• About
  • Blog (Ext.)
  • Books
  • Contact
  • Education Resources
  • News Links

PERRIN LOVETT

~ Deo Vindice

PERRIN LOVETT

Category Archives: Legal/Political Columns

A collections of my popular ramblings concerning the law, Natural Law, and political issues. Enjoy!

State of the Union Address Tonight

28 Tuesday Feb 2017

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Donald Trump, government, state of the union

This may be the first one I’ll watch (with interest) in years. Trump may actually lay out a plan that means something. At the least he will be entertaining.

Tonight, Tuesday, February 28, 2017 at 9 p.m.

Live Stream at http://www.whitehouse.gov or any television station.

20170217_adm_jsoc-2017_web_blog-header

The White House.

Ahead of the speech Trump touts some of his first month accomplishments:

  • Reviving key job-creating energy projects such as the Keystone XL and Dakota Access pipelines.
  • Eliminating costly Obama-era regulations such as the “Stream Protection Rule.”
  • Minimizing the economic burden of Obamacare while clearing the path toward repeal and replace.
  • Directing the Department of Defense to develop a plan to defeat ISIS.
  • Standing with American workers by withdrawing from the disastrous Trans-Pacific Partnership.
  • Enacting common sense regulatory reform by ordering any new regulations be offset by the repeal of two other regulations.
  • Building his Cabinet and Administration with the highest quality individuals to help implement the President’s vision for the country.
  • Establishing new ethics commitments for all executive branch appointees to enforce a five-year lobbying ban and a permanent ban on lobbying for foreign governments.

I reserve the right to follow-up commentary, here, tomorrow.

Budget Battle 2017

27 Monday Feb 2017

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns

≈ Comments Off on Budget Battle 2017

Tags

America, budget, Congress, debt, Donald Trump, government

Tomorrow night, at 9 PM, President Trump will address Congress. It’s his duty to present the state of the union which as, fiscally, looks bleak. The CBO is projecting whopping debt increases over the next ten years. If Trump addresses anything, it should be debt spending and the budget. I think he will at least brush over the subjects, each intertwined with the other.

His budget blueprint goes to Congress on March 13st. Here’s a little of what we know now:

President Donald Trump’s first budget proposal will look to increase defense and security spending by $54 billion and cut roughly the same amount from non-defense programs, the White House said Monday.

The budget blueprint, which was sent to government agencies Monday, would increase defense spending to $603 billion and decrease non-defense discretionary spending to $462 billion, Office of Management and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney said.

The Last Refuge outlined some of Trump’s proposals:

As we have discussed numerous times, President Trump is going to propose a $10 trillion spending cut over ten years – or $1 trillion per year. This is entirely reasonable considering the scale and scope of government.

Baseline for understanding – The entire U.S. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is roughly $20 trillion. The total of all current income taxes is roughly $4 trillion, or 1/5th of GDP.

President Trump’s economic plan is predicting an earnest rate of economic growth of 4%. We feel this is the minimal achievable in FY 2018, but all projections say at least 4% GDP growth is anticipated. Four percent of growth equals an additional $1 trillion added to GDP. The tax revenue from the GDP growth is $400 billion/per year (1/5th of $1 trillion). Or $4 trillion over the 10-year projection.

Yes, entitlements equal approximately $2.5 trillion; and yes, the current budget is approximately $4 trillion. However, this is a false term because the SS/Med expenditure is constantly being refreshed by an additional $2.5 trillion in Social Security/Medicare taxes received that are beyond the individual income tax rate.

Think of it this way – If you have $4 to spend at the grocery store (your budget), but the bus ride to the store costs $2.50, you could say the bus ride equals two-thirds of your budget. However, if I gave you the bus fare in addition to your $4 budget, you are not spending your budget on bus fare. This is the way SS/Medicare is handled in the budget.

Just like when we went through the “sequester cut Armageddon” narrative of 2012, the media relentlessly push this ridiculous fake term in order to make it appear the discretionary budget is much smaller than it is.

Simple common sense math you can do in your head, shows you how fake the term is. If the budget was actually $4 trillion, and entitlements came from that budget equaled $2.5 trillion (two-thirds) it would be impossible to cut $1 trillion out. Again, it’s common sense.

♦ President Trump is proposing a 10% first year increase in defense spending. That equals approximately $54 billion more for defense. If you look at the income from projected GDP growth (4% = $400 billion), you can see how easily that expenditure is covered.

♦ President Trump is proposing significant wholesale cuts to all other departments including Dept of State and EPA. The U.S. State Department has over 70,000 employees, that alone is ridiculous. Easily the DoS can eliminate 20% of staff, and find efficiencies well beyond those numbers.

Essentially, President Trump’s proposed outline is a decrease of 10% per department. Easily attainable, especially when you consider these departments have been operating at around 3% rates of growth due to nine years of base-line budget growth without a federal budget in place.

You only need to look back to 2006 to see federal spending was under $3 trillion. Fiscal year 2008 was the last year we had a federal budget in place. Every year since then has been continuing resolutions, omnibus spending, debt ceiling increases and base-line budget growth (spend 3% more) based on prior year expenditures.

President Trump is the first President in 30 years to actually propose a budget that reduces spending in whole numbers from the prior year.

This, if it happened, would be a good start. It would eliminate most new debt spending (if D.C. can stay out of illegal wars and let banks fail). It would, if it happens. That’s asking a lot in Washington, where they haven’t been able to put together a solid budget for a decade.

What this would not do is pay down any of the $20 Trillion federal debt (on books). And Congress, the CBO, and the Treasury Secretary formerly known as Goldman Sachs all expect the debt ceiling to be raised this Spring, dramatically. If there’s going to be no new debt, why raise it at all?

pres_budg_total_spending_pie

Plenty to work with/on. This is what the fools cobbled together last year for the present, 2017. Enough wasted money to colonize Mars. National Priorities.

The answer is that Trump can propose all he likes but the decisions lie with Congress. Their track record has been … what’s the word … hellish. Still, Trump seems to actually believe in what he says (rare) and seems willing to fight for it (rarer).

Between now and the Summer we are in for perhaps the greatest budget battle of the 21st Century.

And, again, this is all just a start. One day, sooner or later (and probably sooner), those “untouchable” entitlements will have to be addressed. The debt (on and off books) must be dealt with. We must finally stop being the world’s simultaneous policeman and bully. And we really need honest money.

Will trump get us there? Probably not though he is doing as admirable job as any could. If he needs an axe, I have one to lend. Or, give me one year and dictatorial powers and all these issues would be resolved. 2006 levels? I’d aim for 1786.No Tweets from me either.

We’ll start to get an idea tomorrow night. I’ll sharpen the axe this evening.

Is This Draft Bill the Obamacare Replacement?

25 Saturday Feb 2017

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

House, law, leak, legislation, ObamaCare

Rumors can be just that. Politico reports the leak of a potential Bill from the House.

Draft Bill HERE.

(You might need a drink to even out the wobbles. Who copied this thing?)

nimbus-image-1488033117449

Haven’t read it yet. May not. Congress didn’t read the ACA after all. Hubba.

Witches to Cast a Spell on Donald Trump Tonight (Not Kidding)

24 Friday Feb 2017

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

Catholic Church, Christianity, demons, Donald Trump, evil, God, Jesus Christ, Macbeth, Satan, witchcraft, witches

Plenty of people disapprove of President Trump, his programs, policies, and demeanor. That’s fine and well in a free society. Others, wish he were simply more perfect (or just perfect). That, too, is fine and well though he’s not nor ever will be. Life goes on.

But sometimes life takes a weird twist. Tonight, at midnight, the witches of the world will “cast a spell” on Trump. Jaya Saxena of Elle reports:

Starting at midnight on Friday, witches around the country are calling for a mass spell to be cast on Donald Trump every night of a waning crescent moon until he’s driven from office.

The spell was publicized by Michael M. Hughes, who told ELLE.com that it was tweaked from multiple spells he saw going around private witchcraft groups. He published it on Extra News Feed because he felt “it would be very welcome to a lot of people.” It quickly spread, with events being formed around the country and support on social media.

Hughes explained that he chose a binding spell because “we’re not wishing harm on anyone, we’re just trying to stop the harm they’re doing. It’s not the equivalent of punching a Nazi in the face, it’s the equivalent of tying him up and taking his bullhorn away.”

The ritual itself is pretty standard magic working, binding Trump from doing harm to others and to himself, rather than asking any forces to do harm to him. There are objects to represent the elements and to represent Trump himself. The tarot card of the Tower represents ambitions built on lies, which are struck down by a lightning flash of truth. For those who believe in witchcraft, it looks to be an effective spell.

…

Hughes also says that all are welcome, even those highly skeptical of magic. “The real intention is just to get the energy focused at the same time, as many people as possible,” he says. People can participate in their own religious rituals, or even perform this as a joke or an art project. “No matter how you approach it, it’s still great to be part of it.” Plus, we’re sure you have some candles lying around.

This is no joke. This is active Satanism. This is using (trying to use) the powers of Hell for selfish profit on Earth. This has nothing to do with candles. This is direct or indirect appeal to the Devil to intervene in human affairs. Agree or disagree with the motives behind ceremony, there is no getting around the inherent evil of this plan. And, sadly, no one needs to seek out evil; it has a way of finding us on its own.

The Church is clear on this subject:

All forms of divination are to be rejected: recourse to Satan or demons, conjuring up the dead or other practices falsely supposed to “unveil” the future. Consulting horoscopes, astrology, palm reading, interpretation of omens and lots, the phenomena of clairvoyance, and recourse to mediums all conceal a desire for power over time, history, and, in the last analysis, other human beings, as well as a wish to conciliate hidden powers. They contradict the honor, respect, and loving fear that we owe to God alone.

All practices of magic or sorcery, by which one attempts to tame occult powers, so as to place them at one’s service and have a supernatural power over others—even if this were for the sake of restoring their health—are gravely contrary to the virtue of religion. These practices are even more to be condemned when accompanied by the intention of harming someone, or when they have recourse to the intervention of demons. Wearing charms is also reprehensible. Spiritism often implies divination or magical practices; the Church for her part warns the faithful against it. Recourse to so-called traditional cures does not justify either the invocation of evil powers or the exploitation of another’s credulity.

– Catechism of the Catholic Church, Nos. 2116-2117.

The Bible is even clearer: “Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.” Exodus 22:18 (KJV). By this quote I do not, herein, advocate the burning or other killing of witches – unless they actually threaten one with harm. And, given the ways in which they might seek to do harm, and given the tenuous effectiveness of such attempts, this is a wobbly standard.

In most cases a death sentence is unnecessary. These types lead lives worse than death. So long as they do no overt harm, they should be left alone. And they may be safely discounted. In fact, they should be included in prayers of deliverance and redemption. In most cases.

Michael Hughes’s statements kind of give away the “most cases” scenario. “We’re only doing good magic. We don’t want to harm anyone. Etc.” I’m sure many or most really do mean no harm. Yet the harm is there, merely in the doing of these acts and the belief if the powers behind them. Those powers are real – not a joke.

The Devil is real. Demons are real. Evil is real. Petition to the occult too often (even once) and the occult may answer. Sometimes there is a price to be paid for the interventions. Once these forces are invited in,there is no controlling them. And that is why the Church has been adamant about distancing oneself from them.

For those outside the practice, those potential victims or subjects like Trump, the spells and magic usually carry no weight whatsoever. Usually.

Now, I speculate. I have spoken with Priests and other authorities but I am no expert here. In most cases, those who chant magic words, joke or not, are merely a joke. A dangerous joke, but an empty threat nonetheless. Nothing comes of it. It has no power over anyone. However, sometimes the Devil and his minions are roused to action. Thus it is that spells are, may be, real.

A chief danger to the casting witch, warlock, or sorcerer is that the demonic forces, invited to act, act independently – often against the witch. They do not care what a witch wants; they’re just looking for any opportunity to corrupt.

In those cases where the spell gains some power, some actual authority beyond weird incantation, that power is still generally limited. Our Trinitarian God has absolute control over and against Satan, as demonstrated by Christ. This immunity and authority may be transferred to men, the power to reject or to cast out demonic forces. (See the pertinent acts of the Apostles and the work of concurrent and historical exorcists).

Many hold that the Grace of Belief and Acceptance provides Christians general protection against the demonic forces of Hell. The theory is that the gifts and nature imbued by The Holy Spirit are sufficient to defend against the Devil. This is my belief. Still I think there is a danger as to use of the gifts and the susceptibility of the subject Christian. In other words, a lapse or foible in the faith might render one vulnerable.

I understand that Trump is (or claims to be) a Christian. I also understand he is given to certain weaknesses. Thus, I do not think, though I am not sure, that he is safe from all the spells in the world. If you have doubt, please pray for his Divine Defense. It might cover all of us anyway.

Remember that what these demented people seek would affect every American and many others, not merely Trump himself. And there is no telling how Satan would choose to effect any of this “binding” – if he adhered to the requests at all.

Suppose, in parable exploration, that Trump is a shepard of sorts. He is all that stands between his flock and a ravening wolf. Some of the flock might not like Trump at all. Others might wish he would deal more decisively with the wolf. Others cheer him on. Still other don’t notice or care. If he is “bound”, restrained from any action, where does that leave the flock in  relation to the wolf? Vulnerable, whether the shepard is harmed by the binding or not.

So it is that this is serious business. Dangerous.

macbeth-and-the-three-witches-1855-xx-theodore-chasseriau

MacBeth and the Witches, Theodore Chasseriau (1855). Oceansbridge.com.

There is also an odd literary, poetical angle to it all. I recall a little Shakespeare, as if some verses had been written with Trump specifically in mind and in this predicament:

I’ll drain him dry as hay.
Sleep shall neither night nor day
Hang upon his penthouse lid.
He shall live a man forbid.
Weary sev’nnights, nine times nine,
Shall he dwindle, peak, and pine.
Though his bark cannot be lost,
Yet it shall be tempest-tossed.
Look what I have.

-1st Witch, Macbeth, Act 1, Scene 3.

Is Trump Macbeth or the Sailor? Trump lives (lived) in a penthouse. He certainly barks a lot. The witches wish to dry him out, render him impotent in terms of political effectiveness. The only thing missing is a link to Melania and some chestnuts.

Few things are more threatening and dangerous than government. This instance represents one of them.

Obamacares: Stupid is as Republicans Does

24 Friday Feb 2017

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ Comments Off on Obamacares: Stupid is as Republicans Does

Tags

GOP, ObamaCare, stupidity

Conservative Republicans cannot lead, have no spines, and need medication. Seriously. Years have passed with a hundred promises to rectify the ruinous ACA and, now with everything in place, ……. nothing. Pathetic.

Jim DeMint pointed out the painfully obvious to his former colleagues:

Heritage Foundation President Jim DeMint, the former South Carolina Republican senator, called on activists attending the Conservative Political Action Conference to push their members of Congress to send to President Donald Trump the same legislation that dismantled the law and was vetoed by President Barack Obama with all due haste.

“We must and we can repeal Obamacare now,” DeMint said. “They should send that same bill to President Trump right now.”

They previously passed the Bill through a less amenable Congress prior to an Obama veto. All of the obstacles are now removed. What on Earth is the holdup!?

And you people vote and pay for this!

 

The 4th Attacks the 2nd: A Dangerous Decision

24 Friday Feb 2017

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns

≈ Comments Off on The 4th Attacks the 2nd: A Dangerous Decision

Tags

4th Circuit, gun control, law, Second Amendment

This week the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an insane,and flatly communist, decision on the Second Amendment. They held that AR15s and other “high-capacity” firearms are “dangerous” and not protected arms for the people. The terrible 110-page order.

I’ll have plenty to say about this soon enough. For now: it’s idiotic, communist, anti-American, it stinks, and it will be overturned.

The Court based its decision, partly, on the Supreme Court’s porous ruling in D.C. v. Heller (2008), which I have previously described as a dangerous victory for guns rights. More on that later.

bushmaster-m42a

Breitbart/Bushmaster.

For now, this ruling smacks the faces of the Second Amendment, American history, and the people’s choice of some of the most popular weapons of all time.

I would suggest the ruling judges from this panel be impeached for misconduct, following their physical removal and detention as enemy combatants.

The Racket: ‘Full Range of Options’: U.S. Troops in Syria? Dear Lord…

23 Thursday Feb 2017

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns

≈ Comments Off on The Racket: ‘Full Range of Options’: U.S. Troops in Syria? Dear Lord…

Tags

Donald Trump, ISIS, Smedley Butler, Syria, terrorism, War

President Trump promised to “smash the hell out of ISIS”. He’s ordered his generals to come up with a plan to do just that. One would hope they would focus of doing the smashing in places where it might benefit the U.S. – Orlando, New York, allied areas in Europe, etc. Instead they are hinting at further action in Syria.

ISIS is in Syria, no doubt. We made sure of that. They’re all over Syria. And it’s very bad there. But, as bad as it may be, IT’S IN SYRIA. Last I checked, that was thousands of miles away in a place that barely concerns the average American.

Of course, this is just one option among many:

The top U.S. military officer declined repeatedly on Thursday to rule out committing U.S. ground troops to battle the Islamic State in in Syria, stressing that the Pentagon will present President Donald Trump with “a full range of options” to combat the terror organization.

Marine Gen. Joseph Dunford, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, made the comments at a Washington research center as the 30 days that President Donald Trump gave military leaders to develop a strategy to fight the Islamic State are almost up.

“I’m in the business of providing the president with options,” Dunford said several times at the Brookings Institute in Washington, D.C. when repeatedly pressed on whether those choices would include conventional ground troops.

Following through on a campaign promise, Trump ordered a 30-day review of the U.S. strategy to fight the Islamic State on Jan. 28. Defense Secretary Jim Mattis is expected to present him with the plan next week, according to the Pentagon.

Another Marine general once said, “war is a racket”. Times have changed, some trends with them. For instance, the U.S. no longer wins wars. In fact, it seems to enter into them with the express intention of not winning. Rather, they’re just something to do, to waste money and lives on. The racket lives on all these years later.

meme-smedley-butler

Waking Times.

I suppose it is no good rushing to judgment just yet. But there is a pattern to beware of. However it happened, ISIS is our enemy. And they fight us here, on our soil, these days. That would be my preference for where to smash them. Eradicate them in The West. Syria, even before it starts, smells a lot like Iraq, Somalia, Afghanistan, Yemen, Libya, Iraq again, Sudan, some earlier Syria, and still Afghanistan. No bueno.

Any action in Syria, if it must happen, has to include cooperation with Russia, both to succeed and to avert a real war. And it might be nice, for once, to see the little countries of that stricken region solve their own damned neighborhood problems. Or, even better, maybe we could draft the banksters to fight their own war for once. Overly optimistic, yes.

I hope there are other, better options in the plan. We’ll know soon enough. Developing…

The ‘Happy Talk’ About Obamacare

23 Thursday Feb 2017

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

GOP, government, John Boehner, law, ObamaCare, taxes

John Boehner says that everything Congress and President Trump has claimed about “repealing and replacing” the dying Obamacare system is mere “happy talk”. That, in Washington terms, means it’s a ruse to fool the rubes.

Congressional Leaders Honor Fresco Painter Of The Capitol Constantino Brumidi

Tears of happiness (talk). The High School Conservative.

Boehner is famous for resigning as Speaker of the House, tanning, smoking cigarettes, and crying. Yet, here, he may know what he’s talking about. Modern socialist Amerika will not tolerate a full repeal nor anything approaching free market principle in healthcare. And a full replacement may not be necessary to keep things limping along for a while.

Said Boehner:

“[Congressional Republicans are] going to fix Obamacare – I shouldn’t call it repeal-and-replace, because it’s not going to happen,” he said.

Boehner’s comments come as Republican lawmakers across the country are facing angry constituents at town halls worried that Obamacare will be yanked away without a suitable replacement.

President Donald Trump has said in recent days that he will release a plan by early to mid-March on how the administration plans to move forward on a repeal-and-replace plan.

On Thursday, Boehner said the talk in November about lightning-fast passage of a new health care framework was wildly optimistic.

Trump says “the healthcare” must be addressed before the tax reforms are introduced. And, again, all of this is promised sooner than later. And sooner than later does not seem lightning fast.

Developing (slowly) …

Taxing Matters, the Waiting Game

23 Thursday Feb 2017

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns

≈ Comments Off on Taxing Matters, the Waiting Game

Tags

1986, America, Congress, FOPA, government, gun control, law, taxes, theft

Bloomberg laments (or ponders) that it has been 31 years since the U.S. saw meaningful tax reform. They looked at what happened in 1986:

The result was a comprehensive bill that slashed individual and corporate rates while compensating for the lost revenue by closing loopholes. That meant eliminating tax advantages enjoyed by powerful interest groups like the oil and real-estate industries and overcoming their formidable allies in Congress.

On the way, the 1986 tax bill nearly died on multiple occasions as lobbyists pressed their cases. Throughout almost two years of debate and negotiation, the conventional wisdom was that the proposal would not survive. It was defeated once in the House. The Senate, with Democrats and Republicans equally beholden to special interests, appeared to be a certain graveyard.

Then, as the bill reached final passage, Senate Republican Leader Bob Dole marveled that in a matter of days, it went from “immovable to unstoppable.” It cleared the Senate by 97 votes to three. A combination of will, skill and ideological flexibility made it possible.

While pining for has-beens who occupied Congress for far too long, they also looked, tentatively, towards the rest of 2017.

Republicans envision a new sales tax on domestic and imported goods and services dubbed a “border adjustment tax,” a variation of a European-style value-added levy that would favor exporters like Boeing and Caterpillar over equally powerful consumer-product companies like Wal-Mart and Target, not to mention consumers themselves. There’s economic merit to the idea since it would raise money to enable rate cuts and avoids the crude protectionism that Trump has championed.

But it would create a big new tax, and already some House conservatives are objecting. So has the right-wing advocacy group Americans for Prosperity, which was founded by the Republican mega-donors Charles and David Koch.

Yes, the border tax. Therein could lurk the double-edge. The playing field needs leveling. The taxes might, or might not, do it. Cutting regulations and taxes, and reigning in the Fed certainly would. Who knows at this point? But, there is always some cause for concern.

In 1986, the tax cuts in some areas were accompanied by increases in others. Federal spending and debt continued to grow, unabated. Then there was the quiet inclusion in the deal of the Firearms Owners Protection Act (FOPA). FOPA did nothing to protect anyone other than federal bureaucrats. It drastically limited the number of available automatic weapons – driving costs through the roof and into the stratosphere. Gun grabbers were pleased. Most of the public didn’t notice.

The grabbers are still at work, recent defeats aside. I suspect they will at least attempt to introduce some type of gun control into whatever tax reforms Trump proposes this year. They must be defeated.

Then again, we now know very little about what is planned for the rest of this year. Treasury Secretary Goldman Sachs Steven Mnuchin says a major overhaul is coming by August. We will see.

President Trump will address Congress next Tuesday, his first State of the Union remarks. It is a given he will discuss, in some fashion, the need for tax reform, among other measures. Details have been short. He’s also due to present a budget to Congress in the very near future. Tax details may be in there as well – again, details are in short supply.

So we’re going to continue on, and we’re going to take this budget, which is — in all fairness, I’ve only been here for four weeks, so I can’t take too much of the blame for what’s happened. But it is absolutely out of control, and we’re going to do things that are going to be tremendous over the years. We have to take care of our military. We have no choice, we have to take care of our military. It needs work; it’s very depleted. And we have to take care of a lot of other things.

Healthcare is moving along nicely. It’s being put into final forms. As you know, before we do the tax — which is actually very well finalized — but we can’t submit it until the healthcare, statutorily or otherwise. So we’re doing the healthcare. Again, moving along very well. Sometime during the month of March, maybe mid- to early March we will be submitting something that I think people will be very impressed by.

-Trump, Budget Meeting, Feb. 22, 2017.

I hope there’s something in it to be impressed with. The healthcare (or lack) is a tax itself. And I’m not sure why they can’t be reconciled together. At any rate, this is wait and see at this point.

While we wait we can look back at the history of taxation in America, the last 104 years. Bloomberg provided this graph:

nimbus-image-1487859364957

So much can be learned by simply tracking those little lines. Before 1913, the tax rates were ZERO – no taxes. Then, just as soon as they were in place, they skyrocketed. Their trajectory closely follows wars, economic turmoil, and social spending boondoggles. Their decline since the 70s paces the insane growth of debt spending – again, the spending is not dependent of the taxes and it does not stop.

It’s too much to hope that Trump wants to return to a 1912ish sound government. Still, there’s a modicum of hope. Hope tinged with caution. Keep the guns, kill the taxes.

They Just Do Not Want Illegal Mexicans – Back In Mexico – *From The Last Refuge

22 Wednesday Feb 2017

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns

≈ Comments Off on They Just Do Not Want Illegal Mexicans – Back In Mexico – *From The Last Refuge

Tags

America, Donald Trump, immigration, law, Mexico

**Either they know something we don’t. Or, else, they’re admitting something we won’t. And either way, it’s too bad. The ‘repatriation-tied-to-visa-program’ angle in this is beautiful. Take back the illegal migrants or we stop all of them, legals too. And, Mexico would risk terminating its largest trade and economic agreements (a large percentage of their GDP). They’ll take ’em back – maybe to camps just south of the Rio Grande – but they’ll take them.**

Oh man, the winning is getting almost too exponential today. Mexico’s Foreign Minister Videgaray states his government will not allow President Trump to deport illegal Mexican aliens back into Mexico. He’s setting himself up for a big problem, here’s why. What no one noticed yet was Trump administration immediately postponed the release of the new immigration policy […]

via Mexico Again Demands Illegal Alien Mexicans Be Kept Out of Mexico… — The Last Refuge

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Perrin Lovett

From Green Altar Books, an imprint of Shotwell Publishing

From Green Altar Books, an imprint of Shotwell Publishing

Perrin Lovett at:

Perrin on Geopolitical Affairs:

Archives

  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • June 2012

Prepper Post News Podcast by Freedom Prepper (sadly concluded, but still archived!)

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • PERRIN LOVETT
    • Join 42 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • PERRIN LOVETT
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.