• About
  • Blog (Ext.)
  • Books
  • Contact
  • Education Resources
  • News Links

PERRIN LOVETT

~ Deo Vindice

PERRIN LOVETT

Monthly Archives: March 2013

Legal “Education”

12 Tuesday Mar 2013

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns

≈ 6 Comments

Tags

ABA, bar exam, case-law, changing the world, Constitution, education, Gospel, John Adams, judges, law, law school, lawyer jokes, lies, LSAT, Max Tucker, Muddling Through College, Natural Law, Neal Boortz, profession, racket, Scotland, Thomas Jefferson, trade, U.S. News and World Report, unprepared

This post follows Muddling Through College.  It is intended as a truthful assessment of what life in law school is like and the relationship between legal education and the practice of law and society in general.  As with my undergraduate article, I realize that my experience is dated by a good decade.  Actually, it’s been a pretty bad decade – especially for the legal industry.  Therefore, again, I have tried to incorporate “modern” materials herein as well.

I once heard attorney-turned radio talk show host, Neal Boortz state that when he began practice law in the early 1970s, the law was still a profession.  He then said when he left the law in the early 1990s to pursue radio full-time, the law had degenerated into a trade.  Several times I recall him saying the happiest day of his life was the day he put his status with the Georgia State Bar in the inactive category.  I will update his cycle now – the law has further degenerated into a racket.

The average attorney is greeted by society with all the warmth and affection people normally reserve for a visiting termite.  I hear lawyer jokes every week.  Most are pretty damn funny.  I am one of the few attorneys not offended by these jokes.  Most attorneys do get offended even if they don’t show it.  The reason is that most know the jokes have a great basis in truth and they don’t want to admit the facts.

Mr. Boortz once said, speaking of attorneys, “No other group has done more to help and to damage our society.”  He’s right.  Lawyers were behind the Revolution, the Declaration of Independence, The Constitution, the civil rights movement, and numerous other causes for freedom.  You never hear lawyer jokes in a criminal court.  In a jail holding area or cell block, we are greeted like rock stars.  However, pick any oppressive, illegal, dishonest, or otherwise unsavory law, business, or relationship and you’ll find lawyer DNA all over it.  As a judge I once clerked for said, “It’s amazing how bad most attorneys are.”

The bad begins in law school.  There are about 200 law schools in America which have received the ABA’s seal of approval.  There are more which operate by special rules within their respective states.  U.S. News and World Report ranks and categorizes law schools every year based on a set of semi-relevant criteria.  Schools fight hard to place high on the list.  I don’t see the point.  Judging by the performance of their graduates, all the schools seem equally bad.

prof law

(This cat never practiced law and won’t teach you anything.  Google Images.)

Max “I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell” Tucker wrote an awesome article, http://lewrockwell.com/orig14/max-t1.1.1.html, on reasons NOT to attend law school.  Read it!  I agree with every single thing he said.  By the way, I fell under the Want To Change the World category.  I learned its damn near impossible to change a neighborhood, let alone the world.  And, most people don’t want any change – they enjoy their serfdom.

After four (or 6, 8, etc.) years in college one must score decently on the LSAT and submit a rigorous application in order to gain entry into even the lowest ranking law school.  Once there, one is suddenly trust into an environment that eerily resembles high school.  That’s the law school effect, everyone reverts to teenager-ish behavior and attitudes.  Nothing is actually taught in law school except how to look up information and fill out forms.  You can learn a thing or two in a specialized elective class but nothing therein will appear on the dreaded bar exam of any state.  Given the sad state of the profession, dependant on the exam’s function as a brutal hazing to enter the fraternity, you would think law professors would concentrate on the subjects covered by the bar and the methodology employed for the tests (Byzantine).  They do not.  In fact, after graduating you MUST take a private prep course in order to have any chance of passing the test.  I theorize that any well-educated person could take such a class and pass the bar.  I was not supposed to tell you that.

The majority of instructional time is instead devoted to instilling reverence for the system.  Courts, judges, and their opinions (case-law) are sold as the Gospel.  Rebels like me are interested in core concepts behind the law and the betterment of humanity.  The average student simply accepts the drivel and becomes a system cog.  As I have stated elsewhere, the average lawyer does not know and does not care why we have law or where the law comes from.  Natural Law may as well be officially forbidden by the ABA.

Once one passes the bar and gets that first legal job another enormous short-coming becomes alarmingly clear.  Law schools do not prepare anyone to practice law.  A friend of mine, a Federal Magistrate Judge once asked me, “Remember when you got out, and knew nothing?”  New attorneys are thrown to the wolves.  Half can’t hack it; I think 50% is the current percentage who leave the law sooner than later.  The other 50% live in a nightmarish state, dreaming of getting out. 

In the old days, and in a few foreign countries (Scotland comes to mind), students of the law would apprentice with an existing attorney or law firm for a number of years in order to prepare for actually practicing law.  They would simultaneously “read the law” on their own to gain a full understanding of core concepts.  After satisfying their mentors, the apprentices would be admitted as attorneys, with or without examination.  That’s how Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Abradamn Lincoln and Cicero did it.  Today, only California, Maine, Vermont, Virginia, and Washington still allow “reading” and I imagine it is discouraged.  This process denies law schools reason to exist and deprives budding young lawyers of their $100,000+ school loan debts.  Students might also emerge ready to practice if allowed to study under a competent attorney.  I’m not supposed to tell you any of this.

I have applied for several positions, academic and administrative, at a variety of law schools of late.  I am hoping my experience will give me an advantage.  One would think it was.  I make a particular point to explain that I want to help as many young people as possible actually prepare for the racket….er…profession.  Oddly, many law professors have never practiced law a day in their lives, many aren’t even members of a bar.  It makes sense, in a way, as law school has absolutely nothing to do with practicing.  That evil bar exam (truly a horror worthy to justify the myths) has nothing to do with school or practice either.  Like the schooling, it’s just there – an unavoidable obstacle to tackle.

Law students become attorneys disillusioned, in debt, unprepared, and in today’s market, with slim job prospects.  Most new attorneys today, who can find a job, earn less than $60,000 per year.  The big bucks go to the elite few who land jobs with major law firms.  At those firms, newbies (with all the problems I mentioned) can start at $150,000 or better.  For that pay, they have to “bill” 2500 hours a year.  Billing 2500 means working 4000; that means working 80-100 hour weeks, every week, for about $30-$40 per hour.  Tucker gives examples of jobs that pay that well, don’t require all the time and hassle, and don’t necessitate wasting 3 years in law school.  Remember, those are the best of the best jobs.  Most big firm associates wash out quickly or else end up in mental institutions or under bridges.

lawyer

(Welcome aboard, young associate.  Google Images.)

Ponder what I have written here if you think you want to join the lawyer club.  Some people are meant to be attorneys and will do well at their chosen work.  Most will drudge on miserably until the retire, die, or go nuts.  Some, like me get out.  Well, I’m trying to get out.  Leaving the law can be like leaving a street gang.  You have to walk a gauntlet to exit.  Please pray I make it.  As for you, avoid the whole racket if you can.

PS: I issue a challenge to all attorneys and law school faculties!  Change the system!  Concentrate on the theory and the practice of the law itself and dispense with the case worship, the obsolete mysteries, and the false illusions of nobility.  For you, read Alan Watson’s The Shame of American Legal Education, 2d ed. (Vandeplas Publishing, 2006).  Watson, of Scottish legal training, nails the problems of the American system.  Let’s change it.

Bigger and Better!

12 Tuesday Mar 2013

Posted by perrinlovett in News and Notes

≈ 3 Comments

I’ve added a few features to the site to assist you with contacting me and checking on my most popular posts.  Scroll down the left-hand side to check it all out!  The first thing you’ll notice is a new picture of the new (thin) me – no cigar and a suit!

I’d like to welcome my second Ad – Augusta Iron and Steel Works, Inc. of Augusta, GA.  They build the best bridges in the Southeast! Call them for your next overpass or railroad project!  Perrin approved!

I was out and about this morning and someone recognized me at random from the site.  And! Rather than attack me with a hammer, he complimented the Second Amendment column!  Getting better every day, folks.  All for you.

Some more great posts are in the works.  Stay tuned!

Monday Night News

11 Monday Mar 2013

Posted by perrinlovett in News and Notes

≈ Comments Off on Monday Night News

I think I shall scrap the plan to ask Gov. Deal for a Generalship.  He likely doesn’t even know he has a militia at his disposal.  I also doubt I could raise a platoon, let alone a larger unit.  Maybe with Kim Jong UnBalanced about to start WWIII, the Marines will be called away from Georgia. 

I hope you liked my sentimental babbling about college in Muddling Through College, https://perrinlovett.wordpress.com/2013/03/11/muddling-through-college/.  Have a read if you didn’t see it – especially if you plan to go or go back to college anytime soon.  I’ll have my take on legal education soon.  And, maybe I’ll revisit the Second Amendment before the ASU (GRU) function next week.

The news:

The Colorado movie theater shooter may enter an insanity plea soon.  The judge has cleared the way for a psychoanalysis inclusive of “truth serum.”  For a little morbid fun, Google “shooting libor scandal” and check the results.  There’s an odd connection between the CO theater shooting and the one in Connecticut a few months later.  Both Holmes and Lanza were also under the prescribed influence of psychotropic narcotics at the times of their alleged crimes.  For more fun, Google “james holmes MK Ultra.”  I see a giant conspiracy.  I love conspiracy theories because 9 out of 10 times they’re dead on, even if it takes a century for the truth to come out.  I trust absolutely nothing the government and the lamestream media say.  Do you?  A Pew Research poll says only 30% do.  By the way, check Wiki for “MK Ultra” if you’re not familiar.  Love that CIA!

There was an earthquake in California.  There was also a wave on the ocean.

New Yakkahs are free once again to consume giant sugary beverages!  Woot!

The WSJ has joined the Bash Rand Paul movement.  Sad.  The Urinal used to be a good publication before the neocons took over.

Shaq claims he is a big geek.  I have a friend who was once in Florida on business.  He was having a meeting at a sidewalk cafe with an entertainment industry big-wig.  My buddy was smoking a cigar – probably a Perdomo.  Shaq rolls up in a custom SUV, gets out, and comes over.  He knew the big-wig.  Upon seeing the cigar, Shaq grabbed it from my friend’s mouth, took a long drag, and said, “That’s a good cigar!”  I’m not a basketball guy but I like the Big Geekrock.

Muddling Through College

11 Monday Mar 2013

Posted by perrinlovett in Other Columns

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

academic, accounting, Athens, business, career, CEO, classics, college, corporations, deception, Donald Trump, education, failure, finance, GA, interests, law school, lay offs, lies, MSU, muddles, old people, people, philosophy, racket, real estate, scholarship, the American dream, The Time Given, Trammell Crow, truth, UGA, UVA, What Will They Learn, youth

Given the popularity of my postings on the law, generally and regarding specific topics, and given the inclination of so many people to ask me about becoming a lawyer and what it’s like, I thought I would write something about legal education in America.  It won’t be pretty but it will paint a good overall picture of the modern training lawyers undergo.  First, however, I thought I would write something about the undergraduate experience which precedes law school.  That’s what this article concerns.  It is mainly drawn from my experiences at the University of Georgia in the early – mid 1990’s.

As my personal collegiate experience is somewhat dated (ugh….), I have tried to incorporate a little news concerning more modern college education as well.  So, this piece is really about my personal muddling with an updated, universal background.  I hope it serves as a guide of sorts for those entering college or already there and struggling to decide what to make of the situation.  For those you who have already completed your formal education, I hope this resonates with you.  It’s up to us to enlighten the younger generations so that they may achieve their full potential.

College today is much the same as it was back then.  Modern students have a wealth of on-line information to assist them in picking the right school and program for them.  I wished we had had that.  I recently stumbled across a fantastic website that goes beyond the normal rankings and summary guides.  Check out this site: http://www.whatwilltheylearn.com/.  It’s an initiative from numerous alumni to assess what, if anything, colleges teach these days.  The results are eye-opening.  Of the 1000 or so schools surveyed only 21 got an “A” based on required core curriculum.  I’m proud to say my alma mater was among them.  Several famous and pricy schools did not fare so well.  Watch their video too.

cap

(Google Images.)

Back to yours truly.  I started college in 1993 immediately after graduating from high school.  I applied to and was accepted to three colleges (I think it was three, I’m lazy).  I got accepted to Mississippi State University (in my original home town) and the University of Georgia, where many of my relatives attended.  I think the other school was UVA; I attended classes for a week as a high schooler and was most impressed. 

MSU offered me a scholarship, I think it was a full ride.  My dad had been a professor there and apparently they needed someone from Georgia.  I probably should have accepted but, given my poor choices in college, I would have likely lost the scholarship anyway.  In the end, I went to UGA.  The Georgia HOPE scholarship was recently enacted at the time.  My high school grades were excellent and so I would have qualified.  Unfortunately, my parents made something like 50 cents over the family income maximum.  The next year they raised the maximum but by then my grades were so dismal it didn’t matter.  I must say I had a great time in Athens.  The city is overrun with bars and hot girls and there is always something to do.  Oddly, none of that matters looking back.

I have since analyzed why I did as poorly as I did in the early half of my college career.  I used to blame the school and several professors in whose classes I did poorly.  I have come to the conclusion though that any failings (pun intended) were my fault only.  I had considered that perhaps I was not ready for college.  Then again, I’m not sure what I would have done instead at that time.  I wanted to continue my formal education, I just went about it all wrong.  I was not true to myself.

I have devoted a whole chapter in The Time Given (not long now….) to being true to yourself.  My understanding of the concept comes from my own self-betrayals.  In high school and for the first few years I was at UGA I was under the delusion of the great “American dream.”  George Carlin once said, “it’s a dream because you have to be asleep to believe it.”  I know what he meant.  The dream went something like this:  You go to college to get a valuable degree.  The degree gets you a ticket to work for a big corporation for 30 or 40 years.  By working hard for your employer you get rich and enjoy a comfy retirement.  You can vacation in Destin, Florida and such.

I tried to take the dream to its extreme conclusion.  I just knew I had to major in business in order to get that golden job ticket.  I started out as a general business major and then switched to a speciality in real estate.  UGA’s real estate program is excellent and I did learn some things in my concentration classes which came in handy at Trammel Crow and in my brief real estate sales career.  I also found some of my advanced economics classes fascinating – but only from an academic standpoint.  The rest of the core business classes bored the ever-loving hell out of me.  My grades reflected this.  I recall mornings when I remembered I had to drop classes I had not attended all semester – on the last day possible.  Still figures into some of my nightmares.  I recall passing finance my reading the booklet for my fancy calculator the night before the final exam.  I wasted a semester in a business MIS class that covered things like floppy disks and the new-fangled internet, whatever that was.  That all says something – I’m not sure what…

The “hard” problem I found with an undergraduate business degree was that you studied based on scenarios only a CEO would encounter.  Then you get into the job market and discover only entry-level jobs are available.  It’s kind of depressing.  I really lucked out with Trammell Crow and it took me months of interviewing for scores of other positions to find.  Another problem is that once you’re on the job, they retrain you completely.  I’d say only 10% of what I managed to learn ended up being useful on the job.

If you want to enter business, I think it’s best to get an MBA. It also helps to study something you have connections to (the family business, etc.). Otherwise, you’re wasting your time.  I wasted a lot of the stuff.

The “soft” problem I had was that I didn’t really want to be a business major.  I look like a businessman but I have the heart of a history professor or a latter-day dragon slayer, neither of which benefit from a class in marketing.  This was made clear to me during my senior year.  For whatever reason I finished most of the required classes and had an abundance of electives to take.  Out of curiosity I wound up in a number of classics (ancient Greece and Rome) and philosophy classes. 

Suddenly, I was immersed in subjects that spoke to me about eternal issues I could relate to everyday American life.  I also got “A” after “A” and it wasn’t hard to do.  I liked the programs.  I identified with the programs.  I dig ancient wisdom and logical discourse more than ROI statements and accounting baselines.

It occurred to me a little late in the game to change majors and stick it out.  I probably should have done that.  At the time though, the same stubbornness that got me into my plight held me there.  I made excuses like “I’m almost done.  I need to settle, get out, and get that dream job.”  Ha!  The job I got was great.  I foresaw myself rising in the ranks and becoming a developer, another Donald Trump.  I was good at it.  I thought I could even open my own business and build skyscrapers.  Then, they called me one day and thanked me profusely for my hard work.  I smelled a raise.  Then they said the division was closing and I was no longer needed.  More depression followed.  This is the real American dream – you lie to yourself, waste time and money, and end up getting laid off after giving 150%.  Well, it was the dream.  I think most people have to settle for permanent unemployment or food stamps these days.

After a year of flopping around I headed to law school.  It was my attempt to right my ship.  It almost worked.  I know now that while I love the concept and theory of law, present and historical, these are not good reasons to go to law school.  I’ll have more on this in my coming column on the legal education racket.

I should have gotten a Ph.D. in political theory or history.  Then I would have been primed for a happier career in higher education, pondering the big ideas and helping young people seek questions and answers.  I’m currently trying to re-route myself that way.  This blog is a grand outlet for my academic pursuits.  I’m delighted by the support I have received so far.  I plan to press forward regardless of what kind, if any, formal institution I end up in.  I don’t mean an “institution” where I weave baskets…

Counting the four years I was locked up in high school, it’s been about 24 years getting around to being honest about my ambitions.  I have been extremely lucky in the alternative.  I’ve had the opportunity most people don’t get in the business and legal fields to interact with academics, statesmen, titans and ticks of all stripes.  I have also been able to strike a few blows for freedom over the years.  Everything happens for a reason and I have accepted my long way home.

I hope you, dear readers, find and accept yours too.  Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help you.  I genuinely like helping people.  It’s really why I’m here.

Second Amendent “Debate”

11 Monday Mar 2013

Posted by perrinlovett in News and Notes

≈ 2 Comments

“The GRU [Augusta State University] Political Science Club, Pre-Law Club, and Model United Nations Club are hosting a Brown Bag Event on Tuesday, March 19, 2013 from 2:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. in University Hall 170 titled: RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS? – LEGAL PERSPECTIVES & COMPARATIVE POLICIES.” 

I was informed too late about the event to join the panel.  However, I will be present to listen and then raise a little hell.  Come join the fun.  apparently, some people still believe in the “collective rights” theory of the Second Amendment and will present the tired, discredited arguments – misinterpretations of a case called U.S. v. Miller (1930s) and maybe some Nazi/Communist garbage.  I hope this is rhetorical and a “devil’s argument.”  At any rate I will be present to actually speak for the 2A and the freedoms of We the People!

Here’s the whole program as I was emailed today:

******The GRU Political Science Club, Pre-Law Club, and Model United Nations Club are hosting a Brown Bag Event on Tuesday, March 19, 2013 from 2:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. in University Hall 170 titled: RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS? – LEGAL PERSPECTIVES & COMPARATIVE POLICIES.

This event will rely on the great minds of our faculty to articulate the various constitutional interpretations of the 2nd Amendment and others to inform (not persuade) the audience. However, Hammad Sheikh, the president of the Pre-Law Club, will present comparative policies and statistics dealing with gun ownership as well. Professor Peter Flanagan, the Pre-Law Club Advisor, will explain the rationale of the “individual right” interpretation as articulated by the Supreme Court in Washington D.C. vs. Heller, and how the right was selectively incorporated to apply to the states by virtue of McDonald v. Chicago. Dr. Saundra Reinke will explain the rationale of the “collective right” interpretation as articulated by the Supreme Court in United v. Miller including how the 10 Amendment may be construed by some as the appropriate alternative to the 2nd Amendment in applying the right (or the lack thereof) to bear arms. Dr. Lance Hunter, the co-advisor of the Political Science Club, will act as the Event Moderator and will guide the discussion along in a timely manner. Each speaker will have between 5 – 8 minutes to present their information. The remaining time will be used for an open discussion on the topic between faculty and students.

Sincerely,

Ethan Holliman

GRU Political Science Club (2013), President*******

Of the speakers I only know Dr. Flanagan.  He is a former attorney and actually is a great mind.  I say I will raise hell but those who know me know I will be most respectful …. and entertaining.  I hereby invite any and everyone to attend.  “GRU’ is located off Walton Way in Augusta (easy access from the Wheeler Road [1C] and Wrightsboro Road [2] exits on I-520).  I have no idea where University Hall is – better do some Googling yourselves.  Parking may be another issue.  Check in advance with the school.

This is a natural follow-up to my talk yesterday to the Augusta LP.  I will even wear a form-fitting, expensive suit so as to look like a real attorney and expert!  I don’t know what “brown bag” means.  If you come, don’t plan on free food.  If it’s there, it’s for the students I suppose.  I may try to get on the panel if it’s possible.  If not, I’ll be in the peanut gallery. 

See you there!

PS: All my followers must also be respectful to all present.  If you carry a gun, don’t bring it in the school.  It’s against the illegal Georgia law we currently have and it may frighten some of th sheeple.

A Successful Sunday

10 Sunday Mar 2013

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

Al-CIA-da, Atlanta, Augusta, Augusta State, Austin Reed, Bastiat, Bastiat, Detroit, Empire, Georgia, guns, Heller, Karzai, libertarians, Liberty, LP, MacDonald, Marine Corps, militia, Obama, Parker, Peaches, Peaches, people, police, Republicans, Second Amendment, South Carolina, thin Perrin

Today I spoke to the Augusta, GA Libertarian Party about citizen-police encounters, especially when the citizen is armed.  What a great group!  You can view my presentation materials here: https://perrinlovett.wordpress.com/2013/02/28/march-10-2013-libertarian-party-event-bullett-points/.  It’s a shortened version of How to Interact With the Police, https://perrinlovett.wordpress.com/2013/02/26/how-to-interact-with-the-police/. I think How to Interact may be one of my most popular posts yet.  After the great reception today and some of the feedback I got, I think a follow-up of some sort may be in order. 

I decided to where a suit and tie to the event today. 

0310131318

(Who the hell is the thin dude???)

Unless they’re Christmas ties, I generally do not like ties.  They remind me of upside-down silk nooses.  I only don ties when I go to court.  In fact, today when I revved up I ditched the tie and jacket.  But, I had to wear them.  You see, for many years I have had a closet full of really nice suits I couldn’t fit into.  I think the one above is an Austin Reed, if that means anything.  Thanks to my exercise program and diet, which I think I will patent and hawk on TV, not only do those suits fit – they’re a little loose!  My fat suits may need serious surgery.

0310131319

(Me.  Thin.  In a suit.  With no cigar or beard…  Yes, really me.)

I brought my daughter along for the fun.  She did great until I went on a little too long – she got up and told me it was time to leave…  Thank you, sweetie!!!  We had strawberries and a visit to her little friend’s house as a reward.

0310131321

(Daddy’s little helper.)

I love talking to and with libertarians, big or small “l.”  They are the few who prefer liberty, as Sallust suggested 2000 years ago.  And, as a rule, they are informed, engaging, and very very nice.  Today was no exception.  I fielded questions throughout the presentation, questions that greatly contributed to the overall topic.  I also discussed the possibility of addressing other groups.  I even offered to “debate” any communist or other hack they could dig up at Augusta State (GRU U) on the subject of gun control.  It seems there is still doubt as to what the Second Amendment really means, even after Heller, Parker, and MacDonald, and a slew of other cases.  I intend to write a clarifying post soon – particularly as to what part the people play with relation to the militia and where the militia stands with regard to the Imperial military (totally different birds).

I always learn something at these types of events, even when I’m the presenter.  Speaking of the militia, today I learned that federal and state law enforcement, in conjunction with the MARINE CORPS!, has been conducting hypothetical war games in our area – against the Georgia militia!  These exercises take place next door in South Carolina.  I think I will write both governors and the interloper in the White House and ask if they would like the Georgia Militia to actively participate!  I will lead the effort, if mr. Deal will allow it and appoint me as a Colonel or General or something.  Men, I may be calling on you soon.  If nothing else, I will demand to know why the USMC is drilling against the people of our state.  Have they killed off all “tha taaarrists”???

The news:

Maybe we are the terrorists now.  According to Washington’s puppet, Hamid Karzai, the U.S. is colluding with the Taliban.  Remember them?  They were our allies in the 1980s, who betrayed us on 9/11 and now, after 12 years of war, have become our allies again?  I’m confused too.  Kind of like al-CIA-da – the terror group developed by Washington during the cold war, who became our enemies in 2001, only to get our help in Libya, Syria, etc.  Foreign entanglements, gotta love em.

In other news, Atlanta is now being called the “Detroit of the South” – that can’t be good.  More and more suburbs are seceding to get away from the crime, corruption and financial burdens of the Big Peach.  I have heard rumors that northern Fulton County may split and reform Milton County or whatever it was called 90 years ago.  Peachy.

More rumors – the RepubliCONS, all hyped up on something, are vowing to budget Obamacare away sometime in the future.  I have a shiny nickel that says they don’t.

That’s all for now.  Many thanks again to Amanda, Rocky and my gracious hosts today.  They even gave me a trio of books I have not read before – one about Bastiat!  This looks to be a great week.  I’m planning some terrific columns and maybe a site upgrade or two.  See you tomorrow!

Saturday Night News

09 Saturday Mar 2013

Posted by perrinlovett in News and Notes

≈ Comments Off on Saturday Night News

Remember, tomorrow I am addressing the Augusta, GA Libertarian Party at 1 p.m.  See previous posts for details.  Make sure to factor in Daylight Savings Time – “spring forward” one hour tonight.

The news earlier (in post) than normal:

The Southern Poverty Communism Center sent a letter to Attorney Gunrunner Eric Holder and Homeland MiniPax’s Janet Napolitano urging vigilance against “patriotic” domestic terrorists (you and I).  This group knows what they’re talking about: they had an informant working with Timothy McVeigh before the Oklahoma City bombing (it’s not clear if “John Doe Number 2” was this informant or a CIA black-op/agent provocateur).

new flag

(Google Images.)

Sadly, the terror is spreading like wildfire.  In Texas a young man recently terrorized two home-intruding rapists by menacing them with a firearm (they reportedly described it as “an assault weapon”).  The boy, who tired of watching his mother and sister being raped and who did not wish to see them murdered, did not have the decency to show compassion for the two men.  By acting with a gun, he also denied the state its role as immortal guardian, an act of rebellion which jeopardizes millions.  See here: http://www.infowars.com/boy-stops-murder-plot-with-gun-national-media-ignores-story/.  Studies show that this type of domestic taliban-style ruthlessness take place about 2.5 million times per year.  Just think of all the traumatized criminals…

Young Americans, despite years of statist propaganda, just don’t seem to get it.  A recent Reason poll found that 70% of young people favor private ownership of assault weapons.  Another poll found a similar majority plan to purchase such weapons as soon as possible.  These are supposed to be Little Barry’s people, instead they are following in the footsteps of notorious terrorists such as Patrick Henry, Thomas Jefferson, and David Crockett.  They may reconsider when facing off against the 100s of billions of rounds of ammunition and the thousands of tanks of Mrs. Napolitano’s Schutz Staffel.

Question of the day/week/month:

Not that the dreaded SEQUESTER (dark clouds form in your mind) has taken effect, why does the federal debt still skyrocket at over $100,000 PER SECOND!?  Just asking.

I look forward to posting an account of my successful work with the LP tomorrow.  Hopefully, I’ll see many of you there.  Until next time, keep the tyrants sweating!

Friday Night News – Milestones

08 Friday Mar 2013

Posted by perrinlovett in News and Notes

≈ Comments Off on Friday Night News – Milestones

First, a reminder that I will address the Augusta, GA-area Libertarian Party this Sunday, March 10, 2013 at 1 p.m.  My topic will be how citizens should interact with the police, especially while armed.  See my post, How to Interact With the Police, https://perrinlovett.wordpress.com/2013/02/26/how-to-interact-with-the-police/, for more details on the subject.  I will gladly accept donations of cigars, booze, and gold…  The meeting will be at The Roadrunner Cafe, 2821 Washington Rd, Augusta (just off I-20).  You can find the Roadrunner here: http://www.roadrunnercafe.com/.  The Augusta LP is on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/299217897355/.

I started this site last summer but didn’t really get it going until this time last month.  What a month!  I’ve had about 2000 views in the past 30 days.  Keep coming back!  Today, I published The United States Constitution, https://perrinlovett.wordpress.com/2013/03/08/the-united-states-constitution/. Check it out if you haven’t. 

In my quest to find interesting items for your review, and to make money for me, I’m evaluating a service which will allow me to tailor advertising on the site.  I’m looking for products and services I think you and I are interested in.  Thanks again to Top Shelf Cigars for being the very first ad!  I vow no pop-ups!

A few personal notes – Today I added my 1000th friend on Facebook.  In addition to being a great way to keep in touch, Facebook provides a valuable outlet for my ramblings.  And, I have dropped 45 pounds since I started my program.  I’m at 193 now and feel great!  I’ve noticed a few people have joined me on the fitness bandwagon.  The more the merrier.

The news:

Slow news day but The Onion has a great story about Obama and drones: http://www.theonion.com/articles/youre-my-best-friend-says-obama-to-drone-that-appe,31594/.  I always trust the Onion.

The United States Constitution

08 Friday Mar 2013

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns

≈ 8 Comments

Tags

18th Amendment, 21st Amendment, Act of Congress, administration, agencies, amendment, America, aristocracy, Articles of Confederation, Attila and the Witch Doctor, attorneys, Ayn Rand, Bill of Rights, branches, CFR, commerce clause, Congress, Constitution, Courts, cycle of the state, democracy, emergency, English, Executive Orders, Federal government, For the New Inellectual, Founders, general welfare, history, James Clyburn, jurisdiction, King George III, law, leviathan, libertarians, Liberty, Lysander Spooner, Nancy Pelosi, national defense, necessary and proper, ochlocracy, oligarchy, Plato, power, President, Quiotic, republic, Revolutionary War, Romans, Speaker of the House, States, Supreme Court, taxation, Tenth Amendment, timocracy, truth, tyranny, wars

The United State Constitution is a historical anomaly.  The Constitutions of the several States are as well.  Our English predecessors had a Constitution of sorts as did the Romans long before.  These are however, rarities.  Many nations today have “constitutions” or charters which allege the rule of law, but which in reality are no different from the dictatorships and dominions of old.

Traditionally, most people have lived under one regime or another which ruled by the whims of men and the force they could exert.  Ayn Rand discussed this phenomenon, labelling it “Attila and the Witch Doctor.”  For the New Intellectual (1961).  Attila is representative of the ruling big man, a brute whose law” extends from the barrel of a gun or the tip of a spear.  The Witch Doctor is the “holy” man who finds some “divine” reason to justify Attila’s power and also placated the people to avert their suspicion or anger.

In 1775 the American colonists were under the rule of a gentler Attila, King George, III, who was constrained by Parliament and the English Constitution.  He even had a state-chartered church to serve as the Witch Doctor.  The next year the colonists declared their independence from England and instituted on earth thirteen new nations.  During the Revolutionary War these nations were united in Congress due to their dire predicament.  In 1781 the 13 states adopted the Articles of Confederation (the ratification process began in 1777) which tied them loosely together for mutual benefit.

Not being satisfied with loose ties, in 1789 the early Americans drafted a stronger document to commence a stronger central government – the Constitution.  The first ten amendments to the document, the Bill of Rights, came along in 1791. 

Constitution_Pg1of4_AC

(The Constitution.  Federal Archives.)

People like me are always rallying to the Constitution, its limits on government power, and it’s protection of individual rights.  When comparing the reality of modern American government to the government set forth in the original text of the Constitution, the two things seem polar opposites.  Thus, the constant call for a return to Constitutional government.  There is no doubt, from a libertarian perspective, the latter would be far easier to accept than the former. 

However, the problem I have finally come to terms with is that the two opposites are really the same thing – separated only by time.  Again, I quote Lysander Spooner: “But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain – that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it.  In either case, it is unfit to exist.”  “Unfit” is a harsh assessment, but it is probably the most intellectually honest view. 

I have personally sworn (affirmed) several oaths to support and defend the Constitution as an attorney.  Then, immediately, I have been told to look the other way as nearly every provision of the document is rendered moot.  The government these days does what it wants, end of discussion.  Its power is always on display.  If one or two of your rights happen to be respected, be happy.  The government will tell you it gave you those rights!  There is no respect for the letter of the Supreme Law.

In 2009, then Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, was asked by a reporter, “Madam Speaker, where specifically does the Constitution grant Congress the authority to enact an individual health insurance mandate?”  Mrs. Pelosi responded with indignation, “Are you serious?  Are you serious?”  She then put on the record that the question was not serious.  http://www.aim.org/guest-column/yes-nancy-pelosi-we-are-serious/.  The question was dead serious and the true answer is “nowhere.”  Truth gets in the way.

Rep.  James Clyburn clarified the issue: “There’s nothing in the Constitution that says that the federal government has anything to do with most of the stuff we do.”  http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203917304574412793406386548.html.  Jimmy was brutally honest.  Over the long-span of our Republic, a few pet phrases and ideas in the old parchment have been used to systematically justify the awesome growth of the federal government – the commerce clause, the necessary and proper clause, the general welfare clause, national defense, and taxation.  Today, when most of what the government does is illegal, they don’t even try to justify their actions.

This was hard for me to accept as an attorney.  Actually, I never did accept it.  In many (most) cases there absolutely nothing I could do for the interests of true justice and Constitutional fidelity.  However, I remain one of the few who will stand on principle to the point of Quixotic excess.  I do not fear being labeled wrong when I am right.

Here’s how the Constitution was supposed to work.  It was quite simply compared to today’s leviathan.

First, please read the Constitution.  Here’s a link: http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution.html.  This is the official site of the Constitution, complete with pictures of the original text.  Make it a “Favorites” link on your browser. 

The Constitution created the federal government, divided into three branches.  The branches were listed in order of importance.  Article One defines and empowers the legislative branch, Congress.  The powers of Congress or the legislative authority it has are mainly derived from Section Eight though a few powers reside elsewhere (some have been added by subsequent Amendments).  The powers enumerated in the text are the only powers which Congress may legally exercise.  The Tenth Amendment says so.  The number of these powers is the subject of some speculation among libertarians.  Some count the individual sub-sections only.  Some delineate each power from the subsections – I follow this approach.  Some extrapolate reasonable relations between the individual powers.  However you calculate them, the powers are few in number.  Let’s say there are about 30.  That’s it!  Those are the only things the government is supposed to do. 

Today we are trapped under tens of thousands of laws and countless regulations which cover literally everything imaginable.  The regulations are issued by various agencies, supposedly to implement the laws Congress passes.  You can find this mind-boggling collection of verbosity at: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collectionCfr.action?collectionCode=CFR.  Don’t make too close of a study; the regulations change constantly.  In my view none of these rules are valid as they are not the expressly permitted work of Congress.  However, the agencies that make them have armies of men with guns to ensure compliance.

Article Two concerns the executive, The President. The President’s authority is even more minimal than Congress’s.  He is supposed to only attempt to enforce the valid laws Congress passes, run the day-to-day operations of the government, and prosecute wars as declared by Congress.  That’s about it. 

Of course, today the President is a virtual government unto himself.  The executive’s ability to take “emergency” action and the constant acquiescence to these actions by the other branches, have made the President the most dangerous part of the central government.  He issues Executive Orders, which were originally only supposed to concern policy implementation within his administration, but today are taken as Acts of Congress (without Acts of Congress).  My view is that almost all of these Orders are invalid.  There again, the President is in charge of all those armies of armed men and the regular military too.  He usually gets his way.

Article Three concerns the federal Judiciary.  This article only established the Supreme Court.  It left another power to Congress to create and empower inferior courts of different kinds.  Originally, legal matters were supposed to be handled by State Courts for the most part, with the Supreme Court deciding differing outcomes from different States when a controversy arose.  Many libertarians think the judiciary has become too powerful.  Perhaps it has.  Most attorneys take the opinions of the courts to be divine.  I do not, for the most part, agree.  Congress has the ultimate authority over law in this nation and has the power to override a contrary court decision.  Congress also has the express authority to limit the jurisdiction of the courts, meaning Congress can prohibit a court from reviewing certain matters.  Congress rarely uses this power.

The rest of the original articles explain various concepts, procedures, and guarantees.  Perhaps the most important feature of the remaining articles is in Article Five – the procedure for adding Amendments to the Constitution.  This has been done 27 times since the original charter was enacted.

The Bill of Rights, those first 10 amendments, was added as a cautious afterthought.  The rights therein were acknowledged as Natural Law in origin and eternal.  In 1789 all ten were taken as a given.  The Founders assured everyone, including each other, that due to its explicitly limited nature, the new government would never be a threat to individual liberties.  There was no point in adding statements of protection.  But, in 1791, suspicion gave way to action, and several core rights were definitely stated and protected.  They have been poorly defended of late.

The remaining seventeen amendments were added over the course of years.  Most granted the government more power.  Only one of those has ever been repealed – the 21st Amendment, the only one ratified following State Convention origination, repealed the 18th Amendment, which outlawed alcohol.  In my estimation, of all the Acts of the federal government in its entire history, none were more cruel than the 18th Amendment.  During a period of dramatically increasing federal power and erosion of individual liberty, the government decided to take away the People’s ability to legally drink their serfdom away.  Thank God it was erased after only 14 years.  True to form though, the government could not simply end prohibition, rather, the ability to regulate alcohol was passed on the States.  The ATF and your State’s revenue department bear witness to the enduring character of legislative folly.

In conclusion, while the Constitution may be revered as creating a government of limited powers, it still created a government.  That government has vastly exceeded its authorized power to the detriment of our Liberty.  I would like to see a return to The Articles of Confederation or some other less powerful central state.  This is not likely to happen.  The best alternative would be to simply adhere to the Constitution as written, no more.  This is equally unlikely to occur.  As is, we will have to wait until time takes its toll on the remains of the Republic.  This process may not be pleasant for us.  Plato described the cycle of the theoretical state about 2500 years ago – we would appear to be somewhere near the end.  Aristocracy gives way to timocracy (rule of land owners).  Timocracy becomes oligarchy (the rule of an elite).  Oligarchy degenerates into democracy.  Democracy can also be called “ochlocracy” or mob rule.  Ultimately this paves the way for a despot to seize power.  The cycle then repeats. 

We can really only hope that someday, a future generation will learn from our mistakes and correct them.  History says that correction won’t last long.

Thursday Night News

07 Thursday Mar 2013

Posted by perrinlovett in News and Notes

≈ Comments Off on Thursday Night News

Earlier today I posted Don’t Drone Me, Bro!, a hybrid news/column piece concerning drones, bankers, and a bird (not all together…).  If you didn’t catch it today, click here: https://perrinlovett.wordpress.com/2013/03/07/dont-drone-me-bro/.

I’ve got some new stuff in the hopper – on the Constitution, some historical figures, more zany laws, and my endearing personal stories.  Look for one or more this weekend.

The news:

Rand Paul is having a war of words with John McInsane (RINO – AZ) and Lindsey Grahamnesty (RINO – SC).  The dull duo attacked Paul for his audacity at defending the Constitution and the lives and freedom of the American people.  Paul fired back at the fearful, war-mongers, “They think the whole world is a battlefield, including America.”  Read more: http://thehill.com/video/senate/286881-paul-blasts-back-at-mccain-graham#ixzz2Mu7ubpjK.  

In other news, the people of Kenya are officially smarter than Amerikans.  President Sotoro’s brother (the Obama who stayed in Kenya) lost his bid for the governorship of Siaya.  Then again, the Kenyans have had over four years to review “hope and change” and they don’t have to filter the BS from our “news” programs.  Word has it yet another Bush is preparing to run for the Whitehouse.  2016 will be a grand opportunity for Amerikans and especially RepubliCONS to demonstrate their stupidity.

Check back tomorrow for more and better stuff.  As usual I am always trying to improve the site. 

Perrin

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Perrin Lovett

From Green Altar Books, an imprint of Shotwell Publishing

From Green Altar Books, an imprint of Shotwell Publishing

Perrin Lovett at:

Perrin on Geopolitical Affairs:

Archives

  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • June 2012

Prepper Post News Podcast by Freedom Prepper (sadly concluded, but still archived!)

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • PERRIN LOVETT
    • Join 42 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • PERRIN LOVETT
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.