study For High Capacity Magazines

14 Sunday Apr 2013

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ Comments Off on Another Case Study For High Capacity Magazines

Tags

ABC, Am-Way, AR-15, Biden, Bloomberg, crime, Feinstein, felons, Gestapo, government, high capacity, murder, North Carolina, Obama, Sandy Hook

ABC News 11 out of Raleigh, North Carolina reports today there are two less Democrat voters over in Wilmington.  See the story: http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=9062720.  This news has far greater implications.

It seems some normal, ordinary man was at home when four “gentlemen” who, by the way, would look an awful lot like Obama’s sons, came calling.  The visitors were not selling Am-Way.  Rather, they intended to rape, rob, kill, or otherwise victimize the residents of the home.  Unfortunately, for them, the homeowner obviously had not heard the news about the Sandy Hook shootings, nor had he turned in his firearms to the local Gestapo. 

As I said, FOUR thugs went into the man’s house.  But, only TWO of them came out!  That’s right, this guy joined about 6,500 other Americans who used guns to defend themselves that day.  Sadly, two thugs got away.  Here are their pictures, which look a lot like pre-existing mug shots to me:

thugs

(Funny how violent felons aways have mug shots handy.  ABC, 11, NC.)

If you see the two survivors, call the cops, or better yet, send them off to burn with their friends.  Seriously, I hope they are brought to justice and maybe, just maybe, they can learn a terrible lesson here and possibly walk away better men someday.  They face a long list of charges.  In Georgia, they would also face murder charges – for their dead homies.  In GA, a criminal conspirator faces murder charges if one or more of his co-conspirators dies during the commission of the underlying felony.  Maybe NC has a similar law.

The homeowner here is to be commended for helping clean up the streets of his town.  He is also likely in need of counseling.  No-one wants to kill other people, no matter how despicable they might be.  Still, in the end, this man acted like a true American.  He’s a hero.

You know what?  I bet he fired more than two bullets in order to drive off the invaders.  There are more than a few un-American types slithering around places like Washington, D.C. who are hell-bent on making sure the People are restricted to lower-capacity firearms.  Then, they will take away all your firearms.  After that, they may take your homes and possessions to “redistribute” to thugs such as those pictured above.  I hate these people.  I hold them far more accountable for the decline of our nation than the low street savages whom they defend.  The cretins just want a thrill or some free stuff.  The gun-grabbers have an agenda.

One of their tired and moronic battle cries is that “nobody needs an AR-15 to hunt…”  They hate the AR and all similar weapons (unless carried by their shock troops).  They hate the idea that any “common” citizen can field a gun with a 30-round (or greater) ammunition capacity.  Stories like the one out of NC demonstrate, conclusively, the need for high-capacity weapons (I say automatic weapons too).  Last year, right across the river from where I live, the exact same scenario unfolded.  A shopkeeper, who lived at his business, confronted four felons who crashed a van through his wall.  He had an AR-15 pre-loaded with a 30-round magazine.  The felons fared poorly but the citizen almost ran out of bullets – even with the dread weapon he carried.

One of the commentors on the above news story (I love reading those comments) noted that you do need high-capacity rifles for hunting.  “Some animals come in packs.”  This is true of hogs, coyotes, and criminals.  It’s even truer about the ultimate and most dangerous creatures stalking the American people – government thugs.  As I write, a pack of these demons seek to disarm the free People, a crime more notorious than any home invasion.

I hope the likes of Barry Sotoro, Joe “Shotgun” Biden, Dianne Feinstink, and The Jerk choke on their satanic initiatives.  At the very least, they can take a few high-capacity magazines and shove them.

Keep calm, and shoot on!

Natural Origins of Self-Defense

21 Thursday Mar 2013

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

10 Commandments, 11th Commandment, aggressor, American, Aristotle, banksters, Bible, Catechism, Catholic Church, Cato, Christ, Christians, Chuck Baldwin, Cicero, civil government, Codex Justinianus, Confucius, Constitution, criminal, David Kopel, Declaration of Human Rights, Declaration of Independence, duty, Eastern, Exodus, God, government, Hitler, Hobbes, Jesus, John, John Locke, justice, King George III, law, leviathan, Liberty, man, Matthew, Michael Grant, money-lenders, murder, Natural Law, Nicomachean Ethics, NRA, On Duties, oppression, Paul, Peter, Plato, political science, political theory, Pope John Paul II, Proverbs, religion, rights, Roman Empire, Roman Law, Roman Republic, Romans, Saint Thomas Aquinas, Second Amendment, self-defense, society, Summa Theologica, sword, The People, The Republic, Timothy, tyranny, U.N., victim, vigilante, weapons, Western

This is the first in a new series, an expansion of my both my Natural Law column and Second Amendment and related columns.  Here, I briefly examine the ancient and eternal theories behind the basic rights which gave rise to the doctrine enshrined in the Second Amendment.

Legal practitioners and law and political science scholars, along with the general public, many politicians, and the media, often make the common mistake of looking only to the text of the Constitution (State or federal) or recent court cases in order to gain perspective into the meaning and/or application of the Second Amendment (and related State protections).  While government protection of our rights is vital (the only reason for government), rights do not come from government.

My examination here is theoretic in nature and, thus, seeks out existential sources which provide both definition and supporting argumentative and empirical evidence which are fixed throughout history and across all geographic areas.  Of course, as my ultimate view is towards the American experience, I will pay closer attention to sources from Western civilization.

The Bible is replete with approval of self-defense.  “If anyone does not provide for his relatives, and especially for members of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.”  1 Timothy 5:8.  This would seem to encompass the responsibility to keep one’s family safe to the extent possible.  “If a thief is found breaking in and is struck so that he dies, there shall be no bloodguilt for him, but if the sun has risen on him, there shall be bloodguilt for him. He shall surely pay. If he has nothing, then he shall be sold for his theft.”  Exodus 22:2-3.  This provision is the basis for the common-law doctrine against burglary, originally extended to night-time attacks.  The matter of daylight adds an interesting perspective.  Again, this passage addresses a thief, not a would-be murderer of rapist.  It is divine commentary on the value of human life over mere possessions when an opportunity exists to examine the intent of a criminal.  While it is not a prohibition against using force to deter a thief, the provision indicates the Lord’s wish that force not exceed the attendant circumstantial need.

Paul continues this theme of limited aggression in Romans 12:19: “Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave it to the wrath of God, for it is written, ‘Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord.'”  Again, God does not seem opposed to immediate use of force to deter violence but, once danger has passed, he commands that we leave judgment to him.  This is backed by the Old Testament: “Do not say, ‘I will repay evil’; wait for the Lord, and he will deliver you.”  Proverbs 20:22.  Again, for Christians, after the fact of a crime, the matter is God’s to handle.  This is the basis for a general prohibition against vigilante justice.

In Romans 13, often mis-cited as a justification for any and all government action being divine, Paul extolls the virtues of political agencies instituted in God’s Name.  When such an entity exists, then it has God’s authority to pursue prosecution of criminal matters.  I refuse to accept that this concept applies to all governments – I doubt God approved of Hitler’s action, for instance.  Rev. Chuck Baldwin, http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/home/, has extensively commented on this subject – http://www.romans13truth.com/.

Jesus Christ, himself, tacitly endorsed armed defense: “And let the one who has no sword sell his cloak and buy one.”  Luke 22:36.  I say “tacitly” because of the caveats Jesus placed on the use of force, essentially limiting it to only urgent circumstances.  Christ urged us to “turn the other cheek” when possible.  Matthew 5:39.  He also admonished Peter to sheath his sword while repairing the injure Peter had inflicted with his sword.  John 18:11.  Jesus, while defending the 10 Commandments, issued an 11th: “love one another.”  John 13:34.  The Son’s words places strict constraints on the Father’s allowance of the use of force.  It does not foreclose the concept.

JESUS-620_1587358a

(The ultimate Defender.  Google.)

Jesus only once resorted to the use of force, personally.  When He discovered the money-changers (the banksters of their time) abusing the Holiness of the Temple, Jesus violently drove them away.  John 2:15.  This underscores the possibility of defense as an immediate solution, without resort to formal authority or the eventual actions of the Lord.  The Church has formally detailed both the right to such defense as well as the moral duty of such action in need.  “Legitimate defense can be not only a right but a grave duty for one who is responsible for the lives of others. The defense of the common good requires that an unjust aggressor be rendered unable to cause harm.”  Catechism of the Catholic Church (“CCC”): 2265 (emphasis added)(see also CCC: 1909).

The Church also commands dignity be afforded to the human body, generally: “This dignity entails the demand that he should treat with respect his own body, but also the body of every other person, especially the suffering”  CCC: 1004.  While this backs the general prohibition against unlawfully harming others, it also reminds the Believer to respect even his enemy and attempt to limit his forcible response to criminal activity as far as possible to minimize harm.

“… [I]n the case of legitimate defence, in which the right to protect one’s own life and the duty not to harm someone else’s life are difficult to reconcile in practice. Certainly, the intrinsic value of life and the duty to love oneself no less than others are the basis of a true right to self-defence. The demanding commandment of love of neighbour, set forth in the Old Testament and confirmed by Jesus, itself presupposes love of oneself as the basis of comparison: ‘You shall love your neighbour as yourself’ (Mk 12:31). Consequently, no one can renounce the right to self-defence out of lack of love for life or for self.”  Pope John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Evangeliun Vitae (The Gospel of Life), 1995.

The eminent scholar, David Kopel, has documented the general agreement among Eastern Religions along these ideas.  In his review of Confucianism, Taoism, Hinduism, Sikhism, Jainism, and Buddhism, Kopel explodes common myths that these religions do not allow for proper use of self-defense.  David B. Kopel. “Self-Defense in Asian Religions” Liberty Law Review 2 (2007): 79, 80-81 (http://works.bepress.com/david_kopel/20).

Kopel’s expose is excellent.  He also touches on the Eastern version of Baldwin’s critique of Romans 13: “Although Confucianism, like most other religions, has been used by tyrants to claim that revolution is immoral, Confucius himself ordered a revolution against an oppressive regime.”  Id, at 163.  Only the “religion” of the State would decree that the government is above the Natural Law.

Commenting on Exudus 2, above, Saint Thomas Aquinas said, “it is much more lawful to defend one’s life than one’s house. Therefore neither is a man guilty of murder if he kills another in defense of his own life.”  Aquinas, Summa Theologica.

“If a man, in self-defense, uses more than necessary violence, it will be unlawful: whereas if he repel force with moderation his defense will be lawful, because according to the jurists, ‘it is lawful to repel force by force, provided one does not exceed the limits of a blameless defense.’ Nor is it necessary for salvation that a man omit the act of moderate self-defense in order to avoid killing the other man, since one is bound to take more care of one’s life than of another’s.”  Id.

Plato noted that when one acts in true self-defense, taken as a natural right, one may actually do the criminal perpetrator (in addition to the victim and society) a service: if the criminal survives, he may reflect on his wrongdoing positively.  Plato, The Republic, The Problem of Justice.  Plato’s great student, Aristotle, agreed.  Aristotle noted that a true case of self-defense is not necessarily a voluntary action.  Thus, any suffering from the act of defense may be attributed to the aggressor and not the defender.  Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics.

The possession of weapons and their defensive usage, though regulated, was allowed in both the Roman Republic and the Empire. “We grant to all persons the unrestricted power to defend themselves, so that it is proper to subject anyone, whether a private person or a solider … to immediate punishment in accordance with the authority granted to all [up to, and including, death, if warranted].”  Codex Justinianus 3.27.1.  The Romans regarded the right to use weaponry in defense as implicit to the right itself.

The mighty Cicero opined: “There exists a law, not written down anywhere, but inborn in our hearts; a law which comes to us not by training or custom or reading but by derivation and absorption and adoption from nature itself; a law which has come to us not from theory but from practice, not by instruction but by natural intuition. I refer to the law which lays it down that, if our lives are endangered by plots or violence or armed robbers or enemies, any and every method of protecting ourselves is morally right.” Cicero, “In Defence of Titus Annus Milo,” Selected Speeches of Cicero, Michael Grant translation, 1969.  Again, the esteemed David Kopel gives excellent analysis to this ancient Natural Law position in The Sword and the Tome, America’s 1st Freedom, NRA, 2009.

Cicero’s titanic predecessor, the black-robed Cato, made an interesting analogy along the lines of Jesus’s act of retribution noted above (as noted by Cicero himself): Cato was asked by an ambitious Roman, “What is the most profitable about property?”  Cato answered, “To raise cattle with great success.”   The young man then asked, “What is the second most profitable?”  Cato answered, “Raising cattle with moderate success.”  The inquirer pressed again, “The third most profitable?”  “Raising cattle with little success.”  Finally, the young man cut to his presupposed profession, “How about money-lending?”  Cato answered (somewhat in advance of Jesus), “How about murder?”  Cicero, On Duties.

I by no means equate money-lending or banking with murder but it appears the subject was considered by multiple ancient sources.  It seems the evil of the banksters in as eternal as natural law.  Defense against the predation of this wicked class may be something to consider.

Later political theorists expounded the virtue and necessity of self-defense.  John Locke described self-defense as the first among Natural Rights.  Locke, Second Essay on Civil Government.  Hobbes concurred in this assertion, regardless of the state of any society.  Hobbes, Leviathan, 1651.  Even the craven and generally useless United Nations begrudgingly attempted to acknowledge this fundamental truth: “No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation.  Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.”  Universal Declaration of Human Rights, U.N. General Assembly, Article 12, December 10, 1948.

In the earliest American tradition, we find acknowledgment of the Natural Law (before the adoption of the Second Amendment).  The Declaration of Independence (1776) begins: “When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.” (Emphasis added).  The Declaration then enumerates the crimes of King George, among them many of which might be defended against under the doctrine explained herein.

sword

(In case of emergency only.  Google.)

Again, self-defense is a God-given, eternal right.  It is also a duty, one to be exercised only in dire need and with a grave sense of responsibility.  As with all matters of Natural Law, man-made legislation must attempt as closely as humanly possible to approximate the divine purposes of the Law.  In the next installment of this series, I intend to examine more ancient legislation regarding weapons and self-defense, specifically Roman Law.

Gun Rights Survey

21 Thursday Mar 2013

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

America, AR-15, ASU, Australia, Britain, crime, criminals, Dianne Feinstink, firearms, freedom, God, government, law, Liberty, magazines, Natural Law, NRA, regulation, responsibility, Second Amendment, Second Amendment Foundation, self-defense, society, Stand Your Ground, The People, tyranny, violence

This morning I recived an email from The Second Amendment Foundation, a toothier NRAish organization, for those of you unfamiliar.  You can see the email as a website here: http://smna.conservativecontacts.com/track?t=v&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWlkPTExODA3Jm1zZ2lkPTgzMDAmZGlkPTQwMCZlZGlkPTQwMCZzbj0xNjc4MjMwMCZlaWQ9bG92ZXR0cEBlYXJ0aGxpbmsubmV0JmVlaWQ9bG92ZXR0cEBlYXJ0aGxpbmsubmV0JnVpZD1sb3ZldHRwQGVhcnRobGluay5uZXQmcmlkPTYwMjYxJmVyaWQ9NjAyNjEmZmw9Jm12aWQ9JnRnaWQ9JmV4dHJhPQ==&&&2100&eu=200&&&.  I hope the link works; the site contains a ten question survey, which I decided to turn into a short column.  Read on, friends.

By the way, check out the SAF: http://www.saf.org/.  They produced the video I posted a while back about racism in gun controls.  They do good work on behalf of our freedom.  Sign up for their email updates.

I took the liberty of cutting and pasting the survey whole from the email here, without permission.  I figure they won’t mind as I am promoting them.  Anyway, The questions are “yes” or “no” answerable.  I took the opportunity to show you how I would answer along with further explanation.  Here we go:

QUESTION 1: Do you own a semi-automatic firearm that has a detachable magazine, folding stock, or pistol grip?
YES NO
I would answer Yes, although all of you know I don’t really own any firearms.  I don’t belive in them…

 0321131203_0001

(Guns, like cigars and tobacco products are very dangerous.  Avoid both…)

QUESTION 2: Do you own a clip or magazine that holds more than ten rounds?
YES NO
 Again, with the above “truthful…” caveat, I answer Yes.
QUESTION 3: Do you think the Feinstein Gun Ban would reduce gun violence?
YES NO
 NO!  Gun control has nothing at all to do with ending violence.  Every country which enacts strict gun control (see Britain, Australia, etc.) experiences a dramatic increase in violent crime.  Gun control is about disarming the people so as to make them helpless in the face of tyranny.
QUESTION 4: Do you think you could need more than 10 rounds in a self-defense situation?
YES NO
 Yes!  Abosolutely!  The other day at the 2A forum at ASU (GRU), someone asked me this question.  I responded with the case of a local gun dealer who was confronted by 4 armed thugs in his shop.  They drove a van through the wall in hopes of a 100% discount on his merchandise.  Fortunately, he was armed with an AR-15 with a 30 round magazine.  It took all 30 rounds to convince the “shoppers” to vacate the premises.  There is no rational reason to limit the capacity of self-defense as the chance of danger is never so limited.
QUESTION 5: Do you oppose all attempts to ban semi-automatic firearms?
YES NO
 Yes!  I oppose all attempts to ban any firearms – semi-automatic, AUTOMATIC, black-powder, or any other kind.  The free People should have available for their protection any and all means of defending their liberty and their lives.
QUESTION 6: Do you oppose regulations that limit the amount of ammunition you may purchase?
YES NO
 Yes!  Like the guns themselves, the only limits on the amount of ammunition one purchases should be desire and ability to pay.  I tend to oppose regulations period.
QUESTION 7: Do you believe gun control laws will only hurt law abiding citizens?
YES NO
 No.  Surprised?  Don’t be.  I think gun control hurts everyone.  Even a convicted felon might find a need for weaponry if attacked in a situation not of his creation.  Gun control only helps ACTIVE criminals – the government, banksters, street thugs, etc.  I don’t want to help any of these types.
QUESTION 8: Would you feel safer if all law-abiding citizens possessed firearms?
YES NO
 No.  Again, hear me out.  While I support the general right of all qualified, responsible individuals to possess firearms, there are a large number of my fellow citizens I do no trust.  I would not fell safer if every Tom, Dick, and Harry had a gun.  Some of these folks can’t operate automobiles or shopping carts without trouble.  They sure as heck aren’t competent to use weapons.  But, I leave this to them, the Lord, and anyone but the government to sort out.  You and I owning guns makes me safer (you too), regardless of how we feeeeeel.
QUESTION 9: Should laws that protect our self-defense such as the Stand Your Ground Law exist?
YES NO
 Yes, although the need for such laws is a sad commentary on our society.  The right to self defense is as natural as the laws of phsyics.  We should not need laws to protect the right, though it seems better to have them and not need them than the alternative.  Overall, I would prefer if people stopped committing crimes thus eliminating the need in the first place.  Again, that’s out of my personal power to control.
QUESTION 10: Do you believe the 2nd Amendment was written to protect U.S Citizens against a tyrannical take over?
YES NO

Yes!  There is no doubt about it.  While hunting, collecting, and sport shooting are all important, as is the right of defense against criminals and dangerous critters, the real purpose of the 2A was to ensure the People would always be able to resist tyranny if necessary.  Thank God we do not face such a situation today.  Such tyranny would only come from a regime that did things like tax our incomes and threaten us with death by drones – unheard of in Amerika.

There you have it!  My answers and views de jure.  Perhaps you have similar or divergent views.  You are entitled to them and, by all means, feel free to list them here in response to mine.  I only ask that, for any opinion you hold, make sure it is the result of reason and not a knee-jerk or parroted position.  Think for yourselves.  Arm yourselves.  Live free and prosper!

The People Appreciate a Benevolent Dictator

18 Monday Mar 2013

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

Amerikans, beer, Constitution, dictators, dumps, electricity, eminent domain, Fifth Amendment, Freud, Georgia, Georgia Power Co., government, Kelo v. City of New London, Liberty, lobbyists, March Madness, Nascar, profits, public use, republic, Sallust, Savannah, Supreme Court, taking, taxes, The People, theft, ticks, Tom Bordeaux, TV

The title here is a quote from a Georgia Power Company lobbyist, made to the Georgia House Judiciary Committee in session, 2003.  The remark resulted in outrage from the audience and the committee.  I was present and among the most taken-aback members of the peanut gallery.

Eminent Domain is the process by which a government forcible condemns a piece of private property in order to make public use thereof.  The usual reasons for the practice include road, bridge, or other infrastructure projects.  The Fifth Amendment of the Constitution states that no such “taking” shall occur without proper compensation.

The subject of the particular committee meeting was a review of Georgia’s unconscionable Constitutional provision allowing for eminent domain actions by private utility companies.  Such companies need not have the government condemn your land for power lines or plants, they can do it directly.  Yes, we actually have that here.  A resolution was before the General Assembly which called for a new Amendment to end the practice.  The hearing was a natural result.

20758472_BG1

(Madness under the Gold Dome.  CBS Atlanta.)

The hearing was chaired by the Hon. Tom Bordeaux of Savannah.  Tom is a capable attorney and a good politician though his tenure as chair was short-lived.  I was working as a legal intern at the State Administrative Office of the Courts at the time and covered the issue, one of the biggest of the 2003 session.  Anyway, representatives from various utility companies were on hand to defend the procedure as vitally necessary to the State’s economy and the well-being of the citizens.  Rowdy protesters and opposition speakers voiced other opinions. 

The general mood of the entire committee seemed dead set against the policy.  Tom remarked that if a new Constitution were drafted in 2003, it would certainly not entertain such legalized theft and trespass.  The existing provision dated from the early 20th Century when telephone and electric services were relatively new.  I suppose the ticks of the day deemed it necessary to modernize the Empire State of the South.  The issue in general was receiving major attention nationwide. 

Two years later the U.S. Supreme Court, in the case of Kelo v. The City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), said it was okay for the City to condemn land via eminent domain solely for the purpose of turning the land over to another private party – a developer.  The theory was that the older houses condemned would not generate as much tax revenue for the City as the proposed redevelopment complex would.  Thus, there existed a “public need” sufficient to justify the takings.  The plan went forward.  The homes were taken and leveled.  Then, fate delivered the City an ironic blow.  The developer failed to find financing for the redevelopment and abandoned the project.  The lots sat empty.  The land is now a dump.  I wonder how much revenue that generates, in addition to lovely odors?

Back in Georgia, the lobbyists gave their best explanations for keeping the Constitutional provision the way it was.  Essentially they said the people did not realize that they actually believed having electricity, etc. (not to mention corporate profits) were more valuable to them than the homes they reside in; silly people.  Their final argument was, “The people appreciate a benevolent dictator.”  When the fellow uttered those words the room grew silent.  Based on the dropped jaws and red faces of the committee members one would have suspected the lobbyist had just tried to rationalize child rape.

A hurricane of angry comments followed, a verbal lynching of the lobbyist.  I thought it was great.  He began to back-peddle immediately in stammering, apologetic fashion.  I have come to realize though his Freudian slip was, in fact, completely accurate.  Most (not all, but most) people DO appreciate a benevolent dictator.  I refer once again to my ancient friend, Sallust: “Only a few prefer Liberty, the majority seek nothing more than fair masters.”

People might get upset if a company or the government tells them to move out of their homes.  But, the odds are tremendous a taking will only happen to someone else.  In that case, the people could care less.  They are more than willing to sit by as their neighbors lose their homes so long as the loss results in more creature comforts in their own homes.  Cables and wires and such power televisions which display football, basketball, Nascar, reality shows, and pornos.  They allow for the refrigeration of cheap beer and processed food – staples of the Amerikan diet.  Air conditioning, internet, blabbing on the phone – the benefits are too numerous to list.

It is interesting to note the great debate over this subject has died down recently.  Not enough people care, not enough prefer Liberty.  In the end, the General Assembly did what it does best – nothing.  The provision is still there ten years later.  Poor Aunt Matilda may be very sympathetic when the bulldozers approach her house but she never contributes to political campaigns.  Arrogant utility companies and their lobbyists give away millions of dollars a year to the ticks.  They put their money where their foul mouths are.  They also get their way.

This is just a little something to consider when contemplating representative republicanism.  Okay, you can go watch March madness now.

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Perrin Lovett

From Green Altar Books, an imprint of Shotwell Publishing

From Green Altar Books, an imprint of Shotwell Publishing

Perrin Lovett at:

Perrin on Geopolitical Affairs:

Archives

  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • June 2012

Prepper Post News Podcast by Freedom Prepper (sadly concluded, but still archived!)

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • PERRIN LOVETT
    • Join 42 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • PERRIN LOVETT
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.