, , ,

Someone is desperate to keep the railroading going.

Federal Judge Emmet G. Sullivan late Wednesday issued a stunning ruling in the prosecution of Michael Flynn, President Donald Trump‘s former National Security Advisor. The two-pronged order (1) appoints a former federal judge to argue against dismissing the case; and (2) considers holding Flynn in criminal contempt for perjury.

“Upon consideration of the entire record in this case, it is hereby ORDERED that the Court exercises its inherent authority to appoint The Honorable John Gleeson (Ret.) as amicus curiae to present arguments in opposition to the government’s Motion to Dismiss,” the judge wrote. “[I]t is further ORDERED that amicus curiae shall address whether the Court should issue an Order to Show Cause why Mr. Flynn should not be held in criminal contempt for perjury pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 401, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 42, the Court’s inherent authority, and any other applicable statutes, rules, or controlling law.”

Wouldn’t it be better to appoint a special master to determine why Flynn and 97% of federal defendants enter into plea agreements, regardless of the evidence or the circumstances of the cases? Or, even better, why not ask whether the USA committed treason by bringing another hoax case devoid of evidence? Just us in Amerika.

BTW, this is no. 3,300, if you’re counting.