Tag Archives: women

College Inequality

14 Tuesday Sep 2021

Posted by in News and Notes

≈ Comments Off on College Inequality

Tags

, , , ,

Along with the other lies, women were brought into the universities and colleges under the false pretenses of equality. Soon, the schools may turn into female-only institutions.

‘In the next few years, two women will earn a college degree for every man’

The number of men enrolled at colleges has fallen behind women by record levels, The Wall Street Journal reports.

The article, headlined “A Generation of American Men Give Up on College: ‘I Just Feel Lost,’” reports that there is a “widening education gap across the U.S.” at two- and four-year colleges and universities:

At the close of the 2020-21 academic year, women made up 59.5% of college students, an all-time high, and men 40.5%, according to enrollment data from the National Student Clearinghouse, a nonprofit research group. U.S. colleges and universities had 1.5 million fewer students compared with five years ago, and men accounted for 71% of the decline.

If this had happened in 1950, then it would have been a crisis. Now, it’s a bit of a blessing. With substantial (yet fading) exceptions, the colleges teach virtually nothing other than CRT, White-bashing, male hatred, and anti-Christianity. With a few select exceptions, no American man should waste time in these dying, useless hen houses, especially given all of the saner alternatives.

When reality still mattered, less than 10% of men attended college because of exclusionary principles based on excellence and ability. That system maintained and grew society. Today, these schools are more paint thinner than paint. Talented and eligible American men, by and large, should either look to opportunities in Europe or else utilize the grand alternatives of independent study, apprenticeship, or trade schooling.

Ladies: You’ve come a long way, babies! See age?

COLUMN: Hug It Out

10 Tuesday Aug 2021

Posted by in Other Columns

≈ Comments Off on COLUMN: Hug It Out

Tags

, , , ,

Hug It Out

 

This column is a kind of open letter to Volodymyr Zelensky, Andriy Taran, Anna Malyar, and, to a slightly lesser degree, Vladimir Putin. It’s also a chance for me to play the sappy white knight role for a beautiful woman not named Gal Gadot.

Recently, I was surprised to discover the Olympics are still a thing. Seriously, they’re running the games in Japan or they were. Before you yawn and roll your eyes, just know there was a little heart-tugging, kind sportsmanship on display. Sportswomanship, rather. 

After a hard-fought match, the lovely Russian Mariya Lasitskene bested the gorgeous Ukrainian Yaroslava Mahuchikh. Congratulations, ladies! Magnanimous in defeat, Mahuchikh offered Lasitskene a hug. This is the girly-power version of what we used to call being a good loser, showing respect due to a worthy competitor. We used to. This is 20-hoax-ever, the age of uncivil stupidity. Therefore, a controversy immediately arose!

Ukraine’s Deputy Defense Minister, Anna Malyar (herself not a bad-looking chick), took to the Faceberg spy site, saying: “Athletes representing Ukraine at international competitions must understand that the Russian-Ukrainian war is ongoing in Ukraine and it imposes certain restrictions and responsibility.” She added the spectacle of the hug “caused an outrageous reaction in society.” Mahuchikh (literally “My-hot-chick”) is a sergeant in the Ukrainian military. Upon her return from the Land of the Rising Incel, she’ll be summoned to the Defense Ministry for a “conversation,” presumably about the martial conditions currently existing between Russia and Ukraine and the ramifications of the heroic embrace. 

Pictures of the shocking display HERE.

Ergo, my message to the relevant governing parties is, “KNOCK THAT SHIT OFF!”

If a hug between two (really pretty) athletes causes an outrageous reaction in your society, then something is wrong with your society. The two sane commenters on BergBook are right – these ladies put honor and respect ahead of politics. That’s a good thing. So, knock off the outrage and the conversations.

Knock off the war too. It’s not exactly my place to intrude, but here I go. Your nations are kissing cousins. Cousins argue and sometimes fight like siblings. They don’t kill each other. They work things out. More in common and all that.

And, if you’ll kindly notice, you have a common enemy. The same little satanic group that almost destroyed Russia with the Red Revolution and aftermath is the same parasitic lot that caused the Holodomor in Ukraine. They happen to be engaged in a semi-open war against Russia right now, and they have caught Ukraine up in their wayward interactions with the dying USSA and ascendant China. They greatly assisted with the total destruction of the American nation. They also just happen to currently be one party behind the Coronahoax attacks on the entire human race. (They also run stupid spy sites like Farcebook, FYI). A peace between Kyiv and Moscow would hurt them as much as it helps you.

Just leave the mindless outrage and irrational violence to the Amerikans. It’s what we do best and we’ll keep doing it until we exit the world stage (soon). We’re under massive assault on all sides by multiple parties and, oddly, the faithless, overweight, under-intelligent masses seem to enjoy it. Our worthless, communist leaders like Greg Abbot, John “Quarter Ton” Hagee, and Rick Desantis are literally tripping over each other to appease the enemy even as the enemy keeps kicking us in the face. 

Do you want to live like that? Die like that? I didn’t think so. So, in conclusion, I offer a sensible roadmap to peace. Please appoint these two charming champions as respective ambassadors for your sane, Christian countries. I will meet with them and act as a mediator. To help smooth things along, consider sending additional representatives like Deputy Malyar, Alexandra Kuznetsova, and any other nines and tens you can spare. Given the company, I suppose it doesn’t matter where we meet, so long as we meet. We’ll leave that up to the women. A beach maybe? Somewhere quiet and private. For my part, I’m ready. Hugs for peace.

Don’t Reflect Our Values

11 Thursday Mar 2021

Posted by in Legal/Political Columns

≈ Comments Off on Don’t Reflect Our Values

Tags

, , , ,

It must be the devil’s that the pentagram brass is babbling about in response to Tucker’s recent admission of simple truths.

In an extraordinary rebuke, the Pentagon and several senior members of the US military called out Fox News host Tucker Carlson on Thursday for a sexist segment in which he mocked women serving in the armed forces.

Carlson, who is effectively the face of Fox and hosts the top show on the right-wing channel, ridiculed President Joe Biden Tuesday for saying that the US military had created uniforms to fit women properly, created maternity flight suits for those who are pregnant, and updated requirements for hairstyles.

Tomorrow on PPN, I call it the Barbie Military Playset. It is sad but this is a good thing. The USSA military is going to get the living shit kicked out of it in the next major hot war. And it poses very little threat to the Americans who will build new American nations on the ruins of the US.

How’s That Sexual Revolution Working Out For You?

09 Tuesday Feb 2021

Posted by in News and Notes, Other Columns

≈ Comments Off on How’s That Sexual Revolution Working Out For You?

Tags

, , , , , ,

Not too good, if you’re a woman these days. Because of what the “pandemic” did(!) the WSJ notices that the aging cat ladies among us seem a little disenchanted with their cultural life decisions.

Kelli Wheeler always knew she wanted to have children. But in April, her boyfriend broke up with her right as the pandemic set off social-distancing mandates that make dating much more complicated. The 34-year-old decided she would have to rethink her path to motherhood.

“Even if I met a guy quite quickly, I was three or four years away from having kids because I’d want some time where it was just the two of us,” says Ms. Wheeler, a digital-content producer in Los Angeles. “I began looking into ways I could take control of my fertility, without a man.” She booked a consultation at a fertility clinic and plans to freeze her eggs this spring.

Ms. Wheeler is one of many single women in their 30s and 40s who have found themselves reassessing their plans for having children in the past year. The pandemic has both made it harder to meet a partner and provided time for introspection. For some women, that has sparked a realization that they want to prioritize motherhood, regardless of whether they are in a relationship. Plenty of men, of course, have had similar epiphanies, but biology forces women to take action within a more limited window of time.

Wait! I thought biology was just a social construct. JK! I really do feel for these women and the rest of our rapidly decaying society. Maybe the time to have children was around 18 or 20? Married? Maybe we’ve all been lied to for generations. This has been in force long before the Coronahoax drifted in. See this study on the death of the nuclear family in the US.

Another Demographic Shift!

11 Monday Nov 2019

Posted by in Legal/Political Columns

≈ Comments Off on Another Demographic Shift!

Tags

, , , , ,

“Heather” explains how to vote for someone based on your thinking that the candidate won’t/can’t win. Brilliant.

Three years ago, thousands of these Americans — many working-class, residing in the middle of the country — helped deliver the most astounding electoral surprise in modern history. Now, as they review the Trump presidency a year before his re-election, some are showing signs of turning on conventional wisdom again.

Heather, a local administrative assistant here who is married with a stroller-bound toddler, is still so embarrassed by her 2016 vote that she wasn’t comfortable revealing her last name.

“I’m ashamed to admit . . . But I’m of a more conservative bent and family. I just couldn’t vote for Hillary. But I also thought there’s no way Trump was going to win. This way, I could at least say, ‘Well I didn’t vote for her,’” she said. “I didn’t think I was doing any harm.”

While Heather isn’t sharing her conversion far and wide, she’s already decided “there’s no chance” she’d vote for Trump again. “Heavens no,” she said. “Trump basically turned me into a Democrat.”

The 2020 presidential campaign has been engrossed in a debate over which demographic groups Democrats should devote most of their attention to in order to reclaim the White House. African-Americans in urban areas? Rural voters who flipped from Barack Obama to Trump? Newly emerging but unreliable young people?

But the one pivotal group showing the most evident signs of splitting from the president are white working-class women, according to a review of polling data, focus groups and interviews with more than a dozen party strategists and voters like Heather.

There was the deal of 19: get the vote in exchange for learning to use it. Someone hasn’t kept her end of the bargain. Maybe the stellar GOP strategists will notice this trend too – maybe around 2024.

The Casualties Will Be Extreme

08 Tuesday Oct 2019

Posted by in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ Comments Off on The Casualties Will Be Extreme

Tags

, , , ,

84% of women soldiers failed the new Army ACFT.

According to the numbers, a jaw-dropping 36% of soldiers overall failed the test, with 64% passing. When you break it down by gender, 70% of men passed. But here is a number should kill and bury the ACFT evermore: 84% of women failed the test. Those numbers are so absurdly biased against women that I was afraid this was some sort of elaborate joke by Duffelblog. But I spoke with one soldier in a leadership position at an ACFT test battalion, and the soldier confirmed that the leaked numbers lined up almost exactly with those of the soldier’s battalion.

Here is why those fail numbers are so bad, male or female: you fail your physical training test, you get flagged. You aren’t going to military schools like Basic Leader Course or Airborne School. And if somehow you get there anyway, when you’re tested again you’ll be turned around and sent home. You cannot be promoted. You cannot be reclassified into another MOS. In the Guard and reserve, you cannot be transferred. You lose your tuition assistance. You can’t even reenlist!

Here is where it gets really ugly. If 84% of women are failing this test—keep in mind, 84% of women who are in battalions specifically preparing for the ACFT—you have essentially eliminated women from the United States Army. It gets uglier yet. When a woman gives birth, she gets a six-month profile excusing her from the ACFT. The thing is: the real killer for women is the “leg tuck” portion of the ACFT, in which you assume a pull-up position and bring your hips and knees up to your elbows and back down as many times as possible in two minutes. That’s asking an awful lot for a woman who has given birth in the last few months; and allows, basically, for no time to actually train up for the event once her profile expires. Already, women are failing the leg tuck test by 72%.

It is no secret that sexism is a problem in the military. What this test makes clear is that said sexism knows no bounds, and with the capricious stroke of a pen, those men have found a way to wash an entire gender from the ranks. If 84% of women are failing the test, the problem is not with women soldiers; it’s the test.

Of course, it’s the sexism and the maternity leave – not biology or anything. This may actually benefit the US in the upcoming conflict. If the Russians and/or Chinese can’t stop laughing, then they can’t fight. Brilliant!

U.S. Women Prefer Socialism

11 Tuesday Jun 2019

Posted by in Legal/Political Columns

≈ Comments Off on U.S. Women Prefer Socialism

Tags

, , ,

55% of American women between 18 and 54 would take Marx over Smith.

  • 55 per cent of U.S. women between age 18 and age 54 would prefer to live in a socialist society rather than a capitalist one ,polling data from mid-April show
  • That number is 40 per cent for men and women combined, underscoring a deep gender schism
  • Self-described Democratic socialists like New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders have brought socialism back in vogue
  • Americans don’t agree on what socialism is, but majorities understand that socialist governments own companies rather than private individuals or groups 
  • Large majorities agree that providing a basic living to everyone and covering the cost of tuition and healthcare are hallmarks of socialist systems 
  • Venezuela is suffering famine and near revolt after instituting socialist reforms; socialism undergirded Soviet communism

Before August 18, 1920, there was sort of a national compromise. Men, as a whole, agreed to let women vote. In exchange, women promised to educate themselves about politics and economics. Men kept their word. This poll and many other studies show that women, as a whole, did not.

Next year, the MSM will probably hold a big centennial celebration for tha gurls. The year after that, the famine will likely commence.

An Even Worse Decline: “We” are Not Even “Us” Anymore

13 Saturday Apr 2019

Posted by in News and Notes

≈ Comments Off on An Even Worse Decline: “We” are Not Even “Us” Anymore

Tags

, , , ,

This fits nicely with PCR’s earlier scheduled encapsulation of the fall of our Nation. Read DeGroot’s analysis of the collapse of happiness in America, particularly among the young.

This situation has several causes, all social in nature. Marriage, friendship, religious attendance, and sex are all correlated to higher levels of happiness, and with the exception of friendship, these are in decline. Why? I think the short answer is what I will call the autonomy paradox. There are sometimes good reasons for rebelling against the mores of the past. There are sometimes good reasons for having greater individual autonomy. The trouble is that such changes tend to produce new problems, and are often averse to preserving social cohesion. We must then find ways to deal with those new problems, and to achieve greater social cohesion, nor will the past—or present!—necessarily furnish adequate means for these efforts.

“There is nothing in political liberalism or individual autonomy that can teach the sexes how to make relationships work. For that, they need tradition.”
Progress, too, has a way of producing unexpected problems and sources of unhappiness. Few people, for example, thought that contraception, no-fault divorce, or the internet would engender an instrumental approach to sex and love, and yet that is just what has happened. Increased freedom has meant increased selfishness, manipulation, and irresponsibility. Eros is a free-for-all, with the relations of men and women, in their bewildering autonomy, more and more resembling those of gay male culture. And though there are many people who want more from sex and love, not all of them know how to get it.

According to Wilcox and Stone, the primary cause of declining happiness among the young is less sex:

…

Read the whole piece at Taki’s Mag.

As THE POPE wrote recently, the sexual revolution has helped in a host of depravity. It’s also led to less actual healthy sex. So it is with social media mania – for all the instant connections, we really couldn’t be more isolated.

Progress?

It’s a Woman’s World

07 Monday Jan 2019

Posted by in Legal/Political Columns

≈ Comments Off on It’s a Woman’s World

Tags

, , , , , ,

Men just built it and are expected to run it and pay for it. The power is her’s, the discrimination is his:

Men ‘face MORE discrimination than women’: Global study claims males receive the raw end of the deal with harsher punishments for the same crime, compulsory military service and more deaths at work

Men are disadvantaged in 91 countries compared to 43 nations for women
The UK, the US and Australia all discriminate against men more, a study claims
Italy, Israel and China are harder environments for women, researchers say
Scientists created the Basic Index of Gender Inequality to assess inequality
Closer the BIGI score is to zero the greater the level of equality is in the country

This comes as a surprise to no-one expect, perhaps, a few modern-wave feminists and their lavender supporters. The US comes in at number 61, favoring (you guessed it) women.

Tell us more about that ERA thing.

 

 

Planned Abortion Mistreats Pregnant Women? Quelle Surprise

21 Friday Dec 2018

Posted by in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ Comments Off on Planned Abortion Mistreats Pregnant Women? Quelle Surprise

Tags

, , ,

How is the following news? One can hardly be surprised that an organization founded on literal Nazi eugenics practices and which oversees the murder of hundreds of thousands of children every year isn’t the least bit concerned about the well-being of expectant mothers.

Discrimination against pregnant women and new mothers remains widespread in the American workplace. It is so pervasive that even organizations that define themselves as champions of women are struggling with the problem.

That includes Planned Parenthood, which has been accused of sidelining, ousting or otherwise handicapping pregnant employees, according to interviews with more than a dozen current and former employees.

In interviews and legal documents, women at Planned Parenthood and other organizations with a feminist bent described discrimination that violated federal or state laws — managers considering pregnancy in hiring decisions, for example, or denying rest breaks recommended by a doctor.

In other cases, the bias was more subtle. Many women said they were afraid to announce a pregnancy at work, sensing they would be seen as abandoning their colleagues.

Some of those employers saw accommodating expecting mothers as expensive and inconvenient. Others were unsympathetic to workers seeking special treatment.

“Expensive and inconvenient” is exactly how they describe their droves of annual natal victims. The adult women victims should be afraid, mortally so. A pregnant woman working amongst such demons is like – exactly like – Jonathan Harker’s duty call at Castle Dracula.

And, your taxes pay for this, you know.