Tag Archives: France

COLUMN: Hummingbirds for Hedgehogs, Cats for Mice: General Commentary AND a Review of LA POUDRE AUX YEUX by Justine Reix

10 Wednesday May 2023

Posted by in Other Columns

≈ Comments Off on COLUMN: Hummingbirds for Hedgehogs, Cats for Mice: General Commentary AND a Review of LA POUDRE AUX YEUX by Justine Reix

Tags

, , , , ,

Hummingbirds for Hedgehogs, Cats for Mice: General Commentary AND a Review of LA POUDRE AUX YEUX by Justine Reix

 

Late last week, I learned that SBU stormtroopers had arrested Gonzalo Lira again in Kharkov. He stands accused of, much like Julian Assange and Edward Snowden, telling the truth. Here’s praying for the best for him, his family, and his friends. I suppose emailing Tony Blinken the suggestion Lira is really a lesbian basketball druggie will not help as, of course, he and all other honest men can expect zero assistance from the imperial Yankee government. Today’s book review deals with government incompetence, dishonesty, and callous disregard – getting there in just a moment. Just the other week, all three characteristics were on full display when Joe Wilson (R – South Israelina) dropped House Res. 322, which might as well be known as the “Hey! While We’re Being Totally Wicked And Stupid, Let’s Declare (Unwinnable) War On Russia Act Of 2023”. Don’t worry, you, your children, and your grandchildren will pick up the potential tab for that.

Also, not too long ago, I learned of a terrible misdefinition of the “Sigma Male” of Socio-Sexual Hierarchy (SSH) fame. Many a right-winger, including the author of the original taxonomy, were amused at the reporting on the subject by one writer at VICE. She got it wrong, obviously, but I’m not entirely certain it was all her fault. Many illegitimate sources have out-of-the-blue claimed expertise in all things SSH. It may be a case of her not looking deeply enough, instead becoming satisfied by what she saw blathered all over creation (and TikTok). There was also the subtle feeling of Gekaufte Journalisten at work. Some SSH ideas help the heterosexual male members of the right and are thus anathema to Clown World. Regardless, writers like her get paid to produce content. Given everything, I found it difficult to fault her too hard.

But I did look into her, finding this:

(Multiple Twitter Picture Postin’s).

What a beautiful … book!

It turned out to be not such a bad book either. Here’s my,

Review of La Poudre Aux Yeux: Enquête sur le Ministère de l’Ecologie by Justine Reix, JC Lattès (2022) (US) (FR). 

La Poudre Aux Yeux, (Powder in the Eyes), is the tandem call for better ecological policy, and a discovery that government does not necessarily work as promised. It is not, as of yet, available in English. That may deter the casual non-French reader. However, I am told that multiple digital parties have assembled easy-to-use translation services. So there is hope for the intrepid reader. 

My Amazon review, below, essentially summarizes most of my thoughts on Reix’s book. However, I will first share a few more specific revelations for readers of my blog and, especially, the gangs at Reckonin’ and Abbeville. After all, agrarianism is a major theme for Southern People. It even received titular and topical treatment in Alan Harrelson’s (hey, bub!) doctoral dissertation at MSU, Native to the Soil: Twentieth-Century Agrarian Thought in the Upland South. Agrarianism is inescapably linked to ecology and environment matters. We all have to live somewhere, and most of us would like our somewheres as pristine as possible. Over the past few years, for reasons related to chemtrails, railroad fires, DNA-altering “vaccines”, and more, many on the right have changed their thinking about environmental issues. We all remain at least somewhat suspicious of the government and its (often corporate) owners.

A primary expertise of mine is in spotting and understanding evil trends in political matters, which is very, very easy. This helped markedly in appreciating Reix’s realization that France’s Ministry of Ecology might not do the best job of representing the interests of the French people. For her part, I suppose she is and was an idealistic, liberal young woman who perhaps thought things semi-worked as advertised. I was relieved to see, despite coming around to the harsh truth, she never lost her fire regarding her core concerns. 

However, many of my readers may not know it, but I was briefly, for one class in one college quarter, a student of Eugene Odum, the “father of modern ecology”. The class might have been entirely conducted by a graduate student, and I may have forgotten 97% of what I learned, but there’s still that 3%, right? There’s also the fact that I appreciate a clean environment. Many of the principles of modern “climate change” ecology I not only disagree with but know to be disproven, observably and mathematically. Reix covers some of that, but innocently and not in any raging or pushy fashion. I do agree with her on many of the other matters she discusses. Much of her caution and advice, especially as to what individuals and families can and should do, is sound. The great geostrategic and economic changes of the past year are literally forcing some of her proposals on the world; she called for a lessening of globalization, and that’s what we’re getting. Families in rural Doubs, France, and in rural northern Alabama are already practicing better ways that look suspiciously like traditional ways. 

For the Amazonians, I noted one particular point that I and Reix both found saddening – the fact that many young people are actively foregoing family formation and children out of fear of damaging the planet. There are other factors, economic and cultural at work, but this trend is real. I hope it ends immediately. Our greater ecological risk is damaging ourselves more than or to a higher degree than the Earth. And the only people who should have to fear are the people who have wrecked our fields, streams, towns, schools, economies, DNA, tranquility, sanity, and nations. Kids, that is not you; have no fear. Get out there, be happy, and have a bunch of children!

Also, keep those children out of organized schools and, to the greatest extent possible, out of the dying postmodern culture. While discussing potential corrective ecological approaches, Reix quotes a Léo Cohen, p. 138 (Kindle), on a similar entangled subject: “Quand on oblige les parents à mettre leurs enfants à l’école dès l’âge de 3 ans , on ne parle pas d’éducation punitive . Il y a une bataille culturelle à mener (When we force parents to put their children in school from the age of 3, we are not talking about punitive education. There’s a cultural battle to be fought)”. I do talk and write about “punitive” education, all the time. The schools in France, as-is, work much better than those in the former United States. However, they still force parents to send their children to be forcibly instructed in whatever the force of the state decrees appropriate. Interestingly, many of Reix’s personal suggestions, such as buying, growing, and living locally, appear most compatible with the concepts of homeschooling and parental (not state) control over children. 

There are other points I could make, though I think those work here. So now, please read my (5-Star) review submitted to Amazon, in French (translation follows):

Colibris pour Hérissons

Soixante ans après SILENT SPRING, nous avons peut-être un digne successeur à Rachel Carson.

Justine Reix a accompli deux exploits remarquables dans LA POUDRE AUX YEUX, plaidant de manière éclairée et sensée pour la gérance de l’environnement, tout en rappelant simultanément au monde la cupidité, l’insouciance et la léthargie systémiques endémiques dans les domaines intimement liés de la politique et de la corporatocratie.

Problèmes environnementaux. Même moi, un Américain de droite, j’ai trouvé un terrain d’entente avec les questions centrales abordées par Reix. Bien que je ne sois pas exactement d’accord avec toutes les politiques et slogans actuels associés à l’écologie moderne, je reconnais que nous avons tous des problèmes. Nous avons également tout intérêt à résoudre ces problèmes afin de pouvoir, selon les mots d’Eugene Odum, favoriser << des relations plus harmonieuses entre l’homme et la nature >>. Nous devons, pouvons et allons le faire. Au milieu de discussions sur de nombreux sujets et stratégies d’amélioration, Reix énumère des solutions véritablement réalisables, en particulier certaines de celles qu’elle oriente vers la prise de décision individuelle.

Calamité ministérielle. Reix doit être félicitée pour ce qui a dû être un processus d’enquête ardu dans la compilation matériel de base. Et elle aurait pu facilement transformer ses découvertes exploratoires en un traité sur n’importe quel ministère ou département de n’importe quel gouvernement de n’importe quelle nation. Tous les gouvernements sont soumis à certaines tendances bureaucratiques, et tous finissent par succomber à un abaissement et à un déplacement des loyautés et des efficacités. Étant donné que mon pays est dans un état aussi mauvais, voire pire que la France, le seul conseil que je pourrais donner est de persévérer.

Méfiez-vous également quelques des experts et des responsables, au sein et en dehors du gouvernement, en particulier ceux qui s’appuient sur un état constant d’alarme rhétorique. Il y a un grand cycle à l’œuvre, et ses différents auteurs changent fréquemment de rôle, résolvant un problème, dont la résolution crée un nouveau problème, qui continue encore et encore. Les préoccupations écologiques sont étroitement liées aux préoccupations économiques, de stabilité sociétale, etc. Ce réseau de soins interconnectés devrait intéresser tout le monde, car la plupart des groupes ont plus en commun qu’ils ne le pensent indépendamment. Reix couvre magistralement cette vérité; à titre d’exemple, j’ai été réconforté par le mention de forger un lien potentiel avec les gilets jaunes.

Une chose m’a causé une inquiétude supplémentaire dans la lecture, une tendance que j’ai lue ailleurs. Reix note et déplore certains hommes et femmes plus jeunes qui décident <<de ne pas faire d’enfants par peur de l’avenir>>. J’encourage tous les membres des jeunes générations en France, aux États-Unis et au-delà, à ne pas céder à la peur et à renoncer ainsi à tout bonheur familial, dont la poursuite n’est pas seulement sous l’ordre de Dieu mais qui procure également une grande joie personnelle. Certaines des propositions simples de Reix, correctement mises en œuvre, devraient encourager plutôt que décourager les familles harmonieuses. Ce n’est pas le chemin le plus facile à parcourir, mais des auteurs comme Justine Reix proposent le début d’une feuille de route décente.

La composition narrative de Reix se lit également très facilement, coulant de manière transparente d’un concept à l’autre. J’ai été entraîné, captivé et ma maîtrise du français, ma deuxième langue, fait un peu défaut. Quoi qu’il en soit, un argument convaincant et convaincant ressort des paroles de Reix. Elle est honnête mais passionnée, audacieuse mais raffinée, sage mais pleine d’esprit. Je note qu’elle a ouvert et fermé son livre avec des analogies allégoriques animales, une touche délicieuse. Elle a une belle voix et un style belletristiques, et j’aimerais la voir se développer davantage, ou, plutôt, la libérer à l’avenir. Quelques feux, humble colibri, ça paye de continuer à brûler !

Une série de messages importants dans un livre merveilleux.

English:

Hummingbirds for Hedgehogs

Sixty years after SILENT SPRING, we may have a worthy successor to Rachel Carson.

Justine Reix accomplished two remarkable feats in LA POUDRE AUX YEUX, making an informed and sensible case for environmental stewardship, while simultaneously reminding the world of the systemic greed, recklessness and lethargy endemic in the intertwined areas of politics and corporatocracy.

Environmental problems. Even I, a right-wing American, have found common ground with the central issues addressed by Reix. While I don’t exactly agree with all of the current policies and slogans associated with modern ecology, I recognize that we all have issues. We also have a vested interest in solving these problems so that we can, in the words of Eugene Odum, promote “more harmonious relations between man and nature”. We must, can and will do it. Amid discussions of many topics and strategies for improvement, Reix lists some truly workable solutions, especially some of those that she steers toward individual decision-making.

Ministerial calamity. Reix is to be commended for what must have been an arduous investigative process in compiling source material. And she could easily have turned her exploratory findings into a treatise on any ministry or department of any government of any nation. All governments are subject to certain bureaucratic tendencies, and all eventually succumb to a lowering and displacement of loyalties and efficiencies. Since my country is in as bad a state, if not worse than France, the only advice I could give is to persevere.

Also beware a few experts and officials, inside and outside government, especially those who rely on a constant state of rhetorical alarm. There is a great cycle at work, and its various authors change roles frequently, solving one problem, the solving of which creates a new problem, which goes on and on. Ecological concerns are closely related to economic concerns, societal stability, etc. This network of interconnected care should be of interest to everyone, as most groups have more in common than they realize independently. Reix masterfully covers this truth; as an example, I was comforted by the mention of forging a potential link with the yellow vests.

One thing caused me additional concern in reading, a trend I’ve read elsewhere. Reix notes and laments some younger men and women who decide “not to have children for fear of the future”. I encourage all members of the younger generations in France, the United States and beyond, not to give in to fear and thus renounce all family happiness, the pursuit of which is not only under the order of God but which also brings great personal joy. Some of Reix’s simple proposals, properly implemented, should encourage rather than discourage harmonious families. It’s not the easiest road to travel, but authors like Justine Reix offer the start of a decent roadmap.

Reix’s narrative composition also reads very easily, flowing seamlessly from concept to concept. I was driven, captivated and my fluency in French, my second language, is a bit lacking. Regardless, a compelling and convincing argument emerges from Reix’s words. She is honest but passionate, bold but refined, demure but witty. I note that she opened and closed her book with allegorical animal analogies, a delightful touch. She has a beautiful belletristic voice and style, and I would love to see her develop it more, or, rather, release it in the future. A few fires, humble hummingbird, it pays to keep burning!

A series of important messages in a wonderful book.

In closing, I gently correct Mademoiselle Reix. Lovely little hummingbird, ignoring the learned wisdom of the TikTok kings, while Bateman may be a Sigma gone maliciously insane, there are two more plausible classificatory explanations. First, if the story of American Psycho was fictitiously “factual”, then he is most likely an Alpha gone maliciously insane. Second, if the tale was a delusional dream, then, to me, it appears more likely than not he is a delusional Omega (possibly a delusional Gamma) gone maliciously, delusionally insane. Nonetheless, thank you for your dedication and spirit clearing away the powder.

Reverse Imperialism and Europe

08 Monday May 2023

Posted by in Legal/Political Columns

≈ Comments Off on Reverse Imperialism and Europe

Tags

, , , ,

Elements posted an interesting take on the slow slide of post-modern Europe. Mechanical translation:

The decline of Europe

For Julien Freund, decadence is an inevitable historical phenomenon. To use the subtitle of his work Decadence, of a « category of human experience ». The philosopher thus recalls that « every great civilization has its Barbarians, which it tries to conquer, with the more or less firm will to assimilate them until the moment when it finds that the relationship has been reciprocal and that it is itself exhausted in this game ». In fact, « its decadence is already part of its expansion ».

As Vox has said, empire is the art of choosing which foreigners will rule over one’s grandchildren. Europeans chose very poorly.

The solution, beyond the obvious need to remove the reverse conquerors, may come from some of the ideas in Terry Hulsey’s new book. Crisis, perhaps recovering a little from its COVID-Ukraine stupor (now do V2!), has an interesting defense of monarchy by Robert Shaffern:

The French monarchy has often been described as absolute, but that word poorly describes the actual regime. Many government responsibilities lay beyond the authority of the throne. While the French king was the only source of legislation for the entire realm, the king’s decrees only became efficacious when they were registered by the Parlement of Paris; thus, at the very least, the wishes of the king could be delayed. Both the British and French monarchies had to obtain the approval of the Parliament and Estates General, respectively, to collect new taxes.

The Enlightenment notion that king = bad, and muh democracy = good is part of what has led Europe, the USSA, and the rest of the West to the brink of utter disaster. Here’s hoping our future may look a little more like our past.

COLUMN: Proximité Périlleuse Pauvreté

29 Wednesday Mar 2023

Posted by in Other Columns

≈ Comments Off on COLUMN: Proximité Périlleuse Pauvreté

Tags

, , , ,

Proximité Périlleuse Pauvreté

 

My title roughly translates into “Poverty’s Perilous Proximity”, minus a “de” and “la” or two. I had to de-grammarize as we must always avoid alliteration! 

While I would dearly love to keep discussing the in-progress collapse of the Clown World economy, as it technically relates to Americans, my head hurts and the zero button on my calculator broke. However, I do fancy people who still want to exist. Ergo, as sometimes happens, we have a slightly different take on affairs. Une prise Française, with brief layovers in Ireland and China.

For several reasons, I lately drifted from my usual somber reading and picked up a copy of Mary Morrissy’s excellent collection of short stories, Prosperity Drive. While all her words stand out in a striking, yet poetic fashion, I found specific inspiration in these, in her fourth story, Gracefully, Not Too Fast:

Poverty was something to be feared: not for what the poor in their rage might do to you but for its perilous proximity. As if it might be infectious.

– Mary Morrissy, Prosperity Drive, Random House, (Kindle Ed.) P. 38 (2017).

The story walks the line, excitedly and sadly, self-ware and aloof, through a maze of music, illiteracy, and, as one might expect, social standing and destitution. The book is certainly worth one’s effort, so consider purchasing a copy. The above quote reminded me of a question posed by the wonderful Jessamine Lee the other day: “So I’m not rich.  So what?” It also reminded me of something a little older: of the wisdom in a passage of the Analects of Confucius:

When a country is well-governed, poverty and a mean condition are things to be ashamed of. When a country is ill-governed, riches and honour are things to be ashamed of.

So what, indeed, Ms. Lee? What does it all mean? On and around Prosperity Drive, poor little Bridget could not help her pecuniary circumstances. Her life and times were set in the post-WWII era, a transitory time for Ireland and the West. Much like her, so many of us cannot exactly control our circumstances. The Master constantly differentiated between the virtues of the superior man and the shortcomings of the mean man. He juxtaposed these two archetypes across various political cultures both desirous and baneful. The superior man should always stand upright, stoically, regardless of prevailing conditions. The mean man does not and cannot do so. Yet Confucius’s words used herein pertain to the general conditions of the populace.

In a noble country, graced with a fitting government, history shows a tendency toward merit, equity, and prosperity. In such a happy society, most people attain a relative position of self-sufficiency if not what might be regarded as economic wealth. And while there are exceptions – childhood travails, personal calamity, or obliging vows of poverty – under such tranquil circumstances, a lowly and crude status is generally thought to be indicative of poor character – of inelegance and sloth. Such is somewhat the spirit of the cautious admonishment from Saint Paul in II Thessalonians 3:10 (also attributed, later, to John Smith at Jamestown): “we declared to you: that, if any man will not work, neither let him eat.” In the original verse, “you” refers, twice before and once after, to [our] Christian Brethren. Hence, the assumption is an addressed society well-governed, spiritually if not politically or economically.

However, in a fallen state, cursed with a foul government, the opposite is generally true, as to honor and lament. While there must be some exceptions, in a lower(ed) society, those who have great abundance, or who are lauded popularly, are generally among the worst kinds of men – the “ticket-takers” of popular parlance. They are only thought wealthy and exemplary because they conform to the wickedness of the ruling status quo. In reality, their riches and their honor are false. One recalls a certain poor Carpenter turned Street Preacher and His angry rejection of the silver coin of the wealthy, well-connected, and presumably “honorable” elites of His day.

What remains of much of the faltering West is the dictionary definition of “ill-governed”. Not quite everything political, cultural, and economic is fake. Note that under such conditions, poverty and crudeness do not necessarily become proper; rather, it is that outwardly benefiting from the false, rigged system becomes the more shameful condition. You’re not “rich”? Good, it’s better that way.

France was recently a relatively stable country. It remains so, though something is obviously afoot. While French “socialism” was somewhat misunderstood by many Americans, it worked well enough for enough of the French people. The secularization of Catholic France is another matter. But, economically, in return for higher marginal tax rates (marginal, because other factors greatly equalized the overall burden felt by, say, Americans), the French did, in fact, receive various benefits such as general peace, excellent transportation, good schools, quality healthcare, functioning courts, long vacations, and early retirement. In short, the people paying for the services received the benefit of the services. Critically, the French ruled France. 

Then, something(s) changed.

One might not know it by watching what passes for news in the US, but for about five years, the French have been daily rioting in the streets. The gilets jaunes, mostly middle-aged, middle-class, ordinary French, not-so-quietly rebelled over several observable changes to their great nation. From the outside, France appears to be in a phase of transition, further along than the general West of the mid-20th century. In some ways, many ways, it is about where the US was around 1980, and, like the US in 1980, the picture is changing quickly. The recent pension reforms, carried out in the usual Clown World “democratic” fashion, without a proper vote, sparked a new, higher level of rebellion, something perilously bordering on civil war. The evil globalist elites who control the French government have postponed the age of retirement to free up more money for a growing cadre of schemes. The French are now being forced to pay for their altered destiny. And they know it. Transitioning into nefarious governance, the infectious specter of poverty knocks at the door. The people see that their limited future holds less in the way of riches and honor. 

They are responding accordingly and properly. They’re burning it down! Taking a page from the Sri Lankan and Lebanese playbooks, they’ve started torching the homes of the wicked politicians who dared to disrupt the accepted order of things. Millions of men and women are blocking streets and fighting for their collective way of life. Farmers are dumping manure and garbage at government offices. The people are setting fire to police stations. Some speak of making the guillotine great again. Some mention Macron by name. State visits are postponed. The heat, as they say, is on.

If this was happening in places like Russia, Iran, or Minneapolis, then the gekaufte journalisten would be singing the praises of these mostly peaceful protesters attempting to overcome oppression. As-is, the militarized police are in the streets beating and gassing their countrymen. But cracks are forming. Here and there, unionized civil employees, firefighters, and police officers are joining the protests. We are also reminded of the Generals’ Letter and the Soldiers’ Letter, penned barely two years ago. Previously, the military warned the idiot politicians that domestic unrest was imminent if something wasn’t given. Nothing was given, and now the letters look prophetic. And if a war of some kind is inevitable, it might make sense to get it over with sooner than later. 

This should have been foreseen as it is literally in the lyrics of “La Marseillaise”:

Allons enfants de la patrie,

Le jour de gloire est arrivé!

Contre nous de la tyrannie

L’étendard sanglant est levé! (bis)

Entendez-vous dans les campagnes,

Mugir ces féroces soldats?

Ils viennent jusque dans nos bras

Égorger nos fils, nos compagnes!

Aux armes, citoyens!

Formez vos bataillons!

Marchons ! Marchons!

Qu’un sang impur

Abreuve nos sillons!

In English:

Let’s go children of the fatherland,

The day of glory has arrived!

Against us tyranny’s

Bloody flag is raised! (2x)

In the countryside, do you hear

The roaring of these fierce soldiers?

They come right to our arms

To slit the throats of our sons, our friends!

To arms, citizens!

Form your battalions!

Let us march! Let us march!

May impure blood

Water our fields!

Last year, they endured a bit of a drought, so the fields are thirsty. Here’s the anthem, as sung magnificently in 1989 by the irrepressible Mireille Mathieu:

Mathieu, a staunch Catholic, might personally prefer the tone of the alternative Royalist version (Allons armée Catholique!). I would like to say that I do; however, that edition was essentially a parody of the Freemasonic original. It needs work, honestly. And, given the times and the elitist luciferian enemy occupying Paris, the lyrics of the standard anthem work well, regardless of parentage. Indeed, it is most fitting to hurl the words back at the Enlightenment mongers who have created the current existential crisis! Let the usurpers fear what the legitimate people do in their rage.

Given the continued fiery resistance of the proud French, and the futility of Clown World analytics, I have a grand idea! My Tom Ironsides’s action novella, AURELIUS, is set amidst barely-fictitious contemporary French social and political turmoil to match literal current events. As such, I may drop select parts of a few chapters here soon. Publication, hopefully, shall happen this autumn. Until then, of course, THE SUBSTITUTE awaits your perusal. 

Une note à mes amis Français: Continuez à vous battre! Pourquoi? Parce Deus vult, et Deo vindice!

Avant de partir: Je t’aime trop et je ne peux vivre sans toi! Voici “Pardonne Moi” de Mathieu (1970):

One Sole Question

20 Monday Mar 2023

Posted by in Legal/Political Columns

≈ Comments Off on One Sole Question

Tags

, ,

The French ask.

“Let’s get clarity. The vote means clarity,” Aurore Berge, chief of the pro-government MPs, told broadcaster Franceinfo Sunday.

“It’s about one sole question: is the pension reform indispensable or unbearable for the French public?“

A prerequisite question: is the French public dispensable to the Clown World elite? In another example of WereWestern “democracy” meaning ramming through pension “reform” without a vote, Emperor Macron wielded his nuclear option in favor of homoglobo’s Camp of the Saints invaders. A follow-up question: can Macron be backed down?

It’s either no confidence or more rioting. If the French let this slide, then they can enjoy their freedom French fries.

UPDATE: Or not. Now a good question might be, would it be better to go ahead and start the inevitable civil war sooner than later?

Enrichment Continues in Paris

23 Friday Dec 2022

Posted by in Legal/Political Columns

≈ Comments Off on Enrichment Continues in Paris

Tags

, ,

DIEversity brings so many blessings.

Five police are among the injured in Paris this evening after demonstrators set fire to the streets in response to the tragic deaths of three Kurds, who were massacred by a ‘racist’ gunman in the heart of the city.

Five police are among the injured in Paris this evening after demonstrators set fire to the streets in response to the tragic deaths of three Kurds, who were massacred by a ‘racist’ gunman in the heart of the city.

“Racist.” Who knows exactly who the 69-yo retired choo-choo operator is. But just wait until French men of all ages start emulating his work. When it finally happens, one hopes US conservatives and libertarians will notice that it does not involve voting.

Se battre pour exister!

Our Reputation Proceeds Us

17 Thursday Nov 2022

Posted by in Legal/Political Columns

≈ Comments Off on Our Reputation Proceeds Us

Tags

, , ,

It must be all the domestic extremists in the US that have 97% of the DGSE/I spooks nervous in France.

New research published by France’s Ecole de Guerre Economique has revealed some extraordinary findings about who and what the French intelligence services fear most when it comes to threats to the country’s economy.

The findings are based on extensive research and interviews with French intelligence experts, including representatives of spy agencies, and so reflect the positions and thinking of specialists in the under-researched field of economic warfare. Their collective view is very clear – 97 percent consider the US to be the foreign power that “most threatens” the “economic interests” of Paris.

No, wait, my bad. The Frogs are hoping mad about the empire’s belated, desperate unrestricted warfare against darn near everyone, especially its allies. This article partly explains why the usual suspects hated De Gaulle so. It ends with Henry Kissinger’s words, “to be an enemy of America can be dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal.” France is our oldest ally (friend); at least they’re waking up.

More Werewestern “Democracy”

22 Saturday Oct 2022

Posted by in Legal/Political Columns

≈ Comments Off on More Werewestern “Democracy”

Tags

, , ,

The mayor of a French town has a plan to destroy the town.

His constituents are 80% opposed to his wicked, stupid plan. So, in keeping with the false, evil spirit of “democracy,” Werewest style, he plans to forge ahead regardless of what his people need and want. This is, we’re told, different from and better than the tyranny imposed by dictators in less-Werewestern nations.

Callas is pretty close to the ocean. Someone else probably has a little boat. Another someone probably has some rope or wire. I imagine yet another someone has some concrete blocks lying around. If only a solution would suggest itself. Sad.

Hommes de France, réveillez-vous.

Murdering Europe, Un Enfant à la Fois

19 Wednesday Oct 2022

Posted by in News and Notes

≈ Comments Off on Murdering Europe, Un Enfant à la Fois

Tags

, , , ,

When, if ever, will the people of France and Europe tire of stories like this one.

French police has four Algerians in custody suspected of participating in the brutal murder and rape of a 12-year-old schoolgirl only identified as Lola. The suspects (Dahbia B., Amine K., Friha B., and Rachid N.) all hail from the same Algerian village, and one of them may be in the country illegally.

The body was found in a suitcase curled up, shackled, with a deep wound in her throat, and marked with inscriptions. According to the autopsy, carried out on Saturday, her death was due to asphyxiation. One of the suspects in the case have been charged with “murder of a minor under the age of 15 in connection with a rape committed with acts of torture and barbarism,” “rape of a minor under the age of 15 with acts of torture and barbarism,” and “concealment of a corpse.” Although there was no mention of sexual violence when the story first broke, the latest details from BMFTV allege the girl was also raped.

Barbarism, once again, from the blessings of DIEversity, tolerance, and ethnic suicide.

Paris, ton ennemi n’est pas à Moscou.

COLUMN: As Go French Overseas Territories, So Goes The West?

27 Wednesday Apr 2022

Posted by in Other Columns

≈ Comments Off on COLUMN: As Go French Overseas Territories, So Goes The West?

Tags

, , , ,

COLUMN: As Go French Overseas Territories, So Goes The West?

 

That was one of the very interesting things about Sunday’s election. While homeland France, the European Nation, voted approximately 60% to 40% for five more years of globohomo tyranny, almost the exact opposite happened in the territories, where majorities in Martinique, Guadeloupe, Guiana, etc. voted for Le Pen and nationalism. 

The populations of the territories are generally anywhere from majority to hyper-majority autochthones of their respective lands, the native peoples – African, Poly-Oceanic, etc. They are the remainder of the former French Imperial Colonies who elected to remain attached politically to the primary state. I find it fascinating that these assorted peoples saw through Macron and decided they would rather be represented by someone who at least says she favors France for the French. I have not looked and I don’t plan to, but I suspect that much of the pro-Macronian territorial support came from the White French minorities (along with local cronies, sycophants, looters, and moochers of all stripes). I also have a suspicion that many of the pro-Le Pen voters also harbor some ideas about full and total independence; those who favor nationalism tend to desire separate nations, for themselves as much as for others. Again, this is based on educated if unsupported suspicion.

Back on the Continent…

I’m tempted to ask, “what the hell will it take to wake you fools up?!” But, I live in a country that is in drastically worse shape than France, which leaves me little room to talk. And yet I will. Here, literal Americans are an absolute minority in our own land. Best-proxy, late definition Americans are slouching towards oblivion and should become a simple minority by the end of this decade. While the current British Brethren begin to look a lot like us, the original set wouldn’t recognize us. Christianity has taken and keeps taking a horrific beating, partly self-inflicted. The average national IQ is poised to soon drop into the range almost all authorities deem “low average.” All of them except Kaufman, which calls it below average. Everything from the schools to the media to the government to the money is fake in the US of Not-A. It is not so, not yet, in France.

Not yet, but parity may approach faster than many will be comfortable with. Satanic globalism, while not quite as bad as in the USSA, is rampant in France. It appears their elections still work, for now. Their government is a bit different, better in some ways, worse in others, but it is still mostly, plausibly functional for the French (with large takeaways for Brussels and Mordor). The rot shows itself in somewhat distinct ways: for example, French schools are better and their colleges, also better on the average, are cost-appropriate. Hellish financialization does not intrude into education (as with the wicked scheme of USian student loans), but it does affect other parts of the economy (like labor and housing prices). The Concorde is as dead as the Dodo, but the TGVs are still racing along with their routes expanding.

The French, still being mostly French, are probably a third of a standard deviation smarter than the average US resident (perhaps on par with legitimate Americans). However, the religious situation is arguably worse in the Fifth Republic. The evils of the Enlightenment took an immediate toll on French Catholicism, the Twentieth Century was far from kind to it, and the Twenty-First is literally stabbing and burning what’s left. 

But again, France is still, for now, a hyper-majority French nation. My best estimate is that 85% of the population is French. 90-ish% are French and other, similar Europeans. The remaining 10% ranges from almost similar to incompatible to extremely dangerous. In Census-related terms, France is about where the US was around 1970. In other words, it isn’t all that bad yet. In other other words, they have a damned huge problem that is going to turn into an emergency. 

They know all of the foregoing and yet nearly six out of ten of them voted for the little boy, lawn jockey of the House of Rothschild. Now, I’m back to asking what the hell?! Does the banksters’ boy have to set up a Moloch furnace in the ruins of Notre Dame? Does he have to make Nick Conrad his Minister of Culture?

Macron knows he’s walking a very fine line. Yet, he continues to walk on. In his tepid thank you speech the other night, he babbled proudly about making France “greener.” Those very fast trains require electricity. One of the shining achievements of the De Gaulle – DGE era was the superior positioning of nuclear power. Now, because it works, it has to go. Same with coal. Gas comes from Russia and that, yeah… 

This is the fool who packs in the diversity, calls it French, and then denigrates the actual French with bad names when they dare to notice the damages. He’s playing Kiev against Moscow against Paris against London against Brussels against Brandon in some mad game to force a mostly-peaceful war of globe-crushing consequence. He didn’t just work for a bank, nor a central bank, nor the IMF; he worked for the ROTHSCHILD FAMILY itself.

Maybe the alternatives weren’t that great. Le Pen, like her father, talks a good game. She is, however, a she. Eric Zemmour is equally right-sounding, though he happens to not be a native Frenchman. Something, something Isaiah, I think. If that thought matters here, then it’s worth noting that even as the rule or potential rule by women and foreigners indicates a people are under a curse from God, it doesn’t necessarily mean the women and foreigners are cursed, wicked, or even bad – they’re just indicators. Where, one wonders, are the French men? At least a De Gaulle caliber is needed at the moment. Soon, a Martel may be required. Is he, whoever he is, to be found somewhere between Nantes and Grenoble? Probably, or so it’s hoped.

This latest failure of the promise of restored Euro-nationalism may be what’s needed to spur a near-future renewal. Other signs, if one knows where to look for them, are promising. Four out of ten voters know there are severe problems and want to solve them. That’s up considerably from 2017. May that it crests a majority by 2027. The Gilets Jaunes aren’t going away, intensifying rather. There were the not-so-subtle twin warnings from the general staff of the military and from the enlisted core. There has to be a latent backlash of resentment over Paris’s participation in the C19 hoax and war. There may be no need to wait another five years. I’ve been telling the podcast audience that France is one of the big, steaming hot potatoes to watch for the rest of this year. Watch her. 

Also, keep watching the miraculous dismantling of globohomo by Russia. This grand phenomenon might be a dark horse gift for France, Western Europe, and all Christendom. Speculation abounds that once Vlad and Co. liberate Ukraine, drive away the US’s thugs and ziocons, and force a beautiful end to the idiocy of the EU, much or all of Europe may begin to adopt “Russian” values, that is to return to the core principles of Western Civilization. 

It’s a long game and a lot to hope for. Still, it’s great to have a lot to hope for, on, and with. There is still time for France and Europe to restore harmony and order. Unlike in the faded-away US, they still have, for some time, political options – if they’ll exercise them. If, or rather when it all goes well, we can give much of the originating credit to the brave people of places like Martinique as they saw further, with greater clarity, first. Bravo, Territorials.

My Freedom Fry-less Frog Friends, seriously, WHAT THE HELL?!