Pax Per Bellum: AURELIUS Update

Tags

,

I’ve stalled for quite an impressive amount of time. Yet over the weekend, I finally submitted the manuscript of AURELIUS to Green Altar Books. In this shorter, faster, harder novella, Tom Ironsides returns with a vengeance. No saving education, just action, action, and a little more action. What the people want!

The word I got back a day later was: “The new Ironsides is great! Of course, that was only to be expected.” I take that as a compliment and a green light.

What have we here? Some kind of nascent cover art???

Might get in a little trouble for teasing any kind of cover material, but we’ll all live. (All designs subject to change, etc.)

Expect a winterish timeframe for publication – no promises yet. More soonish!

JUDGING ATHENA Interview

Tags

,

Literary Titan asked, and I answered: behind the romance.

Perrin Lovett Author Interview

 

Judging Athena follows a humble and kindhearted research assistant who meets a curator at an art gallery, and what begins as a chance encounter over a necklace for a young girl’s birthday unfurls into a deep and poetic romance. What was the inspiration for the setup of your story?

The idea came to me while I was walking one evening last October. There is a real art gallery gift shop in a charming New England town. Many years ago, I purchased some custom nickel jewelry from the shop manager, a lovely woman with an accent (the nationality of which I cannot recall). On my walk, I suddenly suspected a story was lurking in the memory. As I strolled along, it all began to coalesce in my mind, blending with a few other ideas. I decided to go home, start typing, and see how far it went. Three and a half weeks later, I had a rough draft.

I enjoyed the romantic relationship between Josh and Athena. How did their relationship develop while you were writing it? Did you have an idea of where you wanted to take it or was it organic?

I’m glad you enjoyed it! I had a notion about both characters and their interaction. While they eventually presented themselves well in the first draft, initially, both were somewhat difficult for me to conceptualize. Josh was a challenge because of his humility and piety, and because I wasn’t sure how he would relate to Athena. She was very challenging due to her rarified nature and utterly unique circumstances. And her essence changed quickly in my mind, from a mere legend into something higher and in keeping with her arc of redemption. Fortunately, all my quandaries were resolved as I wrote. Once I was used to the sincerity and kindness in both characters, writing them became a nearly effortless pleasure.

Because of my marital deliverance theme, and partly in defiance of postmodern trends, I knew I wanted the relationship to progress from meeting to matrimony as quickly as possible. Yet in getting there, I decided to dwell on the details of dates, thoughts, emotions, and so forth. And many, many roses! That is why the betrothal period, less than two months long, essentially occupies half the book. I felt the emphasis on clean and honest dating and development, along with genuine understanding behind the marriage, was that important. As an aside, part of me almost wishes I could have dedicated the same level of attention to the rest of the story. However, that would have resulted in a book of 95,000 pages, not words, and I was pleased with the second half anyway.

I did have an idea of where I wanted Athena and Josh to go, though the idea evolved a bit. Most unusual for me, the ideas pretty much landed in the word processor in an organic fashion. Ordinarily, I erratically plot, fill in via scattershot, overthink, and stall manuscript development for months or even years. I practically wrote Judging Athena straight through from page one to “The End.”

What were some themes that were important for you to explore in this book?

Perhaps the most important element is the Christian concept of joint salvation, manifested through the three primary reasons for marriage, as explained by Father Josias in Chapter Four. This is a core tenant of the Church, however, too much of its veracity has been lost or diluted in our era. The tale I tell is, sadly, not my own. Rather, it is an idealistic expression of the ideal romance. My plot device or hook regarding Athena’s true nature is an admittedly extreme use of speculative theology. However, given the extreme state of the real world around us, I thought it was important to provide a strong counterbalance.

Another important concept, for me and, hopefully, for readers, is the complete deference to God offered by two imperfect people who, by dispensing with solipsism, offer anathema to the postmodern concept of the individual über alles. Fiction provides a forum for letting be what should be, even if the imagined vehicle approaches the fantastical.

Many of the themes and subthemes in Judging Athena stem from First Corinthians. I really enjoyed working various metaphors into the characters’ perceptions, their relationship, and their interaction with God, others, and the world. In addition to all else, the titular matter of judgment requires a real apophatic leap of faith. While hinting all around, I do not expressly explain how it happens. I don’t know technically how these matters unfold. No one does. Hence, a degree of trust is warranted. Had I delivered a detailed verdict, I doubt anyone would have liked it—least of all the author.

Also, I really like writing “innocent” fiction. All too often, my work veers into the polemical and the expositive. I may have finally discovered it is better to suggest than to force certain matters. Beyond telling what I hope is a sweet and entertaining story, I ultimately hope to encourage young men and women to defy the world, unite, be fruitful, and help each other redeem themselves through and into the glory of the Almighty.

What is the next book that you’re working on, and when can your fans expect it out?

Next up, Tom Ironsides returns in AURELIUS, a hard-charging action novella wherein the CIA’s former best blasts through the ranks of assorted international criminals. It’s another book that’s been simmering for a while, since around 2020. With any luck, it should be out late this year or in the winter of 2026. As with Judging Athena and The Substitute, it will come to market via Green Altar Books, the growing and outstanding literary imprint of Shotwell Publishing.

I generally have four or five manuscripts in development at any given time, and now is no exception. My “save the world” inclinations are slowly giving way to something more genteel and with more genuine literary quality. I have a few more romances in the works, including an outline for something of the levels of apologetics in Judging Athena. And there’s always more coming along—in due time.

Disappeared Means Dead?

Tags

,

The official death toll in the Gazacaust stands at 56,331. Virtually all of the 14,000 missing Gazans are dead, so the total real count is more like 70,000. As horrible as the number is, it is probably low. From Dr. Marwa and the Cradle with terrible probabilities: 377,000 – 598,000 murders committed by the children and stepchildren of the devil:

The Cradle

Harvard-linked study finds Israel ‘disappeared’ nearly 400,000 Palestinians in Gaza, half of them children: Report

The study by a Ben Gurion University professor uses data-driven analysis and spatial mapping to highlight a severe decline in Gaza’s population since October 2023

News Desk •

A study published via the Harvard Dataverse reveals that Israel has “disappeared” at least 377,000 Palestinians since the start of its genocidal campaign against the Gaza Strip in 2023.

Half of this number is believed to be Palestinian children.

The report was written by Israeli professor Yaakov Garb, who used data-driven analysis and spatial mapping to show how the Israeli army’s siege of Gaza and indiscriminate attacks on civilians in the enclave have led to a serious drop in its population.

The 377,000 Palestinians who are unaccounted for due to Israel’s genocide are approximately 17 percent of the Gaza Strip’s entire population, which now stands at about 1.85 million. Prior to the war in Gaza, the strip’s population was estimated at 2.227 million.

While some are displaced or missing, a significant number are believed to have been killed by Israeli forces, according to the report.

The professor notes that the official death toll of 61,000 is clearly an underestimate, as victims who remain trapped under rubble are not included.

Garb also condemned in the report the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) – a controversial US-Israeli aid distribution mechanism launched last month.

“These aid compounds seem to reflect a logic of control, not assistance, and it would be a misnomer to call them ‘humanitarian aid distribution hubs’. They do not adhere to humanitarian principles, and much of their design and operation is guided by other objectives, which undermine their declared purpose,” he said.

The UN has accused GHF of being designed to further the forced displacement. Since it began operations, GHF has led to the deaths of hundreds of Palestinian aid seekers by Israeli forces.

The Harvard-linked report is not the first indication that the death toll in Gaza could, in fact, be significantly higher than reported.

The Lancet medical journal released a study in January this year revealing that the death toll from Israel’s genocide in Gaza was most likely undercounted by 41 percent in the first nine months of the war.

The January study highlighted that around 59.1 percent of those killed were women, children, and elderly.

The year before, in July 2024, The Lancet said Israel’s assault on Gaza could lead to between 149,000 and 598,000.

For many Zios, Yankees, NATO Nazis, and others complicit in this genocide, there will literally be hell to pay, on this earth or, certainly, beyond it.

Also: Dr. Marwa joins Larry Johnson and Lisa Issac to talk about the late Zio-Yankee aggression against Iran: Cross Talk.

Lucky 13: Another Blog Anniversary!

Tags

, , ,

Long time been a’bloggin’ here. It all started on a scalding hot June day many … blah, blah, blabbity, blah. (Ironically, today is the hottest day of 2025 so far…) And this year is one when some of the often pondered changes did, in fact, come along. This place is a dot-ME and, once again, a dot-COM. Yay. And there’s now the real and working Author Page. (Quality and presentation will, as always, improve tomorrow…)

The stats: 13 years, 6,500+ ramblings, 40 bazillion words (some nearly coherent), 4 visitors, 3 views, 1 possum, and 19 green space chickens. Yee haw.

Remember this guy? If I recall correctly, this one even predates the blog by a few years and gray hairs:

Even this picture has a little age on it now:

Not long ago, reading glasses (1.25x) entered the fuzzy picture:

I started this project in my thirties and now I trudge on deeper into my second half century. (I mean, look at those photos…)

In some ways, 2012 was just yesterday. In others, it was a long time ago. I now offer over 6,500 posts here: some good, some better, some, uh, not so better. Thanks for coming for all these years. And before switching permanently to books (primarily novels), I think there’s still a little gas left in the Old Blog’s tank. Think of the near future as a transition period. I’ve already been scaling back somewhat. That will continue. I’ve added a News Links page to make up for my house reductions, renditions, and other “r” words.

Going to add to these:

Day-to-day postings will become less frequent, as will my columns, essays, and book reviews. Those latter articles will continue here and via my international semi-syndicated network. I fancifully aim for about one per month, but we shall see. Further ahead, look for more short stories, occasional longer essays on important topics of interest to me, and far deeper concentration on novels. I also have a few non-fiction book ideas to get around to. The time has come.

Happy 13th Anniversary, all.

Perrin

Shooting Back

Tags

, ,

Iran has teeth. It’s unclear whether this retaliation against the GAE is tit for tat with the scripted non-event Trump won’t shut up about, or if it’s a major move. Still, it is something.

Iranian armed forces have launched a missile barrage at American military bases in Qatar in a retaliatory operation a day after Iranian nuclear sites were targeted by US bombers.

In a statement following the successful retaliatory operation, Iranian armed forces said the operation came in response to the “blatant military aggression by the criminal regime of the United States” against the nuclear facilities of the Islamic Republic.

The statement described the US aggression as “a clear violation of international law” and added that under the directive of the Supreme National Security Council and the command of the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters (PBUH), the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC), using the sacred code “Ya Aba Abdillah al-Hussain (AS),” launched a powerful and devastating missile strike on the Al Udeid base in Qatar.

This base serves as the headquarters of the US Air Force Command and represents the most strategic asset of the American military in West Asia.

“The message of this decisive action by the sons of the nation in the armed forces to the White House and its allies is clear and direct,” the statement noted, adding that the Islamic Republic of Iran will “never leave any violation of its territorial integrity, sovereignty, or national security unanswered.”

It further said that the American enemy’s aggression has “exposed to all that Zionist malice is simply a continuation of US strategy” while reminding all that in this national defense, American military bases and assets in the region “are not points of strength but critical vulnerabilities — the Achilles’ heel of this warmongering regime.”

The story is developing…

I’m about to wrap most daily commentary on things like this. It’s nice to see someone like Andrei Martyanov saying what I’ve said for a while, that the US is not a sovereign country. His take on the collapse and the pathetic clown show of the Trump:

UPDATE? Ceasefire?? It may be that the zios caved while facing defeat. Larry with a word.

GAE Bombs Iran

Tags

,

The Trump has either just made a calculated and coordinated face-saving gesture to extricate the empire from the zionist’s mess in West Asia, or else, he has just effectively ended the United States. While I pray for the former, I wish for the latter. Either way, just how, exactly, does this “MAGA”?

And so it goes.

New Review of JUDGING ATHENA

Tags

From Literary Titan.

 

Judging Athena is a slow-burning and intense romantic tale wrapped in layers of faith, wonder, and philosophical exploration. The novel follows Josh, a humble and kindhearted research assistant with a troubled past, as he meets the mesmerizing Athena, a seemingly otherworldly curator at an art gallery. What begins as a chance encounter over a necklace for a young girl’s birthday unfurls into a deep and poetic romance. But the book is far more than a love story. It is a meditation on grace, providence, redemption, and the mysterious forces that shape our connections with others. Lovett weaves Christian themes and classical imagery into a narrative that’s both gentle and spiritually charged.

Reading this book was like watching a candle flicker in a dark room—it’s quiet, but it draws you in with its warmth. Lovett’s prose is clean, sometimes florid, and undeniably heartfelt. He leans heavily into emotional introspection, and there’s a timelessness in how the characters speak and behave. I found Josh’s sincerity almost disarming. His faith isn’t just tacked on; it’s baked into the bones of who he is. Likewise, Athena, with her mythic presence and veiled depth, feels like a figure out of legend—yet she’s also relatable. Sometimes the writing feels deliberately old-fashioned, almost theatrical, but it works here. It feels earnest, not forced. There were scenes—particularly Josh’s interactions with the orphaned children—that made me tear up. This book is tender and idealistic, and that’s its charm.

Judging Athena won’t be everyone’s cup of tea. Some readers might find the pacing slow or the emotional tone a bit too syrupy. There’s also an idealization of the romantic female figure. Personally, I didn’t mind that. The mythic vibe—the goddess-like presence of Athena—is part of the book’s fabric. Still, it’s good to know what you’re walking into. I also appreciated how the novel wrestled with ideas of spiritual identity and belonging without sounding preachy. Lovett trusts the reader to wrestle alongside the characters. And for a book grounded in religious themes, that kind of subtlety is rare.

I’d recommend Judging Athena to readers who are believers in second chances, hopeless romantics, and anyone who finds beauty in the quiet corners of life. If you like books that wear their heart on their sleeve and aren’t afraid to slow down and feel deeply, this one’s worth your time. It is full of love for people, for faith, for redemption.

Pages: 330 | ASIN : B0F6KQ6C9S

Buy Now From B&N.com

The Best Incentive

Tags

,

David Hearst writes about the sheer wicked stupidity flowing from the Trump and Crime Minister Satanyahoo as exhibited by their joint attack on Iran. After 30-40 years of failed hype about Iran building nukes, these demented fools may have finally given Tehran a real reason to obtain the weapons they really don’t want and shouldn’t need.

US President Donald Trump’s decision to allow Israel to attack Iran is the worst miscalculation a US president has made since George W Bush invaded Iraq.

Bush’s decision heralded eight years of conflict in Iraq, killed at least 655,000 people, according to The Lancet, spawned an extreme group of Takfiri militants in the Islamic State group and brought a major state to the verge of collapse from which it has yet to recover 14 years on.

Trump’s decision could yet prove to be more calamitous.

Allowing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to attack Iran, when US envoys were engaged in negotiations with Tehran, places the US presidency on the same level of trustworthiness as Al Capone or Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman.

This is the way you behave if you are in charge of a drug cartel, not a global power.

Read the whole thing. And remember that Iran has 5 nuclear-armed allies, two of which are somewhat to very likely to lend nukes to Iran or just retaliate on Iran’s behalf in the event the Zios do they unthinkable. Pakistani and DPRK ICBMs can hit Occupied Palestine and many yankee bases. DPRK missiles can also reach the yankee homeland.