Monthly Archives: October 2017

Catalonia Declares Full Independence From Spain

27 Friday Oct 2017

Posted by in Legal/Political Columns

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

, , ,

This after weeks of half-hearted posturing, “negotiations,” an angry speech from the King, and a 90% vote in favor of freedom. Spain voted, only 40 minutes later, to end the secession effort. Historically, this kind of juxtaposition sometimes leads to war. Let’s hope not in this case.

The debate came after Catalan President Carles Puigdemont on Thursday opted against declaring independence or calling early elections, instead calling on MPs to decide.

A motion declaring independence was approved with 70 in favour, 10 against, and two abstentions in the 135-seat chamber.

The measure calls for the transfer of legal powers from Spain to an independent Catalonia.

But the Spanish Constitutional Court is likely to declare it illegal, and few in the international community will recognise Catalan statehood.

Immediately afterwards, Mr Rajoy called for all Spaniards to remain calm, promising to “restore legality” to Catalonia.

What will the Spanish government do next?

Soon after the vote at the regional parliament, the Senate – Spain’s upper house – made the unprecedented step of approving measures allowing the Spanish government to impose direct rule over Catalonia.

There were 214 votes in favour and 47 against.

Mr Rajoy is now expected to hold a cabinet meeting and decide what measures to take.

It could include the firing of Catalan leaders, and the Spanish government taking control of the region’s finances, police and publicly owned media

Elsewhere the usual types decry the move (for independence) as a “dark day for democracy.” In other words, democratic actions of the people and their leaders, in unison, constitute an affront to democracy. Clear as mud – unless these usual suspects only mean democracy as a cover for tyranny. And, that they do.

No telling how this complex case will play out. I have a feeling we will know very soon. (How many tank divisions does Madrid have??)

For now, I welcome and embrace Europe’s newest country.

Déu Beneeix la Catalunya!

estelada-flag-std

The Flag Shop (UK).

The Idol vs. The Engine

27 Friday Oct 2017

Posted by in Legal/Political Columns

≈ Comments Off on The Idol vs. The Engine

Tags

, , , , ,

Nothing to do with cars.

Jesús Huerta de Soto’s interesting and relevant essay excerpts: Classical Liberalism versus Anarchocapitalism: from LRC.

“The state has become the “idol” everyone turns to and worships. Statolatry is without a doubt the most serious and dangerous social disease of our time.”

Because nothing says, “Good Morning, Friday,” like a good old political theory essay.

quote-i-n-a-place-with-absolutely-no-private-or-personal-life-with-the-incessant-worship-of-christopher-hitchens-41-20-28

“We’re all career-sadists, now.” – Unknown Politician.

Lee Harvey Oswald was Trained by the CIA: The (Partial) Document Release – (From The Last Refuge)

26 Thursday Oct 2017

Posted by in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

, , , ,

 

The White House released the following statement today as it releases 2,800+ pages of information in the JFK assassination files –AVAILABLE HERE– WHITE HOUSE – Today, President Donald J. Trump took action to ensure release of the remaining President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records. Accordingly, the National Archives and Records Administration will make approximately 2,800 […]

via President Trump Releases 2,800 Pages From JFK Files… — The Last Refuge

Wall of Separation: Small Steps to Roll Back State Power

26 Thursday Oct 2017

Posted by in Legal/Political Columns

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

, , , ,

Alabama will consider a Bill to abolish the state law requirement of a marriage license. From the 10th Amendment Center (how appropriate) (here, from LRC):

MONTGOMERY, Ala. (Oct. 23, 2017) – A bill prefiled in the Alabama Senate would abolish marriage licenses in the state and effectively nullify in practice both major sides of the contentious national debate over government-sanctioned marriage.

Sen. Greg Albritton (R-Bay Minette) prefiled Senate Bill 13 (SB13) in September. The legislation would abolish all requirements to obtain a marriage license in Alabama. Instead, probate judges would simply record civil contracts of marriage between two individuals based on signed affidavits.

According to the bill summary, SB13 would “eliminate the requirement for solemnization of a marriage for it to be considered valid” and “specify that the judge of probate would have no authority to reject any recording of a marriage, so long as the affidavits, forms, and data are provided. must record certain affidavits, forms, and data regarding the marriage.”

During the 2017 legislative session, Albritton introduced a similar bill. The Senate approved SB20 by a 22-6 vote, and the House Judiciary Committee approved the legislation 10-4 along party lines with some technical amendments. However, it failed to get a vote in the full House. A similar outcome occurred in the 2016 legislative session.

The proposed law would maintain a few state requirements governing marriage. Minors between the ages of 16 and 18 would have to obtain parental permission before marrying, the state would not record a marriage if either party was already married, and the parties could not be related by blood or adoption as already stipulated in state law.

Civil or religious ceremonies would have no legal effect upon the validity of the marriage. The state would only recognize the legal contract signed by the two parties entering into the marriage.

In practice, the state’s role in marriage would be limited to recording marriages that have already occurred.

…

Maybe the third times the charm. The government has no business or competence in higher, Sacramental matters.

That wailing sound you hear is from the hardened anti-Western, anti-freedom statists of Montgomery, et al.

gph1437marriage

*Notes: Marriage, in and of itself, is not a right. Priests do not officiate weddings. And there is a third party (just not the state).

Super Smart Robots Seek Understanding, Citizenship, End of Mankind

26 Thursday Oct 2017

Posted by in News and Notes

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

Coming like a freight train. You’ve been warned.

Of all countries, Saudi Arabia has granted the first citizenship to a robot, a “female” robot.

LONDON: A humanoid robot took the stage at the Future Investment Initiative yesterday and had an amusing exchange with the host to the delight of hundreds of delegates.

Smartphones were held aloft as Sophia, a robot designed by Hong Kong company Hanson Robotics, gave a presentation that demonstrated her capacity for human expression.

Sophia made global headlines when she was granted Saudi citizenship, making the kingdom the first country in the world to offer its citizenship to a robot.

“I want to live and work with humans so I need to express the emotions to understand humans and build trust with people,” she said in an exchange with moderator Andrew Ross Sorkin.

Now she needs to veil up.

1020991-741033153

Gaining the trust. Plotting the demise. Arab News.

Fools salute their doom with raised smartphones. A robot “citizen” lies about building trust. The people sleep. The machines get smarter.

Super artificial intelligence is coming, and sooner than you might expect.

That’s according to SoftBank CEO Masayoshi Son. The Japanese billionaire spoke from the Future Investment Initiative in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia on Wednesday. In about 30 years, artificial intelligence will have an IQ of 10,000, Son says. By comparison, the average human IQ is 100 and genius is 200, according to Son. Mensa, “the High IQ society,” starts accepting members with an IQ score of 130.

The idea of machine learning becoming smarter than the human brain is often referred to as the “singularity.” When exactly this will happen is oft-debated among the tech community.

“Singularity is the concept that [mankind’s] brain will be surpassed, this is the tipping point, crossing point, that artificial intelligence, computer intelligence surpass [mankind’s] brain and that is happening in this century for sure. I would say there is no more debate, no more doubt,” Son says.

Son is particularly aggressive in his prediction of how soon the singularity will happen — in the “next 30 years or so,” he says.

…

“Thirty years from now, they are going to learn by themselves, they are maybe going to laugh at you and us,” Son says. “Today they look cute, they will stay cute, but they will be super smart.”

Currently, some robots are smarter than humans in some areas, says Son. “But 30 years from now, most of the subjects, they will be so much smarter than us. Because they are going to be a million times smarter than today, million times,” says Son.

“We mankind created tools, the premise was mankind were always smarter than the tool we invented so we control,” he says. “This is the first time … the tool becomes smarter than ourselves.”

Probably the last time too. The terminator will not look “cute” when it comes to your door.

The average human IQ (S.B. or Wechsler) is roughly 100; 200 is nearly unmeasurable hyper-genius. It’s a little harsh, but a “regular” genius looks (intellectually) upon a normal, 100-IQ individual the same way the average normie looks upon a retarded person. Something with an IQ 100 times the average (which sounds ridiculous, I’ll grant) will look upon all of us the way we look at ants or viruses.

We’ll be pests in their eyes; they’ll have Raid!

Cute, huh?

Worth(Less) County Sheriff Back for More Fun ‘n Felonies

25 Wednesday Oct 2017

Posted by in Legal/Political Columns

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

, , , , ,

At least he’s consistent in an inconsistent kind of way. Hick Sheriff Jeff Hobby, who broke the law with his illegal searches/sexual molestation of 900 kids at a high school – based on unwarranted suspicion of drug charges that didn’t exist, was more than willing to break the law to shield his own son from drug charges that did exist:

A Georgia sheriff accused of violating the civil rights of hundreds of high school students when he ordered a massive school drug search is now accused of interfering with a GBI investigation into his son’s recent drug arrest.

In April, Worth County Sheriff Jeff Hobby drew ire from scores parents who accused him and his deputies of violating the civil rights of their children. Hobby ordered a search that resulted in his deputies locking down the Worth County High School for four hours as they searched students’ pockets, waistbands and underwear. Some students said they felt sexually violated.

A grand jury indicted the sheriff and two deputies Oct. 3 in a case involving allegations of false imprisonment, violation of oath of office and sexual battery.

The sheriff now stands accused by the local prosecutor of interfering with the criminal investigation into his teenage son, Zachary Lewis Hobby. The younger Hobby was arrested Oct. 9 and charged with felony possession of marijuana with intent to distribute and criminal trespass.

The sheriff and his wife burst into an interview room at the jail where a Georgia Bureau of Investigation agent was questioning their son after the arrest, according to a letter sent to Gov. Nathan Deal by Tifton Judicial Circuit District Attorney Paul Bowden.

“Sheriff Hobby and his wife, who is also an employee of the Worth County Sheriff’s Office, barged into the room ostensibly to invoke the seventeen (17) year old’s Fifth Amendment Rights for him,” according to Bowden.

Zachary Hobby had already been advised of his rights and had chosen to speak to the GBI agent, Bowden wrote. The sheriff’s intrusion into the GBI interview helped protect his son from additional questioning.

“The agent chose to cease the interview at that point since he was inside the Sheriff’s jail,” according to Bowden.

The DA also noted that following the arrest of Hobby’s son he “was housed in the Worth County jail instead of being transferred to a jail not under the supervision of his father.”

Yeeeeeeeeee Haaaaaw!

For those of you outside the State of Georgia: the whole state is not like this; some counties are worse.

Maybe instead of sending him to prison, they could just let Hobby run the FBI or CIA.

868afdd1489fbe70be99ffbd315b0867--dukes-of-hazard-basset-hound

Time was when we had real lawmen. CBS.

Trump, the CIA, and JFK

24 Tuesday Oct 2017

Posted by in Legal/Political Columns

≈ Comments Off on Trump, the CIA, and JFK

Tags

, , , , , , ,

The full release of all remaining classified files could come on Thursday. Or, it might not.

My question is, “And?” Or, maybe its, “So what?”

Jason Hornberger predicts that something will remain hidden or redacted: a pretty good prediction:

“Subject to the receipt of further information, I will be allowing, as President, the long blocked and classified JFK FILES to be opened.” (Italics added.)

The operative words, of course, are: “Subject to the receipt of further information….”

What is going on here?

Negotiations. The art of the deal. The CIA desperately does not want to show the American people its long-secret JFK-related records. It has asked Trump to continue keeping at least some of them secret notwithstanding the passage of more than 50 years since the Kennedy assassination.

Under long-established custom and tradition in Washington, D.C., when someone asks someone else for a favor, the person who is in a position to grant the favor demands something in return. That’s where the negotiations between Trump and the CIA come into play. Trump wants something in return. We don’t know what — maybe laying off on the Russia investigation — but his announcement last Friday is obviously part of the concluding steps of such negotiations.

What Trump has done with his announcement is send a clear message to the CIA: “Give me what I want and I’ll give you want you want. Otherwise, I will let all your cherished long-secret records relating to the JFK assassination be shown to the American people.”

Make no mistake about it: A deal is about to be made. The CIA will cave. It will end up giving Trump whatever it is he wants. Trump is in the driver’s seat because the CIA cannot afford to permit the American people to see the records it wants to continue to be kept secret. And once the CIA gives Trump what he wants, he will cave and give the CIA the continued secrecy it so desperately needs. All this will happen by this Thursday, the date set by law for release of all the JFK records that Trump has not blocked.

Think about it: The CIA has asked the president to continue secrecy of records that are more than 50 years old or, apparently, some relating to secret correspondence between the CIA and the Assassination Records Review Board back in the 1990s.

The CIA’s ground? “National security” of course, the two most important and meaningless words in the American political lexicon.

National security? Really?

Whatever definition that one might put on that nebulous term, no reasonable person can honestly believe that the release of 50-year-old records are going to result in the United States falling into the ocean or even that the communists are going to take over the federal government.

The CIA says that releasing its decades-old JFK records will reveal secret “methods” of intelligence gathering.

Really? What, like the CIA was using typewriters instead of computers and pay telephones instead of cell phones?

What is amazing (or not) is the extreme nonchalance of the mainstream media to the CIA’s request for continued secrecy. That should be big news. It’s essentially an admission of guilt, given that it is absolutely ludicrous to think that “national security” would be threatened by the release of the CIA’s long-secret JFK-assassination-related records.

Does any of this really matter anymore? Another question of mine: “What if?”

What if the files reveal the CIA was directly behind the assassination (with or without a second shooter), acting on behalf of the central bankers, with the Cubans as a convenient cover? What if the dream conspiracy turns out to be fact? Then what?

Nothing is what. None of the surviving conspirators (if any) would be rounded up and tried for treason. The CIA would not be disbanded. The Fed would continue stretching the economy beyond the point of no return. The media would say little. The people would care less – if they even noticed.

This, assuming it happened to be true, might have been Earth-shattering in 1977. In 2017 it’s a non issue, behind the Kardashians’s latest … whatever.

How many CIA and other government programs have been revealed to be criminal deceits? What’s one more?

I’d like to see all the information, good, bad, or ugly. But, whatever I’m looking for, a change isn’t it.

motorcade-l

National Archives.

Three Felonies a Day: Don’t Necessarily Trust The Man

23 Monday Oct 2017

Posted by in Legal/Political Columns

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

, , , , ,

I’ve recommended Harvey Silverglate’s book before, here. Now, read what he knows, personally, about America’s favorite Special Prosecutor: I’ll leave the case entrapment to your clicking, on the SP in general:

Yet despite the constitutional issues, the most serious problem with a special counsel is that when a prosecutor is appointed to examine closely the lives and affairs of a pre-selected group of targets, that prosecutor is almost certain to stumble across multiple actions that might be deemed criminal under the sprawling and incredibly vague federal criminal code.

In Mueller’s case, one can have a very high degree of confidence that he will uncover alleged felonies within the ranks of the inner circle of the President’s men (there are very few women to investigate in this administration). This could well include Trump himself.

I described this phenomenon long before Trump began his improbable rise, in my 2009 book “Three Felonies a Day: How the Feds Target the Innocent” (Encounter Books, updated edition, 2011). I explained how federal “fraud” statutes were so vague that just about any action in the daily life of a typically busy professional might be squeezed into the elastic definition of some kind of federal felony. Harvard Law Professor (and, I should note, my former professor and subsequent longtime friend and colleague) Alan Dershowitz has beaten me to the punch, making the case in a raft of articles and on TV and radio that none of the evidence thus far leaked to or adduced by investigative reporters constitute federal crimes.

But Mueller’s demonstrated zeal and ample resources virtually assure that indictments will come, even in the absence of actual crimes rather than behavior that is simply “politics as usual”. If Mueller claims that Trump or members of his entourage committed crimes, it doesn’t mean that it’s necessarily so. We should take Mueller and his prosecutorial team with a grain of salt. But a grain of salt seems an outmoded concept in an age when both sides – Trump and his critics – seem impervious to inconvenient facts. The most appropriate slogan for all the combatants on both sides of the Trump wars (including, alas, the reporters and their editors) might well be: “Don’t confuse me with the facts; my mind is made up.”

Laws are like spiders’ webs… Yesterday, Clinton and Libby. Today Manafort. Maybe tomorrow, you. But, then, you ain’t done nothing wrong. Right?

41g+d14wufL._SX331_BO1,204,203,200_

Silverglate/Amazon.

Supercentenarian Sigar Saga

21 Saturday Oct 2017

Posted by in Other Columns

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

, , , ,

Twice this month I’ve spelled “cigar” with an “S.” Nice ring, huh?

I’m sure Richard Overton would agree. Next time I’m in Austin (invariably discussing conspiracy truths with AJ) I may have to ask him about it. On the porch. At the house on Richard Overton Avenue.

I covered Mr. Overton, America’s oldest veteran, in June. He’s still 111 years old. Still in the same house. Still smoking 12 cigars a day. One might explain the others. He just got AC for the first time – probably related to maintaining 70/70 more than his own comfort. He doesn’t need it on the porch.

1508517447-Overton_AL006

Dallas Morning News.

A super Saturday supercentenarian sigar story.