, , , , ,

Here follows a link to the Ninth Circuit’s ridiculous immigration order:



At issue in this emergency proceeding is Executive
Order 13769, “Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist
Entry Into the United States,” which, among other changes
to immigration policies and procedures, bans for 90 days the
entry into the United States of individuals from seven
countries. Two States challenged the Executive Order as
unconstitutional and violative of federal law, and a federal
district court preliminarily ruled in their favor and
temporarily enjoined enforcement of the Executive Order.

The Government now moves for an emergency stay of the
district court’s temporary restraining order while its appeal
of that order proceeds.

To rule on the Government’s motion, we must consider
several factors, including whether the Government has
shown that it is likely to succeed on the merits of its appeal,
the degree of hardship caused by a stay or its denial, and the
public interest in granting or denying a stay. We assess those
factors in light of the limited evidence put forward by both
parties at this very preliminary stage and are mindful that our
analysis of the hardships and public interest in this case
involves particularly sensitive and weighty concerns on both
sides. Nevertheless, we hold that the Government has not
shown a likelihood of success on the merits of its appeal, nor
has it shown that failure to enter a stay would cause
irreparable injury, and we therefore deny its emergency
motion for a stay.


On January 27, 2017, the President issued Executive
Order 13769, “Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist
Entry Into the United States” (the “Executive Order”).
82 Fed. Reg. 8,977. Citing the terrorist attacks of September
11, 2001, and stating that “numerous foreign-born
individuals have been convicted or implicated in terrorismrelated
crimes” since then, the Executive Order declares that
“the United States must ensure that those admitted to this
country do not bear hostile attitudes toward it and its
founding principles.” Id. It asserts, “Deteriorating
conditions in certain countries due to war, strife, disaster,
and civil unrest increase the likelihood that terrorists will use
any means possible to enter the United States. The United
States must be vigilant during the visa-issuance process to
ensure that those approved for admission do not intend to
harm Americans and that they have no ties to terrorism.” Id.

This is one of the most insane, anti-American court orders I have ever read. And that’s saying something. Look for this to be overturned and soon. These fools write about the need for foreigners to teach in schools and perform research?! They fail to mention the stabbings, the shootings, and the bombings. On what planet convenes the Ninth Circuit?

The President has every authority needed under current law and the Constitution to order the reforms as he did. That the Ninth completely set aside the argument of national security, given the state of the nation, is unconscionable. The Constitution, Article IV, Section Four, makes clear the federal government has to protect the several States from invasion and domestic violence. This court [SIC] just sanctioned those things.