Tag Archives: Vox Day

BOOK REVIEW: Veriphysics: The Treatise by Vox Day

20 Friday Feb 2026

Posted by in Other Columns

≈ Comments Off on BOOK REVIEW: Veriphysics: The Treatise by Vox Day

Tags

, , , ,

Veriphysics: The Treatise: The Failure of the Enlightened Mind and the Path Toward Truth by Vox Day

Review by Perrin Lovett

 

If traditional Western Civilization were an airplane, then the philosophy of the Enlightenment was the set of new-fangled engines installed under the wings. The engines failed and, predictably, the plane crashed. Luckily, there are survivors. It is up to them, as soon as they recover, to rebuild and relaunch the craft and its mission. They’ve just received blueprints and schematics courtesy of Vox Day and Veriphysics: The Treatise: The Failure of the Enlightened Mind and the Path Toward Truth. Here follows a quick glance at Day’s proposed path forward.

(Castalia House 2026. That guy looks familiar.)

Day, Vox, Veriphysics: The Treatise: The Failure of the Enlightened Mind and the Path Toward Truth, Switzerland: Castalia House, 2026.

Vox Day is the genius behind the Darwin-crushing concept of MITTENS, the full taxonomy of the socio-sexual hierarchy, SJWs Always Lie, Corporate Cancer, Probability Zero, and a host of other useful projects and publications. Your reviewer has read Day with great appreciation since 2001, and his earliest days as a columnist at World Net Daily. A Top 40 recording artist, he slings some mean beats and lyrics. Veriphysics is available from Amazon. 

A funny thing happened on the way to the philosophy. A few years ago, I was involved with a minor project with a then-functioning Moscow-based educational think tank. My proposal was understandably placed on the back burner pending the debut of a major project, an introduction to philosophy geared towards high school and college students. While I waited, I inspected some of the incoming major project material, finding it slightly out of place. Rather than beginning with classical philosophy, say, with Plato or Aristotle, the wisdom of the Russian Church, or any other ancient source, the focus jumped straight to the Enlightenment. And the material was sourced from a U.S. Ivy League university. I found this odd for several reasons, not least among them the copious availability of knowledge at MSU, RSUH, and other local institutions. Something felt off. I will not say it felt like an attempted inversive encroachment, but…

Anyway, for whatever reason, the fledgling think tank ceased primary operations. My contribution was published elsewhere. And the philosophical direction and defense of Mother Russia continues, in no small part due to the efforts of men like Alexander Dugin.

Dugin’s Fourth Political Theory is a framework for reclaiming tradition. See Dugin, Alexander, The Fourth Political Theory, London: Arktos, 2012/2018. In 2024, I wrote: “Dugin’s Fourth Theory may be summarized as a rebellion against Liberalism, its “enlightened” modernity, and the underlying anti-human satanism at its heart.”

One of the criticisms of Dugin’s theory is that it lacks exactitude. However, rather than being a precise “how to” set of directives, it is a potentially universal approach wherein the exact applications are left open for each society, nation, or civilizational state. See my essay at the last link, above, for a glimpse of how Dugin the philosopher is also Dugin the doer, rebuilding a critical component of Russian society, the traditional Russian way. Russia’s ancestral trajectory was broken by decades of communism, followed by a single decade of hard, heavy liberalism. This century, Russians are forging ahead while also rekindling tradition, with Dasein in one hand and Oreshnik in the other. Much or most of the wider world is, to one degree or another, following their path.

But what of the West and its potential? The heirs of the Greco-Roman legacy have endured many centuries of relentless liberalism. As Day previously noted, this is observably worse than communism. As Dugin has said, Westerners are the original victims of liberal modernity. How, then, will Westerners begin to shake off the Enlightenment and relaunch their civilizational aircraft? The process, which cannot begin a day too soon, will take time and great effort. Luckily, Day’s Veriphysics provides an accessible, actionable framework for understanding what went wrong and how to remediate it. 

As a treatise, Veriphysics is a short book, 86 pages long, but it is packed from beginning to end with gems. In fact, in its totality, it is essentially a large diamond. Herein, as if with a jeweler’s loop, I merely examine a few facets. I’m also going to try an experiment towards the end. 

The Enlightenment has failed. Day notes, on page 4:

One by one, the foundational concepts that shaped the modern world have been tested against reality over time and found wanting. The social contract, the invisible hand, the marketplace of ideas, the arc of progress, democracy, the separation of powers, freedom of speech, and the rights of Man: each of these ideas have been weighed in the balance of recent centuries and discovered to be, at best, a partial truth elevated far beyond its proper domain, and at worst, a deceptive illusion that fueled three centuries of unnecessary human suffering.

Veriphysics breaks the illusion and its five main premises, from page 8: “…autonomous reason, sovereign individuality, mechanical nature, the fact-value distinction, and inevitable progress…” Here I note that, like Dugin, Day correctly identifies individuality as a duplicitous issue, rather than a concrete value. While the individual, created in God’s Image, has his definite worth, he is not severed from the whole as the Enlightenment proposed. The realization of this atomization of man was a shock for your formerly libertarian reviewer, a shock I trust is shared by many.

Part One is a recitation of the failures of various Enlightenment planks: representative democracy, the inversion of natural rights to make J.B. Bury blush, assorted economic disasters, the corruption of science, and more. Day explains the general pattern of observable failure: “[L]ogic first, then mathematics, then empirical evidence—and still the orthodoxy persists, sustained by institutional inertia and the career interests of its beneficiaries.” Page 32. Day’s new philosophy aims to reverse and undo these failings by allowing the bold to preserve tradition while conforming that tradition in a way that meets modern needs. 

Day defines the doctrine on page 58:

[U]nlike classical philosophy, … Scholasticism, … and Enlightenment philosophy, … veriphysics is focused solely on truth, or veritas. Every aspect of veriphysics is meant to explore and expand the concept of truth to the greatest extent possible, through every path that is capable to leading to some aspect of the singular, core, and underlying Truth. The objective of veriphysical philosophy is veriscendance … veritas and ascendance.

Two areas where Day goes into detail are the capture of our traditional institutions and the baleful curse of usury. I have lumped these two together for a reason. And in getting to the institutions, Day examines how classical philosophy failed to adequately counter the Enlightenment’s rise, a matter partly of the dialectical versus the rhetorical. He notes that understanding the previous weaknesses is necessary for reversing the damage those weaknesses allowed. Day lists five mandatory factors for defeating the Enlightenment’s grip on mind and society, culminating with the rebuilding of what was lost. Part of this process involves the ancient Christian concept of participation—the melding together of knowledge, human and divine. See page 62.

The university is an example of a stolen institution. “The very idea of a university, a community of scholars devoted to preserving, transmitting, and extending knowledge, was a medieval Christian innovation. The Enlightenment did not create these institutions; it invaded them, subverted them, and eventually seized them.” Page 48. Furthermore, the Enlightenment, while removing academic value from the formerly functioning universities, increasingly ransoms the lives of students via usurious debt, a double evil. Student loans in places like the United States are a severe problem for the young, yet they are only one piece of the collapsing debt puzzle. 

The Enlightenment dispelled and reversed millennia of prohibition against interest on loans. This was a direct contradiction of the commands and wisdom of Almighty God, Jesus Christ, the Christian tradition, the Hebrew tradition, the Islamic tradition, the traditions of other religions, and the traditions of all civilizations, great and small, that survived the lethal temptation of usury. “The Enlightenment promised liberation; the usury that funded it delivered a new form of bondage.” Page 25. 

And in a nation like the United States, it’s really a matter of super-usury; not only does the required extra money for the interest not exist in reality, but the underlying money loaned out is also a fraudulent, non-existent fiction. “Money itself is debt—a liability of the central bank, created through lending, destroyed through repayment. An economy that repaid its debts would be an economy without money. The system requires perpetual expansion of debt to function; deleveraging is not an option but a crisis.” Id. 

The postmodern monetary system is about as simple as it is evil. The money masters geometrically increase the money supply and, accordingly, its burden on the people, while sucking all true wealth and real value into their own pockets. It’s not a system of robbing Peter to pay Paul; it is a scheme of murdering Peter to pay Judas. How can this be fixed? The notion of the sabbatical and the jubilee comes to mind. But how to get there from the ruins of the Enlightenment? As noted above, understanding precedes correction. To that end, Day offers a starting point, a mechanism for evaluating the ideas, fantasies, and deceptions of the liberal disorder: the Triad of Truth. 

“Veriscendancy offers a genuine criterion: the Triad of Truth, the Triveritas. A claim merits assent—may be accepted as probably true—when and only when it satisfies three conditions: logical validity, mathematical coherence, and empirical anchoring.” Page 70. He also lists a few examples of the Triveritas in action. For my experiment, I thought to apply it, in a quick sketch, to usury. 

The premise of usury, as currently practiced in the U.S., is that paying monopoly rent to the Epstein Class for limitless debt-based fake money is beneficial for societal prosperity and harmony. The logic behind it is a stretch, but let’s give them that one out of kindness. The mathematical analysis, however, fails. Michael Hudson, Steve Keen, David Graeber, and others have described in extraordinary detail how the multiplication of money through debts quickly outpaces a society’s ability to repay the debts. The compounding effect is too great to be sustainable. Hammurabi knew this, as did anyone else who ever ran the numbers. The empirical anchor is likewise broken free from the economic ship. Forget the financial damage done; the hyper-financialization is having dysgenic and dyscivilizational effects. Because they can’t afford families, people are no longer having children. The nation subjected to unfettered usury literally flirts with extinction. Thus, the usury premise fails the Triad of Truth.

Day’s conclusion is optimistic. “The ascent is possible. The tools are available. The opportunity is open. All that is required is the will to climb.” Page 85. And he’s correct. Veriphysics provides an inspirational, well-reasoned, and superbly functional framework for starting the ascent. Buy it, read it, and commence your part in forging truth from knowledge. Western Civilization depends on you.

*Many thanks to Vox Day for writing Veriphysics and for graciously allowing me to use the foregoing quotes and cover image.

BOOK REVIEW: The Frozen Gene: The End of Human Evolution by Vox Day

11 Wednesday Feb 2026

Posted by in Other Columns

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

, , , , ,

The Frozen Gene: The End of Human Evolution by Vox Day

Review by Perrin Lovett

 

While the term is usually associated with having a high IQ, with perhaps little popular thought given to substantial achievement, a genius is a person who innovatively solves novel problems for the betterment of society. See chapter seven, “Identifying the Genius,” Charlton, Bruce, and Dutton, Edward, The Genius Famine, London: University of Buckingham Press, 2016. Vox Day is a genius. There, now it’s in print—all protestations, Day’s included, notwithstanding. 

Day’s ability to identify and solve problems, especially those overlooked by experts for generations, is on full display in The Frozen Gene. In his new book, Day builds on the mathematical attainment of Probability Zero and breaks new ground. Part of his latest success is the refutation of Motoo Kimura’s neutral theory of molecular evolution. But there is much more, some of it possibly holding profound consequences for mankind. Here follows a cursory look at a few facets from Day’s second major work in demolishing the dogma and quasi-theology of evolution and human genetics.

(The Frozen Gene, Castalia House, 2026.*)

Day, Vox, The Frozen Gene: The End of Human Evolution, Switzerland: Castalia House, 2026 (Kindle edition). 

Vox Day is one of the few defenders of Western Civilization who, while others whined and complained, did something to preserve our heritage. Rather, he’s done many things, including writing and editing a slew of books (SJWs Always Lie, Corporate Cancer, A Throne of Bones, Probability Zero, etc.). Your reviewer has read Day with great appreciation since 2001, and his earliest days as a columnist at World Net Daily. He assembled the comprehensive taxonomy of the socio-sexual hierarchy (alpha, sigma, gamma, et al). He is the author of MITTENS, the Mathematical Impossibility of The Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection, an empirical demolition of Darwin’s theory of evolution and a core concept in Probability Zero and The Frozen Gene. A Top 40 recording artist, he slings some mean beats and lyrics. The Frozen Gene is available from Amazon. 

Like Probability Zero, The Frozen Gene is partly written in the language of mathematics. However, as I told someone, somewhere, the written explanations accompanying the many formulas make for easy reading, even for those not possessed of a “math” brain. An open mind will go far in understanding what might otherwise be intimidating. As for help understanding or reacquainting with various mathematical symbols, please start here. The Frozen Gene is in part an explication of a series of scientific papers published on Zenodo by Day and his valiant assistant, the esteemed Claude Athos. An illustrative preview paper, Generational Extension and the Selective Turnover Coefficient Across Historical Epochs (Day and Athos, 2025), is found here. And by explication, I mean the kind of linguistic elucidation that not only reinforces and clarifies, but also adds a degree of relatability. And even fun. Accordingly, such calculus as “d = T × [∫μ(x) × l(x) × v(x)dx/∫l(x) × v(x)dx]” appears alongside analogies to crowded bar rooms, full parking lots, an Italian tale genetically reminiscent of Poe’s The Masque of the Red Death, and the science fiction classic Blade Runner. Day even separates the relative importance of the latter fiction by book and movie. A kind genius.

The Frozen Gene kicks off with a Foreword by Steve Keen, one of the foremost economists of our time, perhaps of all time, and a man familiar with mathematics and the correction of misrepresentations. On page 11, he writes:

If the human genome is indeed frozen, as this book asserts, then this is not merely a scholastic debate, but one with profound consequences for the future of the human race, and of the knowledge we have accumulated in the last quarter millennium. To survive the other threats that humanity faces, from global warming to nuclear annihilation, and yet succumb to evolutionary extinction, would be the worst of Pyrrhic victories.

His acknowledgement and supposition look towards the surprising findings of the book and, in particular, the “scarier” questions raised in chapter fourteen. Scary or not, Day’s ultimate conclusion is straightforward: “We are now living in a frozen gene pool.” Page 16. 

The sample formula, above, is for “d,” the Selective Turnover Coefficient, the rate at which gene pools turn over based on various components, as explained in chapter four. The rate depends on a number of factors, some of them morbid, like infant deaths, that modern life has largely cured. The curing, in and of itself, is a good thing for humanity. But it has radically slowed the rate of genetic transition. Our Neolithic ancestors had a d value of approximately .53. The rate has slowed over time (Medieval d = .44), especially since the industrial revolution; the current estimated d = .015. This 35-fold reduction in turnover speed means that the current rate is too slow for any positive mutation to occur: “Six hundred and thirty thousand years. For a single beneficial mutation to spread through the modern human population.” Page 159. What does that mean for standard Darwinian evolution? “[T]he evolutionary consequence is that natural selection has been deprived of its raw material.” Page 161. 

The consequences for mankind of this freezing are startling. “Beneficial mutations cannot spread because there is no selective mortality to favor their carriers. But for the same reason, deleterious mutations cannot be purged.” Id. 

Day goes on to dismiss concepts like genetic drift, neutral theory, and parallel fixation. In doing so, he shows the “spectacular” failure of Kimura’s theory. He also points out additional Darwinian ridiculousness. For example, if biological imaginings were real, then we should witness the birth of a new, different species every eleven days. Page 286. That, as one might guess, even without a formula, is impossible. 

In chapter thirteen, Day goes deeper into the ramifications of “d” as applied to human society. What is theoretically supposed to represent complete generational genetic turnover is confounded by the fact that human generations overlap, sometimes by factors of four (i.e., four generations in a family alive at the same time). It was also in chapter thirteen that Day relayed a humorous (or sad) tale of ironic rejection. Day and his AI wingman, Claude Athos, submitted several of the aforementioned papers to various scientific journals. One of the rejection letters chastised Day for not respecting the vaunted credentials of other scientists, many of them surely sinecure automatons, while simultaneously rejecting poor Claude for being an automaton. In other contexts, one assumes these gatekeepers are the same sort who laud technological developments like AI, but who evidently do not like their positive real-world usage. But who, really, knows about such people?

That anecdote leads to chapter fourteen and some remarkable speculation about where humans are heading in the future. Stuck without new positive development, but also unable to purge detrimental traits, “[t]he frozen gene pool is not merely frozen. It may be failing.” Page 379. If so, then we may be entering into, or we may already be centuries into, a period of genetic degradation. High-minded (and illogical) biologists and their globalist allies promised us a shiny future with man as a kind of god. We may, in fact, be destined for something that looks more like the movie Idiocracy. “The failing gene hypothesis is not reassuring.” Page 388 (the “actuary in Davos” story). But it is just that, a hypothesis, speculation, not an iron law of destiny. 

All of Day’s findings and conjectures will give the thinking some things to consider. They will give the innumerate more to fret over. As for the implications of gene failure, your reviewer has, of course, little in the way of concrete solutions. Pick one’s recourse, if one will: the apophatic faith all is in God’s hands, the dialectic equivalent, or a combined mixture. In any event, and by any approach, it is better to know where we stand at present. Thanks to Day’s calculations, we do. Genius begets a little comfort. 

As with Probability Zero, your reviewer highly recommends The Frozen Gene. Rarely will one come across a duo of texts that correct such a terrible deception. Day’s work, while it is mathematical in nature, should be of the utmost interest to Christians and other believers seeking to refute the anti-God and anti-man propositions of (post)modernity. As Day states, on page 437: “For more than a century, the theory of evolution by natural selection has been wielded as a weapon against religious belief, against the idea that humans are special, against any notion that our existence has meaning or purpose beyond the blind churning of differential reproduction.” Day has given us copious ammunition with which to return fire. 

Accordingly, and as a side note, I suggest an inspection of sorts for those whose Russian skills exceed my “street signs and menus” level. How might Day’s books bolster the existing Christian efforts to counter Darwinism? Specifically, how could a proper mathematical refutation build upon the work of, say, Bufeev, Fr. Constantine, The Orthodox Doctrine of Creation and Theory of Evolution, Moscow: Russian Education Center of Saint Basil the Great, 2014 (English translation slowly forthcoming)? If our genes are frozen, then our options are not.

*Many thanks to Vox Day for writing The Frozen Gene and for graciously allowing me to use the foregoing quotes and cover image.

BOOK REVIEW: Probability Zero: The Mathematical Impossibility of the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection by Vox Day

19 Monday Jan 2026

Posted by in Other Columns

≈ Comments Off on BOOK REVIEW: Probability Zero: The Mathematical Impossibility of the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection by Vox Day

Tags

, , , , ,

Probability Zero: The Mathematical Impossibility of the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection by Vox Day

Review by Perrin Lovett

By meticulously researching, calculating, and writing Probability Zero, Vox Day has driven a stake through the vampire heart of evolution by natural selection, the last lingering, and possibly the most destructive concept of the failed Enlightenment. Here follows a brief overview of this new and fascinating scientific tour de force.

(Probability Zero, Castalia House, 2026.*)

*Day, Vox, Probability Zero: The Mathematical Impossibility of Evolution by Natural Selection, Switzerland: Castalia House, 2026 (Kindle edition). 

Vox Day is one of the few defenders of Western Civilization who, while others whined and complained, did something to preserve our heritage. Rather, he’s done many things, including writing and editing a slew of books (SJWs Always Lie, Corporate Cancer, A Throne of Bones, etc.). Your reviewer has read Day, with great appreciation, since 2001 and his earliest days as a columnist at World Net Daily. He assembled the comprehensive taxonomy of the socio-sexual hierarchy (alpha, sigma, gamma, et al). He is the author of MITTENS, the Mathematical Impossibility of The Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection, an empirical demolition of Darwin’s theory of evolution and a core concept in Probability Zero. A Top 40 recording artist, he slings some mean beats and lyrics. Probability Zero is available from Amazon. 

If the universe has a language, then its name is probably “math.” Heat rises unless it’s confined to a weightless vacuum. Men act rationally until they don’t. But two plus two always equals four. Math is beautiful and unforgiving. It is the driving force behind Probability Zero. The attendant mathematics absolutely obliterates the random propositions of evolution by natural selection. Professor Frank Tipler (Ph.D., Tulane) notes, on page 6, “Probability Zero represents the most rigorous mathematical challenge to Neo-Darwinian theory ever published.” It is certainly that, though it is, amazingly, more.

If it ever occurred to me, then it occurred rather loosely that evolution is or was just another plank in the misleading, inverted structure of the Enlightenment. Day’s Introduction is a fast summary of the failings of the Enlightenment, a series of supposedly glorious and progressive theories that, when applied in reality, deliver only ruination. The ultimate aim of the Enlightenment, akin to what Professor Alexander Dugin calls the first political theory, (macro) Liberalism, is to whittle away every facet of society, reducing everything down to the individual. Once separated from all that once defined his existence, the individual is then deprived of himself. The role of Darwinian evolution is to subtly deny the hand of God and, thereby, the existence of God. The Almighty is replaced with a shroud of smoke, high and scientific-sounding, but bereft of any substantiation—love and awe superseded by hollow falsehood.

While his argument touches briefly on religion (Christian, Islamic, etc.), Day maintains focus on the theories, words, and examples posited by evolutionists and faux light bringers themselves. He explains the pattern by which all of these dark fairy tales have been exposed over time, coming to rest upon Darwin’s theory, deeming it perhaps the most important of all similar concepts. Applying the pattern, again via a mathematical approach, Day systematically dismantles Darwin. And rather than taking it easy, Day builds a series of “Steel Men” arguments, allowing the broadest discretion in favor of the evolutionists, to make his demolition unassailable. A mathematical dissent against random evolution has existed since at least 1966, although until recently, it lacked the necessary observational proofs. Day completes the puzzle. 

He begins with basic definitions and proceeds to explore and counter each and every proposition the selectionists have come up with (parallel fixation, etc.). Using the pre-existing argument that humans and chimpanzees had, at one time, a common ancestor, and using all available parameters, Day asks, on page 23, “…given the total number of generations available and the observed rates at which mutations spread throughout populations, is there enough time for 20 million mutations to have reached fixation in the human lineage?” The answer is a resounding “no.” Evolutionary biologists should have reached the same conclusion, except that, as Day notes, they evidently do not understand basic math and statistical analysis. And as the biologists put it, they don’t even use experimental data in their experiments; scientists do not practice science. 

If they did, then they would find, in accordance with MITTENS, that the number of (human from chimps) generations, divided by the required number of generations per mutation, reveals a total number of fixed mutations several orders of magnitude insufficient to support their theory. Kindly running the math for the biologists, Day discovered that the odds against evolution by natural selection are ten raised to the (negative) one hundred seventy-second-millionth power. That staggering number, a statistical absolute zero, is what Day terms a “Darwillion,” a factor 1.72 million times larger than the already astronomical Googol. A common ancestor being thus explained by natural selection is, as Day puts it, page 103, “beyond impossible.”

Day goes much further, proving, among many other things, that in addition to being impossible, at least one of the biologist’s pet conceptions, “drift,” is self-disproving; drift, rather than beneficially mutating a species, would, if true, exterminate the species. (Failure to math might have dire consequences!)

Day then proposes the theory of Intelligent Genetic Manipulation (IGM) (Dr. Tipler labels the new hypothesis the “Gray Day Theory,” after Day and botanist Asa Gray (1810-1888)). As random, undirected natural selection is impossible, any and all detectable genetic modifications must be caused by a directed, programmed plan. IGM does not identify the manipulator, nor does it have to in order to supersede Darwin’s fancies and trickery. From page 212: “The fingerprints of manipulation, which consist of genetic changes that could not have fixed naturally in the available time, look the same regardless of whose fingers happen to have made them.” Day finds this principle consistent with Aristotle’s notion of the Unmoved Mover and Saint Thomas Aquinas’s First Cause of theism. Day has given himself plenty of room to build upon his new theory, and evidently, he is hard at work doing just that. Atheists and Enlightenment mongers will, of course, deny that such intelligence is or was possible. They just won’t hang their objections on any concrete proofs or workable formulas.

Regardless of one’s mathematical abilities—assuming one is not a biologist—please read the book in order to fully understand its devastating, yet straightforward proofs. (Your reviewer’s experience is limited to a “B+” in college calculus, and even I found the going easy and even thrilling.) If one seeks material with which to refute what one’s children are (mis)taught in their schools, even their Christian schools (some of them), then read the book. If one enjoys making a righteous mockery of profane travesty, then please read the book. Probability Zero is the scientific innovation of the year, and possibly, of the century. The probability that it will be useful is infinite.

*Many thanks to Vox Day for writing Probability Zero and for graciously allowing me to use the foregoing quotes and cover image.

Not So Free To Choose

09 Tuesday Apr 2024

Posted by in Legal/Political Columns

≈ Comments Off on Not So Free To Choose

Tags

, ,

Vox comments on an article about the Princes of the Yen:

What’s intriguing about both his book as well as his paper is that it explains why both China and Russia are economically routing the bank-controlled economies of the West as well as why Japan is behaving so erratically and in such an uncharacteristic manner of late.

The great deception of liberals, libertarians, conservatives, and independence-minded Americans in general is the idea that corporate management is good and government management is bad. But the so-called Invisible Hand not only doesn’t exist, it perpetuates a gargantuan lie that directly serves the interests of the globalists, who delight in transnationalist unaccountability.

I haven’t read the book yet. But I will, especially since he is obviously far ahead of the game on the realities of how money is actually created in a modern credit economy. Ian Fletcher and I have proven Ricardo was completely wrong. Steve Keen has proven Smith was generally incorrect. So, it should come as no surprise that someone of our intellectual generation would eventually prove that Friedman was wrong as well.

At this point, it’s hardly arguable that none of us are actually free to choose very much of anything at all.

Read the whole thing. Consider getting the book.

“Experts” Warn the Truth is Dangerous

28 Wednesday Feb 2024

Posted by in News and Notes

≈ Comments Off on “Experts” Warn the Truth is Dangerous

Tags

, ,

One can’t make this stuff up. I saw the base article about how too many people are noticing the various lies of Clown World. Read that, along with Vox’s commentary:

The satanic nature of Clown World can always be identified by its invariable inversion of the truth. When Christians who hope to convince people to accept salvation from Hell are accused of doing so out of hate, when anti-vaxxers who try to convince people to avoid being injected with harmful substances are accused of doing so out of selfishness, and when those who speak the truth are accused of misleading people and spreading misinformation, it is very clear that wickedness is at work.

Furthermore if the truth casts doubt on the credibility of mainstream institutions and experts, then everyone is correct to reject those unreliable institutions and experts, and more importantly, ask questions concerning the nature of that unreliability.

Keep on conspiring, truth theorists.

And speaking of, a new theory of mine is coming this afternoon.

 

Bad Government, Good Review

03 Sunday Dec 2023

Posted by in Other Columns

≈ Comments Off on Bad Government, Good Review

Tags

, ,

Many thanks to Vox Day, the Dread Ilk, the VFM, the SGers, and the rest for attention to my little review of Dr. Lama’s excellent book.

I’m not certain that democracy is definitely the worst form of government. Certainly, representative democracy is making a powerful claim to the title, and it’s true that the more the franchise expands, the worse the elected governments get. But it is certainly a lot easier to understand why the American Founding Fathers were so skeptical of the concept and determined to limit it.

This review of Dr. Fadi Lama’s book, WHY THE WEST CAN’T WIN, certainly makes it look worth reading: [Review]

There followed a healthy discussion at SG. Again, here’s hoping this is the one book that manages to wake up the still slumbering masses. My take on the GAE’s base government was that it had degenerated into a tedious balance of oligarchy and ochlocracy. But then, it’s really not a government at all anymore, merely being a satanic cult masquerading as a terrorist organization. Either way, its bad, real bad, or the worst. And thankfully, hopefully on its way out.

Identity or Nothing

17 Tuesday Oct 2023

Posted by in Legal/Political Columns

≈ Comments Off on Identity or Nothing

Tags

, ,

Vox again correctly notes that ideology was always a shaky foundation and poor substitute for identity.

This disemployment of a lifelong leftist highlights why it was a massive mistake for Christendom to fall for the fraudulent “right to free speech” that was pushed by those seeking to undermine the Christian blasphemy laws. Now there are new blasphemy laws, albeit with people putting themselves in the place of God and Jesus Christ, and beyond all criticism.

It is also why it is pointless to refrain from speaking the truth for fear of the possible consequences. Because it’s not enough to simply hold one’s tongue, complete submission and a willingness to knowingly speak falsehood is required.

One has to almost feel sorry for the artist. Netanyahu has been a veritable punching bag for the Left for nearly 40 years. There are vast reams of cartoons lampooning and caricaturing him in a thousand different ways. How was the artist supposed to know that the long-time punching bag was officially off-limits now?

Ideology is dead. Identity dictates everything now.

Read the underlying story and note the words of Lee Qwan Yew.

 

Fake Hicks for a Fake People

02 Saturday Sep 2023

Posted by in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ Comments Off on Fake Hicks for a Fake People

Tags

, , ,

Americans would have been much better served if they had avoided vapid creatures like this. But they are a stupid people after all.

Vox, in mentioning more evidence to paint Mr. Lunsford as the fraud he is, noted as follows:

When the United States of America collapses amidst violence, disease, ethnic strife, and religious conflict, as it is likely to do before 2034, I hope that none of you will be so stubbornly and infernally ignorant as to look to the skies and cry out in despair “why did this happen?”

I can tell you right now why it happened. It happened because Americans, and conservative Americans in particularly, are literally too stupid and too naive to survive.

Someone asked on SG, “is there any hope at all for the survival of the USA”. No, there is not. There is no hope whatsoever for the survival of the USA as a unitary political entity of 50 states spanning the North American continent. None whatsoever. And the reason is that after more than 75 years of relentless subversion, demoralization, inversion, and invasion, a significant percentage of Americans still cheer for and support those who are being used to destroy their nation and their society.

A people this wicked and stupid do not deserve to survive.

The Enemy is Within, Stop Falling for Lies

28 Monday Aug 2023

Posted by in Legal/Political Columns

≈ Comments Off on The Enemy is Within, Stop Falling for Lies

Tags

,

The GAE is ruled by the wicked and the insane. Read Vox’s piece on one of ‘Murica’s leading evil families. Then read his article on the never-ending lies and the dire need to stop falling for them.

There is no excuse for falling for this nonsense again. You’re going to hear outrageous lies about China, Iran, and quite possibly Niger or some other African nation soon. Don’t fall for them.

The GAE is Evil

01 Tuesday Aug 2023

Posted by in Legal/Political Columns

≈ Comments Off on The GAE is Evil

Tags

, , , , , ,

It has been for at least 160 years. Certainly for the last 78 years. Vox accurately describes the GAE’s war crimes in Japan in WWII. This is from the actual historical record. This is the truth.

Although apologists for the atomic bombing of Japan have long claimed that it “saved American lives”, their arguments have always been false and historically ignorant. But while the relevant information belying the justification for the bombings has long been available to historians and military history enthusiasts, it’s now becoming too widely known around the world to ignore.

I suspect the Oppenheimer movie marks the last hurrah of the historical A-bomb mythology.

Please read the whole thing. Contrast the plain record to the lies repeated by the rulers and sycophants of the GAE. The undeniable fact that the GAE dropped an atomic bomb on a church says everything. This thing born during the 1860s is ever and only evil. Do not in any way support it.