The ARC of the Convergence and the Clown Civil War

It is my opinion that in the great war of the sovereign nations versus the satanic world disorder of clown world it appears a civil war of sorts has broken out amongst the clowns. I have no idea, really, which side is which. Though confusing, it is heaps of fun to observe from a safe distance. I’m sure one and all enjoyed the high horse-throwing of Ukraine’s unelected nazi dictator at the White House the other day. Was that the US’s way of easing out of an unwinnable war? Was it the empire shifting the burden to the clowns of Europe? Has the US joined Russia and China in the sovereign camp? Is the US even sovereign? Let’s just hedge all bets and say, “Maybe?”

One thing is certain: the faux elites of the liberal globalist West are panicking as they watch the world they thought they owned and ruled slip away from their clawed fingers. Among other hasty remedial measures, they have evidently decided to co-opt what passes for mainstream conservative or traditionalist thinking in the West. Or they’re trying to re-co-opt it. Again. If one glances around, one will see the signs of convergence.

I recently discovered the new alleged alternative to the World Economic Forum, the Alliance for Responsible Citizenship (”ARC”). ARC just hosted a big conference in London, England. My friends in the genuine multipolar world were not invited to participate in the various discussions. Neither were any ordinary Americans or Westerners. I, of course, was not invited, but I’ve been busy anyway. I encourage one and all to look at who was invited, both the Speakers and the Advisory Board. Some of these are really good people, like the esteemed Victor Davis Hanson. Others, however, are rather suspicious at best. If they are all so edgy and anti-establishment, then why were they gleefully allowed into the PC police state of Airstrip One? And why are they allowed on all the mainstream social media where you and I are banned? Just a few things to think about. Please consider the real utility of people like Jordan “Isn’t it soft?” Peterson, Ben Crenshaw, Mikey Johnson, so many other usual suspects, and Chris Lunsford.

Lunsford is better known by his stage name and is best known for his likely astroturfed, UTA-represented song, “Rich Men North of Richmond”. Since that song came out of nowhere, I’ve maintained it is, at best, diversionary, designed to protect the “rich men” while shifting attention and ire onto more popular targets like poor people. Yes, some poor people on food stamps are short, fat, and obese. But the lion’s share of welfare spending in a place like the US goes to the rich men, particularly to their mega-corporations, and especially to their commercial banks. The banks use legislation, regulation, and super usury to milk the system harder, and they are more obese than any other group. 

Take a look at Peter Costello’s ARC presentation on getting young people out from under the yoke of debt. The man is dead right when he says: “If you want young people to have a good start in life, give them a DEBT FREE start.” However, it appears (from the text, at least) he shifts the discussion away from crushing personal debts and value-zapping monetary inflation imposed by the rich men to the cheerier, conservative-friendly talking point of public debts. All of these debts, all of them fake to begin with, can be easily eliminated. Yet, as Australia, like the UK and the US, is a modern liberal democracy (ARC is big on “liberal democracy”), it is little more than an agent for the international financial class. That class, being composed of greedy, retarded satanists, has no use for setting people free with honest money or things like Heaven-mandated jubilees. 

I suspect that ARC is run by some clown faction(s) and they now realize they have to pay a little lip service towards letting some people live semi-tenable lives. As Dr. Fadi Lama predicted, the chickens of the West are coming home to roost. Perhaps this is some compromise version of globalism light or globalism with a smiley face. (Lama was, of course, not listed as an invitee at ARC’s party.) 

Please take a look at ARC’s plan to “Re-Humanise” education. In the end, we are informed: “The creation and maintenance of diverse pathways of formation—necessary for the great diversity of real human beings, and to the actualisation of the unique potential of each—is the essential condition for the revitalisation of a vibrant culture.” 37-page word salads aside, would it not be better to just get out of the way and let parents educate their children, as they see fit, as they traditionally did, and within the parameters of their unique cultures? 

ARC raises a lot of questions. And ARC has questions for us. Please take a brief look at their big six queries. See if you detect neo-Babylonian concepts like forced unity. See if you catch transactional mention of people and families as if they’re discussing accounting line items or parts in a factory assembly line. Or how they leave financial capitalism out of their list of “mutants”. Or their obsession with free thought, free speech, free movement, free trade, and other faux “frees”. 

Please feel free to look deeper into this developing movement, particularly those of you out in the multipolar world who have the intelligence and spiritual fortitude to make independent sense of it. I could be wrong, but I suspect this is yet another scheme to extend the extreme anti-human sociopathy of the Enlightenment. Rather than being fooled by it once again, Christians, Muslims, and others of goodwill must—and there is no alternative—drive the final stake into that vampire and turn it to ash. It’s the responsible thing we citizens can do. We have God’s blessing, mandate, and assistance.

Deo vindice.