France, as presently incarnated, certainly isn’t Hungary or Turkey, two unabashedly nationalistic nations, one Christian, one Muslim. A big lie!
“It’s a big lie. We are not Hungary or Turkey,” he added, hours after Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan had called Macron “trouble” and urged the French to “get rid” of him as soon as possible.
Some commentaries in English-language media have accused Macron of targeting all Muslims following a spate of attacks in the last weeks blamed on radical Islamists.
But Macron insisted he was not singling out Muslims, rather simply defending the country’s secular system.
“France has no problem with Islam… we are a country that has always had a dialogue.”
Bur he emphasised: “We founded our Republic on the separation of politics and religion.”
They would do very well to return to being a definitive Catholic nation and dispense with the “dialogue.”
Almost every Libertarian I have ever known has been good and decent. Here, a good and decent Libertarian writes a good and decent article about how his party was left out once again in the 2020 election (which the AP has called for Joe Biden if you didn’t know). Nothing from any big-L Libertarian would be complete without mentioning dope; this one does not disappoint.
Voters, “perhaps those with a libertarian streak, in red and purple states such as Arizona, South Dakota, Mississippi and Montana voted to relax their drug laws and reject the status quo,” Zachary Siegel noted for NBC News.
Libertarians “got almost everything they wanted,” Liz Mair wrote in The New York Times in a piece that anticipates Republicans holding the Senate.
The weed is legal! Hooray! Why the long faces about the grip of the Uniparty? When Tulsi Gabbard and Ron Paul have no places and little support in the mainstream, then, yes, libertarianism is dead on arrival. Light one up and chill out, maaaan. Or, understand that civil nationalism, R, D, or L, is dead too. If it’s us versus them, then it’s nationalists versus globalists. And the globalists still have everyone thinking in terms of right, left, and dope.
If you have a homeland after a century of globalist assaults, then congratulations! For simple argument, let’s say your nation is country IS. IS conducts an assassination in country IR, generating hatred and the probability of retaliation. You’re worried about that – even from your perch in counties FR or US.
Jewish communities in the Diaspora are paying close attention to developments following the assassination of Iranian nuclear scientist Mohsen Fakhrizadeh.
Now, imagine if you lived in the homeland your lucky enough to have in 2020 and actively defended it, to include preventing it from doing things that might make others attack you (and the native peoples of FR, US, etc).
Anyone who stands against the nations for all groups, white included, stands against God. Add in political worship and one finds someone probably not too keen on Heaven or America.
Loving America almost as much as heaven
Peters isn’t sure he likes the term “Christian nationalism” because he worries people will equate it with being a white nationalist or someone who hates Muslims and women — all things he disavows. But he concedes it fits the definition of someone who wants America to remain a Christian nation. “Some Christians are trying to shame those who love this country or love President Trump,” he said. “We’re saying, we’re not only unashamed, but we’re going to put it in the name.”
The worries aren’t natural. Chuck Baldwin’s latest sermon was all over this issue of crisis. God did not elect Donald Trump for Trump’s sake or the GOP’s. If there was a divine hand in 45, then it was to illuminate what Christians are doing wrong. One such thing is continuing to follow Charlatans.
There was a Far Side cartoon some years ago that you might remember. It was titled The Dam Bursts, and it featured the residents of the migraine headache institute, armed to the teeth, angrily processing next door to the school for marching bands.
The United States is like that, except it’s not as funny. It also won’t involve just two opposing sides. Hello, there! No, this article is not about the American Civil War of the 1860s. Rather, it’s an early and incomplete analysis of the conflict we’re plunging into today.
The sides. The population by and large consisting of idiots binary thinkers, there’s a temptation to divide things up neatly as they were some sixteen decades ago: two sides: authoritarian mercantilists wickedly allied with usurers against genteel agrarians lazily allied with incompatibles. Or, “North” versus “South,” if you like. In the interests of easy comprehension, we could approximate dual factions, at least as a loose template.
Ultimately, this war, like all others, is a continuation of the eternal struggle between good and evil. That rages on from The Beginning unto The End with us not knowing where we fall along the grand timeline. (Beware of anyone who earnestly predicts such a placement). In a sense, we’re looking at Christians versus satanists. This is an accurate estimation only as to overarching beliefs and ideologies. Our Side, possessed of numerous divisions, still values the good, the true, and the beautiful, all in honor of Jesus Christ. The other side is the dominion of the world, of chaos, ruin, and death.
A more progressive view would be of Nationalists versus globalists. One will note thematic compatibility with the most basic, religious breakdown. Nationalists honor the human societal structure created by Almighty God, destined to exist even in Heaven. The globos seek the destruction, disruption, and despair wrought by a new Tower of Babel, calling evil good, and good evil, and seeking ruination and slavery under the false guise of unity, nicety, and a fabricated definition of almost everything. One should note who stands with or for what. Those who favor the nations also tend to favor the families, the individuals, and tradition. Those who lust for the world tend to attract every manner of abomination and degeneracy. These are not coincidences.
The too-frequent calls for (or against, or merely in observation of) a race war may be misplaced. Given the (non-COVID) events of this year, the view is somewhat understandable. Indeed, it does look like a war has already commenced, but with one side largely abstaining. I can’t say those with this framing are completely incorrect; they just overlook, in a simplistic fashion, a few factors. Again, I hate to tell you old-timers, but it isn’t 1861 anymore. It is no longer a black and white issue – entirely. And, to the extent it is, it is more of a messy component of conflict caused by the most unwise mixing of nationalities or ethnicities. We have also, you may have noticed, most unwisely added some additional parties to the formula and in rather sizable numbers. The formula: (a level of) diversity + proximity = war. There are other problems with the two sizes (sides) fits all approach: for instance, many Africans are Christians; many Europeans serve, directly or otherwise, the devil; some Muslims will ally with Christians; your enemy’s enemy isn’t necessarily your friend; nobody knows how some groups will act or react; etc.
What are the odds? I’d say in the neighborhood of 100%, give or take 0.00.
How’s it going to look in reality? That’s the beautiful thing – no one knows. Nor can we be certain of when it will start in full, how bad it’s going to get, or how long it will last.
It is my belief that it has already started, in a slow, low-pitch manner soon to heat up. When? Look for a spike this November for obvious reasons. Then, it might go ballistic, or it might quiet to a simmer. 2033 was a good enough estimate. However, once the process starts – and it will be a process, not an event – it will go on for years, or decades, or even longer.
How bad? VERY. VERY. BAD. If it started with Molotov cocktails, it may end with B-52 runs. Or, depending on how one looks at it, it may turn out very well. It had to happen, honestly. Rather, it did not, but this is the US, the home of people who really enjoy difficulty. For a reference, remember that, at the beginning of the 21st Century, the debt-based economy had virtually failed. An intelligent and peaceable people might have opted for a simple reset. That was not, and is not us, sadly. The crisis of 2008-9 was papered over, compounded radically, and visits upon us again with far more pressing force. The economic collapse will exacerbate the domestic conflagration, as will the violent, flailing end of the international empire, which also could have been eased out of with greater harmony. The hard way it is! This all makes perverse sense considering that, during these last twenty years, the average intelligence in the US has declined by about half a standard deviation.
The loss of IQ coincides with the loss of morality and all else. The reasons why, along with what comes later, and how the mechanics of the martial process may work out are important, but will all wait for another day. It’s going to be fun, kids! Honest.
In related news, Freedom Prepper is running an October civil war and unrest theme! It’s aimed at surviving the immediate fallout of near-term events and is less of an academic discussion. You should have already started studying the big picture; last week, I gave you The History of Florence to review. You did that, right? Good, because this Empire, like Rome’s, has run its course and is about to dissolve. The best-case scenario would be something like the quick, easy, and happy divorce between the Czechs and the Slovaks. This being ‘Murica, we’re more likely to get something like what happened in the Balkans – messy, violent, multi-partied, and thoroughly devastating. Or, it could be a more drawn-out affair, akin to that of Italy described by Machiavelli. It could be something else.
Look for multiple factions, all over the place. And look for multiple places, all over those factions. I briefly pondered a future North America and came up with twenty to thirty plausible states. In reality, it could be two, or ten, or two-hundred and ten. There’s no telling how far the reductions will run. But, it is time to think and plan. It’s time, on the macro level, to pick your side. It’s time, on the micro-scale, to find your local tribe.
The good news is there is still time, just not as much as there was. Use what you have judicially.
As demonstrated in a newly released text from the 1980s, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn saw right through the alleged promise of magic dirt:
And really, what sort of a country is America? Naïve (although supposedly so enlightened and democratic): through a clutch of its professional politicians, it blithely betrays itself on a daily basis, yet will fly into a sudden brief fury—but an utterly blind one—and destroy whatever is in its path. The Soviets bring down a Korean Air Lines plane—then, in New Haven, the windows of a Russian Orthodox church are smashed in revenge and filth sprayed on the frescoes. A US army barracks in Beirut is blown up—and a quarrelsome resident of the small town of Pittsfield, Vermont, a people’s avenger, arms himself with a revolver, goes off in the morning to a local shop rung by an Iranian and his Russian wife, Tanya Zelenskaya (the daughter of First Wave émigrés), and shoots her dead, thereby expressing America’s revenge on the Iranians and “the Russians standing behind them.”
Shaky. Russian soil may not be accessible to me for a long time to come, perhaps until death, but I cannot sense American soil as my own.
With no solid ground beneath my feet. With no visible allies. Between two World Forces, to be finely ground up.
Dreary.
May his final years be a good reminder of the rewards of nationalism, the truth, and faith.
Herein, I expound upon something I covered last week. The following was also submitted to the Piedmont Chronicles, as columns sometimes are.
Editorial Style in Black and White
(and Nationalism in a Music Video [which was pulled…])
Dear White People, you have no shared culture or history. Those past five-thousand years of triumph, antiquity, exploration, norms, mores, and the invention of essentially everything was nothing but a mental mirage. Get used to it, so say the benevolent kapos at the ASSociated press. Accordingly, they will never capitalize “White” when used in conjunction or association with White People. Blacks, however, will enjoy the full big-letter treatment. Black. Letters. Matter.
For my part, I no longer capitalize anything pertaining to the ap, other than the “ASS” in associated, because the ap is a fake news outfit without a culture or a history. They do, however, have a mission and a narrative to promote. I highly suggest the educated read Gekaufte Journalisten von Udo Ulfkotte. You will have to make do in the original German as the English translation, Journalists for Hire, after a long publication battle, was mysteriously de-listed by Amazon almost as soon as it finally arrived. It’s like somebody was trying to obscure the truth or something.
Ulfkotte was the print journalist and editor who spilled the beans on how intelligence agencies either manufacture or manipulate major news stories. Odds are, if your country has a secret police force (like the CIA), then they control your information. They use scripts that don’t change much. The reader will immediately draw parallels between Ulfkotte’s experience during the Iran-Iraq War and Imperial Amerikan misadventures from earlier this year. One will also note the telling similarities in the ap’s sad little story about racial alphabets and those published by other major outlets, even as quoted in the CIA’s, excuse me, the ap’s version. It’s the reason why different reporters, regardless of the topic, all strangely use the exact same phraseology. This systematized hoaxing couples well with the concept of Sayanim, which I leave to your research abilities.
The Achilleas Thniskon of the ap program is two-fold. First, their stories are only picked up by editors of dying newspapers, very few of them ever to be read by an increasingly illiterate population. The masses have defected to screens, which host their own insidious and never-ending mind control effects. Second, the ap’s little stylebook is only used by people who take bribes from the CIA, akin to cranks only using the MLA book and law students only using the Bluebook. There’s a much better guide anyway.
My 14th Edition Chicago Manual of Style addressed the black and white issue in 1993. Nationalities and other specific groupings of people should always be capitalized. Black and White are sometimes capitalized as representative of the collective identities of Africans or Europeans, though this is discretionary. See: §§ 7.33 – 7.35, pp. 246 – 247. Sane people – in short supply, I know – shouldn’t obsess over the matter so long as “ap” is always derisively lowercase.
The narrative concerns, as always, the spreading of misinformation; the mission is the destruction of irksome Western Civilization. Who might be behind such villainy? ap’s story is by one David Bauder and quotes a John Daniszewski. Bauder and Daniszewski. (((???))) Danniszewski claims that in addition to youse guys being third-rate trash people without a history, you also insert your lack of skin color into “systemic inequalities and injustices.” I suppose that means, what? Ending slavery, starting affirmative action, electing BHO, and ensuring civil rights enforcement? Or, is it symphonies, surgeries, laws, electricity, airplanes, computers, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera – ad infinitum? I’m not sure what he meant, but he did make clear that you lowercase unpersons are “white supremacists,” terminology he left lower case, as capitalization could constitute a capital offense – such is your privileged inequality and whatnot.
The ap also says that you lesser-script, second-class citizens, stale and pale, never experience discrimination. A family in Florida, what’s left of it, might beg to differ.
From Atlanta to Saint Louis to Minneapolis, the #BlackLettersMatter thugs have warned that they are “coming to the suburbs,” meaning they’re about to bring the party to the compact-character Amerikans. They are now doing so, as alleged and reported by ClickOrlando, a local news component of WKMG-6, and not by the ap, which is an outlet without a history or a culture. Two men, father, and son, are dead, a woman is in the ICU, and a little boy is traumatized, thanks to the generous and vibrant evening visitation by one Ezekiel Emanuel Hopkins, who evidently enjoys killing lowercases before consuming bleach.
This specific anecdote is most indicative of overall crime statistical trends and rates. This kind of attack happens every day, at all hours, in all cities, counties, and states. It has for years, though thanks to the threats of BLM, it will intensify. The ASSociated presstitutes ignore these very real majority-victim stories in favor of entertaining hoaxes about drug-overdose respiratory problems, virtuous strippers not accosted by wicked lowercase college lacrosse players, and gentle cigar discount-seekers attempting to “borrow” police firearms.
For the record, and from the (previous, as always) mugshot, it looks like Mr. Hopkins’s group identity should be capitalized and written out as “Uruks of Mordor,” as officially styled by Tolkien. Hopkins is the kind whom I guess the ap would call a victim of “systemic inequalities and injustices” heaped upon his misshapen Uruk head by the little-letter family (and, I suppose, by the makers of Chlorox). In a world of quality and justice, he would already be in the ground.
So, yeah, you syllabary peckerwoods, it’s kind of like what Fred “Safe in Mexico” Reed wrote last week. Other “milks” in other suburbs aren’t just waiting, unaware, for the gate-crashing, bat-wielding, late-night antics; they’re locked, loaded, and rather looking forward to the encounter. If you like 2020, then I’m positive you will absolutely love 2021!
If, perchance, you’re a younger, more innocent member of the diminutive icon set, who does not want to participate in a full-blown civil war of cultural revolution magnitude, then please consider, GET OUT! (This edition is FREE for now).
Meanwhile, the descendants of Genghis Khan proudly and loudly celebrate their righteous pride and heritage. Here’s the juxtaposition of positive ethnocentrism against the regular, depressing domestic rot, a metal tribute to unabashed nationalism that no piece of paper can buy. Ten thousand thanks to Vox Day for digging up the following video:
(The HU, “This is Mongol!”) [Yeah, the video was yanked sometime after I submitted my draft to TPC. You can easily find the tune, however].
At 1:17 [On another version, you’ll know it when you hear it], when they really kick it, here’s what their man on horseback sings:
At the peaks of the mountains, may the Mongols’ spirit always thrive.
Let the Khan’s throne of our ancestors awaken us.
We are blessed by the power of Mongols, whose destiny is great.
And our noble ancestors exalt us!
Can you imagine weak, debased, and effeminate Amerikans rising from their knees, ripping off those ridiculous masks, and singing about their noble ancestors? No, neither can I. Not yet. But, regardless of how it’s slandered by some, nationalism is the future, baby. In certain places, it positively rocks.
***
Gazeta Polska, i in: To jedno z „zachodnich ostrzeżeń.” Boże błogosław. -P
David Ricardo was not an economist in the modern professional sense. He was a stockbroker, a successful con artist who put Michael Milken and Bernie Madoff to shame, a politician who purchased his seat in the House of Lords with his ill-gotten gains, and a pamphleteer. His works were not written with an aim of better understanding the matter addressed, but were primarily written as extended opinion editorials meant to advocate specific political policies. Moreover, his arguments were so heavily biased toward his preconceived conclusions that Joseph Schumpeter was moved to describe the custom of economists creating hopelessly impractical theories on the basis of heavily biased simplifications as “the Ricardian Vice”.
Besides the Theory of Comparative Advantage, which Ricardo cribbed without attribution from “An Essay on the External Corn Trade”, a work that was published two years earlier by Robert Torrens, Ricardo’s two other theories of historical note are the labor theory of value, which you may recall is the logical foundation of Marxist economics, and a highly peculiar theory of wages and profit that concludes the rate of profit ultimately rests upon the price of corn.
Seriously. I’m not kidding.
In fact, despite its massive influence on economists, politicians and trade policy for the last two centuries, the Theory of Comparative Advantage was never mathematically modeled or put to a serious theoretical test for 134 years. And although it was initially claimed that a comparison of textile and automobile production in the U.S.A. versus the United Kingdom broadly confirmed the Ricardian Model, more stringent tests soon demonstrated that neither the model nor the theory on which it was based had much application to the real world.
In his landmark book, Free Trade Doesn’t Work, Ian Fletcher identified seven specific flaws in Ricardo’s version of comparative advantage, which consist of assumptions that do not necessarily hold in any given trade environment, and in many cases, do not apply at all. These seven dubious assumptions are:
Trade is intrinsically sustainable.
There are no external costs.
Production factors move easily between industries.
Trade does not increase income inequality.
Capital is not internationally mobile.
Short-term efficiency causes long-term growth.
Trade does not inhibit foreign productivity.
Of course David Ricardo is not the only economist cited by defenders of free trade. Another common right-wing reference is Henry Hazlitt, the Austrian economist whose Economics In One Lesson, published in 1946, is popular among homeschoolers for its clarity and brevity. Chapter 11 of that work, which is devoted to making the case for free trade, is easily the weakest chapter in the book, as it contains no less than 23 specific errors. Since this article is merely a contribution to an anthology and not a book in its own right, I shall restrict myself to pointing out seven of them.
Conservatives and libertarians have largely based their economic theory and non-ideologies on fallacies. A corn-based economy for corny economics.
A group formed by Christian leaders is warning against the rise of “Christian nationalism,” saying the merging of Christian and American identities poses a threat to U.S. democracy and religious communities.
“As Christians, we are bound to Christ, not by citizenship, but by faith,” Christians Against Christian Nationalism’s statement reads.
“Whether we worship at a church, mosque, synagogue, or temple, America has no second-class faiths. All are equal under the U.S. Constitution.”
The statement is endorsed by at least 17 Christian leaders from various churches and organizations, according to the group’s website.
It won’t be even remotely surprising to discover that their funding is coming from distinctly not-Christian sources, most likely the same people who fund the (((Edmund Burke Institute))) Nationalism is under attack by the globalist gatekeepers and Christian nationalism will be targeted by the Churchians.
Well and good. We have the truth, the Bible, history, science, and Jesus Christ on our side. They have lies, usury, and elite pedos on theirs. I like our odds.
Notice how they can’t even bear to state the name of Jesus. That’s because they serve a very different god.
Parties committed to closer European Union integration began bargaining over jobs and policy on Monday after an election to the EU parliament which fragmented the center but gave only limited gains to nationalists.
National leaders of the bloc, many of whom hailed the vote as a vindication, will meet to chart the next steps on Tuesday.
Matteo Salvini, Italian deputy prime minister, leader of the anti-immigration League and potential builder of a far-right alliance across Europe, said his 34% of the Italian national vote was a mandate to rip up euro zone budget austerity rules.
Nigel! Nigel! Nigel! Baby steps, baby steps before the sprint.
As inspirational as this is, remember that Amerika is much, much farther gone. Still, hope abounds.
PERRIN LOVETT 