• About
  • Blog (Ext.)
  • Books
  • Contact
  • Education Resources
  • News Links

PERRIN LOVETT

~ Deo Vindice

PERRIN LOVETT

Tag Archives: law

Guns and Espionage In The Totalitarian State

07 Wednesday Sep 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ Comments Off on Guns and Espionage In The Totalitarian State

Tags

America, crime, Edward Snowden, freedom, government, gun control, guns, law, Nazi germany, police state, Second Amendment, The People

Several years ago I began a series on the Second Amendment, small arms in America, and the evils of gun control. It started with my commentary on the Second Amendment itself though I drifted on through history both ancient and recent. It’s no secret this is one of my pet issues; I have several books in various forms of readiness lying about which concern the topic. Two things I hope: 1) I finish this work someday and 2) that you approve with sales aplenty.

In 2013 I slowed down a bit and ceased my history of gun control; I think I had made it into the 19th Century. Today L. Neil Smith has carried on for me a bit, chronicling a few of the abuses of the 20th century. Please read his recent History of Infringement.

adolf-hitler-gun-control

In 1968, possibly leaning on his experience during the War Crimes Tribunals, Dodd wrote to the Library of Congress, asking for a translation of the Nazi gun laws that had, among other things, disarmed Jews in Germany (I have seen a photo of Dodd’s letter). He turned the translation, with surprisingly few changes, into the 1968 Gun Control Act, under which we all still suffer.

Dodd eventually left the Senate under a cloud of corruption (for which transparent partisans at Wikipedia try to blame the firearms industry), as did his son, Christopher Dodd. We still live with the evil and idiotic 1968 Gun Control Act today, an enormous infringement on the right to keep and bear arms—and a disincentive to women who must enter an often hostile Man Country to purchase a weapon—that must be repealed.

Daniel Patrick Moynihan a Kennedy-era Senator and amiable drunk from Oklahoma, by way of New York City, believed he was being particularly clever when, unable to get rid of the small, concealable weapons that were virtually a fetish with him and other liberals in the Senate (leftists and their media symbiotes called them “Saturday Night Specials”, short for an extremely racist expression which was popular at the time) but which have since reduced the violent crime rate in America by double digits), so he began a campaign to ban the ammunition they required.

He would have outlawed .25 ACP, .32 ACP, and .380 Auto; I’m not sure about small revolver cartridges. His proposals were a laboratory specimen for “progressive” ignorance, shortsightedness, and unintended consequences. As far as I know, the laws he desired would have done nothing about .22 Long Rifle, of which Americans shoot two billion rounds a year. This means that new designs would soon have emerged with 20- or 30-round magazine capacities, to make up for losses in stopping power. And who knows, they may yet.

655049f8925c807cc309961eddbfd48f

Thanks, jackass.

That’s right. America’s signature gun control law is based (verbatim in some cases[if translated]) on Nazi laws. Congress stripped away language which banned Jews from owning guns though much of their intent was aimed at eliminating ownership among minorities and the poor. One should never be surprised at how low the criminals of D.C. will sink in their attempts to deprive the people of freedom, possessions, and even life.

The rats of Washington are not nearly as stupid as they might appear on television. They learn from their mistakes, hone in on our weaknesses, and adopt the very best (worst) of what works from history. In warfare, thought control and freedom suppression they have borrowed heavily from the leading tyrants of history. Thus, the incredibly successful and damningly popular modern police state.

Every once in a while someone will stand up against these evil men and expose their actions. Edward Snowden did so in 2o13. He, a hated and highly sought after fugitive from justice [SIC], now lives as a refugee in Russia. Today, too, a story came out on how Snowden initially escaped persecution. This is definitely worth a read:

Once the Aeroflot flight to Moscow had exited Chinese airspace, the Hong Kong government announced Snowden had left the country. The U.S. government was livid. Predictably, Snowden’s departure kicked off a global pursuit and his passport was finally revoked.

However, when Snowden landed in Moscow, he was grounded in the transit zone of the airport because his cancelled passport meant he was prohibited from boarding any further commercial flights.

“I never intended to end up in Russia, much less choose it,” he said. “When my government learned I had departed Hong Kong en route to Latin America, they cancelled my passport trapping me in a Russian airport. Unable to travel and unable to leave, I filed applications for asylum in 21 countries around the world, places like France, and Germany, Austria and Finland. But those countries neither accepted my respective requests nor permitted safe travel onwards.”

Edward Snowden and Sarah Harrison at Sheremetyevo Airport
Edward Snowden attends a news conference at Moscow’s Sheremetyevo Airport with Sarah Harrison, a British Wikileaks staffer, on July 12, 2013. In the end, Snowden and Harrison were marooned at the Sheremetyevo airport for a month before the Russian government granted him temporary asylum, which was recently extended for another three years.

So much for the lies that Snowden was working with Putin to undermine American imperial security. Always blame the Russians.

It’s amazing Snowden was willing to sacrifice as he did for the people. It’s even more amazing that the people haven’t used what they learned (or were presented with) in the slightest. The tons of documents gifted by Snowden amount to a massive indictment of the U.S. government. So far, the grand jury has been asleep. They say silence is acceptance.

Snowden has offered to return to the U.S. in exchange for a fair trial. It speaks volumes about the systemic corrupt of the government that they have steadfastly refused this simple offer. A fair trial in America is an impossibility, especially for one such as Snowden. Acquittals are mere flukes these days and there is a mechanism in place to preclude a “not guilty” verdict in cases like this or , at least, to render one moot.

Snowden’s only chance at returning to “normal” American life rests with the possibility of a Pardon. I hope he gets one eventually. Obama is probably out. I don’t think Snowden plays golf. Hillary would do it if there was $omething in it for her and old Billy. Trump could give us a surprise though he is surrounded by people who benefit from the dishonest narrative that Snowden is a criminal and a traitor.

Russia is an increasingly free nation. Perhaps Mr. Snowden will eventually settle there permanently. The old abuses of the Soviet Union are gone. Gone from Russia, come to America.

The Inapplicability of American Law

06 Tuesday Sep 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns

≈ Comments Off on The Inapplicability of American Law

Tags

America, Donald Trump, doom, election, Frank the Frog, government, Hillary Clinton, law, The People

Laws are funny things. They’re a lot like the rules in the game Monopoly except someone may enforce them at gunpoint. As in the game some people choose to adapt or amend the rule of law as they see fit, all as part of their game play fun. But, unlike the game, these people aren’t playing with plastic houses and pewter top hats.

Donald Trump has previously sought to use certain eminent domain laws to further his real estate businesses. I think they left that out at the GOP convention this year. Small potatoes though – hardly different from the “free parking” money. Rules are made for the bending, eh?

Hillary Clinton’s play is more akin to seizing all the money directly from the till before the game starts, wrecking the race car, and leaving a few other players … uh … suicided… In her version the rules are the rules – for you; no rules for her and she does as she pleases.

A friend of mine brought this story to my attention last night. It’s about the FBI’s release of Hillary investigation materials. It’s alarming, yes, maybe more so than her likely Parkinson’s condition. Even the timing of the release is suspicious. Everything concerning Hillary is suspicious. But nothing seems to stick. The laws don’t apply to her at all.

This I covered, artfully I thought, exactly two months before last night. Laws Are Like Spiders’ Webs, I wrote. They are.

nimbus-image-1473164081230

That’s really all there is to it. Nothing will be done and there’s no point in fretting. Given the still large numbers of Hillary supporters (and Trump supporters, to be honest) it seems to me that the American people would vote for damned near anyone, maybe anything.

Late last night as I pondered that uncomfortable realization I was visited by none other than Frank the Frog. A coincidence? Possibly. Frank, you may recall, was interested in higher office. Unfortunately, he was threatened by what he called “shadowy figures” and retreated underground (likely in the literal sense in his case).

I suggested that to him Americans might just vote for anyone or anything. I said, “maybe even a green amphibian!” “Amphibian-American,” he matter-of-factly corrected. He otherwise did not see it my way. We talked for a while. He insisted on delaying even his biography until after this election is past. I sense he might have been a little depressed.

Still, I find more comfort in a depressed, two-inch, green tree frog than in the political alternatives. At least he plays by the rules, rules he may not even be able to read.

Frank would be one of those small things easily ensnared by the law. He has to play along for his own safety. Trump, Hillary, the FBI and the government are large things. They easily smash through the law without consequence. By playing with them we jeopardize our safety.

ZZvwcIo

Weaponized Taxation

04 Sunday Sep 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ Comments Off on Weaponized Taxation

Tags

America, bill of attainder, Constitution, crime, ex post facto, freedom, government, IRS, law, power, taxes

“The power to tax involves the power to destroy.” John Marshall, McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316 (1819).

Last week Apple felt that power from abroad. The EU decreed Apple owes $15 Billion in back taxes. The imposition is seen as retaliation for Apple’s sales success in Europe. Economic success warrants retaliation in the twisted mind of government.

Here in America, Congress is desperately seeking similar retaliation. It has been suggested that American tax power may be weaponized to strike hard at European companies. While they’re at it, they may want to strike at you as well.

The past decade has seen a massive increase (1,000% or so) in Americans attempting to flee the ruins of the old Republic in efforts to preserve what they have created (and to preserve their own freedom). Fleeing the Land of the Free for freedom. Odd.

Mark Nestmann explains:

But just to make sure expatriates know “who’s the boss,” in 2012, Senators Schumer and Bob Casey (D-PA) introduced legislation to retroactively punish them. The “Expatriation Prevention by Abolishing Tax-Related Incentives for Offshore Tenancy Act,” or Ex-PATRIOT Act, would punish wealthy expatriates by forbidding them from ever reentering the US. The proposal would apply to anyone with a net worth of $2 million or more at the time of expatriation. It would also be retroactive for the 10-year period prior to enactment of the statute.

The Ex-PATRIOT Act didn’t pass in 2012, or in 2013 when Schumer reintroduced it as an amendment to another act. But I wouldn’t be at all surprised if it reappears in 2017. It’s hard to see how someone like Donald Trump, who bashes everything non-US, could oppose this bill. And Hillary Clinton has long slammed corporations that move their base of operations from the US to save on corporate taxes. It’s not a huge jump to conclude that if elected, she’d sign the Schumer-Casey proposal into law.

A retroactive law is known legally as ex post facto (after the fact). Such laws were viewed for centuries, rightly, as unfair. They are forbidden not once but twice in the Constitution: Art 1, § 9 and § 10. Such a deliberate targeting of the successful is known as a Bill of Attainder – also prohibited by the Constitution, again in Article I, Section 9.

 

The U.S. abandoned the ancient abstention of retroactive prosecution in 1945 and has not looked back. The Constitution is abandoned. “Constitutionalists” may say what they like but saying doesn’t stop the doing. And it’s all done anyway.

Anyone who deals with the IRS knows Washington wages an everyday war for power. It is more about showing the commoners “who’s the boss” than the money.

Remember Jim Bakker the 1980’s televangelist? His affairs left him with a $500,000 tax bill. Thirty years later the debt has grown (with interest and penalties) to around $6,000,000. Bakker will never pay that off. The government doesn’t expect him to. They are most happy lording over him for life; the money is a side issue. His freedom, otherwise redeemed by the passage of time, is destroyed by taxation. Marshall was on to something.

51+uJUXv1QL

Everyone makes mistakes. Many pay for them. Some have to pay and pay and pay … forever. God forgives. The IRS does not.

The future looks to hold much of the same. Schumer is still trying to ram his pet (illegal) law through Congress. The IRS terrorizes millions. Do not look for help from either presidential candidate.

Trump has already announced an intention to use selective confiscation for his benefit. He wants to seize drug cartel funds and use them to construct his wall. Remember that such programs grow over time, usually to encompass more targets than originally stated. Remember too any wall that can keep Mexicans out can also keep Americans in.

God help you if Clinton is elected. She views all of you as servants and the government as a giant tool for her personal gain. IRS persecution of anyone deemed even slightly anti-Clinton is a given. Worse, she may use tax records (And she didn’t know they were classified! Honest.) to compile a hit list. You know, for more of those “suicides”.

Tomorrow is Labor Day – the day for celebrating productivity in the workforce. Ponder for just a moment, between the burgers, beer and football, that you have a silent partner at work. Whatever you do, your partner takes 20%, 40% (honestly much more – maybe 60-70% in totality) of every dollar you earn and produce while contributing absolutely nothing. Your silent partner uses taxes as a weapon to keep you in line or, at the least, to rob you.

Jim Bakker. Tammy Faye? The makeup??

In Government We Trust: The Shadow Lengthens

31 Wednesday Aug 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ Comments Off on In Government We Trust: The Shadow Lengthens

Tags

America, Constitution, corruption, election, evil, false flag, government, Homeland Security, immigration, IRS, law, taxes, The People, voting

Just yesterday morning I followed up on the bumbling attempts by Washington to explain electoral system security breaches. I pondered whether the FBI actually found said breaches as part of an investigation or if they had created them as part of some false flag scheme for control. Today, we may have part of an answer.

I woke up (late) to this headline at Drudge:

nimbus-image-1472645099779

Hussein Obama elaborates on his golf handicap at NASA; Jeh Johnson looks on.

Drudge likes a little shock value. It should read: DHS to take charge of election security. That’s what they’re planning to do.

Even before the FBI identified new cyber attacks on two separate state election boards, the Department of Homeland Security began considering declaring the election a “critical infrastructure,” giving it the same control over security it has over Wall Street and and the electric power grid.

The latest admissions of attacks could speed up that effort possibly including the upcoming presidential election, according to officials.

“We should carefully consider whether our election system, our election process, is critical infrastructure like the financial sector, like the power grid,” Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson said.

…

Johnson also said that the big issue at hand is that there isn’t a central election system since the states run elections. “There’s no one federal election system. There are some 9,000 jurisdictions involved in the election process,” Johnson said.

Or, there were 9,000. Decentralization of power is a long-standing paper theme in America. I say “paper” because though we cut ties to centralized authority (King George III) in 1776, we reinstituted them in 1787 with the federal Constitution. Still, with something like elections, it’s probably preferable to have 9,000 separate authorities rather than just one. That makes corruption 9,000 times harder. Or, it did.

A related topic was raised in a U.S. News article today:

“There’s nothing in the Constitution which requires a popular election for the electors serving in the Electoral College,” says John Nagle, a law professor at the University of Notre Dame, meaning the body that officially elects presidents could convene without the general public voting.

“It’s up to each state legislature to decide how they want to choose the state’s electors,” Nagle says. “It may be a situation in which the fact that we have an Electoral College, rather than direct voting for presidential candidates, may prove to be helpful.”

Both major parties do have rules for presidential ticket replacements, however, and Congress has the power to change the election date under Article II of the Constitution, which allows federal lawmakers to set dates for the selection of presidential electors and when those electors will vote.

But Congress would be up against a de facto December deadline, as the Constitution’s 20th Amendment requires that congressional terms expire Jan. 3 and presidential terms on Jan. 20. Though it’s conceivable to split legislative and presidential elections, they generally happen at the same time. And if the entire general election were to be moved after Jan. 3, Congress effectively would have voted themselves out of office.

While I would be happy as a clam if Congress voted itself out of office I suspect many others would not. “There’s nothing in the Constitution which requires a popular election…” – that doesn’t jive with all that “democracy” and “you’re vote counts” business so popular today. But, it’s true.

Your vote, your participation in the election is not needed. It is only an illusion. At best it provides the real state electoral system with suggestions. If someone wanted to tamper with your suggestion box, it would be better for them (worse for you) to do so from a singular point (as opposed to 9,000 little points all over the place). Thus, my suspicion of DHS’s power grab.

Oddly, DHS isn’t necessary either nor is it found in the Constitution. With the brief and partial interruption in the scheme from 1861-1865, the federal system operated without DHS from 1787 until 2002 (2003 really). It was a gift of the wooden, horse-like, Greek variety from our dear friend Jorge the Dimmer. (Miss him yet?) It was instituted after another false flag event. (Thanks for that recent admission, Rudy!)

I’m really close to 700 posts on this site and at least about 600 of them deal with the evil nature of government. You simply cannot underestimate the state’s capacity to do harm. Yesterday I mockingly rattled off but a few of the known recent depredations from D.C. Here’s a new one:

Those hard-working, just like us, only trying to better their lives while hiding “in the shadows” illegal aliens have stolen 1,000,000 of our social security numbers. What’s more, the IRS has known about this for about FIVE YEARS and has done nothing! They haven’t even notified the victims. A can of worms this is.

Social Security isn’t in the Constitution either, apart from just being another tax. The IRS is happy to collect taxes from any source it can. If illegals pay in, great. They care nothing about you and your identity theft claims.

As for the illegals, some say there is no such thing as an “illegal person”. This is where I part ways with the open borders libertarians. Is there now no such thing as an illegal identity thief?

We are not the world, nor are we children.

Even if the IRS cared (they don’t), they would have a very hard time sorting all this out. Likely they have no idea how to solve this problem. Their position is partly defensible mathematically: in just a few short score of years both the illegals and the identity victims, every last one, will be dead – thus, no problem in the long run to worry about.

Back to DHS, they have a short but growing history of doing a whole lot of nothing. Nothing except for taking control – of anything they can. That helps boost their budget numbers. A few of you may recall how DHS took control of the West Virginia situation in the novel Republic and the ensuing hilarity.

By the way, and on a concluding note, pursuant to the deficiencies discovered in Republic those you in WV might want to go ahead and stock up on AAA and SAMs.

ObamaCare: A Study in Failure (and a Surprise from Donald Trump)

29 Monday Aug 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ Comments Off on ObamaCare: A Study in Failure (and a Surprise from Donald Trump)

Tags

America, Barack Obama, Donald Trump, government, law, laws, ObamaCare, Ron Paul, The People

Almost every week the news about Hussein Obama’s signature insurance company profit assurance program gets a little worse … if not wholly predictable. The Washington Post reports enrollment is off by ridiculous margins.

Not even half of the uninsured who were supposed to sign up have done so. They were supposed to enter into the new market exchanges with glee and secure “affordable” health insurance. They can’t because the coverage is not affordable. Premiums are skyrocketing as insurance companies race to make sure they can actually cover expenditures based on enrollment proceeds. These companies always make money and, if they don’t, they get out of a failing market.

More than a quarter of U.S. markets are failing. This leaves 1 out of 4 people with only one choice for coverage. And that coverage comes with a steep price, limited care options, and high deductibles. Failure, failure, failure.

The post notes that so many are not signing up because the related tax penalty isn’t working as planned. You recall that Obamacare was justified as just a tax and not as a draconian mandate that everyone must purchase something, needed (or wanted) or not.

I forgot that half of all Americans don’t pay any taxes to begin with. So the numbers kind of fit. Most of those folks are eligible for Medicaid or Medicare anyway. Thus, the burden and all the costs fall on We, the Middle Class People. Always our lot. Our red cross to bear.

I was going to pounce on the presidential candidates for not addressing the issue. With Hillary, there is no point. Her platform might be summarized as “Big government, cronyism, and failure.” If she likes her corruption, she will keep her corruption.

As for her personally, she is totally removed from the process. She and her cigar-probing husband make enough million$ in bribes and pay-offs from crooked corporations and foreign governments to pay for their own private doctors. If she were forced into an exchange, then the $20,000 she has received from the Ku Klux Klan this year would pay for any Obamacare plan.

Then I thought about Trump. Trump is obviously able to afford any doctor of his choosing. What is he saying about the national issue though? It occurred to me that I have never looked into his position on the matter. I thus read from his website and was a little surprised.

Republicans in general always say they want to repeal the law and then replace it with something else – something else sure to fail amid corruption. It’s important to remember than Obama’s program was based on Mitt Romney’s state program. A nationalization of a Massachusetts law was sure to fail – as it has.

Trump wants to repeal Obamacare immediately and then replace it … with free market competition. That’s amazing.Here’s his plan:

Congress must act. Our elected representatives in the House and Senate must:

Completely repeal Obamacare. Our elected representatives must eliminate the individual mandate. No person should be required to buy insurance unless he or she wants to.

Modify existing law that inhibits the sale of health insurance across state lines. As long as the plan purchased complies with state requirements, any vendor ought to be able to offer insurance in any state. By allowing full competition in this market, insurance costs will go down and consumer satisfaction will go up.

Allow individuals to fully deduct health insurance premium payments from their tax returns under the current tax system. Businesses are allowed to take these deductions so why wouldn’t Congress allow individuals the same exemptions? As we allow the free market to provide insurance coverage opportunities to companies and individuals, we must also make sure that no one slips through the cracks simply because they cannot afford insurance. We must review basic options for Medicaid and work with states to ensure that those who want healthcare coverage can have it.

Allow individuals to use Health Savings Accounts (HSAs). Contributions into HSAs should be tax-free and should be allowed to accumulate. These accounts would become part of the estate of the individual and could be passed on to heirs without fear of any death penalty. These plans should be particularly attractive to young people who are healthy and can afford high-deductible insurance plans. These funds can be used by any member of a family without penalty. The flexibility and security provided by HSAs will be of great benefit to all who participate.

Require price transparency from all healthcare providers, especially doctors and healthcare organizations like clinics and hospitals. Individuals should be able to shop to find the best prices for procedures, exams or any other medical-related procedure.

Block-grant Medicaid to the states. Nearly every state already offers benefits beyond what is required in the current Medicaid structure. The state governments know their people best and can manage the administration of Medicaid far better without federal overhead. States will have the incentives to seek out and eliminate fraud, waste and abuse to preserve our precious resources.

Remove barriers to entry into free markets for drug providers that offer safe, reliable and cheaper products. Congress will need the courage to step away from the special interests and do what is right for America. Though the pharmaceutical industry is in the private sector, drug companies provide a public service. Allowing consumers access to imported, safe and dependable drugs from overseas will bring more options to consumers.

 – Trump campaign site.

His position almost looks like it was drafted by Ron Paul – except for the Medicaid provisions. Astounding.

I’ve been rather critical of Mr. Trump, saying that his potential tenure will likely be a disappointment. I’ve also said I hope he proves me wrong. It looks like he’s trying.

Such a simple plan would still be very hard to mandate. Powerful forces would (will) align to stop reform in Congress. The masses, still chasing the Pokemon, won’t understand any of it and cannot be counted on for any assistance. Still, the man is trying.

So it is that I start this week off with more of the usual, dismal happenings of Washington and yet with a little ray of hope.

I just discovered that a hawk is perched atop a neighbor’s house right now. Fitting. That’s me- hawkishly watching out for you.

_20160829_082741

Happy Monday, America!

 

Advice for Would-Be Law Students

13 Saturday Aug 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, Other Columns

≈ Comments Off on Advice for Would-Be Law Students

Tags

America, freedom, law, law school, legal education, legal profession, The People

Late this spring, at a school ceremony, I was surprised to learn that my Daughter wants to be an attorney when she grows up. I had thought she wanted to be a marine biologist or a veterinarian or an artist. Maybe like me, she’s a contrarian; after hearing me grumble for years about the law business, maybe she just has to try it. Maybe she’ll grow out of it. Perhaps she’ll become a marine biology attorney. I just want her to be happy.

The law isn’t for everyone and not all areas of the legal profession are the same. The law itself isn’t what it used to be. At Nuremberg the traditions of Western legal philosophy were effectively jettisoned through the window. They clung to the ledge for a while and then fell. Currently, the law lies, dying, on the street below. If one listens, one can still hear it murmur things like “due process” and “no ex post facto…”. Sad, really.

Still, many will want to at least attend law school; several will go on to become practicing attorneys. For these prospective students, I thought I would offer some advice, some ideas about the profession and its formal education process. Here goes:

The practice of law is horrible. Tucker Max wrote the best essay on the subject I have ever read: Why You Shouldn’t Go to Law School: For the overwhelming majority of people (>99.9%), law school is the wrong choice. Here’s why. Read that. Neither he nor I practice now. I fell under his fourth reason not to go to law school – I wanted to do something noble. I didn’t, I couldn’t. It is impossible. My ideal was to bring freedom to as many people as possible. They don’t want it. Most of what I write here is still a vain attempt to bring people around. That, or preaching to the choir. Read that essay – Tucker’s a funny man, but he’s dead serious on all counts. And right too.

 

Even worse than the theory of jurisprudence and the active practice is state of legal education itself, especially in America. Read my essay on that.

American legal education is so bad that the esteemed Alan Watson wrote a book about it: The Shame of American Legal Education. Read that book before you apply to law school.

Alan Watson, Esq. Amazon.

If an American, despite these warnings, must go to law school, they should consider Watson’s alternative. Consider going to law school in Scotland. There, legal theory is still revered and taught. The Scottish schools teach people the law itself. American schools teach being a boring cog in a broken wheel (and most aren’t very good at even that). One might decide to stay in Scotland. Should one return to the U.S. one will have to obtain some auxiliary BS “training” before joining the bar. But, at least that person would be fortified in the truth and the science as American law students are not.

One American law school is about as bad as the rest. Rankings really do not matter. Still, for prestige alone and to help with seeking employment, try a top-rated school if possible. The experience will still disappoint.

These schools, for as little as they are worth, are expensive. A legal education can easily cost $250,000 or more. And low-tier schools can be just as expensive as Harvard or Yale. If one must go, try for a top-ranked state school and try to get a scholarship.

Take a break between undergraduate studies and law school and explore something – anything. This might kill the desire to study law. That would be a good thing.

Consider alternatives. Put some thought into it. In retrospect, I should have pursued an advanced degree in political philosophy or history. Maybe chemistry or forestry. Yes, the law can open many doors of opportunity but it also makes you walk through other doors not so appealing.

Do not study pre-law or business law or any related BS in college thinking it will help with law school. It won’t. English, philosophy, and political theory are better majors. The best course of study is the one that interests you the most. Above all else, remember to learn something.

Before you fully commit to legal education (here or abroad) do two internships or volunteer stints. The first should be in the area you think you are most interested in. The second should be in the field that is most remote from what you think you like. This will provide a real-world perspective and a little balance. Bounce your ideas off of everyone.

Consider the rise of the AI attorney. Robots are not just stealing factory jobs. By the time my daughter graduates from college (or even high school) computers will be doing most legal work. This will be good and bad. It will save many students from horrendous careers though leaving them burdened with debt and regrets.

Consider that people will constantly bother you for advice – even if you can’t give it. “You’re a contracts attorney? Great! Let me ask you about my friend’s DUI charges…” These types love to waste time and they don’t pay for it. They also don’t follow advice anyway. Upon not following it, they will still blame you for the problems they created. As there are a few too many attorneys, so there are WAY too many idiots.

Don’t be afraid of change. Becoming a lawyer doesn’t mean being one for life. One can switch areas of practice or leave the law altogether. Fifty percent or more of American lawyers do not practice law.

In fact, don’t be afraid. That’s the best advice I could give my daughter or anyone else. I just want her to be happy. I want everyone to be happy. And free. See, I’m still at it…

 

*Ads below this line are not Perrin Lovett’s. He hopes they are harmless.

 

Voter Fraud and Other Urgent Matters

03 Wednesday Aug 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

America, crime, fraud, government, law, terrorism, The People, voting

What would Holden Caulfield say about modern America? “Phony” until he was hoarse, of course. True. Even our frauds are phony. Or, perhaps, our phonies, frauds.

fraud-alert

Activistpost.com.

The Vote

Donald Trump and his supporters have recently raised the specter of a rigged election, of voter fraud coast to coast. Jimmy Carter and others have been concerned about this issue for years. The White House, also busy laundering money for Iran, mockingly wrote off the concerns while the Department of Homeland Security seems a little more interested. Congruence, that. Homeland is taking a look at the risk of hackers swinging the general election; their cyber-alarm is in tandem with a belief that Russia was behind the DNC email affair. By the way: it wasn’t the Russians.

Newsflash: voting in American is a fraud in and of itself. One political party masquerading as two offering up the same crap every cycle. The party has a legal monopoly on election law in many (most) places so as to keep out honest competition. Voters must play by the party’s narrow rules while the party can and does bend its own rules in order to perpetuate the monopoly. None of the candidates are fit for the jobs they seek nor do they care at all about the people (or the law). And, nothing ever changes regardless of who gets elected. Fraud.

Terrorism

The government and the party do everything they can to create terrorism, resentment and hatred worldwide. Some of their lab monster creations actually come to life. ISIS is no longer an imaginary hobgoblin. Still, the CIA and the other alphabet agencies can’t even keep track of what their babies are doing and where they are. The National Counterterrorism Center just released a map of ISIS hotspots.

The map is part of a classified briefing document received by the White House dated “August 2016” and prepared by the National Counterterrorism Center. It shows a stunning three-fold increase in the number of places around the globe where ISIS is operating.

U.S. State Department documents indicated that in 2014, when the U.S. military began its campaign to destroy the extremists, there were only seven nations in which the fledgling state was operating.

160802-whitehouse-monthly_report-isil-mbe-610p_d117e8af1191fbf20c3b4a724ab8a3fc.nbcnews-ux-600-480

       “Phony” Map: U.S. government.

Only in seven countries before we started to destroy them. Now they’re fully operational in 18 countries! In D.C. “destroy” must mean proliferate. But wait! Doesn’t that map look a little lite? What about the attacks in Orlando, Tennessee, Oklahoma, Texas, and California, among others? No ISIS is the U.S.? Why is Europe blank? ISIS just fire-bombed a bus in Paris. (I vowed not to talk terror unless it was really big – this is a report on terror reporting, or the lack thereof). Fraud!

Terror-Prone Police

A metro D.C. police officer was just arraigned on charges he joined or supported ISIS. Not only did this not make the NCC map, it raises startling questions about those who are supposed to enforce the law, not break it. USA Today reports there is an increasing concern about jihadis on the police force.

Many already think the police act enough like terrorists as is. Many of them have a point. What does this outright conjunction of law enforcement with the caliphate mean for the last shreds of justice in the U.S.?

How will “law and order” yokels handle this development. The yokels always want to “nuke them taarists” while at the same time holding a police officer up in a saintly light. What about when the two are the same? Mass confusion? I call it another fraud.

These are just three out of about 10,000 frauds actively running around the nation right now. To be on the safe side one might want to treat anything coming out of Washington as a fraud. What a bunch of phonies.

Felonious Entanglement

03 Wednesday Aug 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

America, banksters, crime, Europe, foreign affairs, George Washington, government, Iran, law, money, Obama

America’s first president warned his compatriots and their posterity to steer clean of entangling foreign affairs. (Geo. Washington, Farewell Address, 1796). He also advised against the ills of faction, or party-based politics as these tend to foster the death of civility while at the same time allowing for the expansion of laws. This wise admonishment was dutifully copied into history books and then promptly forgotten.

When, at unhappy times, faction meets entanglement, bad things happen.

Being born of European breed, it is only natural that America would have some alliance with and affairs in Britain and the Continent. Even Washington did; Lafayette, we remember. What Washington was warning of was affairs to the point of controlling and confusing excess. Sometimes the excess is demonstrated in ridiculous fashion.

SanePolicy

Maybe the dummies can’t read. Davesblogcentral.com.

Europe and America still have much in common, including many of the same problems. Refugees, immigration, and terrorism are a few of those modern commonalities. France’s Hollande has made a career out of brilliant failure to address Islamic counterculture and terror in his own country. On his sleepy watch the French have endured attack after attack after attack – mass murder upon mass murder. He should resign and auto-exile.

Instead he chooses to intercede in American politics with haughty words and unclear motives. Hollande, who has lain down for the French, is disgusted that one man at least says he might stand up for Americans. His counterpart in Germany, equally ineffective in operation if a tad more evil in theory, has wisely if oddly remained silent. If she will not also resign, at least she keeps quite. Entanglement with those two might be unwise to say the least.

France and Germany both have many connections with America, not least of which are their economic ties. They, along with Switzerland and the failing EU, have powerful central banks. The Swiss host the most powerful of all such institutions, the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). With such money-changers we often find the intersection of entanglement and funny money, oftentimes with not-so-funny reactions.

America’s latest president recently made scandalous use of that interwoven, Monopoloy money, printing press relationship. He did so to facilitate the latest blunder in a decades-old string of entanglement in another part of the world.

In the 1950’s the people of Iran elected a new government – democratically and in pursuit of self-determination – then said to be approved conduct by the American elite. The elite, ever a fickle and criminal bunch, had a change of collective black heart. In 1953 the CIA essentially overthrew the new prime minister and his reform-oriented government in order to permanently keep the Shaw Mohammad in power. The Shaw declared himself emperor in 1967. This was good business for the military-industrial complex. It was also a fantastic example of entanglement writ large.

In 1979 the Shaw placed an order with the MIC for the purchase of American fighter jets, secured with a $400 million deposit. The transaction was poorly timed as the Iranian people had nearly simultaneously had enough of the Shaw’s oppression and, accordingly, ousted him in favor of religious zealots. 1979 also saw the advent of the long-lasting Iranian policy of hostage taking for political purposes.

True to form, around 2014 the Iranians seized several Americans on dubious charges and held them as pawns in their never-ending match with D.C. Around the same time the Iranians’ case against America for the return of that $400 million (plus interest) was moving through arbitration in the Hague. There was also the issue of Iran’s nuclear projects.

In January of 2016 all of these issues appeared to have been neatly wrapped up; Hussein Obama himself tied a little bow atop the package. Iran agreed to international monitoring, hostages were released, and the court case was settled. At first and independent glance it appeared the deal was a triumph of statesmanship. Maybe it was. Now the details are emerging; they do not look promising.

The Obama administration this year stealthily transferred $400 million in cash to Iran. This was the first payment (all on a single airplane to Tehran) under a $1.7 Billion settlement of the old 1979 case. The administration says it was done to facilitate the terms of the legal case. Critics say it amounted to a ransom payment. Both are likely correct. I, upon hastily reading a few laws, wonder if it did not also amount to a felony.

The $400 million payment was assembled of various European currencies and delivered on palates in a cargo plane. The money came from those European central banksters and was arranged by mysterious Swiss types – probably in the BIS. The administration admitted it could not (openly) send U.S. currency as that would violate U.S. law against paying cash to Iran.

Following the unpleasantness of 1979 the U.S. enacted laws prohibiting investment and most other transactions with Iran. Knowing the D.C. lust for criminalizing everything, I looked for something and found it.

It’s not just outright payments that are prohibited. Any attempt to evade the law and any conspiracy to do so also amounts to a violation. See: 31 C.F.R. § 560.203.  If you or I had attempted to invest money in Iran for whatever reason and had converted our U.S. dollars into Euros or Francs in order to do so, we would already be in jail for conspiracy to evade the law. The penalties are both civil ($250,000 or twice the amount of the transaction) and criminal ($1 million fines and 20 years in prison). 50 U.S.C. § 1705. In other words, it’s a felony.

A felony for you and I, that is. We all know now that the law does not apply to the government itself. No law so applies. D.C. isn’t so much above the law as it is the law. Thus, it is lawless. Any FBI agent who dares issue an investigative report here wastes his time and commits career suicide.

Criminal or not, if these payments were a final end to the Iranian debacle, they would be (tax) money well spent. They are not. Once the meddling starts, it has no end.

This is why Washington forewarned us. We ignore his advice at our peril.

Hillbilly Justice: Public Corruption in North Georgia

23 Saturday Jul 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ Comments Off on Hillbilly Justice: Public Corruption in North Georgia

Tags

America, corruption, crime, FBI, freedom, Georgia, government, law, The People

The mountains of North Georgia are some of the most beautiful and peaceful country in America. The air is cleaner and cooler than the state in general. The rolling countryside is covered, end-to-end, in old-growth trees. The people (most of them) are as friendly as can be. The pace is slower. There’s a happiness that descends on the spirit there. There’s also a malignancy. I know all of this first-hand; I used to live in the shadow of those hills.

Remember Boss Hogg (J.D. Hogg) from The Dukes of Hazard? He was the fat guy in the white suit who owned and controlled everything – the bank, the court, the police, the roads, etc. He was a gangster and a crook, although a very lovable one. To a degree, that funny, fictional character was based on some very real but not very funny people.

Warner Brothers, CBS.

A local journalist suspected there might have been a little financial hanky-panky in the local Superior Court. Pursuant to state law he and his attorney filed an open records request, looking for canceled checks and other evidence of (minor) misconduct.

His legal requests stirred the anger of Superior Court Judge Brenda Weaver, who obviously felt she had something to hide. Rather than letting the requests play out (admitting a little impropriety, if necessary, and moving on) or administratively (legally) moving to block the requests, she single-handedly instigated a fake criminal investigation. Both the journalist and his attorney were charged with utterly false counts of felony identity theft. The local district attorney and the local police were complicit in this scheme.

Much of Georgia government works that way. For instance, sometimes an insurance company will audit a policy and arbitrarily decide someone owes more premium money – even if the person isn’t a policy-holder. That’s barely even a civil matter. If the person (rightly) refuses to give his money to the insurance crooks, the crooks turn him over to the state Insurance Commission. The Commission has its own police force, who will bring felony fraud charges against the completely unconnected and innocent person as a form of revenge for the real crooks. The insurance industry, and others, pay a lot of money for this malicious extortion privilege. They’re aren’t above the law – they are the law.

So it is with Judge Weaver and her friends. They would be more than happy to use a major crime to cover up a small malfeasance. But for national news coverage of their plot, they might have gotten away with it. Once the story broke on the Drudge Report, the charges were dropped. The FBI is now investigating.

Of course, the FBI is looking for financial irregularities, not into corruption and false prosecution. Being agents of the banksters, they look after money – not after you and me. That’s why Denny Hastert is in prison: not for molesting children, but for technical banking deviance.

Even the end of the trumped-up felony charges in this case smacked of evil oppression. A visiting, senior judge was brought in to dismiss the charges. He held a hearing reminiscent of Soviet-style censorship and threat. I read the comments in the above-linked story about the bizarre hearing. One was written by a friend of mine, the very best adoption attorney in the state of Georgia. She recounted how tyrannical and terrible the hearing judge had been to her clients in the past.

None of this surprises me. I used to live nearby and I know of a few of these Boss Hogg-like characters. Only a few years ago, in the same location, several elected officials were arrested for their parts in a cock-fighting and gambling ring. I think every one of them was re-elected. It makes sense. Even when he was out to get them, the Duke boys frequently stood up for old J.D.

So, what becomes of justice in the hills? I imagine a civil suit and an expensive settlement will come along sooner or later. The FBI is following the money for the money’s sake. If the governor or the attorney general cared, they could take action. They don’t and they won’t. What else is left?

There are two ways to (legally) get rid of a bad Georgia judge. A judge can be impeached by the General Assembly. This is extraordinarily rare. Getting that body to do anything is a difficult task. Asking them (corrupt to the core, mostly) to investigate corruption is like asking the fox to look into a hen-house attack.

The other option is for a formal complaint to be filed with the Georgia Judicial Qualifications Commission (JQC). If the Commission finds cause, they will recommend the Supreme Court order the judge to vacate her office. This is almost as rare as an impeachment.

In this particular case, complaints have already been filed with the JQC. They will slowly investigate. I don’t look for much to come out of it. The Chairman of the JQC is none other than Judge Brenda Weaver. Convenient, huh?

nimbus-image-1469283678738

Yeeeah….. State of Georgia.

I still encourage people to visit those mountains. From the Reese Apple Farm to Amicalola Falls, it’s a fantastic region. Just mind your P’s and Q’s; don’t upset their apple cart or you may be in for a fall.

20 Trillion Reason$ to Love Government

21 Thursday Jul 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ Comments Off on 20 Trillion Reason$ to Love Government

Tags

America, banksters, debt, Debt Clock, economy, government, law, politicians, The People, usury

Democrats are (once again) celebrating Hillary’s inexplicable ability to avoid the jailhouse. Republicans are celebrating Trump for Trump’s sake. It’s so exciting!

They should all take a brief pause to celebrate a mutual achievement, many years in the making. The on-books U.S. federal debt has hit TWENTY TRILLION DOLLARS ($20,000,000,000,000)!!!! Hooray for government!

Actually, it’s a hair under $19.4 Trillion. Or, it was; it has gone up many millions of dollars while I’ve been typing these sentences. But, heck, I’m celebrating early. Here’s where it stood just a minute or two ago:

nimbus-image-1469105193964

Courtesy: U.S. Debt Clock.

Yes, your “share” of the debt is almost $60,000. Each one of your children “owes” $60,000 – today – tomorrow (hell, later this morning) it will be more.

The debt, if it must be divvied up, should be allocated among about 600 corrupt men and women – the President, members of Congress, Treasury officials, and Fed Governors. They each “owe” roughly $32.33 Billion. By the way, $19.4T is about 105% of our GDP.

That’s just for the federal debt, as officially and wrongly accounted. The total on-book liabilities including state, corporate, and your own debts comes closer to $66 Trillion (358% of GDP).

These are big numbers. They keep getting bigger.

A more honest accounting figures in the total of all liabilities like Medicare and Social Security shortcomings, which must under law be paid … somehow. The net present value of those liabilities is over $100 Billion (554% GDP). And, that’s what we owe, and need the money on hand to pay off, today. We’re in the hole. Deep.

Then, for honesty’s sake and as a precaution, one should calculate in the U.S. derivatives market. That means all of the side bets made by banks, insurance companies, and different funds – a sort of end around the Fed to create more money than really exists. That number is over $420 Trillion (what’s the point% of GDP). The global derivatives exposure pushes the number well over $1 QUADRILLION (Ha Ha % of GDP)! These extraordinary inclusions are important and necessary because, though they are private and fictitious, in the event of eventual default or collapse, they will be placed on the backs of the people. The banks are too big to fail, remember. Your share of that is something like $3,125,000. Got your checkbook ready, just in case???

Now for some predictions by me.

Presidents tend to serve two terms almost as a rule these days. I’d say there is, right now, a 65% chance Donald John Trump will be the 45th President. At the end of his second term the “official” U.S. debt will probably be somewhere around $40 Trillion. In the off-chance Hillary Rodham Clinton is elected, at the end of her second term the debt will also be about $40 Trillion. Again, that’s the loosely accounted debt. The real figure will be closer to a quarter Quadrillion, the hypothetical deviratives-based debt exposure closer to $2Q.

None of this will ever be paid. These numbers exceed the GDP of the entire world. The higher numbers are likely equal to, or exceed, the value of the entire earth and its contents. The only way to pay off such ridiculous amounts would be to print more money – which would have to be accounted as additional debt. Hilarious.

The politicians and the banksters would be content to let this cycle go on forever if that were possible. It is not. The people, the majority, don’t understand or care. It doesn’t hit home until the lights go out and the grocery store is derelict – ask those in Venezuela.

The only sane solution is to blank the books – entirely. The whole of all the debts should be repudiated and forgotten. This will happen at some point. It has to. We might as well make it an official decision. Thereafter, it might be wise to make debt illegal. How about a war on debt!? Debt issuance, by governments, banks, etc., could (should) be a felony; debt creation via usury and creation of supply inflating, funny money – capital felonies.

If that were now the law, we would need about 600 tall trees and 600 lengths of good rope. I think you’ll admit those are far easier and cheaper to come by than your $60,000 alternatives.

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Perrin Lovett

From Green Altar Books, an imprint of Shotwell Publishing

From Green Altar Books, an imprint of Shotwell Publishing

Perrin Lovett at:

Perrin on Geopolitical Affairs:

Archives

  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • June 2012

Prepper Post News Podcast by Freedom Prepper (sadly concluded, but still archived!)

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • PERRIN LOVETT
    • Join 42 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • PERRIN LOVETT
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.