• About
  • Blog (Ext.)
  • Books
  • Contact
  • Education Resources
  • News Links

PERRIN LOVETT

~ Deo Vindice

PERRIN LOVETT

Tag Archives: ObamaCare

Congressional Republicans, The Ever Evolving Definition of “Pitiful”

11 Saturday Feb 2017

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns

≈ Comments Off on Congressional Republicans, The Ever Evolving Definition of “Pitiful”

Tags

Congress, Donald Trump, GOP, government, insanity, ObamaCare, Republicans

Or is that “devolving”?

The only character from fiction that even comes close to approximating the pathetic, stupid, useless, and tortured evil of the GOP is Gollum. Even he falls short, he having some unique talents and an ultimate, if unlikely, purpose.

I honestly see no redeeming value to the Republican Party. They lack even comedic value. Note: Trump is a titular “Republican” only; President Trump is really a …. Trump. Love him or hate him. he sure as hell tries. And he seems to have fun with. And he exhibits a devil-may-care attitude. This all may or may not turn out well but it is undeniably more noble than the righteous do nothing but still manage to screw up anyway insanity of his party.

The Democrat Party also stands head and shoulders above the GOP as a party – usually. They took a beating from Trump and are in understandable disarray. Again, love ’em or hate ’em, they command a certain level of respect due to their tenacity and consistency. They want to redefine the demographics of the U.S. – they do it. They want to crash Western civilization – you know when they try. They say they’ll socialize something – done. They want to raise taxes – done. Whatever it is, good or bad, they get it done.

The Republicans seem to have existed lately only to provide weak, nominal resistance to the ultimate Democratic victories. And that’s it. They have no strategy and no ability to lead independent or their sad, schizophrenic dependency. I think the last Republican with a will of his own was Abraham Lincoln (and that will was to wreck the Constitution and kill people).

Yes, yes, Republicans do a good job of throwing bombs and raising debt levels. But they always do so only with copious Democratic assistance.

So it is that the GOP has absolutely no idea what they’re doing with regard to Obamacare, the ACA:

Republicans love cutting taxes, especially if they were authored by a president named Barack Obama. But as they push their wobbly effort to erase his health care overhaul, they’re divided over whether to repeal the levies the law imposed to finance its expanded coverage for millions of Americans.

It’s a trillion-dollar dilemma – actually closer to $1.1 trillion. That’s the 10-year price tag the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office puts on revenue the government would lose if the law’s taxes on wealthy people, the insurance and pharmaceutical industries and others were eliminated.

Republicans and President Donald Trump have been edging away from their promise to quickly eliminate Obama’s entire law. Still, annulling its taxes would be a partial victory and is irresistible for many GOP lawmakers and the conservative voters at the core of their support.

“We should do full repeal,” said Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, a leading House conservative. “And full repeal means not taking the taxes” from people.

Yet voiding those levies erases a mammoth war chest Republicans would love to have – and may well need – as they try replacing Obama’s law. It’s a major rift GOP leaders face as they try crafting a health care package that can pass Congress.

“These are sources of revenue you just can’t discount,” said Rep. Patrick Meehan, R-Pa., a member of the Tuesday Group of GOP pragmatists. He said the money could help “create a soft landing and coverage for those who currently rely on Obamacare.”

Imagine a fool (the GOP), standing on the railroad tracks. Even the fool can see the flaming wreck of a train (Obamacare) speeding towards him. All he has to do to save himself is step off. However, this fool is so stupid that all he can do is equivocate about stepping left or right. At the same time he obsesses about the kinetic value of the train and how to possibly replace it with yet another flaming wreck. The train is seconds away from impact.

This scenario would be hilarious except that, in our case, the fool’s demise will derail the train, crashing it into our house.

you-cant-fix-stupid

Whatever. The Masters is only a few weeks away…

Executive Order Minimizing the Economic Burden of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Pending Repeal

24 Tuesday Jan 2017

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Donald Trump, executive order, IRS, law, ObamaCare, taxes, theft

Whitehouse.gov is fully operational now, including Executive Order No.1.

nimbus-image-1485305466625

The White House.

EXECUTIVE ORDER

– – – – – – –

MINIMIZING THE ECONOMIC BURDEN OF THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT PENDING REPEAL

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. It is the policy of my Administration to seek the prompt repeal of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148), as amended (the “Act”). In the meantime, pending such repeal, it is imperative for the executive branch to ensure that the law is being efficiently implemented, take all actions consistent with law to minimize the unwarranted economic and regulatory burdens of the Act, and prepare to afford the States more flexibility and control to create a more free and open healthcare market.

Sec. 2. To the maximum extent permitted by law, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (Secretary) and the heads of all other executive departments and agencies (agencies) with authorities and responsibilities under the Act shall exercise all authority and discretion available to them to waive, defer, grant exemptions from, or delay the implementation of any provision or requirement of the Act that would impose a fiscal burden on any State or a cost, fee, tax, penalty, or regulatory burden on individuals, families, healthcare providers, health insurers, patients, recipients of healthcare services, purchasers of health insurance, or makers of medical devices, products, or medications.

Sec. 3. To the maximum extent permitted by law, the Secretary and the heads of all other executive departments and agencies with authorities and responsibilities under the Act, shall exercise all authority and discretion available to them to provide greater flexibility to States and cooperate with them in implementing healthcare programs.

Sec. 4. To the maximum extent permitted by law, the head of each department or agency with responsibilities relating to healthcare or health insurance shall encourage the development of a free and open market in interstate commerce for the offering of healthcare services and health insurance, with the goal of achieving and preserving maximum options for patients and consumers.

Sec. 5. To the extent that carrying out the directives in this order would require revision of regulations issued through notice-and-comment rulemaking, the heads of agencies shall comply with the Administrative Procedure Act and other applicable statutes in considering or promulgating such regulatory revisions.

Sec. 6. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

DONALD J. TRUMP

THE WHITE HOUSE,
January 20, 2017.

Two things of particular note in this Order. First, the repeal part – even makes it into the title! Love it. Second, and more immediately important for millions of $uffering taxpayers is Section 2:

“…the heads of all other executive departments and agencies (agencies) with authorities and responsibilities under the Act [TO INCLUDE THE IRS] shall exercise all authority and discretion available to them to waive, defer, grant exemptions from, or delay the implementation of any provision or requirement of the Act that would impose …  a cost, fee, tax, penalty, or regulatory burden on individuals…”

Shall means shall. One hopes the agency heads see the urgency here. Perhaps this will apply to 2016 income taxes and the insanely complex and utterly evil incomprehensible nonsense known as the “shared responsibility payment” (a.k.a. Damned Theft). This is the gun to the head provision of Obamacare, the one John Roberts found to just be another cozy little tax.

You might want to hold off on filing the 1040 until April to see how this plays out. Of course, as fast as Trump is moving, the whole law may be gone by then. I hope its ghost haunts Barry on the links.

Patient Freedom From Obamacare?

22 Sunday Jan 2017

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Donald Trump, government, health, ObamaCare, taxes, theft

That’s what they may call it, the Patients’ Freedom Act of 2017. Or something like that.

Happy halftime from the AFC Championship game. What a great game and what a great performance, earlier, by Atlanta.

And this could be a happy day for long-suffering taxpayers in America. The details on the PFA17 are sketchy but President Trump’s first executive order may take the gun-to-your-head teeth out of Obama’s miserably failed tax collection plan, aka Obamacare.

The Trump administration may no longer enforce a rule requiring individual Americans to carry health insurance or pay a penalty if they do not, a senior White House official said on Sunday Speaking on ABC’s “This Week” program, Kellyanne Conway, counselor to the president, said President Donald Trump “may stop enforcing the individual mandate.”

Separately, on CBS’ “Face the Nation” show, she reiterated Republican promises that no one would lose their health insurance under Obamacare while a replacement is being developed.

“For the 20 million who rely upon the Affordable Care Act in some form, they will not be without coverage during this transition time,” she said.

On Friday Trump signed an executive order concerning the 2010 healthcare law, urging U.S. agencies to “waive, defer, grant exemptions from, or delay the implementation” of provisions deemed to impose fiscal burdens on states, companies or individuals.

Healthcare experts had speculated that Trump could expand exemptions from the individual mandate.

This is fantastic news for any healthy person who has the crazy idea that their money is actually their money. I tried to find the Order. Here’s what they have out so far:

nimbus-image-1485133334203

Come on, POTUS Trump. Don’t leave us hanging. And don’t keep us paying.

Details, again, are a little short. Hopefully so to will be the duration of this horrible law. Developing…

 

 

The End of Obamacare?

16 Monday Jan 2017

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns

≈ Comments Off on The End of Obamacare?

Tags

Congress, Donald Trump, fraud, government, health, insurance, medical care, ObamaCare

There’s no doubt the ACA is finished. It’s bankrupt; it doesn’t work; its killing coverage; the coverage afforded is basically unusable; doctor’s are fleeing; insurance companies are abandoning entire states; and, of course, it’s found nowhere in the Constitution outside the overactive imagination of John Roberts (not that that one matters). The question is how will it go out. And what will take it’s place?

President-elect Trump dropped some hints as to his coming answers:

President-elect Donald Trump said in a weekend interview that he is nearing completion of a plan to replace President Obama’s signature health-care law with the goal of “insurance for everybody,” while also vowing to force drug companies to negotiate directly with the government on prices in Medicare and Medicaid.

Trump declined to reveal specifics in the telephone interview late Saturday with The Washington Post, but any proposals from the incoming president would almost certainly dominate the Republican effort to overhaul federal health policy as he prepares to work with his party’s congressional majorities.

Trump’s plan is likely to face questions from the right, after years of GOP opposition to further expansion of government involvement in the health-care system, and from those on the left, who see his ideas as disruptive to changes brought by the Affordable Care Act that have extended coverage to tens of millions of Americans.

In addition to his replacement plan for the ACA, also known as Obamacare, Trump said he will target pharmaceutical companies over drug prices.

“They’re politically protected, but not anymore,” he said of pharmaceutical companies.

One wonders how “insurance for everybody” will be paid for. Trump is likely to face a greater fight from his own party than from the opposition. The Democrats should technically be okay so long as continued coverage for the “poor” is promised (no-one cares about delivery, it’s the thought that counts in D.C.). And the GOP has murmured about changing the law but keeping those dreadful taxes – even as they contemplate mind-blowing debt increases in the near years to come.

obamacarebattlemgn

NBC News.

Another huge problem will be the insurance industry and the medical community. They will not go away quietly. And they will join forces with the big-pharma racket. Nothing about repealing or replacing this monster will be easy. But change has to come. Barring massive, massive subsidies, the program as is, is finished.

Fred Reed recently mused on the fact that the much-maligned, socialist single-payer system found in some other countries is preferable to what we have now. And he’s right. Single-payer would cost less overall and would likely deliver much better results. But, recall that delivery doesn’t matter in D.C. Due to the stigma, the potential loss of control and profits for the insurance cabal, etc., and the lingering collective remembrance of freedom, socialized medicine is not going to happen in America. No time soon, at least.

The Austrian, the anarchist, and the capitalist in me fully believes that a completely unregulated, free-market system is by far the best alternative. It’s one we used to have and is still found in a few small places around the world. It worked – too well for the government and their corporate handlers. It will never return.

So “free” medicine, the best solution, and socialized medicine, a distant second-best, are off the table. That leaves things in between them and what we have now. And what we have now is the worst possible in the developed world. It’s really little better than no care at all in many cases. In some cases, it’s actually worse.

What we’re probably going to end up with is a compromise. Something dead in the middle that will last a few years or decades and then need another massive overhaul. I wish Trump (and all of us) well but I remain optimistically pessimistic.

As is, I’ll try to stay healthy and avoid any contact with any medical system. That’s what I recommend for everybody.

Repeal and Replace but Keep the Taxes (of Course)

22 Thursday Dec 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Congress, GOP, government, ObamaCare, taxes, theft

My first substantive post here regarded Obamacare. It is as much a taxation scheme as it is a corporate welfare measure and a vote-buying apparatus.

The same worthless GOPers who didn’t stop the Act from becoming law have, for years now, blathered on about repealing and replacing it. They haven’t of course though they have had a considerable amount of time and ample evidence for the cause. One Donald J. Trump was recently elected president in small part based on his promise to amend or abolish the system. “You’re going to have the best healthcare,” he said.

114272_6001

Rick McKee.

A flat-out repeal isn’t going to happen. The free market is simply no longer an option in America. As Fred Reed recently pointed out, the dreaded socialist single-payer system is now probably cheaper and more efficient than what passes for healthcare in the U.S. That won’t happen either.

What likely will happen is more of the same communist/corporatist BS we have endured for the past 50 years. The programs may change a little but the effect will be just as it is now: lousy and expensive third-rate care. The insurance and medical cabals will continue to profit. The government will continue to justify its pointless existence. You’ll continue to pay.

And, of course, now that it comes to it, the same useless GOP is contemplating keeping the associated taxes even as they monkey with the law.

Congressional Republicans are considering holding off on repealing some of ObamaCare’s taxes, according to lobbyists familiar with the discussions.

GOP lawmakers on the House Ways and Means Committee discussed the possibility of keeping some of the taxes in place during a retreat last week at the Library of Congress, the sources say.

Even if some of the taxes are not removed as part of the initial repeal bill, it does not necessarily mean they will remain indefinitely. Some ObamaCare taxes could be dealt with as part of a larger tax reform bill later in the year.

Still, there is at least a possibility that some taxes could remain in place to provide revenue for a replacement healthcare measure.

Discussions are still in flux…

A while back, defending his embattled signature work, Obama said, “If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor.” He was lying and he knew it. Now it’s Trump’s turn and the GOP’s. Doctors aside, I like my money. Might I keep my money?

ObamaCare: A Study in Failure (and a Surprise from Donald Trump)

29 Monday Aug 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ Comments Off on ObamaCare: A Study in Failure (and a Surprise from Donald Trump)

Tags

America, Barack Obama, Donald Trump, government, law, laws, ObamaCare, Ron Paul, The People

Almost every week the news about Hussein Obama’s signature insurance company profit assurance program gets a little worse … if not wholly predictable. The Washington Post reports enrollment is off by ridiculous margins.

Not even half of the uninsured who were supposed to sign up have done so. They were supposed to enter into the new market exchanges with glee and secure “affordable” health insurance. They can’t because the coverage is not affordable. Premiums are skyrocketing as insurance companies race to make sure they can actually cover expenditures based on enrollment proceeds. These companies always make money and, if they don’t, they get out of a failing market.

More than a quarter of U.S. markets are failing. This leaves 1 out of 4 people with only one choice for coverage. And that coverage comes with a steep price, limited care options, and high deductibles. Failure, failure, failure.

The post notes that so many are not signing up because the related tax penalty isn’t working as planned. You recall that Obamacare was justified as just a tax and not as a draconian mandate that everyone must purchase something, needed (or wanted) or not.

I forgot that half of all Americans don’t pay any taxes to begin with. So the numbers kind of fit. Most of those folks are eligible for Medicaid or Medicare anyway. Thus, the burden and all the costs fall on We, the Middle Class People. Always our lot. Our red cross to bear.

I was going to pounce on the presidential candidates for not addressing the issue. With Hillary, there is no point. Her platform might be summarized as “Big government, cronyism, and failure.” If she likes her corruption, she will keep her corruption.

As for her personally, she is totally removed from the process. She and her cigar-probing husband make enough million$ in bribes and pay-offs from crooked corporations and foreign governments to pay for their own private doctors. If she were forced into an exchange, then the $20,000 she has received from the Ku Klux Klan this year would pay for any Obamacare plan.

Then I thought about Trump. Trump is obviously able to afford any doctor of his choosing. What is he saying about the national issue though? It occurred to me that I have never looked into his position on the matter. I thus read from his website and was a little surprised.

Republicans in general always say they want to repeal the law and then replace it with something else – something else sure to fail amid corruption. It’s important to remember than Obama’s program was based on Mitt Romney’s state program. A nationalization of a Massachusetts law was sure to fail – as it has.

Trump wants to repeal Obamacare immediately and then replace it … with free market competition. That’s amazing.Here’s his plan:

Congress must act. Our elected representatives in the House and Senate must:

Completely repeal Obamacare. Our elected representatives must eliminate the individual mandate. No person should be required to buy insurance unless he or she wants to.

Modify existing law that inhibits the sale of health insurance across state lines. As long as the plan purchased complies with state requirements, any vendor ought to be able to offer insurance in any state. By allowing full competition in this market, insurance costs will go down and consumer satisfaction will go up.

Allow individuals to fully deduct health insurance premium payments from their tax returns under the current tax system. Businesses are allowed to take these deductions so why wouldn’t Congress allow individuals the same exemptions? As we allow the free market to provide insurance coverage opportunities to companies and individuals, we must also make sure that no one slips through the cracks simply because they cannot afford insurance. We must review basic options for Medicaid and work with states to ensure that those who want healthcare coverage can have it.

Allow individuals to use Health Savings Accounts (HSAs). Contributions into HSAs should be tax-free and should be allowed to accumulate. These accounts would become part of the estate of the individual and could be passed on to heirs without fear of any death penalty. These plans should be particularly attractive to young people who are healthy and can afford high-deductible insurance plans. These funds can be used by any member of a family without penalty. The flexibility and security provided by HSAs will be of great benefit to all who participate.

Require price transparency from all healthcare providers, especially doctors and healthcare organizations like clinics and hospitals. Individuals should be able to shop to find the best prices for procedures, exams or any other medical-related procedure.

Block-grant Medicaid to the states. Nearly every state already offers benefits beyond what is required in the current Medicaid structure. The state governments know their people best and can manage the administration of Medicaid far better without federal overhead. States will have the incentives to seek out and eliminate fraud, waste and abuse to preserve our precious resources.

Remove barriers to entry into free markets for drug providers that offer safe, reliable and cheaper products. Congress will need the courage to step away from the special interests and do what is right for America. Though the pharmaceutical industry is in the private sector, drug companies provide a public service. Allowing consumers access to imported, safe and dependable drugs from overseas will bring more options to consumers.

 – Trump campaign site.

His position almost looks like it was drafted by Ron Paul – except for the Medicaid provisions. Astounding.

I’ve been rather critical of Mr. Trump, saying that his potential tenure will likely be a disappointment. I’ve also said I hope he proves me wrong. It looks like he’s trying.

Such a simple plan would still be very hard to mandate. Powerful forces would (will) align to stop reform in Congress. The masses, still chasing the Pokemon, won’t understand any of it and cannot be counted on for any assistance. Still, the man is trying.

So it is that I start this week off with more of the usual, dismal happenings of Washington and yet with a little ray of hope.

I just discovered that a hawk is perched atop a neighbor’s house right now. Fitting. That’s me- hawkishly watching out for you.

_20160829_082741

Happy Monday, America!

 

If You Like Your High Prices, You Can Keep Your High Prices: Ailing ObamaCare

12 Friday Aug 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ Comments Off on If You Like Your High Prices, You Can Keep Your High Prices: Ailing ObamaCare

Tags

America, government, insurance, money, ObamaCare, taxes

Either Donald or Hillary will face many challenges come January. (One wonders why any sane person would want such a job.) Among them is the rapid deterioration of ObamaCare. The program is in very real danger of failing at least one of its primary goals, insurance company profits.

The Obama administration has struggled for several years to bring young, healthy people into the marketplaces, which is needed to offset the medical costs of older and sicker customers.

These problems are coming to light this year, as insurers get their first full look at ObamaCare customer data. Some, like UnitedHealth Group, say they’ve seen enough and are already vowing to leave the exchanges.

Levitt and other experts warn that if the numbers don’t improve this year, more insurers could bolt. That would deal a major blow to marketplace competition while also driving up rates and keeping even more people out of the exchanges.

The answer is going to be higher (much higher) health insurance premiums for all who currently pay. Rates in some states are set to rise another 40-60% immediately and on top of other recent increases. How’s that for “affordable”? A few of the con-men say this will be a mere one-time offset. Aside from previous increases and those sure to follow, it will be.

nimbus-image-1471007890582

ObamaCare was legally justified by the Nine of Minas Morgul as just another tax. I wrote about that in my first substantive column here, over four years ago. Taxes don’t just steal money of their own accord. They also bring higher regulatory costs, inflation, and higher prices to boot. Thus, their destructive nature. Insurance companies were designed for one thing – to make money for themselves. They will keep doing so at your expense. If you like your money, you will lose your money.

***Any ads below this line are not endorsed by Perrin Lovett – reader beware.***

Another Anniversary and More Silence

28 Tuesday Jun 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in News and Notes, Other Columns

≈ Comments Off on Another Anniversary and More Silence

Tags

blog, Germany, government, ObamaCare, perrinlovett.me, taxes, terrorism

Today is the four-year anniversary of the article that really started the blog:

nimbus-image-1467113136043.png

CLICK HERE TO RE-READ

It’s 2016 and the Obamacare Tax and Insurance Company Enrichment Act still regularly makes the news – usually for additional premium increases or for doctors bailing from the system or from the profession. All in the name of revenue. You’re welcome.

*****

Viernheim Shooting Update – STILL NOTHING!

Pushing a week and still no word on the shooter’s identity beyond “broken German” and disturbed and rank speculation. “The Darmstadt prosecutor remains silent, because the investigations continue.” I read somewhere they considered him an acute threat. To what, I wonder? The EU? Merkel’s Fourth Reich Unholy Empire? They say ignorance is bliss but this is bothering me…

 

Better Not Get Hurt

11 Saturday Jun 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

America, Congress, Constitution, crime, DEA, doctors, DOJ, FDA, Fourth Amendment, freedom, government, law, Ninth Circuit, Obama, ObamaCare, police, police state, The People, tyranny

There was a kindly gentleman a few years ago who wanted to bring healthcare to the masses. It was his dream not no American should go without medical insurance and care. I think his name was Hussein Obama. Maybe it was Barry something. Anyway, he convinced Congress to pass a law. The law did nothing to help the uninsured or those without access to doctors. What it did do was raise taxes and health insurance rates and made a lot of money for big insurance. Ah well, it’s the lie … the thought that counts, right? People needed healthcare.

Part of healthcare usually involves seeing a doctor for some sort of treatment. Sometimes the physician prescribes medication for a patient in the course of ameliorating an ailment. This is where things get funny.

Marlon Jones, one of the millions deeply cared about by Barry Whatshisname, saw his doctor about some knee pain. Jones received a double knee replacement as a result. The surgery caused considerable discomfort for which Jones was prescribed pain medication. Fits the narrative above, eh? Now the funny part.

Jones was arrested and charged with 14 felony drug and fraud charges. One can only imagine how amused he when they were handcuffing him. Ha ha. Jones was a fire chief in Utah. His friend, the police chief, told him the arrest was to “help” him. Very nice.

The state police targeted Jones after reviewing the state’s Prescription Drug Monitor Program database. The database was created under a nefarious law in order to allow the tracking and harassment of citizens in such fashion. Prescriptions and other medical information are supposed to be protected and private material for the use of doctors, patients, and pharmacists. HIPPA was another law enacted to help keep this information private. Why have a database and why allow (warrantless) fishing expeditions into it?

This isn’t just a Utah problem. Many (most?)(all?) states have such databases. Some protect the information. Others use it as Utah does for witch hunts. The feds desperately want in on the fun.

The Department of Justice [SIC] is linking all the state databases together into a super-system. The DEA wants access so they can do what Utah does on a national scale – ruin lives in larger numbers and faster. They have a few roadblocks.

In 2012 Oregon sued the federal government arguing that the personal information in its database was protected by the Fourth Amendment and not accessible outside of a warrant. Federal Judge Ancer L. Haggerty agreed:

In his 2014 ruling against the DEA, District Court Judge Ancer L. Haggerty called warrantless searches of such data an egregious invasion of privacy.

“It is difficult to conceive of information that is… more deserving of Fourth Amendment protection,” Haggerty said. “By obtaining the prescription records for individuals like John Does 2 and 4, a person would know that they have used testosterone in particular quantities and by extension, that they have gender identity disorder and are treating it through hormone therapy.

“Although there is not an absolute right to privacy in prescription information… it is more than reasonable for patients to believe that law enforcement agencies will not have unfettered access to their records,” he added.

The case is now before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. There the FDA and that man who thought everyone needed health insurance argue people have lost their rights to privacy when their information is added to the database so the Fourth Amendment protection does not apply – the adding process is not voluntary, by the way. Actually, they don’t think the Fourth Amendment (or any others pertaining to individual freedom) apply at all any more.

Congress, not wanting to be left out of the Bill of Rights desecration party, passed this March the The Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act or “CARA” which will ease the sharing of database information pursuant to the DOJ’s and DEA’s plans. “CARA” is like “care” but with an “a”. The truth is these criminals do not care – not about you at any rate. They do care about expanding their police state powers. You should care. You should be alarmed.

Given this flurry of idiotic laws flying around concerning mandatory healthcare and database sharing and reporting, maybe one is better off forgoing any and all medical treatment. Jones surely could have lived a long (if painful) life with his old knees. Then again, they could just pass another law forcing people to have medical procedures. The Doctors And Medication Nationalization Act or “DAMN”? The doctors could just operate right in the prisons to make things logistically feasible.

The problem isn’t limited to medicine either. Heck, it’s everywhere the government touches – which is everywhere. The new FDA regulations developed illegally under the federal Family Tobacco Demonization Act may have similar implications for cigar smokers in the near future. Buy a box of Padrons and you’ll trigger the database police. A 10-year felony for cigar fraud. America, post America.

Google.

The solution is to get rid of these damned laws and their attendant regulations. Get rid of the agencies that enforce them. Get rid of the War on Drugs, the War on Freedom. Leave us alone. The government, if it must exist at all, should be a tiny little office in the D.C. swamp where the workers are terrified an angry mob of citizens might be at the door at any hour.

Until then maybe one should avoid seeking medications and medical care. You better not get sick, better not get hurt.

ObamaCare Unconstitutional…again

16 Monday May 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ Comments Off on ObamaCare Unconstitutional…again

Tags

America, Congress, Constitution, Courts, criminals, government, insurance, law, ObamaCare, taxes

Well, not so much the law – the Supreme Court said it was a-ok. The problem, the illegality is in the manner in which the administration is making payments to insurance companies under the law.

The Constitution says “No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law,” [Judge] Collyer noted, but the administration has continued to pay billions to insurers for their extra cost of providing health coverage.

“Paying [those] reimbursements without an appropriation thus violates the Constitution,” she wrote. “Congress is the only source for such an appropriation, and no public money can be spent without one.”

Federal judge rules Obamacare is being funded unconstitutionally, L.A. Times, May 16, 2016.

The Ruling will probably be overturned on appeal. The Judge is 100% correct about Congressional appropriation. However, the Constitution is as dead as a hammer and the government gets what it wants. In this case it wanted a new tax (even though they didn’t know it was a tax at the time – thank you, John Roberts, for the clarification). The tax is designed to funnel money to insurance companies (“billions to insurers”). Those insurers wrote the law in order to get the free money.

Approximately the same number of Americans are now uninsured as were before the law was enacted. The difference is that many have to pay a sizable tax every year because they are uninsured. Those with insurance pay higher premiums under the law. The net effect is: no new coverage for the uninsured and; massive profit for the insurance industry of America (second only to the banks in political power/thievery).

Mull this over, if you will. Hillary and Bernie will not change this. The Donald and the spineless Paul Ryan will not change this. Those latter con-men only talk about “repealing” Obamacare and “replacing” it with something else written by the insurance lobbyists.

Google.

Hope and change ain’t making America great. It’s all making a certain sect of criminals richer than ever – at our expense as usual. Keep on voting!

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Perrin Lovett

From Green Altar Books, an imprint of Shotwell Publishing

From Green Altar Books, an imprint of Shotwell Publishing

Perrin Lovett at:

Perrin on Geopolitical Affairs:

Archives

  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • June 2012

Prepper Post News Podcast by Freedom Prepper (sadly concluded, but still archived!)

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • PERRIN LOVETT
    • Join 41 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • PERRIN LOVETT
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.